Chapter 5: Character, Propensity and Specific Acts Flashcards
Propensity
Tendency of a person to behave in a certain way
Character
In evidence: refers to the general traits, qualities, or characteristics that make up an individual’s personality or behavioral tendencies
Specific Acts
Known as crimes, wrongs, or other acts
Habit:
admissible evidence. The propensity toward conduct that is more consistent, routine, and repetitive.
Rule 403: excluding relevant evidence for prejudice, confusion, waste of time, or other reason
The court may exclude relevant evidence if its probative value is substantially outweighed by a danger of one or more of the following:
- unfair prejudice,
- confusing the issues,
- misleading the jury,
- undue delay, wasting time, or
- needlessly presenting cumulative evidence.
Rule 404(a)(1): Character Evidence, Crimes, or other Acts
Evidence of a person’s character or character trait is not admissible to prove that on a particular occasion the person acted in accordance with the character or trait
Rule 404(a)(2)(A): Exceptions for a criminal defendant or victim
A defendant may offer evidence of their own trait. But if they do, Prosecution may rebut it
Rule 404(a)(2)(B): Exceptions for a criminal defendant or victim
a defendant may offer evidence of a victim’s trait. If admitted prosecution may:
- rebut it with evidence
- offer evidence of the defendant’s same trait
Rule 404(a)(2)(C): Exceptions for a criminal defendant or victim
in a homicide case: the prosecutor may offer evidence of the victim’s trait of peacefulness to rebut evidence that the victim was the first aggressor
Rule 404(b)(1): Exceptions for a criminal defendant or victim
Evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts are not admissible to prove a person’s character to show they acted a certain way.
Rule 404(b)(2): Exceptions for a criminal defendant or victim
Other acts may be admitted to prove:
a. motive
b. opportunity
c. intent
d. preparation or plan
e. knowledge
f. ID
Rule 404(b)(3): Exceptions for a criminal defendant or victim
In a criminal case prosecution must:
A. provide reasonable notice of other act prosecution intends to introduce
B. In the notice: show intended purpose for introduction
C. provide notice in writing before trial
Sullivan Test for admissibility of other acts evidence:
- Purpose: is the other act evidence offered for an acceptable purpose?
- Relevance: does the other act relate to a fact of consequence and have probative value?
- Prejudice: Is the probative value of the other act evidence substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issue, or misleading the jury?
Rule 406: Habit, Routine Practice
Evidence of a person’s habit or an organization’s routine practice may be admitted to prove that on a particular occasion the person or organization acted in accordance with the habit or routine practice
Rule 405(a): Methods of proving character
Permits the proponent to offer both reputational and opinion testimony in the limited situations where FRE 404(a) allows the use of character evidence to prove action in accordance with that character