Chapter 4 Flashcards

1
Q

<p>

| Journal Articles</p>

A

<p>
Descriptions of studies published in professional journals. They are often subjected to peer review. Peer reviews are often blind (reviewers are not told names of authors and vice versa.).</p>

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

<p>Research Journal Articles have an IMRAD Format which means...</p>

A
<p>The paper is preceded by a title and an abstract, and concludes with references.
IMRAD =
Introduction
Method 
Results
And Discussion :)
</p>
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

<p>Abstract </p>

A

<p>A brief description of the study placed at the beginning of the article.

The abstract answers questions like the following: What were the research questions? What methods were used to address those questions? What were the findings? What are the implications for nursing practice?
Readers can review an abstract to judge whether to read the full report.

</p>

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

<p>Old Style Abstract</p>

A

<p>Single paragraph, about 100 to 150 words

</p>

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

<p>New Style Abstract </p>

A

<p>More detailed, with specific headings

| </p>

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

<p>An Introduction </p>

A

<p>Sets the stage for presenting what the researcher did and what was learned.

Description of:
Central phenomena, concepts, or variables
Study purpose, research questions, or hypotheses
Review of literature
Theoretical/conceptual framework
Study significance, need for study

</p>

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

<p>The Method Section </p>

A

<p>sThe method section describes the methods used to answer the research questions. In a quantitative study, the method section usually describes the following, which may be presented in labeled subsections:
Research design
Sampling plan
Methods of measuring variables and collecting data
Study procedures, including procedures to protect participants
Analytic methods and procedure

</p>

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

<p>In qualitative studies, the method section contains...</p>

A
<p>Research tradition
Sampling approach and description of study participants
Setting and context
Data collection approaches
Study procedures
Analytic strategies
</p>
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

<p>How do qualitative studies differ from quantitative in the method section? </p>

A

<p>Qualitative researchers discuss many of the same issues, but with different emphases.
For example, a qualitative researchers often provide more information about the study setting and context than quantitative researchers, and less information on sampling and data collection. Increasingly, reports of qualitative studies describe the researchers’ efforts to enhance the integrity of the study.

</p>

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

<p>The Results Section </p>

A

<p>Presents the findings that were obtained by analyzing the study data.
</p>

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

<p>What do Quantitative studies have in their &quot;results&quot; section? </p>

A

<p>Descriptive information (e.g., description of subjects)

Results of statistical analyses

Names of statistical tests

Value of calculated statistics-

=The value allows researchers to reach conclusions about their hypotheses. The actual value of the statistic, however, is not inherently meaningful and need not concern you.

Level of statistical significance

=If a researcher reports that the results are statistically significant, it means the findings are probably true and replicable with a new sample.

</p>

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

<p>Statistical Tests </p>

A

<p>Researchers use statistical tests to test their hypotheses and assess the probability that the results are accurate.
A statistical test helps answer the question </p>

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

<p>What do statistical tests help answer? </p>

A

<p>(If the researcher finds that the average birth weight of drug-exposed infants in the sample is lower than the birth weight of infants not exposed to drugs, how probable is it that the same would be true for other infants not in the sample?)

*A statistical test helps answer the question, Is the relationship between prenatal drug exposure and infant birth weight real, and would it likely be observed with a new sample from the same population?*

Statistical tests are based on common principles; you do not have to know the names of all statistical tests to comprehend the findings.

</p>

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

<p>Level of Statistical Significance </p>

A

<p>Index of how probable it is that the findings are reliable
</p>

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

<p>Example of a level of statistical significance </p>

A

<p>For example, if a report indicates that a finding was significant at the .05 level, this means that only 5 times out of 100 (5/ 100 = .05) would the obtained result be spurious. In other words, 95 times out of 100, similar results would be obtained with a new sample. Readers can thus have a high degree of confidence— but not total assurance— that the results are accurate.

</p>

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

<p>In qualitative studies, the &quot;results&quot; section has...</p>

A

<p>Findings often organized according to major themes, processes, or categories identified in the analysis
Almost always includes raw data—quotes directly from study participants
</p>

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

<p>Raw Data- </p>

A

<p>The actual words of participants

| unanalyzed data; data not yet subjected to analysis</p>

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

<p>The &quot;discussion&quot; section contains...</p>

A

<p>Interpretation of the results
Implications for nursing practice and for further research
Study limitations
</p>

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

<p>What is the purpose of a discussion section? </p>

A

<p>It demonstrates to readers that the authors were aware of the limitations and probably took them into account in interpreting the findings.

</p>

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

<p>Where are study limitations typically described?</p>

A

<p>The &quot;discussion&quot; section of the report </p>

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

<p>The style of research journals are often difficult to glean the &quot;story&quot; being told because of?</p>

A

<p>1. Compactness.

Journal space is limited, so authors compress a lot of information into a short space. Interesting, personalized aspects of the investigation cannot be reported, and, in qualitative studies, only a handful of supporting quotes can be included.

2. Jargon.

The authors of research articles use research terms that may seem esoteric.

3. Objectivity.

Quantitative researchers tend to avoid any impression of subjectivity, and so they tell their research stories in a way that makes them sound impersonal. Most quantitative research articles are written in the passive voice, which tends to make the articles less inviting and lively. Qualitative reports, by contrast, are often written in a more conversational style.
4. Statistical information.

In quantitative reports, numbers and statistical symbols may intimidate readers who do not have statistical training.

Objectivity &amp; statistical information are particularity prominent in quantitative research articles. </p>

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

<p>Tips on reading research articles:</p>

A

<p>Read regularly, get used to style.
Read copied articles—underline, highlight, write notes.
Read slowly.
Read actively.

Reading actively means that you constantly monitor yourself to verify that you understand what you are reading. If you have difficulty, you can ask someone for help. In most cases, that “someone” will be your instructor, but also consider contacting the researchers themselves.

Look up technical terms in glossary.
Don’t be intimidated by statistics—grasp gist of story.
“Translate” articles or abstracts.

You can do this by translating jargon into more familiar words, by recasting the report into an active voice, and by summarizing findings with words rather than numbers.
</p>

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

<p>Things to remember about critiquing research articles?</p>

A

<p>They are Careful and objective appraisals of the strengths and limitations of a study

Critiques of individual studies can be done for a variety of reasons (e.g., for a student assignment, for making decisions about whether or not to publish a manuscript, for EBP purposes)

They Vary in scope, length, and form, depending on purpose

They Can be comprehensive, appraising the substantive, methodologic, theoretical, ethical, interpretive, and stylistic aspects of both the study and the report (e.g., students can critique a single study to demonstrate their research skills.)

Critiques to inform EBP focus on whether evidence is accurate, believable, and clinically relevant.
</p>

24
Q

<p>What are research critiques? </p>

A

<p>A research critique is an objective assessment of a study’s strengths and limitations.

Critiques usually conclude with the reviewer’s summary of the study’s merits, recommendations regarding the value of the evidence, and suggestions about improving the study or the report.
</p>

25
Q

<p>Why are research critiques done? </p>

A

<p>To evaluate the strengths and limitations of a study.

| </p>

26
Q

Research Critiques can be facilitated by…

A

Using a formal protocol or critiquing guideline—although a one-size-fits-all guideline does not typically work perfectly (see guidelines for quantitative and qualitative studies in this chapter as models.)

Reviewing a model of a good critique

27
Q

What is an “Inference” ?

A

An inference is a conclusion drawn from the study evidence using logical reasoning and taking into account the methods used to generate that evidence.

28
Q

What are the Key Challenges in Research?

A

Designing studies to support inferences that are:

  • Reliable and valid (quantitative studies)
  • Trustworthy (qualitative studies)
29
Q

Why are inferences necessary?

A

Because researchers use proxies that “stand in” for things that are fundamentally of interest. A sample of participants is a proxy for an entire population. A study site is a proxy for all relevant sites in which the phenomena of interest could unfold. A measuring scale yields proxy information about constructs that can only be captured through approximations. A control group that does not receive an intervention is a proxy for what would happen to the same people if they simultaneously received and did not receive an intervention.

30
Q

Reliability

A

The accuracy and consistency of obtained information

31
Q

Validity

A

The soundness of the evidence—whether findings are convincing, are well-grounded, and support the desired inferences

32
Q

Trustworthiness

A

The overall integrity of the study’s evidence

. In general, qualitative researchers discuss this. Trustworthiness encompasses several different dimensions— credibility, transferability, confirmability, dependability, and authenticity.

33
Q

What are the dimensions of trustworthiness?

A
Dimensions of trustworthiness:
Credibility
Confirmability
Dependability
Transferability
Authenticity
34
Q

Credibility

A

A key criterion, achieved to the extent that researchers can engender confidence in the truth of the data and their interpretations

Credibility is an especially important aspect of trustworthiness.

Credibility is achieved to the extent that the research methods inspire confidence that the results and interpretations are truthful and accurate.

Credibility in a qualitative study can be enhanced through various approaches, but one strategy merits early discussion because it has implications for the design of all studies, including quantitative ones.

35
Q

Triangulation

A

-The use of multiple sources or referents to draw conclusions about what constitutes the truth.

  • Triangulation can contribute to credibility.
  • Triangulation is a useful strategy in both qualitative and quantitative research.
36
Q

An Example of Triangulation…

A

Carlsson and colleagues (2012) conducted a study to describe the accuracy of discharge information for patients with eating difficulties after stroke. They triangulated information from hospital records, interviews with nurses, and observations of patients’ eating.

37
Q

What is a key aspect of trustworthiness?

A

Credibility

Rationale : Credibility is a key criterion for trustworthiness. Reliability and validity are key for evaluating quantitative research. Triangulation is the use of multiple sources or referents to draw conclusions

38
Q

What is Bias?

A

An influence producing a distortion in study results.

39
Q

What factors create bias?

A
Lack of participants’ candor
Faulty methods of data collection
Researcher’s preconceptions
Participants’ awareness of being in a special study
Faulty study design
40
Q

What does “Research Control” involve?

A

Research control usually involves holding constant influences on the outcome variable so that the true relationship between the independent and outcome variables can be understood.

(In other words, research control attempts to eliminate contaminating factors that might cloud the relationship between the variables that are of central interest.)

41
Q

What is one method of addressing bias?

A

Research Control

42
Q

Confounding variables

A

Contaminating factors, things that influence bias.

43
Q

Randomness

A

Having certain features of the study established by chance rather than by design or researcher preference.

When people are selected at random to participate in a study, for example, each person in the initial pool has an equal chance of being selected.

This in turn means that there are no systematic biases in the make-up of the sample.

44
Q

What is An important tool for achieving control over confounding variables and for avoiding bias?

A

Randomness

45
Q

Blinding/Masking =

A

It is a bias reducing strategy, especially bias that stems from awareness.

Involves concealing information (usually about the study hypotheses or about participants’ status in different groups) from those playing a role in the study.

46
Q

Single Blind Masking

A

Only one group is blinded (e.g., study participants)

47
Q

Double Blind Masking

A

Two groups (e.g., study participants and people collecting the outcome data) are blinded

48
Q

An Open Study

A

A Study without blinding

49
Q

A closed study

A

A Study with blinding

50
Q

Reflexitivity

A

The process of reflecting critically on the self, and of attending to personal values that could affect data collection and interpretations of the data.

A strategy used primarily by qualitative researchers (e.g., they may maintain an ongoing journal to record their reflections before and during the study.)

51
Q

What kind of studies is blinding used in?

A

Quantitative

52
Q

Generalizability

A

the extent to which study findings are valid for others not in the study

53
Q

What kind of research uses generalizability?

A

Quantitative research

54
Q

Transferability

A

The extent to which qualitative findings can be transferred to other settings

55
Q

What kind of research uses transferability?

A

Qualitative research

56
Q

Thick Description

A

supports transferability

57
Q
A