Chapter 30 - Risk transfer Flashcards
When faced with a risk, each stakeholder can choose whether to:
TRAP RR
- Transfer al the risk
- Retain all the risk
- Avoid the risk altogether
- transfer Part of the risk
- Reduce the risk ; either by reducing the prob. of occurence or consequence
- Reject the need for financial coverage bcz it is either trivial or diversified
Each option for mitigating a risk can be evaluated by assessing:
SAME
- any SECONDARY risks resulting from implementing the option
- ANY cost of implementing the option
- MITIGATING actions for secondary risks
- the likely EFFECT on frequency, consequence and expected value
The extent to which stakeholders will pass on all or some risks depends on:
HR RAW
- HOW likely the stakeholder believes the risk event is to happen
- RISK appetitive of stakeholder
- RESOURCES that the stakeholder has to finance the cost of the risk event should it happen
- AMOUNT required by another party to take on the risk
- WILLINGNESS of third party to take on the risk
What are the benefits of reinsurance?
EVIL W
- access to EXPERTISE and data of reinsurer
- reduction in claim VOLATILITY and hence:
– smoother profits
– reduced capital requirements
– increased capacity to write more business - reduce INSOLVENCY risk
- LIMIT large losses arising from:
– a single claim on a single risk
–a single event
– cumulative events
– geographical and portfolio concentrations of risk - increased capacity to WRITE larger risks
What are the main costs of reinsurance
- Profit is passed from cedant to reinsurer
- Reinsurance premium is likely to exceed cost of benefits (in the long run) as it will contain loadings for expenses, profit and contingencies.
- Liability may not be fully matched by reinsurance
- Possible liquidity issues
- Reinsurer may default
- Reinsurance may not be available on terms sought
Define cede
pass on
Define treaty
covers a group of policies; the reinsurer is obliged to accept these risks from the insurer, subject to conditions (which are set out in the treaty)
Define direct writer
an insurer with a direct contract with the policyholders
Outline the two contract variations on which reinsurance may be arranged.
- Facultative:
- Arranged on a case-by-case basis.
- This is typically done for particularly large risks, but the insurer is not obliged to cede these risks to the reinsurer, but neither is the reinsurer obliged to accept them. - Treaty
- A defined GROUP of policies is covered by the treaty.
- The reinsurer is OBLIGED to accept these risks, subject to conditions as set out in the treaty.
What is proportional reinsurance
the reinsurer covers an agreed proportion of each risk
this proportion may:
- be constant for all risks covered ( quota share reinsurance)
- vary by risk covered ( called surplus reinsurance)
What are the key features of proportional reinsurance?
- Claims are split between the cedant and the reinsurer in pre-defined proportions.
- Does NOT CAP the claim paid by the cedant.
- Is written by TREATY.
- The two types are Quota Share and Surplus.
- Under QS, the proportion claim split is the same for ALL risks.
- Under Surplus, the proportion can vary by risk.
- The reinsurer may also pay the cedant a reinsurance commission, which can be used to provide financial assisstance.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of quota share reinsurance?
Advantages:
1. QS is useful for small, new or expanding cedants who want to diversify their risk, write more risks or who would like reciprocal business.
- Administration is relatively simple, since it is written by treaty and a constant proportion is ceded for ALL risks.
Disadvantages:
1. It is INFLEXIBLE in that the same proportion of each risk is ceded, irrespective of the size or potential volatility.
- A share of profits will also be passed to the reinsurer.
- It does not cap large claims.
What is surplus reinsurance?
it is proportional reinsurance and is written under a treaty. the terms of the treaty will give the direct writer the flexibility to choose how much risk to retain, but often within limits. the treaty would specify a retention level and a maximum level of cover available from the reinsurer
In what situation would surplus reinsurance and risk XL reinsurance provide the same cover?
Where the risk event can only result in the payment of the full sum assured or no payment tt all, there is no difference between risk XL and surplus. e.g life insurance, since payment amount is known with certainty before the time
What are the advantages and disadvantages of surplus reinsurance?
Advantages:
- The proportion of each risk passed to the reinsurer can vary from risk to risk, allowing the cedant the opportunity to ‘fine-tune’ its exposure. It is therefore useful where risks are heterogeneous in nature.
- Surplus is useful for cedants who want to diversify their risk, write more risks or who would like to be able to write larger risks.
Disadvantages:
- Surplus treaties are more complex and expensive relative to quote share due to the extra administration in particular of assessing and recording each risk separately. Therefore, surplus is generally more appropriate for larger, more heterogeneous risks such as commercial property.
- It does not cap large claims.