Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Psychology 333 > Chapter 4-5: traits, needs, motives > Flashcards

Chapter 4-5: traits, needs, motives Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
Psychology 101 flashcards GRE® Psychology flashcards AP® Psychology flashcards
1
Q

The trait approach

A

builds on how people intuitively think and talk about each other by translating the natural, informal language of personality into a formal psychology that measures traits and uses them to predict and explain human behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Personality psych and everyday human observations are

A

not so different

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Components of the trait approach

A
  1. based on empirical research that mostly uses correlational designs (trait predicts behaviour)
  2. focuses exclusively on individual differences
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

trait measurements are _______, not ________

A

ordinal

rational

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

ordinal data

A

ordinal data is a statistical data type consisting of numerical scores that exist on an ordinal scale, i.e. an arbitrary numerical scale where the exact numerical quantity of a particular value has no significance beyond its ability to establish a ranking over a set of data points.

can’t have 0

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Rational scale

A

Rational scale
measurements compared in terms of ratios
ex. could have a 0

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

people are inconsistent

A

there will be numerous exceptions to people’s general or usual way of behaving

situations are also important

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

older people are more ______ in their ________ than _________

A

consistent
personalities
younger people

older adults are more stable in general (i.e. have an established identity, career…

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Person-situation debate

Walter Mischel

A

which is more important for determining what people do? The people? or the Situation?

  • traits are poor predictors of behaviours
  • situations are better when accounting for differences in behaviour
  • personality assessments and everyday intuitions about personality are fundamentally flawed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Predictability

A

test the usefulness of a personality trait is whether you can use it to predict behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Situationist argument of predictability

A

predictive capacity of personality is limited

at best, correlations between personality traits and behaviour are about 0.3 (0.4 NIsbett)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Situationist argument of predictability: responses!

A
  1. unfair literature review
    - focused on studies that obtained disappointing results rather than the numerous ones with impressive findings
    - many studies were methodologically flawed, yet still found significant correlations
  2. we can do better
    - weak findings merely imply that psychologists can do much better reattach outside the lab
    - some people (and behaviours) might be more consistent than others
    - focus on behavioural trends instead of single actions at particular moments
  3. 0.4 is not small
    - comparison with an absolute standard: a correlation of 0.4 means that a prediction of behaviour based on personality trait is likely to be accurate 70% of the time
    - could also compare with a relative standard: ability of situational variables to predict behaviour
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Situationism

A

personality does not determine behaviour, situations do!

But:

  • often, the impact of the situation is presumed to be what is left over after subtracting the correlation of personality to behaviour
  • don’t tend to measure situational variables in a way that indicates precisely how or how much situations affect behaviour
  • can compare by looking at effect sizes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Funder and Ozer (1983)

A

compared prominent examples from social psychology of the power of situations to shape behaviour

  • Festinger and Carlsimth (1959) cognitive dissonance
  • darley and latane (1968) bystander interventiom
  • milgran (1975) obediance

2 possible conlcuions
situational variables are important
personality variables are also important
aggregate the results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Festinger and Calsmith (1959)

Cognitive dissonance

A

subjects paid one dollar found the study more interesting, because of the cognitive dissonance!
r = -0.36

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Darley and Latane (1968)

Bystander intervention

A

Bystander intervention
r = -0.38
r= -0.39

less likely to help if others are around

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Milgram 1975 obedience

A

r = 0.42, r = 0.36

2 variables:

  • isolation of the victim - further away the obedience was higher than when the victim was in the same room
  • proximity of the researcher - closer they are the more likely to obey
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Are person perceptions erroneous?

A

despite the situations critique, the effect of the personality on behaviour do seem sufficient to be perceived accurately

people really do act differently from each other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

The resolution of the situationist debate?

A
  • situational variables are relevant to how people will act under specific circumstances
  • personality traits are better for understanding how people act in general
  • in the long run, personality affects many important outcomes
    (people maintain their personalities even as they adapt their behaviour to particular situations)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Quality of information

A
  • the value of info you can gather about a person’s personality can vary from situation to situation
    (weak vs. strong situations)

common intuition is that you might be able to learn something extra about a person if you observe them in a stressful or emotionally arousing situation (may be correct)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Personality and life outcomes

A

personality affects life outcomes that matter to people (i.e. health, career satisfaction)

may affect so many outcomes because it is present throughout life

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Interactionism

A

the principle that aspects of personality and or situations work together to determine behaviour
neither has an effect by itself, not is one more important than the other

the effect of the personality variable may depend on the situation or vice versa

situations are not randomly populated, people change situations by virtue of what they do in them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Interactionism: students and caffeine

A

students performed worse after lots of caffeine

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

interactionism and hostile people/white noise

A

when hostile people were allowed to blast white noise at each other, they kept turning up the volume, this did not happen with the non-hostile people
hostile people create a more hostile environment for themselves

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Situationist side of interactionism

A

people are free to do what they want, rather than having their behaviour influenced by their consistent personality

everybody is equal to everybody else, and different outcomes are a function of the situations in which they find themselves

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

personality side of interactionism debate

A

appreciates the unique aspects of every individual

allows people to consistently be themselves

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

personality assessment

A

professional activity of numerous research, clinical and industrial psychologists, as well as a prosperous business

not restricted to psychologists

two criteria for evaluation (validity or accuracy): agreement and prediction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

evaluating personality assessments

A

two criteria for evaluation (validity or accuracy): agreement and prediction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Personality test examples

A 
MMPI
California Psychological Inventory 
Sixteen personality factor questionnaire 
NEO personlaity inventory 
Implicit association test

many are omnibus tests; theres measure just one trait

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

omnibus

A

omnibus: measure wide range of traits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

personality tests mainly take _____ data, but some use ______ data

A

S (results = how you define yourself)
B
(preferring to shower = emphathic response
replying to me vs. not me questions as quickly as possible to questions)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

shyness is best predicted by _____ data, but unconscious predictions of shyness are predicted best by…

A 
S
B data (people who implicitly know they are shy will have faster associations)
33
Q

Projective tests

A

a test that presents a participant with an ambiguous stimulus (a picture/inkblot) and asks the person to describe what they see

  • answers reveal inner psychological states or motivations of which the participant may be unaware
    ex. Rorschach, TAT, draw a person test
34
Q

projective tests provide ______ data

A

B

35
Q

objective tests

A

a personality test that consists of a list of questions to be answered by the participants as T or F, Yes or No, or along a numeric scale

not absolutely objective

ambiguity may be necessity for responses to imply anything about personality
( commonality scale of CPI)

use a large number of items!

36
Q

Why is it important to have lots of items on an objective test?

A

the principle of aggregation!

can improve the reliability of a test by simply making it longer

spearman brown formula

37
Q

Validity of the test depends on ______

A

content

38
Q

The rational method

A

basis is to come up with items that seem directly, obviously, and rationally related to what the test developer wishes to measure

may be based on pre-existing theory, or might reflect whatever questions the researcher find relevant

ex. WPDS
160 questions
these questions related to psychopathy for army recruits

39
Q

According to the rational method, the validity of the measurement depends on (4)

A
  1. agreement on the meaning of the items Between the test-taker and the developer)
  2. the person who completes it must be able to make an accurate self-abasement
  3. the person must be willing to report the self-abasement accurately and without distortion
  4. all of the items on the test must be valid indicators of what the tester is trying to make
40
Q

Factor analytic method

A

method of analyzing patterns of correlation in order to extract mathematically defined factors, which underlie and help make sense of those patterns

used not only for test construction but also to determine the # of fundamental traits

not much different form how people intuitively group things (i.e rides at Disneylands)

41
Q

factor

A

property that makes items alike

42
Q

Factor analysis steps

A
  1. after amassing a large number of items, collect data across a large sampling of people (sample should represent the group of people with whom you how to use the test)
  2. researcher statistically correlates the scores for each item with those for each of the other items (drop items that do not correlate highly)
  3. factor extraction: through statistical means, the researcher identifies mathematical factors which best account for the observed patterns of correlations. Each factor corresponds to a cluster of measures that correlate relatively strongly with one another and only weakly with items not in that cluster (0.3-0.4 or more)
  4. labelling the factors (its subjective, based on researchers conception of the combined meanings of the cluster of items that contribute most heavily to the factor being named. Each of these factor terms refers to a dimension of personality
43
Q

limitations to the factor analytic method

A

it is a statistical tool (not a psychological one)

the quality of info you get from a factor analysis will be limited to the quality of the items you use (GIGO)

once a cluster of items is identified statistically, the psychologist must still decide how they are related conceptually

sometimes the factors tat emerge don’t make sense

limited:
by quality of items that you put in to it
subjectiveness
factors that emerge don’t always make much sense

44
Q

the empirical method

A

based on the idea that certain kinds of people have distinctive ways of answering questions on personality inventories

  1. gather lots of items
  2. administer items to participants divided into groups you are interested in
  3. administer test to participants
  4. compare responses between the groups

ex. MMPI

items are selected solely on the basis of whether they are answered differently by different kinds of people, not content.

  • can include items that seem contrary or even absurd
  • responses are difficult to fake
  • are only as good as the criteria by which they are developed, or against which they are cross-validated
45
Q

empirical method: _______ tend to answer true to “I like tall women”

A

aggressive males

46
Q

Accuracy of personality judgment

A

convergent validation

two primary converging criteria

  • inter-judge agreement
  • behvaioural prediction
47
Q

convergent validation

A

the process of assembling diverse pieces of info that converge on a common conclusion
i.e. the duck test

48
Q

inter-judge agreement

A

degree to which 2 or more people making the judgments about the same person provide the same description of that person’s personality

49
Q

behavioural prediction

A

the degree to which a judgement or measure can predict the behaviour of the person in question

50
Q

Moderator of accuracy

A

the good judge
the good target
the good trait
good info

51
Q

Moderator of accuracy: the good judge

A

highly intelligent
conscientious

women are better judges in extraversion and positive emotionality

people high in communion

psychologically well adjusted

more optimistic = better judge

52
Q

communion

A

style of trying to maintain interpersonal relationships

53
Q

Moderator of accuracy: good target

A

judgeability

coherence and consistently in behaviour

extraversion and agreeableness

54
Q

judgeability

A

the extent to which an individual’s personality can be judged accurately by others

55
Q

Moderator of accuracy: the good trait

A

more easily observed traits are judged with higher levels of inter-judge agreement than are less visible traits

56
Q

sociosexuality

A

willingness to engage in sexual relations within minimal acquaintanceship with, or commitment to and from, one’s partner

57
Q

female judgements of ______ are especially accurate, but male judgments or _____ are even more accurate

A

males

males

58
Q

Moderator of accuracy: good info

A

more info is usually better
especially for certain traits

BUT advantages of longer acquaintanceship does not hold under all circumstances (there is a boundary on the acquaintanceship effect)

59
Q

connecting traits to behvaiour

A

single trait approach
many trait approach
esential trait approach
typological approach

60
Q

Single trait approach

A

focused on the nature, origins, and consequences of single traits of special importance

61
Q

conscientiouness

A

predicts better job performance, longevity, and health

high in this trait = do better in interview, get more promotions
also spend more time preparing
tendency to not procrastinate
these people tend to avoid risk and seek to protect themselves in case something happens
high in this trait
- lead longer lives
- engage in less risky behaviour

62
Q

realistic accuracy model

A

target -> relevance -> availability -> detection -> utilization -> judge - (accuracy) -> target

accuracy is achieved when all four have been met

63
Q

many trait approach

A

examine many traits at once

I data

ex. California Q -set
- consist of 100 phrases that each describe as aspect of personality that might be important
- raters sort the items into categories ranging from highly uncharacteristic (1) to highly characteristic (9)
- distribution is forced; usually is peaked or “normal”
- can provide I data or S data

64
Q

Delay of gratification

marshmellow study

A
  • denying oneself immediate pleasure for long-term gain
  • personlaity correlates of a behaviour measure at age 4 could be detected through personality assessments 1 year earlier and 7 years later

correlations differ by sex
- ego control (impulse control)
- ego resiliency (psycho adjustment)
- men worse at delaying gratification than females
- girls and boys showed similar pattern
girls that were attentive, resourceful, intelligent delayed the most these traits were missing from the boys
the boys who delayed the most were shy, …
in only the girls had ego control and ego reliance
boys had…

65
Q

drug abuse

A

adolescents who used illegal drugs by age 14 were described with the Q-sort nearly a decade earlier

regardless of immediate effects of the situation
the adolescents most likely to abuse drug had suffered psychological problems years before that

  • restless and fidgety
  • emotionally unstable
  • disobediant
  • nervous
  • domineering
  • immature
  • aggressive
  • teasing
  • susceptible to stress
66
Q

essential trait approach

A

identify the most important traits

67
Q

essential trait approach: Block and Block (1980)

A

ego control and ego resilience

under control can get you into trouble but resilience can get you out

68
Q

ego control

A

psychological tendency to inhibit the behavioural expression of motivation and emotional impulse
- over or under controlled

69
Q

ego resilience

A

the ability to vary ones level of ego control in order to respond appropriately to opportunities and situational circumstances

70
Q

Hans Eysenk

A

example of many trait approach
extraversion
neuroticism (unstable emotionality)
psychoticism (aggressiveness, creativity, impulsiveness)

most important traits should be heritable
should also be associated with particular aspects of physiology and brain functioning

71
Q

Raymind Cattell

A

many trait approach example

16 traits:
- socialble -unsocialble 
- intelligent - unintesligent 
- emotionally stable-unstable 
dom-sub
cheerful - brooding 
conscientious - undependable 
bold - timid 
sensitive - insensitive 
suspicious - trusting 
imaginative - practical 
shrewed - naive 
guilt proclivity - guild rejection 
radicalism - conservatove 
self suffiency - group adherence 
self -discipline - uncontrolled will

tense - relaxed

72
Q

the big 5

A
  • based on the lexical hypothesis: the idea that, if people find something important, they develop a world for it
    (many personality traits and synonymous terms in different languages)

neuroticism, extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, openness

factors are orthogonal
- stability and plasticity

73
Q

universality of the Big 5

A

may correspond to essential, universal questions people need to ask about a stranger they are about to meet

  • Extraversion: are they dominant/active or passive/submissive
  • openness: are they agreeable (warm and pleasant) or disagreeable (cold/distant)
  • conscientious: can I count on them?
  • neuroticism: are they crazy (unpredictable) or sane (stable)
  • smart or dumb? (intelligence)
  • personality questionnaires translated into various languages have yielded at least 4 of 5 factors (not openness)
  • analysis of the chinese language yielded 5 factors: social orientation, competence, expressiveness, self control, optimism
  • central attributes are similar to an important degree, yet are also different from one culture to another

funder’s third law: do the best with what you can

74
Q

beyond the big 5

A

may be more to personality than just five traits
- 6th factor: honestly-humility

concerns about the degree to which broad traits at the level of the big five (or 6) are sufficient for conceptual understanding

humour and cunning are often left off

75
Q

motivation

A

a drive is a set of psychological tension that feels good when it is reduced
- primary vs. secondary drives

implies that in the ideal state of existence all needs have to bee satisfied

76
Q

there can be no _____ without _______ a drive

A

reinforcement

reducing

77
Q

motivation: true reinforcement

A

the movement from a state of higher need to a state of lower need

78
Q

approach - avoidance conflict

A
  1. an increase in drive strength will increase the tendency to approach or avoid a goal
  2. whenever there are competing responses, the stronger one will win out
  3. the tendency to approach a + goal increases the closer one is to the goal
  4. the tendency to avoid a negative goal also increases the closer one is to a goal
  5. tendency 4 is stronger than tendency 3

Psychology 333 (3 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions