Chapter 3 Process of assurance: planning the assignment Flashcards
1.1 Overview of the planning process
The audit strategy determines the scope, timing and direction of audit and determines the development of the audit plan. The audit plan shows is in more detail and shows how the overall strategy will be implemented.
1.2 Audit strategy
The key components of audit strategy are:
- Understanding the entity and its environment
- Materiality
- Risk assessment
- Nature, extent, and timing of audit procedures
- Direction, supervision, and review of work
- Other matters
1.3 Audit plan
An audit plan shows how the strategy will be implemented. The auditor is responsible for carrying out audit procedures to obtain sufficient evidence to support their opinion. Audit planning ensures:
- Attention is paid to the most important areas
- Potential problems are identified
- The audit is organised and managed
- Work is assigned to the appropriate member of the audit team
- Appropriate direction and supervision of audit team members
- Reviews by more senior auditors are facilitated
2.1 Understanding the entity – why
ISA 315 requires the auditor to gain an understanding of the entity. This is to assess risk, help design and perform audit procedures and develop the audit strategy and plan.
2.2 Understanding the entity – what
ISA 315 details the following aspects as important in gaining an understanding of the business:
- Industry, regulatory and other external factors, including the applicable financial reporting framework
- Nature of the entity, including the entity’s selection and application of accounting policies
- Objectives and strategies and the related business risks that may result in a material misstatement of the financial statements
- Measurement and review of the entity’s financial performance
- Internal controls
2.3 Understanding the entity – how
ISA 315 requires the auditor to use the following:
- Enquiries of management and other client staff
- Analytical procedures
- Observation of processes
- Inspection of documents or assets
- Prior knowledge of the client
- Discussions among the audit team
3.1 Importance of materiality in the audit
The audit report sets out the scope of an audit stating it involves “reasonable assurance that the financial statements are free from material misstatement”.
Materiality is an expression of the relative significance of a particular matter in the context of the financial statements as a whole. A matter is material if its omission or misstatement could influence the economic decision of users taken on the basis of the financial statements.
Performance materiality – set by the auditor to reduce materiality to an appropriately low level so the probability that the aggregate of uncorrected and undetected misstatements exceeds materiality for the financial statements as a whole.
3.2 Using materiality
At planning materiality drives the level of work carried out (whether to test a balance). During the audit, materiality influences the evaluation of audit evidence (if material an adjustment to the financial statements should be requested).
3.3 Identifying materiality
An item, error or misstatement may be material because of its size or because of its nature (transactions that must be disclosed in the accounts, between the company and directors). At planning stage, a level of planning materiality will be calculated, the rate used are:
- Profit before tax (5-10%)
- Revenue (0.5% - 1%)
- Total assets (1% - 2%)
4.1 Importance of risk assessment
Auditors usually adopt a risk-based approach to auditing. Risk is assessed at planning stage and re-assessed throughout the audit. Effective risk assessment should:
- Make the audit more efficient with work directed to problem areas
- Lead to fewer inappropriate opinions
- Result in fewer negligence claims against the auditor
4.2 The audit risk model
Audit risk = inherent risk x control risk x detection risk
Audit risk is the risk the auditor arrives at an inappropriate opinion in the financial statements. Such as stating the FS show a true and fair view when there is a material misstatement.
Audit risk has two elements: risk the FS contain a material misstatement (inherent risk is the misstatement occurs in the first place and the control risk is the client controls do not prevent or detect this misstatement) and the risk the auditor fails to detect any material misstatements (the detection risk is that insufficient work or poor judgement occurs).
4.3 Inherent risk
This is the susceptibility of a transaction, account balance or disclosure to material misstatement, irrespective of the controls in place. The risk can be considered at three different levels:
Industry level
- Affects the whole industry
- highly regulated industries such as banking
Entity level
- Affects the whole entity
- Company may not be a going concern; management get profit related bonuses
Balance level
- Isolated to a particular account balance
- Items which are complex or subjective
4.4 Control risk
The risk that a material misstatement would not be prevented, detected, or corrected by the accounting and internal control systems.
4.5 Detection risk
The risk that the auditor’s procedures will not detect a misstatement that exists in an account balance or class of transactions that could be material, either individually or when aggregated with misstatements in other balances or classes.
4.6 Significant risks
Significant risks require special consideration. ISA 315 identifies the following indicators of significant risk:
- Fraud
- Significant accounting, economic or other developments
- Complexity
- Related party transactions
- Subjectivity
- Unusual transactions