Chapter 4 constitutional rights Flashcards
Standing rights
the ability of an individual to have their rights adjudicated by a
court
in order to have Standing in a court, you must also have…
claim of injury caused by gov’t conduct if petitioner can prove this, their likelihood of redress increases
Madisonian Dilemma
Believed human nature was inherently evil and people wil go to great lengths to further their interests in the political landscape. Worried about factions opressing or undermining the rights of the public
procedrul right
rights to a procedure when litigating a case- Due process public trial cross examination
substantive rights
rights that are free from gov’t
Stricture ie. freedom of speech
substantive due process by incorporation
courts “nationalize” laws on a case by cass
basis; they extend federal provisions to the states
Rational basis test
To pass: the challenged law must further a legitimate government interest and do so by rational means; when courts employ this test they typically side with gov’t
intermediate basis test
To pass: the challenged law must further an important government interest and do so by substantial means; usually employed in cases concerning projected identity; gender, illegitimate children
Strict scrutiny test
To pass: the challenged law must further a compelling government interest and do so by narrowly tailored means
courts usually side with the petitioner; employed in cases concerning suspect characteristics
Case or controversy
In order to have standing in court an individual must have distinctive claim of injury
Advisory opinions ( george washington)
court cannot administer advisory opinions, George washington asked advice from court on ongoing war, Justice declined his request and cited separation of powers
Supreme court justices
Samuel Alito
Elena Kagan
Sonia Sotomayor
Clarence Thomas
Ketnaji Brown Jackson
Neil Gorsuch
John Roberts
Amy Coney Barret
Brett Kavanaugh
Suspect Classification
Race
Religion
National Origin
Alien Status
Classifications based on immutable characteristics; discrimination is presumptively illegal
Mootness Doctrine
limits the power of judicial review
Ripeness doctrine
prevents litigation based on a law that hasn’t been implemented yet.