Chapter 3 Legislative Framework Flashcards
What is Convention 108?
C. for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of PD.
First legally binding international instrument in the field of PD
Why is Convention 108 important?
3 reasons:
- it is based on a series of principles (accuracy, security, access to PD), similar to GDPR
- protects privacy but also recognizes the importance of the free flow of PD for commercial and public functions
- legally binding - member states must implement its principles in national law
What is the purpose of Convention 108?
achieve grater unity between member states
extend the safeguards for individuals’ rights and fundamental freedoms in respect of automatic processing and flowing across national boarders
When and why was Convention 108 updated?
2018; includes additional safeguards to tackle challenges introduced by new technologies and practices
When was Data Protection Directive adopted any why
1995; the differences in data protection laws amongst EU member states were impacting the free flow of data
Advantage of the DPD over Convention 108?
Applicability to manual data - processing of manual data held in filing system is subject to the same obligations as the processing of PD by automatic means
Which Data protection Authority was established under DPD?
Article 29 Working Party - to examine the operation of the Directive and provide opinions and advice to the Commission
Which 2 legislative proposals emerged from the data protection reform led by the Commission?
GDPR and Law Enforcement Directive (LED)
What is a trialogue?
Process to negotiate a new law in EU between the Commission, the Parliament and the Council
When did GDPR and LED enter into force?
GDPR - 24 May 2016; enforceable from 25 May 2018
LED - 5 May 2016; must be transposed to national law by 6 May 2018
How long is GDPR?
173 recitals and 99 Articles, 11 chapters
Difference btw. recitals and articles
Recitals provide the theories and interpretations
Articles set out substantive obligations and contain the operative law
Main difference btw Directive and GDPR
- GDPR is directly applicable across all EU MS and doesn’t need interposing into national law
- GDPR applies to the controllers and processors
- GDPR applies for business outside EU if the use of PD relates to offering of goods or services to individuals in EU, irrespective of whether payment is required OR monitoring of individuals’ behavior in EU (eg. tracking of DS on the internet to analyse or predict their personal preferences triggers the application of GDPR).
Directive applied if the processing equipment was based in the EU - Putting individuals in control of their data. Stricter conditions for consent! Parental consent is at the discretion of individual member states.
- New and stronger rights for individuals - more control over their data
- more detailed transparency obligations
- new rights: portability (consent, contract), restriction of processing, right to be forgotten, in relation to the profiling
- same rights as DPD: subject access, rectification, erasure, to object
- a new accountability regime
- data processor’s new obligations
- International Data Transfers - BCRs, SCCs, approved code of conduct, approved certification mechanism
-
Security - obligations for controllers and processors alike. Notification of data breaches to individuals in case of high risk to harm
Enforcement and risk of noncompliance - individuals have the right to compensation for breaches for material or immaterial damages. High fines!
What is LED?
EU Directive for the police and criminal justice sector aimed at protecting citizens’ fundamental rights to data protection when PD are used by criminal law enforcment authorities
What are LED’s 3 main objectives?
Better cooperation between law enforcement authorities - enables them to exchange information more efficiently, improves cooperation in the fight against serious crime
Better protection of citizens’ data - including for the purpose of crime prevention, regardless if they are a victim, criminal or witness. Principles of necessity, proportionality and legality and appropriate safeguards for individuals.
Clear rules on international data flows - individuals must have the same level of protection as in the EU in case of transfer outside EU