Chapter 5 Flashcards

1
Q

Negligence

A

Inadvertent or unintentional careless conduct that causes injury or damage to another person or their property

  • All four required elements must all be established to succeed in a negligence action:
  • A duty of care
  • Breach of duty
  • Causation
  • Damage
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Duty of care

A

That the proximity of the parties
created an obligation to exercise
caution or care

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Donoghue v Stevenson – Neighbour
Principle

A

On August 26, 1928, Mrs. Donoghue’s friend bought
her a ginger beer from a café in Glasgow, Scotland.
She consumed about half of the bottle which was
made of dark opaque glass, when the remainder of
the contents were poured into a glass. At this point,
the decomposed remains of a snail floated out,
causing Mrs. Donoghue to suffer a shock and severe
gastro-enteritis.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Anns two-part test

A

Anns case: created a two-stage test for determining the existence of a duty of care

  1. Foreseeable injury and proximity
  2. Provides for exceptions or modifications to the primary test for policy reasons
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Dobson v Dobson

A

pregnant mother drove a snowmobile negligently, crashed and caused in jury to her unborn child. The child was mentally and physically disabled, and the child’s grandfather sought recovery from the negligent mother.

Reasonable foreseeability test was met, however the SCC did not impose a new duty of care between mother and fetus because of policy reasons – intrusion into bodily integrity, privacy and
autonomy rights.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Misfeasance and Nonfeasance

A

Misfeasance: An act that causes harm to another (wrongdoing)

Nonfeasance: A failure to prevent an injury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Breach of Standard of Care

A

Once the existence of a duty is established the second issue is whether the defendant demonstrated sufficient care

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Reasonable person test

A

What would a reasonably prudent person, in possession of all the facts of the case, have done in this situation?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Young v. Bella

A

A social work student, Ms. Young, included a case study in her term paper without proper citation, detailing a woman’s confession of child abuse. Another individual, Bella, concerned about the authenticity, reported it to the Social Work Department, leading to notifications to Child Protective Services, the RCMP, and various social workers across communities

Bella sued and won over $800,000 in damages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Causation

A

the relationship of cause and effect between one event or action and the result.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

But for test

A

But for” test: “but for” the conduct of the plaintiff, no injury would have resulted (causation)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Remoteness Test

A

Whether the specific type of injury suffered
was reasonably foreseeable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Damages

A

In the past, there had to be some actual physical damage but the
court now recognizes economic and mental injury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Defences to Negligence

A

Voluntary assumption of risk
Contributory negligence
Illegality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Occupier’s liability

A

In common law, an occupier of property (not the owner) owes a duty
to people who come onto the property as visitors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Strict Liability – Rylands v Fletcher

A

The defendant had built a reservoir on his property, but under the surface there was a shaft from a coal mine leading to his neighbour’s property. The water escaped and flooded the neighbour’s mine. The defendant was not negligent as he did not know about the mine shaft but the court held him liable for damage.

17
Q

Product Liability

A

Manufactured products are often dangerous because of:
- Some inherent defect, or
- Their nature, such as in the case of chemicals, tools, or explosives

18
Q

Liability of Professionals

A

Individuals who hold themselves out to have some specialized knowledge or skill not generally available.

19
Q

Negligent Misstatement

A

Negligent conduct and negligent words are both actionable

People who suffer economic loss because of a professional’s negligent
statements may recover damages