Chapter 4: Civil Liberties Flashcards

1
Q

Safeguards for those accused of crime. These rights constrain government conduct in investigating crimes, trying cases, and pursuing offenders.

Found in the 4th, 5th, 6th, and 18th amendments

A

Criminal Due Process Rights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Griswold V Connecticut 1965; birth control

Roe V Wade 1973; abortion

Lawrence V Texas 2003; intimate sexual activity

A

Landmark Supreme Court cases protected by First Amendment; right to privacy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

First Amendment clause prohibiting the government from enacting laws from prohibiting an individual’s practice of religion.

A

Free Exercise Clause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

First Amendment clause that bars the government from passing any law respecting an establishment of religion. Often interpreted as a separation of church and state.

A

Establishment Clause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Speech is restricted only if it goes beyond mere advocacy, or words to create a high likelihood of imminent disorder or lawlessness.

Brandenburg V Ohio

A

Imminent Lawless Action Test
or
Incitement Test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Government can suppress speech to avoid grave danger, even if the probability of the dangerous result was relatively remote. Established with Dennis V U.S.

Replaced by Imminent Lawless Action/Incitement Test in 1965

A

Clear and Probable Danger Test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Any speech that has he tendency to incite crime or disturb the public peace can be silenced.

Gitlow V NY 1925

A

Bad Tendency Test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

4 bills passed by federalists in congress post French Revolution, signed into law by John Adams in 1798

  • Criminalized all speech and writings judged to be critical of the government, congress, or president; empowered president to deport aliens suspected of threatening national security
  • invoked by Lincoln post Civil War via Habeas Corpus
  • invoked by Bush post 9/11; military combatants denied protections of civilian courts, tried in military tribunals
A

Alien and Sedition Acts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Government may silence speech or expression when there is clear and present danger that such speech will bring harm that the government has the power to prevent.

Schenck V U.S. 1919

A

Clear and Present Danger Test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Transfer of suspected terrorists to other nations for imprisonment and interrogation; circumvents U.S. law which requires due process and prohibits torture

A

Rendition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q
  • guarantee of Habeas Corpus
  • prohibition of ex post facto laws
  • prohibition of bills of attainder (laws that declare guilt without trial)

Guarantee of a trial by jury in the state where the crime was committed.

A

Article I, section 9

Article III

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Constitutionally established guarantees that protect citizen’s opinions and property against arbitrary government interference.

A

Civil Liberties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Legal safeguards that prevent government from arbitrarily depriving citizens of life, liberty, or property.

Guaranteed at federal level in 5th amendment, selective incorporation into states in 14th amendment

A

Due Process

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Nonverbal speech in the form of action.

U.S. V O’Brien; burning draft cards- not protected
Tinker V Des Moines; armbands to protest war- protected
Texas V Johnson 1989; flag burning- protected

A

Symbolic Speech

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

False written statements about others that harm their reputation.

To sue: must prove malicious intent

A

Libel

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

False verbal statements about others that harm their reputation.

To sue: must prove malicious intent

17
Q

Advertising statements that describe products.
-limited protection in 1st amendment
-may be restricted if the restriction seeks to implement a substantial government interest, directly advances that interest, and goes no further than necessary to accomplish it’s objective
Ex: restrictions on tobacco advertising

A

Commercial Speech

18
Q

1914 ruling, evidence obtained illegally cannot be used in trial. Citing 4th amendment; no unreasonable searches or seizures.

Extended to states in Mapp V Ohio 1961

A

Exclusionary Rule; 4th Amendment

19
Q

Freedoms that ensure individuals can discuss important issues facing the nation and try to agree about how to address the matters.

-solutions emerge through the competition of ideas

A

Marketplace of Ideas

20
Q
speech- Gitlow v NY,1925
press- Near v Minnesota,1931
assembly and petition- DeJonge v Oregon, 1937
religion- Cantwell v Connecticut, 1940 
-establishment clause
-free exercise clause
A

First Amendment rights and their selective incorporation

21
Q

Right to bear arms- McDonald v City of Chicago, 2010

A

Second Amendment rights

22
Q
  • bars double jeopardy and compelled self-incrimination
  • right to speedy and public trial by a jury of one’s peers, confrontation of witness, legal counsel.

= Miranda v Arizona 1966; police must inform you off rights, in custody, before questioning

A

5th and 6th Amendment rights;

Miranda Rights

23
Q

protection against cruel and unusual punishment

Furman v Georgia, 1972- executions must be humane, not painful

A

8th Amendment

24
Q

speech that is likely to bring about public disorder or chaos; the Supreme Court has held that such speech may be banned in public places to ensure the preservation of public order

Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942

A

Fighting Words

25
the apparent design in the universe and in living things is the product of an intelligent cause rather than of an undirected process such as natural selection
Intelligent Design
26
form of censorship by the government whereby it blocks the publication of news stories viewed as libelous or harmful
Prior Restraint
27
Regulations regarding when, where, or how expression may occur; must be content neutral -restrictions do not target speech based on content, and to stand up in court, they must be applied in a content-neutral manner. EX: ok to march in protest, just not at 4am while chanting into bullhorns
Time, Place, and Manner Restrictions
28
Established in Lemon v Kurtzman, 1971; Supreme Court refined the Establishment Clause standard to include 3 considerations: -Does the state program have a secular, as opposed to a religious, purpose? -Does it have as its principal effect the advancement of religion? -Does the program create an excessive entanglement between church and state?
The Lemon Test
29
Indecent or offensive speech or expression; Supreme Court couldn't define it, "I'll know it when I see it"; Developed 3 part test in Miller v California 1973: - The average person applying contemporary standards finds the work as a whole appeals to the prurient interests- tends to excite unwholesome sexual desire - The work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, a form of sexual conduct specifically prohibited by an antiobscenity law. - The work taken as a whole lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value
Obscenity; 3 part test