Chapter 4. Guide to Method Sampling Flashcards
Define the problem
Require a solid understanding of
analytical techniques available
Problem-solving skills
Experience
Intuition, logic and common sense
Define the problem
Intent of the measurement
Considerations in sampling and sample preparation
Best technique/ method for doing the analysis
Evaluation / analysis of data
Reporting of results
Resources needed to accomplish the analysis
choosing you test method: the sample and the analyte
- What is the nature and background of
the problem? - What is known about the history of the
sample? - What analyte is important in the
sample? - What is the concentration range of the
analyte? - What degree of accuracy and
precision is demanded? - What other components are present in
the sample?
Choosing your test method: the analyte
- Have prior, similar efforts been documented in the
literature? - What instruments and equipment are available for
the determination? - How much time is needed to perform the work?
- How soon does the work need to
be done? - How much money is available to
accomplish the work? - How many samples must one
measure? - Are there limitations to the amount
of sample that can be used?
What factors to consider?
✓ What type of information does the method provide?
✓ What are the advantages or disadvantages of the technique
versus other methods?
✓ How reproducible and accurate is the technique?
✓ How much or how little sample is required?
✓ How much or how little analyte can be detected?
✓ What types of samples can the method be used with?
✓ Will other components of the sample cause interference?
✓ Other factors: speed, convenience, cost, availability, skill
required.
Choosing your test method (for water analysis)
- Is an approved/ regulatory method based on
AWWA/ APHA available for use? - What will the results be used for?
(Regulatory compliance or Process Control) - Is the LOQ achievable?
(at least 1/10th of the regulatory value) - Use a standard method/ test kit/ or developed
“in-house” method?
QUALITATIVE INFORMATION ON THE ANALYTE
elemental composition
oxidation states
structural information
isotopic distribution of the elements in the sample
polyatomic atoms, functional groups, specific molecules, molecular species
study quantitative information - rough concentration
- PROPERTIES OF THE SAMPLE/ ANALYTE:
Sample
* Phase: solid,
liquid, gas,
dissolved,
suspended
* Amount
available for
analysis
*Homogeneity
Analyte
* Chemical and
physical
properties
- FACTORS IN SAMPLE
PREPARATION
✓Phase of the sample- solid, liquid, gas
✓Properties of the analyte:
❑Organic or inorganic
❑Pure substance or mixture
❑Homogeneous or heterogeneous
✓Instrumentation- elemental or molecular
✓Decomposition or dissolution of a solid sample
✓Dilutions made prior to measurement
✓Approaches taken to prevent analyte losses or contamination
✓Separation of interferences from the matrix- element or compound that respond directly to measurement; gives a false
signal; signal may be enhanced or suppressed
- ANTICIPATED CONCENTRATION
OF THE ANALYTE
linear dynamic range
limit of linearity
limit of detection
upper and lower
boundary of applicability and may not be
linear over all concentrations
limit of dynamic range
calibration curve
limit of linearity
most important part in method selection
limit of detection
The lowest concentration that can be measured with
reasonable statistical certainty (AOAC)
The lowest concentration of analyte in a sample that
can be detected, but not necessarily quantified,
under the stated conditions of the test (NATA Tech,
Note #3)
The smallest concentration that
can be determined that is
statistically different from a
blank at a specified level of
confidence (typically 95%) This
corresponds to the critical
level.(Currie, 1988, Am. Chem.
Soc.)
The true net concentration or amount of the
analyte in the material to be analyzed to the
conclusion that the concentration of the analyte in the material is larger than that of the blank matrix (ISO DIS 118431)
The output signal or value above which it can be affirmed with a stated level of confidence (e.g.,
95%) that a sample is different from a blank
sample containing no analyte of interest (ISO 13530:2009)
detection limit
three types of detection limit
- instrument detection limit (IDL)
- method detection limit (MDL)
- limit of quantitation (LOQ)/ practical reporting limit (PRL)
▪ the smallest signal above the
background noise that can be
detected reliably
▪ Typically 3 X signal/noise ratio
Instrument detection limit
random variation in signal or background
noise
net response recorded by a method for a sample
signal
a value of S/N = 2 or better is considered to be the minimum ratio needed for the reliable detection of a true signal coming from a sample.
Estimate S/N:
1) Multiple determination of
blank samples.
2) Estimation of best-fit to calibration curves
▪ minimum concentration reportable to 99%
confidence level that the analyte is > zero.
–Determined from the analysis of a low
sample concentration in a given matrix.
–MDL is the “criterion for detection”
LOD = 3 x SD of low sample
LOD = 5 x of blank solution (not a calibration blank)
(US-EPA definition)
Method detection limit
- It is a multiple of LOD at a concentration of the
analyte that can reasonably be determined with
an acceptable level of accuracy and precision - Can be calculated using an appropriate
standard or sample, and may be obtained from the lowest concentration on the calibration
curve (excluding the blank) - LOQ is 10 SD.
Limit of quantitation (LOQ) / Practical reporting limit (PRL)
study graph on what these limits mean in practice
(within batch, internal)
repeatability
- DESIRED PRECISION
s2method = s2
sample + s2
technique
(between batches, variability)
reproducibility