Chapter 4 - The Intersection of Gender and Ethnicity Flashcards
What are the recurring themes of this chapter?
Theme #1: Similarities and Differences (stemming from intersectionality)
Theme #2: Simultaneous Oppression and Strength.
Gendered Racism
A form of oppression and bias based simultaneously on both gender and race/ethnicity.
Hispanic
People of Spanish descent, whether from Mexico, Puerto Rico, or elsewhere.
Latinos/Latina
Latin American people; also refers specifically to Latin American men/A Latin American girl or woman.
Latinx
A Latin American person, unmarked by gender.
African American/s
Americans of African descent.
“Negro” was the respectful term prior to the 1960s. Activists of the Black Power Movement urged the term “Blacks”. In the 1980s, ties to heritage were emphasized and a shift was made towards the term “African American”.
American Indians/Native American
The indigenous peoples of North America.
There is controversy about both terms. “Native American” is argued to exclude indigenous people (the original/native people of a region) while “American Indian” is argued to be a reflection of a geographical miscalculation per the usage of “Indian”.
Asian Americans
Americans of Asian descent.
People from the Indian subcontinent are usually considered Asian American as well. It is often that people of Asian heritage are grouped with people of Pacific Islander heritage (Native Hawaiians and those from the Philippines, Guam, and Fiji) as “Asian and Pacific Islander” (API).
White/Caucasian
Sometimes used to refer to light-skinned people.
Problems arise from “Caucasian” deriving from the biological conceptualization of race (the Caucasoid race) and those native to the Caucasus region between Europe and Asia. Also, there are many Hispanic Americans and people of Middle Eastern descent who are light-skinned and labeled as “White” despite not experiencing life in the USA as a “White” person would.
Biracial/Multiracial
Identifying as being from two or more racial groups.
About 3% of Americans identify as biracial/multiracial.
Race
A socially constructed system of human classification, once considered a biological concept referring to discrete and exclusive groups of people with common physical features.
Why is the concept of “RACE” problematic?
Originally from White colonists, race was considered a biological concept referring to distinct/exclusive groups of people with a common set of physical features (skin color, hair texture/color, etc).
One problem with the concept of race is the assumption that racial groups are distinct and exclusive; that races are “pure” from people have mated exclusively with other members of their race and not others. Yet people have long mated outside of their racial groups meaning that groups cannot be distinct or exclusive.
Ethnic Group
A group of people who share a common culture and language.
Ethnic groups are flexible and often self-defined.
What is the issue with European Americans being the norm in psychological research (just as men have been?)
THIS IS THE ERROR OF OVERGENERALIZATION. Studies based exclusively on samples of White College students or other European American groups involves making an unjustified inference from an all-White sample to all people.
The experiences of people of color are marginalized/made invisible. Consequentially, Whites represent “people” and everyone else becomes “subcultures”.
If psychology is to be a science of all people, then the field needs to study people of diverse origins.
5 Problems with race as a biological concept:
- Race - Problemativ in the assumption that racial groups are distinct and exclusive (“pure” and only mating within the same group)
- Promotes essentialism and denies the contextual factors that oppress people of color.
- Psychological research has ignored different meanings that may be attached to different words/gestures/etc since people of different ethnic groups may have different understandings of words even if the same language is spoken. This is especially apparent when standardized tests are involved.
- Possibility of observer effects; namely, race bias in observations. With biased observations, there would be in-group favoritism that results in observers giving higher/more positive ratings to members of their own group.
- Possibility of bias in interpretation of results.