Chapter 3 - Sources of Criminal Law Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What principle was escorted in R v Sedley?

A

Judges could not make common law offences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What was the ratio of Frey v. Fedoruk?

A

Established that only that which was contained in the Criminal Code could be considered criminal. Udges may not make criminal offences at will.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What was the ratio of R. V. Henry?

A

Not all obiter dicta is binding, but some should be

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

The principle that the legal effect of the law will be measured by how the law will operate and effect Canadains was established in

A

Firearms Act )Canada
Supreme Court of Canada

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What was the ratio of Hunter v. Southham Inc.?

A

The purpose of the Charter is to Protect, within reason, the enjoyment of the rights and freedoms that it enshrines. Use for questions about the pandemic.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the standard of vagueness?

A

A law is unconstitutionaly vuage if it does not provide an adequate basis for legal debate and analyses, if it does not dfeliniate any area of risk, or is not intelligible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Which case established the standard of vagueness?

A

Canadian Foundation for Children, Youth & The Law v. Canada (Attorney General)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

A law runs afoul of the constitution when

A

the means by which the state seeks to attain its objective is fundamentally flawed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Which case illustrated the principle oof discerning when a law runs afoul of the constitution?

A

Bedford v. Canada (Attorney General)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was the ratio of Bedford v Canada?

A

Even if a law’s wording is in and of itself vague, it’s implicit limitations can still make it a specific law. Court’s role is to provide guidance to uncertainty, not direct conduct.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What section of the Constitution Act can save laws if they are deemed unconstitutional?

A

Section 1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

The ratio of R. v. Safarzedeh-Markhali was

A

Whether a law is in contravention of sec7 is dependant upon it’s the relationship between the law’s purpose and effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Laws can be struck down as…

A

vuage, arbitrary, overboard, or grossly disproportionate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly