CHAPTER 4 CASE STUDIES + EXTRA CONTENT: PEACE AND CONFLICT Flashcards

1
Q

Religious Perspectives

A
  1. Christianity: Promotes peace through love, forgiveness, and reconciliation,
    drawing from the teachings of Jesus Christ. Peacebuilding is often seen as
    part of a moral and spiritual duty.
  2. Islam: Emphasises comprehensive peace — personal, communal, and
    political, grounded in the principles of justice (Adl) and beneficence (Ihsan).
  3. Buddhism: Views peace as starting from within each individual, stressing
    mindfulness and compassion. Peace in the Buddhist context transcends mere
    absence of conflict, incorporating the idea of a peaceful mind and peaceful
    society.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Feminist Interpretations of Peace

A
  1. Feminism questions the traditional, often patriarchal, views of peace, arguing
    for more inclusive and representative definitions.
  2. Peace is not just the absence of war, but also the presence of conditions like
    gender equality, justice, and freedom from oppression.
  3. Feminist scholars point out that women and children are disproportionately
    affected by conflict, and their experiences and voices should shape
    peacebuilding.
  4. Influence: These perspectives have influenced international policies, including
    UN Security Council Resolution 1325, which addresses the impact of war on
    women and the importance of their participation in peace processes.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Greed Driven Conflict

A
  1. A focus on material interests, often involving economic gains, territorial
    control, and resource exploitation.
  2. A disregard for ethical or moral constraints, where the pursuit of self-interest
    takes precedence.
  3. In such conflicts, parties may engage in actions that prioritize their
    own material well-being, regardless of the broader societal or ethical
    implications.
  4. Examples of greed-driven conflicts include territorial disputes,
    resource wars, and economic rivalries.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Grievance Driven Conflict

A
  1. The presence of historical, social, political, or economic grievances, which
    often go unresolved over extended periods.
  2. A strong sense of injustice, oppression, or discrimination, which fuels the
    conflict and drives individuals or groups to seek redress
  3. parties perceive themselves as victims of systemic injustice and may
    mobilize to address these grievances. These conflicts are often
    characterized by social unrest, protests, and resistance movements.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Greed and Grievance Conflict: Columbia(FARC)

A
  1. Greed: The FARC’s involvement in the illegal drug trade illustrates a stark
    manifestation of the greed-driven aspect of the conflict. By controlling drug
    production and distribution networks, the FARC secures a substantial source
    of revenue and power. This financial gain sustains their operations and
    contributes to their influence.
  2. Grievance: Grievances related to land reform, social injustice, and
    government oppression have driven communities to support the FARC and
    other rebel groups. These grievances are fueled by historical injustices,
    creating a fertile ground for opposition and resistance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Key Elements of Positive Peace

A
  1. Economic and social justice: addressing inequality, social welfare
  2. Political Inclusion and participation: democratic governance, participation and
    accountability
  3. Sustainable development and environmental care: resource
    management(Equitable) and climate action
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Common Challenges in Achieving Positive Peace

A
  1. Structural challenges: ingrained injustices(Take time to address), systemic
    changes(also, take time, and may be impossible to address)
  2. Measurement and evaluation: assessment difficulties(subjective in nature),
    indicators and metrics(are essential, but not perfect)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Possible Responses to Structural Violence

A
  1. Policy intervention: legal reforms and resources redistribution
  2. Societal Changes: building awareness and advocacy and creating cultural
    shifts
  3. International Cooperation: aid and development and human rights advocacy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Structural Violence Example: Racial Inequality

A
  1. Context: In many countries, racial minorities face systemic barriers in various
    aspects of life. USA in particular.
  2. Manifestation: These barriers manifest in forms like higher unemployment
    rates, poor healthcare outcomes, and disproportionate incarceration rates
    among racial minorities.
  3. Outcome: Such systemic disadvantages perpetuate cycles of poverty and
    marginalisation.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Territorial Conflict: Russian Annexation of Crimea

A
  1. Russia annexed Crimea in March 2014, following the Ukrainian Revolution.
  2. Motivations: Strategic: Control over the Black Sea and its naval fleet stationed
    at Sevastopol. Cultural-Historical: Crimea’s long association with Russia,
    being part of Russia until 1954. Political: Demonstrating Russia’s regional
    dominance and countering Western influence in Ukraine.
  3. Global Implications: Western Sanctions: Led to significant economic sanctions
    from the EU, USA, and others. Security Tensions: Increased NATO presence
    in Eastern Europe and a rekindling of Cold War-type rhetorics.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Psychology Theories of Structural Violence

A
  1. Cognitive Biases: Explores how societal biases and stereotypes contribute to
    institutionalised discrimination.
  2. Mental Health Impact: Studies the psychological effect of living in a society
    marked by structural violence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Territorial Conflict: Russia Ukraine War

A
  1. Dynamics: Support for pro-Russian separatists in the Donbas region.
  2. Motivations: Buffer against NATO, protecting Russian-speaking minorities,
    historical ties.
  3. Impact: Ongoing conflict causing thousands of deaths, massive displacement,
    and heightened global tensions.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Territorial Conflict: South China Sea Dispute

A
  1. Geographic and economic significance: Strategic Location: Crucial for
    international maritime trade, linking the Pacific and Indian Oceans. Resource
    Rich: Hosts vast fisheries and is believed to hold substantial oil and gas
    reserves
  2. Claimants: Major Claimants: Include China, the Philippines, Vietnam,
    Malaysia, Brunei, and Taiwan. China’s Nine-Dash Line: Asserts historical
    rights over most of the sea, conflicting with other nations’ claims and violating
    UNCLOS principles.
  3. Recent developments and tensions: Chinese Activities: Construction of
    artificial islands, installation of military bases. International Response: Legal
    challenges, particularly by the Philippines; U.S. naval patrols; regional
    diplomatic efforts.
  4. Global Implications: Potential for Conflict: Actions by China seen as
    militarisation, raising fears of direct confrontations.International Law and
    Maritime Security: Challenges to the freedom of navigation and overflight
    rights; undermining the UNCLOS framework. Wider Geostrategic Implications:
    Becomes a stage for U.S.-China rivalry; impacts ASEAN unity and regional
    order.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

General Motivations Behind Territorial Conflicts

A
  1. Historical and cultural claims Deep-rooted Histories: Often involve
    centuries-old borders and cultural links to the land. National Identity:
    Territories can be symbolic of national pride and heritage.
  2. Strategic importance: Military Advantages: Control over territories can offer
    significant military or geostrategic advantages. Economic Resources:
    Territories rich in resources like minerals, oil, or natural gas are particularly
    contested.
  3. Nationalism and Political Strategy: Domestic Politics: Leaders might stoke
    nationalist sentiments or use territorial claims to divert attention from internal
    issues. Electoral Incentives: Territorial claims can be used to rally public
    support during political or economic crises.
  4. Economic Resources: Direct Access: Control over territories ensures direct
    access to their natural resources. Trade Routes: Significant for controlling
    major maritime trade paths and chokepoints.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Global Implications of Territorial Conflicts:

A
  1. International relations: diplomatic strains, global power dynamic shifts
  2. Security and Regional Stability: refugee flows and humanitarian crises, arms races
  3. International law and governance: challenges rule of law, requires UN and IGOs
  4. Economic effects: trade disruptions, investment and development
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Economic Interests in Conflict: weapon sales, global arms trade

A
  1. Global Arms trade: Driven by profit, strategic influence, or geopolitical alliances
    this activity may lead to regional arms races, heightened tensions, and
    conflicts.
  2. Controversies and consequences: US companies selling weapons to
    Myanmar, sales to place with poor human rights records. There is an ethical
    and political debate about if the profit, is worth the risks.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Political Interests in conflict

A
  1. Political conflicts stem from struggles over governance, power,
    territorial control, and political ideologies.
  2. Election Disputes: Such as conflicts following allegations of election
    fraud, voter suppression, or manipulation.
  3. Governance Conflicts: Disagreements over control of government
    institutions, policy direction, or corruption.
  4. E.g. Territorial disputes(overlap with territoral conflict) e.g. south
    china sea
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Social Interests in conflict

A
  1. Social conflicts arise around the aspirations, needs, and identities of
    social groups. These often involve issues of rights, representation,
    and social justice.
  2. Labour Disputes: Including conflicts over wages, working conditions,
    and employees’ rights.
  3. Group Rights: Conflicts where ethnic, religious, or other social groups
    seek recognition, rights, and autonomy.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Social Interests in conflict: workplace disputes

A
  1. Causes: Often related to unfair labour practices, pay discrepancies, and lack
    of workers’ representation.
  2. Resolution: Can involve negotiations, legal action, strikes, or even
    international advocacy
  3. Example: Movements like the Fight for $15 campaign can influence broader
    social policies and international labour standards.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Crosscutting themes in interest based conflicts

A
  1. Conflicts rarely exist in isolation and often intertwine economic, political, and
    social factors.
  2. The arms trade, for instance, impacts political alliances and can ignite social
    unrest.
  3. Global interconnectedness means local conflicts can have worldwide
    implications, especially in economically linked issues.
  4. Economic conflicts can disrupt global supply chains, influencing international
    economic stability and relations.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Managing and Resolving interest based conflict

A
  1. Role of IGOs and agreements: Organisations such as the WTO, IMF, and
    World Bank help manage and mitigate economic conflicts through policy
    frameworks and interventions. International treaties and agreements address
    conflicts over global issues like environmental conservation, climate change,
    and resource management.
  2. Diplomacy and negotiation: Diplomacy is a crucial tool in resolving political
    and social conflicts, often through bilateral or multilateral discussions.
    International mediation and dialogue, facilitated by organisations like the UN,
    play a significant role in peaceful conflict resolution.
  3. Influence of Non state actors: Non-governmental organisations (NGOs),
    multinational corporations (MNCs), and other non-state actors increasingly
    impact interest-based conflicts by offering unique resources, perspectives,
    and solutions.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Ideological conflict:

A
  1. Ideological Conflict: Involves disputes originating from opposing sets of
    beliefs, values, or ideologies.
  2. Characteristics: Deep-rooted, extensive, and often emotional; difficult to
    resolve due to their entwinement with personal and collective identities
  3. E.g Israeli-Palestinian Conflict: Represents a blend of territorial, religious, and
    cultural ideological clashes.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Political Ideologies in conflict:

A
  1. Political Ideology: A system of beliefs outlining how a society should operate,
    influencing governance, policy, and social structure.
  2. Arab Spring (2010-Present): Triggered by demands for democratic reforms,
    impacting several Arab countries with varying outcomes, from regime
    changes to civil wars
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Economic ideologies in conflict:

A
  1. Economic Ideology: Shapes views on economic policy and management,
    including capitalism, socialism, and mixed economies.
  2. Globalisation vs Economic Nationalism: Involves debates between advocates
    of global free trade and supporters of protective tariffs and national industries.
  3. Capitalism vs Socialism: Central to political discourse, affecting debates on
    social welfare, public services, and wealth redistribution.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Religious Ideologies in conflict:
1. Religious Ideologies: The belief systems of different religions can significantly influence social norms, laws, and international politics. 2. Sunni vs Shia: Predominantly seen in Middle Eastern geopolitical dynamics, influencing regional politics, alliances, and conflicts.
26
Cultural Ideologies in Conflict
1. Cultural Ideology: Involves the collective beliefs and values expressed through cultural practices, affecting societal behavior and policies. 2. Western vs Non-Western Ideologies: Differences in perceptions of democracy, human rights, and secularism. 3. Traditional vs Modern Values: Tensions arise over evolving societal norms, including gender roles and sexual orientation rights.
27
The Israeli Palestinian Conflict: Ideological factors in conflict
1. A complex conflict influenced by a mix of historical claims, territorial disputes, and religious and cultural differences. 2. Jewish historical and biblical connections to the land. 3. Palestinian aspirations for nationhood and resistance to perceived occupation. 4. Religious significance to Islam, Judaism, and Christianity.
28
The rise of populism in western societies
1. Characterised by a shift towards right-wing ideologies, challenging established liberal and globalist perspectives. 2. Influenced by: Economic dissatisfaction, particularly post-2008 financial crisis. Identity politics, centring on national identity and immigration. Scepticism towards the perceived failures of globalisation and multilateral institutions
29
Impacts of Ideological Conflict
1. On domestic policies: Directly influences a country's internal policies, especially in areas of civil rights, national security, and education, where ideological divisions are pronounced. 2. On International relations: Ideological differences often dictate foreign policy, influencing diplomatic relations, trade, and global strategic alliances. Can be a primary factor in conflicts, contributing to international unrest and military engagements. 3. On society: Contributes to societal polarisation, potentially leading to protest movements or internal conflict. Shapes national narratives, public opinion, and even educational curricula, affecting how history and current events are perceived and taught.
30
Identity Based Conflict
1. Identity conflicts often arise from complex historical, social, and political contexts, where perceived threats to a group's existence or values are paramount. 2. Historical Roots: These conflicts frequently have deep historical origins, including colonial legacies, historical injustices, and long-standing ethnic or religious rivalries. 3. Social and Cultural Factors: Differences in language, religion, and cultural practices can be significant conflict sources, especially where policies or social changes appear to challenge or undermine these identity markers. 4. Political and Economic Inequalities: Such disputes can also stem from situations where particular identity groups feel excluded from political decision-making or economic benefits.
31
Indigenous populations and conflict
1. Land rights and territorial disputes: Historical Context: Indigenous populations have frequently faced dispossession and marginalisation from ancestral lands, which continue to affect relations with state authorities and private entities. Contemporary Issues: Modern-day conflicts often arise due to governmental or corporate encroachments for resource extraction or development, infringing on indigenous land rights and livelihoods. 2. Cultural Rights and preservation: Language and Education: Struggles around preserving indigenous languages and accessing culturally relevant education are a frequent flashpoint. Cultural Practices: Governmental or societal restrictions on traditional practices lead to tensions, emphasizing the need for cultural sensitivity and the right to cultural expression. 3. Political Representation and autonomy: Self-Determination: The pursuit of political representation and self-governance is a key element in many indigenous identity conflicts. Legal and Policy Frameworks: Global frameworks like the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) provide benchmarks for these rights, influencing national policies and identity-based disputes.
32
Complex Dynamics in ethnically diverse states
1. Managing diversity: Policies and Integration: How a state manages ethnic diversity (through policies like multiculturalism, assimilation, or segregation) profoundly affects social harmony and potential conflicts. Socio-Economic Integration: Disparities in employment, education, and wealth distribution among various ethnic groups can exacerbate tensions and lead to conflict. 2. National Identity and inclusion: Constructing a National Identity: Debates around the definition of national identity can either foster a sense of belonging or alienate minority groups. Citizenship Laws and Rights: The framing of citizenship and rights can be pivotal in either unifying a nation or deepening divisions based on identity. 3. Conflict and violence: Communal Violence: When ethnic, religious, or cultural competition for resources, political influence, or cultural dominance escalates, it can lead to communal violence and widespread disturbances. Role of Institutions: The effectiveness of state institutions in managing diversity and addressing grievances influences whether these conflicts are mitigated or intensified.
33
Identity Based Conflict: The Rohingya Crisis in Myanmar
1. Ethnic and Religious Dimensions: The predominantly Muslim Rohingya, residing in a majority Buddhist country, have faced intense persecution and discrimination, culminating in accusations of ethnic cleansing and genocide. 2. Statelessness and Rights: Myanmar's denial of citizenship rights to the Rohingya illustrates how governmental policies can amplify identity conflicts, leading to international humanitarian crises
34
Identity Based Conflict: Kurdish people
1. Cross-Border Ethnicity: The Kurdish population, spread across Turkey, Iraq, Syria, and Iran, has persistently sought greater autonomy and recognition, often clashing with central governments. 2. Impact on Regional Politics: The Kurdish struggle intersects with broader regional dynamics, including territorial integrity issues, national security concerns, and international diplomacy.
35
Identity Based Conflict: The Catalan Independence Movement in Spain
1. Cultural and Linguistic Identity: The distinct cultural and linguistic identity of Catalans has fuelled desires for independence or greater autonomy from Spain, leading to significant political and social strife. 2. Political Responses: The Spanish government's response, including legal and police action against independence proponents, exemplifies the challenges in resolving identity conflicts within democratic, integrated states.
36
Critiques and Challenges of Just War Theory
1. Relevance in Asymmetric Warfare: Traditional Just War Theory doesn’t fully address conflicts involving non-state actors like terrorist groups. 2. Technological Advancements: Drones and cyber warfare introduce new challenges in ensuring discrimination and proportionality. 3. Cultural Bias: Critics argue that Just War Theory might reflect a Western ethical bias, not universally applicable or accepted.
37
Humanitarian Intervention
1. Humanitarian intervention is generally characterised as the employment of military force by one or several nations to prevent or cease gross human rights violations in another nation. 2. Criteria for Intervention: For an intervention to be considered 'humanitarian', its primary goal should be civilian protection. Often, non-military actions such as sanctions or diplomatic efforts are initially undertaken. 3. Consent and Legitimacy: The legitimacy of an intervention often hinges on whether it has the backing of the international community, usually through the United Nations (UN), or a significant number of countries.
38
Justifications for Humanitarian intervention
1. Responsibility to Protect (R2P): Emerged from the 2005 UN World Summit, where world leaders agreed to the principle that when national governments fail to safeguard their citizens from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing, or crimes against humanity, the international community has a responsibility to protect. 2. Preventing Genocide and Mass Atrocities: The ethical argument often hinges on the necessity to prevent mass atrocities. Historical instances like the Rwandan Genocide have been cited as examples where intervention might have prevented mass slaughter.
39
Criticisms and controversies of humanitarian intervention
1. Violation of Sovereignty: Critics argue that humanitarian interventions are often a violation of the principles of state sovereignty and non-interference, essential pillars of the international system. 2. Hidden Agendas: There is concern that states might use humanitarian justifications to pursue broader geopolitical or economic interests. 3. Unintended Consequences: Even well-intentioned interventions can lead to long-lasting conflicts, instability, and sometimes worsen the humanitarian situation they intended to ameliorate.
40
Libya(2011) Responsibility to Protect
1. The intervention in Libya, authorised by the UN Security Council, was initially hailed as a successful application of the R2P principle. However, the subsequent collapse of Libya into chaos and civil war raised questions about the long-term planning and objectives of humanitarian interventions.
41
Evaluating Outcomes of Humanitarian Intervention
1. Success Metrics: The effectiveness of humanitarian interventions is not only in stopping immediate violence but also in ensuring long-term stability, rebuilding efforts, and preventing future conflicts. 2. Impact Assessment: The long-term social, political, and economic impacts in the intervened regions are critical for a comprehensive evaluation.
42
The role of IGOs in evaluating outcomes of humanitarian intervention
1. United Nations: The UN's role in authorising, condemning, or questioning interventions is crucial in determining their legitimacy and effectiveness. 2. Regional Organisations: Bodies like NATO, the African Union, and the European Union influence humanitarian interventions through their support, advocacy, and operational roles.
43
Future Directions of Humanitarian intervention
1. Normative Shifts: The global consensus on humanitarian intervention and the balance between human rights and sovereignty continues to evolve, particularly as new international crises emerge. 2. Technological Advancements: Modern warfare technology, including cyber capabilities and unmanned systems, is changing the nature of interventions and posing new ethical and tactical questions
44
Culturally Condoned Violence
1. Culturally Condoned Violence: Acts of violence endorsed or accepted by a society due to deep-rooted cultural, religious, or traditional beliefs. 2. Common Examples: These include honour killings, female genital mutilation (FGM), forced marriages, witch hunts, and certain forms of religious or tribal warfare
45
Cultural and Religious Justifications
1. Tradition and Honour: Many societies view family honour as paramount, sometimes leading to honour killings to redeem perceived loss of honour due to actions like adultery, refusal of an arranged marriage, or even victimhood of sexual assault. 2. Religious Doctrine: Certain groups use religious texts to justify violence, often picking historical or contextual interpretations that support their stance. 3. Social Control: Methods of maintaining societal control or enforcing social norms, particularly against subjugated groups such as women, LGBTQ+ individuals, and religious or ethnic minorities, can also involve violence.
46
International Response and Critiques
1. Human Rights Perspective: International Human Rights Norms: Many practices of culturally condoned violence breach international human rights standards as per declarations like the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Global Campaigns and Treaties: Various international treaties and campaigns by organisations such as the United Nations, WHO, and Amnesty International aim to combat these practices. 2. Challenges in addressing cultural condoned violence: Cultural Relativism: This philosophy argues that one cannot judge the cultural practices of another group by one's own cultural standards, posing significant challenges in addressing these issues on a global scale.Sovereignty and Non-Intervention: Balancing respect for national sovereignty with the need to prevent grave human rights abuses remains a significant international relations challenge. 3. International actions and policies: Diplomatic Measures: Governments and international organisations often use diplomatic channels to exert pressure for change, though this can be delicate and controversial. Conditional Aid: Western countries and international organisations sometimes link financial aid to human rights improvements, including the cessation of certain violent cultural practices.
47
Positions-Interests-Needs Framework
1. The Positions-Interests-Needs framework is another valuable tool for analyzing conflicts. It focuses on the motivations and underlying factors that drive conflicting parties. 2. Positions: Positions are the explicit demands, claims, or stances taken by the parties involved. In this section, we will explore the concept of positions in conflicts and how they impact the dynamics and potential resolutions. Positions are often characterized by their inflexibility. Parties may hold steadfast to their positions, making negotiations and compromise challenging. The rigidity of positions can lead to prolonged conflicts, as parties are unwilling to make concessions. Positions are typically accompanied by stated demands, which outline what each party wants to achieve. These demands are often the starting point for negotiations. Understanding the underlying motivations behind these demands is crucial for conflict resolution. 3. Interests: Interests delve deeper into the motivations behind positions. This section will explore the concept of interests and how they provide a more comprehensive understanding of the parties' motivations in conflicts. Compared to positions, interests are more flexible and amenable to negotiation. Parties may be willing to adjust their interests to reach a mutually acceptable solution. Recognizing shared interests can be a foundation for conflict resolution. Identifying common interests between conflicting parties is a crucial step in conflict resolution. When parties discover shared interests, it creates opportunities for collaboration and compromise. For example, in a labor-management conflict, both sides may have an interest in a productive and stable workplace. 4. Needs: Needs are the fundamental, underlying concerns that drive both positions and interests. In this section, we will explore the concept of needs and their significance in understanding conflicts. Needs often relate to basic human needs, such as safety, dignity, or justice. Recognizing and addressing these fundamental needs is vital for conflict resolution. Failure to address these needs can lead to ongoing resentment and unrest. In conflict resolution, addressing unmet needs is a key strategy for achieving a lasting solution. Parties may be more willing to compromise and cooperate when their core needs are acknowledged and addressed. Resolving underlying needs can lead to sustainable peace. The Positions-Interests-Needs framework encourages parties to look beyond their stated positions and focus on their underlying interests and needs. By doing so, it opens avenues for creative and mutually beneficial solutions, leading to more sustainable conflict resolution.
48
Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, Positions-Interests-Needs Framework
1. Positions: Israel's position includes demands for security and international recognition. On the other hand, Palestinians demand statehood, sovereignty, and the right of return for refugees. These positions have historically been rigid, contributing to the protracted nature of the conflict. 2. Interests: Both parties have interests in peace, stability, and economic prosperity. Additionally, they share an interest in addressing the well-being and security of their populations. Recognizing these common interests is crucial for the conflict's resolution. 3. Needs: The underlying needs in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict relate to fundamental human needs, including safety, dignity, self-determination, and justice. Unaddressed needs have fueled ongoing tensions and violence in the region.
49
Kashmir Conflict: Territorial Control and Material Interest
1. Territorial Control: Kashmir is a region in South Asia, primarily divided between India, Pakistan, and China. The dispute revolves around the control of this strategically located region. 2. Material Interest: The control of Kashmir offers strategic advantages, access to important water resources, and regional influence. Both India and Pakistan have strategic and material interests in maintaining control over parts of Kashmir.
50
The Shifting Landscape of Territorial and Material Interests:
1. Resource scarcity, driven by factors such as climate change and population growth, is an emerging trend that is expected to impact territorial control and material interests. E.g. water scarcity and new arctic resources 2. Cyberwarfare: The digital realm introduces a new dimension to territorial control and material interests, as conflicts can emerge from attempts to control the digital domain. E.g. digital territorial control,
51
Resource Scarcity: A Catalyst for Conflict
1. Types of Resources: Resource scarcity can pertain to various essential resources, including water, arable land, minerals, energy sources, and more. In regions heavily dependent on a specific resource, scarcity of that resource can trigger conflicts. 2. Case Study: Water Conflict in the Middle East: The competition for limited freshwater resources in the Middle East, particularly along the Tigris-Euphrates river system, has been a long-standing source of tension between nations in the region. The struggle for water rights has created a backdrop for regional instability and conflicts. 3. Economic Implications: Resource scarcity can disrupt economies, leading to socio-economic instability and creating fertile ground for conflicts. This is especially pertinent in regions where industries are heavily reliant on the scarce resource in question. 4. Economic Inequity: Scarce resources often result in economic inequality, as those who can control or exploit the resources gain a significant advantage. This inequality can breed resentment and conflict, as marginalized groups seek to address their grievances. 5. Environmental Degradation: Over-exploitation of scarce resources can lead to environmental degradation, compounding the problems by affecting the livelihoods of those dependent on these resources. This can trigger disputes and conflicts as communities and nations seek to protect their environments.
52
The Intersection of Resource Scarcity and Ideology
1. Resource Scarcity Amplifying Ideological Differences: When resources become scarcer due to factors like climate change, mismanagement, or population growth, it can intensify ideological divides. Nations or groups may resort to extreme measures to secure these dwindling resources, further exacerbating tensions. 2. Case Study: Darfur Conflict: In Darfur, Sudan, resource scarcity, particularly water and arable land, aggravated ethnic and political tensions. This complex web of issues eventually led to one of the most significant conflicts in recent history. This case underscores the destructive potential of the intersection between resource scarcity and ideology. 3. Ideological Justification for Resource Acquisition: Ideology can be used to justify resource acquisition and expansionist policies. Nations may frame their actions as necessary for the survival and prosperity of their ideology, leading to territorial disputes and even armed conflicts
53
Perceived Threats of Conflict
1. Perceived threats to identity can manifest in various forms, and their impact on conflicts should not be underestimated. 2. Cultural Threats: These involve attempts to suppress or replace a specific culture, language, or heritage. For example, the suppression of Tibetan culture by the Chinese government has sparked international tension. 3. Religious Threats: Conflicts often emerge when religious practices or beliefs are threatened. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is influenced by religious elements, as both parties consider the Holy Land integral to their faiths. 4. Ethnic and National Threats: Disputes related to ethnicity and nationality can escalate when individuals or groups perceive that their ethnic or national identities are under threat. The Kurdish conflict, for instance, is rooted in the desire for autonomy and the preservation of Kurdish identity.
54
Skewed Perceptions
1. Cognitive Biases: confirmation bias and group think 2. Perceptions of threat: miscommunication, perception of military build-up(creates arms race)
55
Interaction Between Identity and Perception
1. Reinforcement: Threatened identity and skewed perceptions often reinforce each other. When identity is perceived to be at risk, cognitive biases can intensify, causing individuals or groups to interpret actions and intentions more negatively than they might in other circumstances. This cycle of reinforcement can significantly escalate conflicts. 2. Escalation: The combination of threatened identity and skewed perceptions can escalate conflicts beyond resolution. Parties become entrenched in their positions, and diplomatic solutions become increasingly challenging. Escalation is particularly likely when identity is deeply rooted in cultural, religious, or ethnic factors.
56
Primary Party: State Actor
1. Motivations: national security, territorial integrity, resources acquisition 2. Methods of engagement: diplomatic agreement, military action
57
Secondary Party: International Organizations
1. Motivations: Peacekeeping, humanitarian assistance, conflict resolution 2. Methods of engagement: diplomacy and peacekeeping forces
58
Non Violent Conflict: Demonstrations
1. Public displays of group sentiment, usually in opposition to a specific idea, policy, or regime. 2. Forms: Marches and Rallies: Organised walks or gatherings to demonstrate solidarity and support for a cause. Sit-ins and Picketing: Non-violent occupation of a space or forming lines to display protest. 3. Effectiveness: Publicity and Media Coverage: Demonstrations often attract considerable media attention, amplifying the protesters' message. Pressure on Authorities: Large-scale participation can pressurise governments and institutions to address the demands or grievances raised.
59
Non-Violent Conflict: Civil Disobedience
1. Civil disobedience involves the intentional and non-violent refusal to comply with certain laws, demands, or orders from a government or occupying power. 2. Characteristics: Non-violent Nature: Emphasis on avoiding physical harm to others. Conscientious and Deliberate: Based on moral objections to particular legal provisions or government actions. Public: Unlike covert resistance, civil disobedience is performed openly, often attracting media coverage and public attention. 3. Key Theororists: Henry David Thoreau: His essay "Civil Disobedience" (1849) argues that individuals should not permit governments to overrule their consciences. 4. Martin Luther King Jr.: Influenced by Gandhi, King advocated for non-violent civil disobedience as an instrument of social change.
60
Secondary Party: Transnational Corporations
1. Motivations: Resources acquisition and profit 2 2. Methods of engagement: Lobbying, economic influence, resource acquisition 3. The involvement of Shell, a major oil corporation, in the Niger Delta conflict highlights how economic interests of TNCs intersect with conflicts over resources.
61
Role of Demonstrations and Civil Disobedience in Political and Social CHange
1. Public Awareness and Opinion: Illuminate issues and sway public sentiment. 2. Mobilisation: Galvanise support across different sections of society, creating a collective force. 3. Policy Impact: Can lead to significant policy shifts or the enactment of new legislation.
62
Evaluating Demonstrations and Civil Disobedience
1. Ethics and philosophy: legitimacy of the action, effectiveness 2. Potential for Escelation: risk of radicalisation and state induced-violence
63
Impact of violent protests and guerrilla movements on societies
1. Social Disruption: casualties and human suffering, social divisions 2. Economic consequences: long-term poverty, economic devestation(e.g. Infrastructure destroyed in guerrilla movements)
64
Political Consequences of violent protests and guerrilla movements
1. Regime change: toppling governments(e.g. Arab spring), more stable transitional governments 2. International effects: Neighboring countries are often effected, many time IGOs and NGOs must get involved to facilitate peace. There is often human rights abuses within these conflicts that must be addressed internationally
65
Root Causes of Terrorism and Genocide
1. Socioeconomic factors: poverty and inequality and marginalisation 2. Ideological factors: extremist ideologies
66
Types of third party involvement in conflict
1. Diplomatic efforts: negotiations and mediation and good offices(venue or services (like messaging between parties) can assist in the logistics of peace processes) 2. Economic Measures: sanctions and embargoes, aid and development support 3. Military Involvement: peacekeeping operations, military intervention 4. Legal and political pressures: international court cases, resolutions and declarations
67
Challenges in combating terrorism and genocide
1. Legal and Ethical Challenges: Issues related to human rights, state sovereignty, and the moral complexities in responding to terrorism and genocide. 2. The Future Landscape: How evolving technology, geopolitical shifts, and globalisation might shape the nature of terrorism and genocide in the future.
68
Motives for third-party involvement in conflict
1. Strategic interests: Access to resources, geographical strategic positions, or maintaining or altering the balance of power. Preventing the spread of conflict to areas of strategic importance. 2. Humanitarian Concerns: Alleviating suffering caused by conflicts, especially in cases of mass atrocities, famine, or large-scale displacement. Acting on moral or ethical obligations as global citizens to prevent or reduce human suffering. 3. International Stability: Upholding international law and defending the principles of sovereignty and non-aggression. Preventing the spill-over of conflicts into wider regional wars, which can disrupt global stability. 4. Domestic Political Pressures: Political leaders responding to internal public opinion, which can be sympathetic to the plight of those affected by conflict elsewhere. Political capital gained from successful foreign interventions or peace initiatives.
69
Implications of third party involvement in conflict
1. On the conflict: Potentially bringing conflicts to a quicker resolution through diplomacy, sanctions, or military might. On the other hand, involvement can intensify conflicts, particularly if it's perceived as biased or if it escalates the violence. 2. On the international stage: Shifting power dynamics and alliances, with new partnerships formed or existing ones strained based on the stance and actions in conflicts. Impacts on the reputation and perceived impartiality of international organisations. 3. On domestic politics of involved parties: Influence on the political landscape and public opinion within the countries of the third parties. Successes and failures in foreign policy can significantly impact domestic political fortunes. Economic implications, especially in the case of military interventions, which can be costly in terms of resources and human lives.
70
Challenges and criticisms of third pary involvement in conflict
1. Legitimacy and sovereignty: The principle of state sovereignty and non-interference is sometimes at odds with interventions, leading to debates about the legality and morality of such actions. External interventions are often criticised as forms of neo-imperialism, especially when the intervening parties have significant power disparities with the conflict state. 2. Effectiveness: There is ongoing debate over the long-term effectiveness and sustainability of external interventions in resolving conflicts. Risks of creating dependency or not addressing the root causes of conflict, leading to cycles of violence. 3. Selectivity and Bias: Inconsistent application of intervention, often influenced by strategic interests rather than humanitarian need. Some conflicts receive significant attention and resources, while others are largely ignored. Accusations of bias in international bodies, where decisions may be disproportionately influenced by powerful member states.
71
Examples of third party involvement
1. United Nations in Syria during Arab Spring 2. African union in Somalia
72
Peacemaking: Negotiations
1. Definition: Negotiations in international relations refer to the process where conflicting parties engage in dialogue to resolve disputes and achieve a sustainable peace agreement. 2. Components: Successful negotiations often involve pre-negotiation preparation, defining objectives, identifying negotiable issues, and understanding the interests of the opposing party.
73
Challenges in negotiations:
1. Asymmetry of Power: Power imbalances can impact the fairness of the negotiation outcome. 2. Cultural Differences: Differing cultural backgrounds can lead to misunderstandings and misinterpretations. 3. Lack of Trust: Without trust, negotiations may not progress or yield sustainable outcomes.
74
Peacemaking: Treaties(definition, components, role in conflict resolution)
1. Definition: Treaties are formal, written agreements between states or international actors, legally binding under international law. 2. Components: Typically include the preamble, articles detailing the agreement's terms, and provisions for entry into force and amendments. 3. Long-term Stability: Treaties aim to provide lasting solutions to conflicts by addressing the root causes and establishing frameworks for future relations. 4. Legal Binding Nature: The legal obligations imposed by treaties create a formal structure to ensure compliance by the parties involved.
75
Peacekeeping Forces
1. Definition: Peacekeeping forces are deployed by international organisations, such as the United Nations, to help maintain peace and security in post-conflict areas. 2. Activities: These include monitoring ceasefires, protecting civilians, disarming ex-combatants, and supporting the organisation of elections 3. Successes: Effective Monitoring and Stabilisation: They have been successful in various global locations in maintaining peace and preventing conflicts from re-escalating. 4. Challenges: Issues include limited rules of engagement, logistical constraints, and sometimes, inadequate support from the international community. 5. E.g. operations in Darfur, Sudan
76
Post Conflict Reconstruction
1. Economic reconstruction: restoration of infrastructure(e.g. roads), revival of livelihoods(e.g. employment) 2. Social reconstruction: rebuilding communities(including healthcare and education), Supporting Internally displaced people and refugees 3. Political Reconstruction: re-establishing governance and rule of law, creating electoral reform
77
Challenges in Peacebuilding and Reconciliation
1. Resource constraints: consistent funding and capacity building 2. Political and social constraints: legacy of mistrust, maintaining political will(remember, social contract(sort of)) 3. International Involvement: empowering local leaders is important for sustainable change, coherence of international support is also a priority
78
Peace in Rwanda post genocide
1. Background: Post-genocide, Rwanda faced enormous reconstruction challenges. 2. Strategies Used: Initiatives included the Gacaca courts, community-building programmes, and economic reforms. 3. Outcomes: Significant progress in terms of political stability and economic growth, though challenges like political freedom and ethnic reconciliation remain.
79
The role of education in preventing terrorism and genocide
1. Preventive Measures: The critical importance of education in promoting human rights, empathy, and historical awareness to prevent future instances of terrorism and genocide. 2. Educational Initiatives: Discuss initiatives like peace education, multicultural education, and the teaching of critical thinking skills to challenge hatred and fanaticism.
80
Challenges to resolving Violent Protests and Guerrilla movements:
1. Ceasefires and Peace Negotiations: Once violence has become entrenched, achieving ceasefires and initiating peace negotiations becomes increasingly challenging. Factions on both sides may have vested interests in perpetuating the conflict, making compromise difficult to reach. 2. Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Rebuilding societies torn apart by violent conflict is a Herculean task. Infrastructure must be rebuilt, social divisions reconciled, and institutions strengthened. International support and aid are often crucial in these efforts
81
Primary party: Non-state actors
1. Motiviations, Political, economic and social change and self determination 2. Methods of engagement: Insurgency and guerilla warfare and terrorism 3. A notable example is Farc
82
Just war Theory: Contemporary Philosophical Perspectives
1. Relevance in Asymmetric Warfare: Traditional Just War Theory doesn’t fully address conflicts involving non-state actors like terrorist groups. 2. Technological Advancements: Drones and cyber warfare introduce new challenges in ensuring discrimination and proportionality. 3. Cultural Bias: Critics argue that Just War Theory might reflect a Western ethical bias, not universally applicable or accepted.
83
Economic Interests in Conflict:
1. Economic interests drive conflict when parties compete for resources, market dominance, and economic control. Such disputes can occur over a variety of issues including but not limited to resources, trade policies, and foreign investments. 2. Resource Allocation: Nations or corporations may conflict over access to natural resources like oil, minerals, or water. The desire to control these resources can lead to both local and international disputes. 3. Trade Disputes: Issues arise from practices like protectionism, imposing tariffs, and creating trade barriers. Such disputes can escalate to trade wars affecting global markets. 4. Foreign Investment Conflicts: Occur when there's a clash over foreign direct investments, often influenced by concerns over national security or economic dependence.
84
Sociological Theories of Structural Violence
1. Conflict Theory: Views social structures as inherently unequal, based on power dynamics that favour dominant groups. 2. Symbolic Interactionism: Examines how social norms and values sustain structural inequalities.
85
The Cycle of Structural Violence
1. Perpetuation in Societies: it becomes normalised, institutionalised, and has a lack of visibility 2. Impedes peace: undermines social stability, fosters conflict 3. Sustains conflict: justifies direct violence, leads to a cycle of retaliation
86
Structural Violence Example: Gender Inequality
1. Context: Globally, women and non-binary individuals often face institutional barriers. Talk about Iran or Saudi Arabia. 2. Manifestation: This may be seen in wage gaps, underrepresentation in leadership roles, and inadequate legal protections. 3. Outcome: These issues reinforce traditional gender roles and limit overall societal progress.
87
Role of Education and Culture in Positive Peace
1. Education for Peace: Education systems that promote understanding, tolerance, and critical thinking are crucial in cultivating peace. 2. Cultural Diversity and Respect: Respect for diversity and multiculturalism can decrease tension and foster social harmony.
88
Application of Greed and Grievances in Conflict Analysis
1. Conflict dynamics frequently change, with conflicts transitioning from greed-driven to grievance-driven, or vice versa. Recognizing these shifts is critical in crafting effective conflict resolution strategies. 2. Addressing the root causes of both greed and grievance is fundamental to conflict resolution and peacebuilding efforts. These may include economic development initiatives, measures to address historical injustices, or diplomatic negotiations.