Chapter 4: Decisions Under Risk Flashcards
Maximizing ____________ ____________ is NOT the same as Maximizing _____________ ______________ ______________.
Expected Value; Expected Monetary Value
Three principles used for making Decisions Under Risk
Maximizing Expected Monetary Value (EMV)
Maximizing Expected Value (EV)
Maximizing Expected Utility
Remember, Expected means…
Average
Maximizing Expected Monetary Value (EMV)
Probability of the outcome (p) × monetary value of the outcome (m)
EMV = p₁ × m₁ + p₂ × m₂ + ….pₙ × mₙ
Maximizing Expected Value (EV)
Probability of an outcome (p) × Value of an outcome (v)
EMV = p₁ × v₁ + p₂ × v₂ + ….pₙ × vₙ
Utility of an outcome depends on how ____________ the outcome is from ____________ ____________’s point of view.
valuable; decision maker’s
Principle of Maximizing Expected Utility
(The Expected Utility Principle)
Probability of an outcome (p) × Utility of an outcome (u)
EU = p₁ × u₁ + p₂ × u₂ + ….pₙ × uₙ
Utils (see notes)
Utility derived from the square root of outcomes when calculating expected monetary value (EMV)
Utils ONLY applies to ______________ ________________ _________________.
Expected Monetary Value (EMV)
The Principle of Expected Utility measures more than _____________ ___________.
monetary utility
We represent the utility of an oucome as ___(_______).
u(____)
e.g. utlity of 18 days at sea is u(18).
2 Arguments for Expected Utility Principle
1) Principle of Large Numbers: In the long run, you’ll be better off if you maximize expected utility.
2) Axiomatic Approach: Derives Expected Utility Principle from fundamental set of axioms, regardless of what happens in the long run.
Law of Large Numbers
After an ‘n’ number of trials approaches infinity, the difference between an expected and the average outcome, becomes arbitrarily small, tends to zero.
Objection to Law of Large Numbers (Keynes)
“In the long run were all dead”
- Were never going to face an infinite number of decisions.
- In that vein, it doesn’t matter what the outcome (consequent) of my decision is.
-whether I would be better off maximizing expected utility or infinite number of decisions is irrelevant, because I live a finite life.
(Law of Large Numbers shouldn’t be the basis for rational decision making under risk because it places us in impossible settings).
Gambler’s Ruin
You and a friend each have a pot of $1000 total, made up several $1 bills.
Everytime a coin lands heads up, your friend pays you $1.
Everytime the coin lands tails up, you pay your friend $1.
As the game is played a SUFFICIENT amount of times, you and your friend will reach separate sequences of heads and tails.
Whoever reaches the end of this sequence first goes bankrupt. It’s IMPOSSIBLE to play forever, because either I’m gonna go bankrupt first or my friend is.
It would be better in the long run to maximize expected utitlity ONLY IF my pot is infinite, which is impossible.