chapter 4 Flashcards

1
Q
A

A: Proof that the minor knew the wrongfulness of the act at the time it was committed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q
A

A: Age, intelligence, education, and experience.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q
A

A: Hiding the stolen product shows they knew it was wrong.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q
A

A: They help determine the minor’s capacity to understand their actions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q
A

A: Need for age-appropriate interventions and questions about rehabilitation versus punishment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q
  • ## Q: What challenges arise in proving a minor knew their actions were wrong?
A

A: Assessing cognitive development, interpreting behavior, and external influences.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Flashcard 1:
- Q: What does “Ignorance or Mistake of Fact” mean in legal terms?
-

A

A: It refers to a situation where a person is not aware of a fact that negates the legality of their actions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q
A

A: A man mistakenly takes someone else’s jacket, thinking it’s his own.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Flashcard 3:
- Q: How can a faulty speedometer relate to “Ignorance or Mistake of Fact”?

A
  • A: If a person drives over the speed limit due to a broken speedometer, they may not be aware they’re speeding.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Flashcard 4:
- Q: What is a key consideration in cases of “Ignorance or Mistake of Fact”?

A
  • A: Whether the person acted reasonably based on their understanding of the situation.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Flashcard 5:
- Q: Can children be held accountable for “Ignorance or Mistake of Fact”?

A
  • A: It depends on their age and understanding of the situation, like a child running after a ball and getting hit by a car.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Flashcard 1:
- Q: What is the defense of threat, duress, and coercion?

A
  • A: It allows the accused to claim they acted under threat, duress, or coercion, believing their life was in danger. Not applicable if the crime is punishable by death.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Flashcard 2:
- Q: When can the insanity defense be used?

A
  • A: When the person should not be held criminally liable due to a mental disease or disorder, proven by a preponderance of evidence.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Flashcard 3:
- Q: What must be proven for an insanity defense to be successful?
-

A

A: The person did not understand the nature of their actions or could not distinguish right from wrong.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Flashcard 4:
- Q: Name some other criminal defenses besides threat, duress, coercion, and insanity.
-

A

A: Self-defense, entrapment, necessity, lawful capacity of office, and legal duty.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Flashcard 6:
- Q: What is entrapment?
-

A

A: A defense where the accused argues they were induced by law enforcement to commit a crime they otherwise would not have committed

17
Q
A

A: A defense where the accused argues they were fulfilling a legal obligation when committing the alleged crime.