Chapter 5 Flashcards
experiment
systematic research study in which the investigator directly varies some factor(s), holds all others constant, and observes the results
Independent variable
factor of interest to investigator, manipulated factor; situational, task, instructional
situational variable
Type of IV, features of the environment that the observer might encounter
task variable
Type of IV, groups get different types of problems to solve
instructional variables
Type of IV, groups get different instructions for same task
extraneous variables
not of interest to the investigator but may influence the behaviour being studied if not controlled
confound
any uncontrolled extraneous variable that covaries WITH the independent variable and could provide an alternate explanation of the results
ceiling effect
Dependent variable effect where avg scores for the group are so high that no difference can be determined between conditions
floor effect
dependent variable effect where avg scores for the group are extremely low, usually because the task is too difficult for everyone and again producing a failure to find any differences between conditions
subject variables
may be considered IV, subjects are chosen based on a particular similarity by the experimenter (less control than other IVs and can not make causal claims, only document different measures of DV)
Statistical conclusion validity
concerns the extent to which the researcher uses statistics properly and draws the appropriate conclusions from statistical analysis
ecological validity
Neisser - research with relevance for the veryday cognitive activities of people trying to adapt to their environment (opposite of experimental realism)
Internal validity
Cook and Campbell - the degree to which an experiment is methodologically sound and confound free (researcher feels confident that results as mesured with DV are directly related to IV and not something else); threats include - time, history/maturation, regression to the mean, testing/instrumentation
pretest/postest
used before/after an experience (with a control group) to determine if the difference is due to experience
history
events between pre- and posttest that produces large changes unrelated to the program itself