Chapter 3: E FACTORS Flashcards

1
Q

Environmental risks, World Economic Forum.

A

The Global Risks Report 2019 from the World Economic Forum (WEF),1 environmental risks dominated, accounting for three of the top five risks by likelihood and four out of five by impact.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

The WEF categorises environmental risks into:

A

▶ Extreme weather events and temperatures;
▶ Accelerating biodiversity loss;
▶ Pollution of air, soil and water;
▶ Failures of climate change mitigation and adaptation; and
▶ Risks linked to the transition to a low-carbon economy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

2009, the Stockholm Resilience Centre (SRC)

PLANETARY BOUNDARIES

A

In 2009, the Stockholm Resilience Centre (SRC) led a group of internationally renowned scientists to identify and quantify the first set of nine priorities relating to human-induced changes to the environment that regulate the stability and resilience of the earth system.

This work was presented in a framework known as the planetary boundaries, within which humanity can continue to develop and thrive for generations to come.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Planetary boundaries and The WEF’s Global Risks Interconnections Map 2019

A

The concept of planetary boundaries and The WEF’s Global Risks Interconnections Map 20193 provide useful ways to understand the linkages and systemic relationship between the major environmental issues and how they affect companies and society as a whole.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Research published in the journal, Science, in 2015, four of nine…

A

According to an update of the research published in the journal, Science, in 2015, four of nine planetary boundaries have now been crossed as a result of human activity.

These are:

▶ climate change;
▶ loss of biosphere integrity;
▶ land-system change; and
▶ altered biogeochemical cycles (phosphorus and nitrogen).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

A. climate change;

B. pressures on natural resources, including water, biodiversity, land use and forestry and marine resources; and

C. pollution and waste.

A

There are numerous studies and frameworks that identify a range of environmental factors that are relevant to how investors assess risks and opportunities in their decisions. For the purposes of this syllabus, the environmental issues covered will include:

A. climate change;
B. pressures on natural resources, including water, biodiversity, land use and forestry and marine resources; and
C. pollution and waste.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Climate change

A

Climate change is defined as a change of climate, directly or indirectly attributed to human activity, that alters the composition of the global atmosphere and which is, in addition to natural climate variability, observed over comparable time periods.

It is one of the most complex issues facing us today and involves many different dimensions – science, economics, society, politics and moral and ethical questions. It is a global issue with local manifestations.

(e.g. extreme weather events) and global impacts (e.g. global warming, rising sea levels).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Biggest market failure

A

The warming of the planet caused by greenhouse gas emissions poses systemic risks to the global economy and will have far-reaching effects.

In 2006, the Stern Review5 concluded that climate change is a unique challenge for economics and the biggest market failure ever seen.

The review went on to state that “no- one can predict the consequences of climate change with complete certainty; but we now know enough to understand the risks”

Since then, the scientific and economic evidence that points to increasing risks of serious, irreversible impacts from climate change has become overwhelming.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

2018 report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)

A

Physical risk from a changing climate is already present and growing.

In the 2018 report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), human activities are estimated to have caused approximately

1°C (1.8°F)

of global warming above pre- industrial levels, and global warming is likely to reach 1.5°C (2.7°F) between 2030 and 2052,

if it continues to increase at the current rate.

The report further highlights a number of climate change impacts that could be avoided by limiting global warming to 1.5°C (2.7°F) compared to 2°C (3.6°F), or more.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

UN Environment Programme Emissions Gap Report 2019

7.6% per year

A

The UN Environment Programme Emissions Gap Report 2019 finds that even if all government commitments under the Paris Agreement were implemented, we are still on course for a 3.2°C (5.8°F) temperature rise.

The report tells us that to get in line with the Paris Agreement, emissions must drop

7.6%

per year from 2020 to 2030 for the 1.5°C (2.7°F) goal and 2.7% (4.9°F) per year to meet the 2°C (3.6°F) goal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

The IPCC affirms that the impact of a 1.5°C (2.7°F) increase in global temperatures will …

A

…“disproportionately affect disadvantaged and vulnerable populations through food insecurity, higher food prices, income losses, lost livelihood opportunities, adverse health impacts, and population displacements”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) number 13

A

‘Urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

However - given the systemic nature of climate change, addressing it with mitigation, adaptation or resilience measures can impact and help address all the remaining SDGs. Such actions are particularly closely related to:

A

▶ SDG2: Zero hunger through sustainable agriculture and aquaculture;

▶ SDG3: Good health and wellbeing through pollution control;

▶ SDG6: Clean water and sanitation;

▶ SDG7: Affordable and clean energy;

▶ SDG9: Industry, innovation and infrastructure;

▶ SDG11: Sustainable cities and communities;

▶ SDG12: Responsible consumption and production, particularly in the context of waste management and the circular economy;

▶ SDG14: Life below water (including marine conservation and sustainable aquaculture);

and

▶ SDG15: Life on land (including forest conservation, reforestation, sustainable agriculture and sustainable
forestry).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Business sectors that are carbon intensive are judged to be at particular risk from climate change. High
emitting sectors include:

A

▶ oil, gas and coal;

▶ heavy industrial sectors, such as petrochemicals, steel and cement; and

▶ the buildings and transport sector.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Climate change risk is best understood in terms of transition and physical risks:

A

Ok…

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

▶ Transition risks

A

are a result of changes in climate and energy policies, a shift to low-carbon technologies and liability issues.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

▶ Physical climate-related risks

A

result from extreme weather events, either acute or chronic risks from longer- term shifts in climate patterns, for example, higher temperatures.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

As climate change is a cross-cutting and systemic challenge, businesses are exposed to a range of potential impacts, for example:

A

▶ the risk of stranded assets in the coal, oil and gas, and petrochemical industries because of climate policy action taken to reduce emissions;

▶ growing stress on water resources, with implications for agriculture; and

▶ the physical impacts of climate change, for example the consequences of rising sea levels for installations on the coast such as oil refineries and nuclear plants, but also cities, buildings and infrastructure (e.g. roads, bridges, water supply and other pipelines).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

AFOLU…?

A

Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use (AFOLU)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Responding to climate change involves two possible approaches:

A

▶reducing and stabilising the levels of heat-trapping greenhouse gases in the atmosphere (climate change
mitigation); or

▶ adapting to the climate change already taking place (climate change adaptation) and increasing climate
change resilience.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Climate change mitigation is a human intervention that involves reducing the sources of greenhouse gas emissions (for example, the burning of fossil fuels for electricity, heat or transport) or slowing down the process or enhancing the ‘sinks’ that store these gases, such as forests, oceans and soil.

The goal of mitigation is to:

A

▶ avoid significant human interference with the climate system;
▶ stabilise greenhouse gas levels in a timeframe sufficient to allow ecosystems to adapt naturally to climate change;
▶ ensure that food production is not threatened; and
▶ enable economic development to proceed in a sustainable manner.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Examples include greater adoption of mitigation strategies and policies to promote sustainability include:

A

▶ Energy – renewable energy sources (such as wind, solar, geothermal and hydro or biofuels from sustainable sources).

▶ Buildings – retrofitting buildings to become more energy efficient and using building materials and equipment that reduce buildings’ carbon footprint.

▶ Transport – more sustainable transportation and infrastructure, particularly in cities (such as electric vehicles, rail and metro and bus rapid transit), but also decarbonising shipping, road and air transport.

▶ Land use and forestry – improved forest management and reducing deforestation.

▶ Agriculture – improved crop and grazing land management to increase soil carbon storage.

▶ Carbon tax – carbon reduction policies which penalise heavy emitters and promote greenhouse gas emission reductions.

▶ Industry and manufacturing – developing more energy efficient processes and products, as well as equipment and processes to facilitate carbon capture, power storage (e.g. batteries, pump systems), recycling efficiency, etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

In its 2013 report, Climate Change, Action, Trends and Implications for Business, the IPCC considered four potential futures depending on what policies governments adopt to cut emissions – from a baseline scenario of ‘business as usual’ to varying degrees of climate scenarios that require different levels of mitigation.

A
Business as usual (4Deg)
Some Mitigation (Likely 2Deg)
Strong Mitigation (Likely 2Deg)
Aggressive Mitigation (Unlikely 2Deg)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

adaptation and resilience

A

European Commission describes adaptation as anticipating the adverse effects of climate change and taking appropriate action to prevent or minimise the damage they can cause or taking advantage of opportunities that may arise.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Examples of adaptation strategies include a variety of development plans on how to deal with:

A

▶ protecting coastlines and adapting to sea-level rise;

▶ building flood defences;

▶ managing land use and forestry practices;

▶ planning more efficiently for scarce water resources;

▶ developing drought resilient crops;

▶ protecting energy and public infrastructure; and

▶ developing clean cooling systems.

Climate change adaptation and resilience measures require location-specific assessment of climate risks
and suitable approaches to address them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

In late 2019, Climate Bonds Initiative published the first Climate Resilience Principles…

A

In late 2019, Climate Bonds Initiative published the first Climate Resilience Principles, which provide a framework for developing location-specific climate resilience measures and financing them in the green bond market.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

A Framework and Principles for Climate Resilience Metrics in Financing Operations,

(multilateral development banks)

A

A group of multilateral development banks have also put forward A Framework and Principles for Climate Resilience Metrics in Financing Operations….

…. which provide guidance on how to create effective climate resilience projects and how to measure direct outcomes and wider system impacts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Cities (RISKS)

A

Cities and municipalities in particular are at the frontline of adaptation and resilience due to their high concentration of people, assets and economic activities.

Representing 80% of global gross domestic product (GDP), cities are heavily exposed to climate change risks in the forms of:

▶ sea level rise;
▶ extreme weather events, such as flooding and drought; and
▶ increase in the spread of tropical diseases.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

At the same time, cities are a major contributor of greenhouse gas emissions mainly from transport and buildings.

A 2019 report by C40…

A

All of these will have an economic and social cost to cities’ inhabitants, infrastructure, businesses and the
built environment. At the same time, cities are a major contributor of greenhouse gas emissions mainly from transport and buildings. A 2019 report by C40 outlines useful best practices of various cities’ climate adaptation strategies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Pressures on natural resources

A

The relationship between businesses and natural resources is becoming increasingly important due to the loss of biodiversity and access to natural resources being less secure.

For the purposes of this syllabus,
natural resources covers…

fresh water,
biodiversity,
land use and forestry and
marine resources.

Natural resources also include non-renewable resources (such as fossil fuels, minerals and metals), which cannot be replenished quickly enough to keep up with its consumption.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Governments and businesses are having to deal with increased pressure on natural resources, caused by:

A

▶ population growth;
▶ health improvements leading to people living longer;
▶ economic growth; and
▶ the accompanying increased consumption in developed and emerging economies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Simultaneously, these drivers are leading to the risk of **resource scarcity.

These developments are therefore compelling companies to become more efficient in the way that they use natural resources if they are to remain competitive and become more sustainable …

A

… this can help drive better financial management of resources…

… but also spur technological innovations that can have a beneficial impact on the bottom line…

… in support of a more sustainable and resilient economy and society.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Over-consumption of natural resources

According to the United Nations, the current world population of 7.6 billion is expected to reach:

A

▶ 8.6 billion in 2030;
▶ 9.8 billion in 2050; and
▶ 11.2 billion in 2100.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

The planetary boundaries model sets out the limits of the earth’s natural resources and naturally plays into
this debate.

Over-population has tended to be a taboo subject, especially because it is sensitive in developing countries.

A

Recently, as the interlocking trends of population increase, food production, non-renewable resource depletion and pollution generation have become more prominent,

…organisations have shown more
of an inclination to address the risks of over-population.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

Club of Rome

(The Limits to Growth) 1972

A

The Club of Rome, an organisation of eminent
global experts ranging from scientists to politicians, has continued – following the publication of what was a landmark book in 1972, The Limits to Growth – to focus on this theme.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

Population, Affluence and Technology

A

The prognosis is, particularly in the face of climate change and associated environmental pressures, that it is finally time to redefine growth in a more balanced fashion, addressing three factors in particular:
population,
affluence and
technology.

Central to the UN’s Sustainable Development Agenda 2030, is the importance of shifting to a more sustainable consumption and production model (SDG12), which is about meeting the needs of all whilst using fewer resources, including energy and water and producing less waste and pollution.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

Water

A

Nearly 70% of the planet is covered by water, but only 2.5% of it is fresh water. Water is a vital natural resource, not only for human consumption but also for a range of agricultural, industrial, household, energy generation, recreational and environmental activities. It is critical to many industrial processes, including minerals extraction and cooling for industrial plants. Water demand is set to increase in all sectors.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

World Economic Forum, water - connects - sectors - to broader economic system - must balance social development and environmental interests.

A

According to the World Economic Forum, water also connects these sectors into a broader economic
system that must balance social development and environmental interests.

As the world continues to face multiple water challenges, a decision to allocate more water to any one sector implies that less water will be available for other economic uses, for the public water supply and other social services, or for environmental protection.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

Water scarcity

A

Water scarcity is the lack of freshwater resources to meet water demand.

Water scarcity is present on every continent and is one of the largest global risks in terms of potential impact over the next decade.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

UN WATER

A

UN Water reports that over…

…two billion people experience high water stress across different countries, and about

…four billion people experience severe water scarcity …

…at least one month of the year.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

UN’s Sustainable Development Goal 6

A

The UN’s Sustainable Development Goal 6 is the need “to ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation to all”.

Water scarcity – caused either by economic factors such as lack of investment or by physical impacts related to climate change – continues to cause major concern, especially among the developing and emerging economies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

Biodiversity!!

A

Biodiversity, land-use and associated ecosystems provide a range of invaluable services to society that underpin human health, well-being and economic growth.

Ecosystem services are the benefits that people, including businesses, derive from ecosystems. Biodiversity (or biological diversity), as defined by the Convention on Biological Diversity, means the “variability among living organisms from all sources including, among other things, terrestrial, marine and other aquatic ecosystems and the ecological complexes of which they are part; this includes diversity within species, between species and of ecosystems”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN)

A

According to the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), biodiversity underpins ecosystem services, provides natural resources and constitutes our ‘natural capital’.

Some of these ecosystem services include food, clean water, genetic resources, flood protection, nutrient cycling and climate regulation, amongst many others.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

Natural capital

Natural capital is defined as:

A

“the world’s stocks of natural assets which include

geology,

soil,

air,

water and

all living things.

It is from this natural capital that humans derive a wide range of services, often called ecosystem services, which make human life possible.”

The importance of taking a natural capital approach is explained in more detail in Section 7, which discusses investment opportunities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

In 2019, the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES)….

A

In 2019, the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) published a landmark report, which showed that around one million animal and plant species are now threatened with extinction,

many within decades, more than ever before in human history.

The IPBES report provides a stark and comprehensive set of scientifically proven findings that highlight the deterioration of biodiversity and its ecosystem functions and services.

According to the report, humans have impacted over 75% of Earth’s land areas and 66% of the oceans.

This deterioration is caused by a combined result of land/sea use change, direct exploitation, climate change and pollution.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
46
Q

The WWF’s 2018 Living Planet Report shows an overall decline of 60% in species’ populations …

A

The WWF’s 2018 Living Planet Report shows an overall decline of 60% in species’ populations between 1970 and 2014, a trajectory it claims will likely be exacerbated by global warming. A major driver of this decline is loss of habitat, linked to overexploitation due to large-scale infrastructure and agriculture activity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
47
Q

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Environmental Outlook to 2050 projects a further 10%….

A

…loss in biodiversity by 2050 under a ***business-as-usual scenario, threatening the provision of these services.

Biodiversity loss is already causing severe problems for land use and marine industries, such as the fishing sector.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
48
Q

Other sectors that have potential risk exposure to biodiversity loss include:

A

▶ agriculture;

▶ the extractives industries (cement and aggregates, oil and gas, and mining);

▶ forestry (palm oil and timber); and

▶ tourism.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
49
Q

The ability to conserve nature and improve the sustainable use of natural resources can only be achieved …

A
...through transformative changes across 
economic, 
social, 
political and 
technological factors.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
50
Q

Land Use and Forestry

A

Land use management practices and forestry (also known as Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use (AFOLU)),
have a major impact on natural resources including water, soil, nutrients, plants and animals.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
51
Q

AFOLU sector is responsible for 23%

A

According to the IPCC, the AFOLU sector is responsible for 23% of total net anthropogenic emissions, mainly from deforestation, and agricultural emissions from livestock, soil and nutrient management.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
52
Q

The protection and management of land resources plays a vital role in ensuring the balance of nature and health of the ecosystem.

If not managed sustainably…

A

…it will negatively affect biodiversity, ecosystems and all the natural resources that humans depend on and underpin economic growth.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
53
Q

2019, IPCC, Special Report on Climate Change and Land, which highlighted notable findings. Among them…..

A

….the stability of food supply is projected to decrease as the magnitude and frequency of extreme weather events that disrupt food chains increases.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
54
Q

Forests. 30%. 4 billion hectares.

A

Forests cover approximately 30% of the world’s land area, or just under 4 billion hectares.

Forests are a vital part of the carbon cycle.

They convert the CO2 in the air to oxygen, through the process of photosynthesis, and, in this way, they can be considered a natural regulator of carbon dioxide

(which is underlined by the important role that the world’s tropical forests play in sequestering carbon from the atmosphere).

The more trees, the less carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, and the more oxygen there is.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
55
Q

Deforestation and Forest Degradation. 10–15%.

IPBES
Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services

A

Deforestation and forest degradation account for approximately 10–15% of the world’s greenhouse gas emissions.

The IPBES report states that:

“100 million hectares of tropical forest were lost from 1980 to 2000, resulting mainly from cattle ranching in Latin America

(about 42 million hectares)

and plantations in

South-East Asia

(about 7.5 million hectares)

(of which 80% is for palm oil, used mostly in food, cosmetics, cleaning products and fuel)

among others.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
56
Q

$$$ linked to deforestation (CDP)

A
According to CDP, up to US$941bn (£751.5bn) of turnover in publicly listed companies is dependent on commodities linked to deforestation, including:
soy, 
palm oil, 
cattle and 
timber. 

Soft commodity supply chain risks from these industries can affect standard financial metrics such as revenue, asset valuation or costs, which can impact the credit worthiness or market value of the debt or equity of investee companies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
57
Q

Exposure to Deforestation = Material Risks

A

Companies with exposure to deforestation in their supply chains may face material financial risks, such as:

▶ supply disruption;
▶ cost volatility; and
▶ reputational damage.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
58
Q

shifting business practices allows:

A

By contrast, shifting business practices to adopt more sustainable land management approaches contributes to:

▶ agricultural and economic development, both locally and globally;

▶ the health and stability of forests and ecosystems, and the continued provision of ecosystem services at an
increasing scale; and

▶ the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation and degradation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
59
Q

Marine resources!!!

A

The ocean is the planet’s largest carbon sink, producing over half of the world’s oxygen and absorbing 50 times more carbon dioxide than the atmosphere. It is one of the most valuable natural resources, providing seafood and is also widely used for transportation (shipping). The UN’s Sustainable Development Goal 14 is ‘life below water’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
60
Q

(OECD) Ocean-Based Value Add?

A

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) estimates that ocean-based industries contribute roughly €1.3 trillion (£1.2tn) to global gross value added.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
61
Q

What are the Ocean-Based Industries?

A

Oceans are also mined for minerals

(salt, sand and gravel as well as some manganese, copper, nickel, iron and cobalt, which can be found in the deep sea)

and drilled for crude oil.

The oceans’ resources are a source of economic growth and are also known as the blue economy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
62
Q

the blue economy.

A

According to the World Bank, the blue economy is the

“sustainable use of ocean resources for economic growth, improved livelihoods, and jobs while preserving the health of ocean ecosystem”.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
63
Q

SIDS and COASTAL ZONES

680 M People to 1 Billion by 2050.

A

Communities in close connection with coastal environments, small islands (including Small Island Developing States (SIDS)), polar areas and high mountains are particularly exposed to ocean change, such as sea level rise.

Low-lying coastal zones are currently home to around 680 million people (nearly 10% of the 2010 global population), projected to reach more than one billion by 2050

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
64
Q

OVERFISHING!!!

A

Due to the increase in the human population, the oceans have been overfished, with a resulting decline of fish critical to the economy.

In 2015:

▶ 33% of marine fish stocks were being harvested at unsustainable levels;

▶ 60% were fished to maximum capacity; and

▶ only 7% harvested at levels lower than what can be sustainably fished.

The control of the world’s fisheries is a controversial subject, as production is unable to satisfy the demand, especially when there aren’t enough fish left to breed in healthy ecosystems.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
65
Q

C. Pollution, waste and a circular economy!!

AIR POLLUTION!!!

A

Air pollution
Clean air is essential to health, the environment and economic prosperity. Increased air pollution:

▶ adversely affects the environment;
▶ has a negative impact on human health;
▶ destroys ecosystems;
▶ impoverishes biodiversity; and
▶ reduces crop harvests as a result of soil acidification.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
66
Q

World Health Organization (WHO) Evidence (More than 1/10th!!)

MEGACITIES

A

Indoor and outdoor air pollution are together responsible for more than one-tenth of all deaths globally each year, according to the World Health Organization (WHO).

Evidence by the WHO further shows that more than 90% of the world’s population live in areas with levels of air pollution that exceed WHO guidelines.

Urban air pollution is predicted to worsen, as migration and demographic trends drive the creation of more megacities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
67
Q

Pollution is the largest environmental cause of disease and premature death in the world today!!!

October 2017 by the Lancet Commission on Pollution and Health)

Compared to AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria, and to WAR???

A

Pollution is the largest environmental cause of disease and premature death in the world today.

According to findings published in October 2017 by the Lancet Commission on Pollution and Health, diseases caused by pollution were responsible for an estimated:

  • ** 9 million premature deaths in 2015 –
  • **16% of all deaths worldwide –
  • **three times more deaths than from AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria combined, and
  • **15 times more than from all wars and other forms of violence.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
68
Q

Water Pollution

Water is essential to all living organisms.!!

A

Yet water pollution is one of the most serious environmental threats faced.

Water pollution occurs when contaminants

**(such as harmful chemicals or microorganisms) **

are introduced into the natural environment – through the ocean, rivers, streams, lakes or groundwater.

Water pollution can be caused by spills and leaks from untreated sewage or sanitation systems and industrial waste discharge.

Plastic waste has also found itself in waterways.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
69
Q

Flint Water Crisis

A

n 2014, the Flint city water service in the state of Michigan (USA) changed its water source to
the local Flint River in an effort to cut costs. However, the water in the river failed to be properly treated and dangerous levels of lead leached from old pipes. This caused a public health crisis that endangered thousands of children and adults, and continues to have long-term health implications.

Flint residents have since filed more than a dozen lawsuits against the city, the state and the federal government. The state attorney general, on the other hand, filed a lawsuit against the companies that were involved at the time, including Veolia, a global utility company.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
70
Q

Waste and waste management

A

In view of the concerns about growing pressures on natural resources – combined with opposition to all types of pollution – waste and waste management has, in recent decades, become a bigger priority for policymakers, businesses and citizens.

Increasing consumption and waste levels are putting more pressure on space for landfill waste, which in turn is causing landfill taxes to rise.

Alongside tougher regulation on how waste is handled and managed, businesses are becoming increasingly incentivised to help economies, notably through recycling and by adopting a

**circular economy business model.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
71
Q

Campaign Against Plastics

Ellen MacArthur Foundation and the UN Environment Programme (UNEP) ‘best practices’ to address the plastic waste and pollution system.

A

A recent striking example of the public’s concern over excessive waste is the campaign against plastics, especially in relation to the serious damage that they are doing to our oceans.

This has led to actions by national and local authorities on waste management, and greater responsibility conferred on businesses to manage their waste responsibly.

A global commitment by companies led by the Ellen MacArthur Foundation and the UN Environment Programme (UNEP) has set a benchmark for ‘best practices’ to address the plastic waste and pollution system.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
72
Q

Commercial Recycling Incentives??

A

In most developed countries, domestic waste disposal is funded from national or local taxes, which may be related to income, or property values.

Commercial and industrial waste disposal is typically charged for as a commercial service, often as an integrated charge that includes disposal costs.

This practice may encourage disposal contractors to opt for the ***cheapest disposal option such as landfill rather than the best environmental solution such as re-usage and recycling.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
73
Q

Landfill and Incineration BAD.

**Hypothecated taxes, including the plastic bag charge, are designed to discourage waste and promote recycled usage and are becoming more popular.

A

Landfill remains the most common means of waste management globally. Incineration of waste is carried out in some countries; but it is a controversial practice owing to its generation of gaseous pollutants.

This has led to a rise of recycling waste in developed and, increasingly, developing countries.

Many consumer products (such as metal cans and glass bottles) are recyclable, although the practice varies by city and country.

A financial mechanism, which is growing in popularity in the consumer space, is the use of hypothecated taxes, including the plastic bag charge, designed to discourage waste and promote recycled usage.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
74
Q

Circular Economy

A

The circular economy is an economic model that aims to avoid waste and to preserve the value of resources for as long as possible.

That’s:

raw materials,
energy and
water.

It is an effective model for companies to assess and manage their operations and resource management as it is an alternative approach to the

use-make-dispose economy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
75
Q

The circular economy is based on three principles:

A
  1. design out waste and pollution;
  2. keep products and materials in use;
    and
  3. regenerate natural systems.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
76
Q

The government of the Netherlands has developed a programme for a circular economy…

A

The government of the Netherlands has developed a programme for a circular economy, aimed at

“preventing waste by making products and materials more efficiently and reusing them.

If new raw materials are needed, they must be obtained sustainably so that the natural and human environment is not damaged”.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
77
Q

Ellen MacArthur Foundation: The importance of a circular economy.

A

A recent report from the Ellen MacArthur Foundation, stresses the importance of a circular economy as a fundamental step towards achieving climate targets.

To illustrate this potential, the paper demonstrates how applying circular economy strategies in just five key areas
1. Cement.
2. Aluminium.
3. Steel.
4. Plastics.
5. Food
can eliminate almost half of the remaining emissions from the production of goods – 9.3 billion tonnes of CO2e in 2050 – equivalent to cutting current emissions from all transport to zero.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
78
Q
  1. SYSTEMIC RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN BUSINESS ACTIVITIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES
A

This Chapter EXPLAINS

The systemic relationships and activities between business activities and ecosystem services, including:

climate change and other environmental issues;

supply, operational and resource management issues;

supply chain transparency and traceability;

systemic impact of climate risks on the financial system.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
79
Q

Much of the understanding of key environmental factors in respect of business and investment centres on specific issues,

such as **climate change and **unsustainable natural resource consumption and production –

and on the negative impacts that businesses, consumption habits and investment demand are having on the health of natural capital stocks.

There is, however, less of an understanding of how businesses and financial activities depend on natural resources and properly functioning ecosystem services.

A

This is due to the difficulty in valuing and measuring natural resources and so, this has not been fully priced into the costs of doing business.

This is also known as the
**cost of pricing externalities*

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
80
Q

Climate change and other environmental issues.

Physical Risks

Over the last 20 years, physical risks have become an increasingly more important consideration of the business agenda.

The physical risks of climate change are a major theme and outcome of the science,

manifested in:

A

▶ more extreme weather effects, such as unprecedented rainfall (Houston in 2017) or severe drought and bushfires (southern Australia in 2018 and again in 2019);

▶ rising sea levels caused by the melting of glaciers (in Antarctica and Greenland), and the well-documented roll- back of Arctic ice;

▶ the acidification of the oceans and degradation of marine life, notably on coral reefs and plankton ecosystems; and

▶ the impacts on food and crops (The World Food Programme (WFP) sees major risks to food availability and access to food for developing countries. This is because lower food production could negatively affect incomes and increase the prices of major crops in some regions.)

All these impacts are set out in IPCC’s Special report: Global warming of 1.5 °C.

A manifestation of the economic consequences of climate change can be seen in the growing evidence of direct linkages between climate-derived catastrophes and business risks.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
81
Q

Energy Performance Certificate of E or better.

A

There is also growing awareness that the transition to a low-carbon economy entails policy, legal, technology and market risks related to climate change,

and can be particularly acute for high-emission businesses and economic activities that are highly vulnerable to climate change impacts.

For example, in the UK, a minimum level of energy efficiency standards introduced in 2018 prohibits private landlords from letting residential units if their

***EPC (Energy Performance Certificate) rating is E **

or lower, effectively creating stranded assets unless the landlord invests in energy efficiency upgrades to their properties.

In 2019, some of the UK’s leading commercial property owners representing more than $305 billion in AUM and +11,000 commercial properties globally signed a groundbreaking commitment to tackle climate change through the delivery of net zero carbon real estate portfolios by 2050.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
82
Q

According to the UN Environment Programme, policy and regulatory measures backing green finance have more than doubled since 2015.

A

According to the UN Environment Programme, policy and regulatory measures backing green finance have more than doubled since 2015,

and reporting and disclosure are a focal point for policy and regulatory action
– comprising roughly 25% of all measures implemented.

As multilateral organisations, central banks and governments step up their efforts to tackle climate change, the rate of policy action and demands on disclosure around climate change risks and risk mitigation are expected to increase,

posing a business risk in their own right if not or inadequately addressed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
83
Q

Relationship between natural resource and business.

In general, businesses and investment activities impact and depend on natural resources and ecosystem services in both direct and indirect ways.

The Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) — which is a global sustainability reporting framework —- explains the causes of

*****direct and indirect impacts and dependencies of businesses on biodiversity resources.

A

▶ A direct impact:

An organisation’s activities directly affecting biodiversity.

For example when degraded land is converted for the benefit of production activities, surface water is used for irrigation purposes, toxic materials are released, or local species are disturbed through the noise and light produced at a processing site.

▶ An indirect impact: the impact is caused by parties in an organisation’s supply chain(s).

For example, when an organisation imports fruits and vegetables, produces cotton shirts, sells construction materials or publishes books, the production of the inputs for these goods will have indirect impacts.

Indirect impacts can also include those from activities that have been triggered by the operations of the organisation.

For example, a road constructed to transport products from a forestry operation can have the indirect effect of stimulating the migration of workers to an unsettled region and encouraging new commercial development along the road.

***Indirect impacts may be relatively difficult to predict and manage, but they can be as significant as direct impacts and can easily affect an organisation.

Impacts on biodiversity can be either negative

(degrading the quality or quantity of biodiversity)

or positive (creating a net contribution to the quality or quantity of biodiversity)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
84
Q

Examples of sectors that rely significantly on natural resources and ecosystem services, with the potential to negatively affect biodiversity, include:

A

▶ agriculture, aquaculture, fisheries and food production;

▶ extractives, infrastructure and activities or projects involving large-scale construction activities;

▶ fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) companies – primarily through the sourcing of raw materials in products;

▶ forestry;

▶ pharmaceutical (in some cases);

▶ tourism and hospitality (in some cases); and

▶ utilities, including those involved in hydropower or open-cycle power plants generating significant thermal discharges.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
85
Q

Supply, operational and resource management issues.

Companies need to measure, manage and disclose the environmental impact (both positive and negative) from their direct operations.

Investors need to assess the extent to which companies understand the impact of their operations and manage resources, which are material to their business.

Environmental impacts from direct operations can include:

A
▶ toxic waste;
▶ water pollution;
▶ loss of biodiversity;
▶ deforestation;
▶ long-term damage to ecosystems;
▶ water scarcity;
▶ hazardous air emissions and high greenhouse gas emissions; and energy use.

Failure to address these challenges will expose businesses to additional risks, while working on solutions presents a business opportunity to develop climate-resilient business strategies.

The circular economy described in Section 1 is a useful model for companies to assess and manage their operations and resource management.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
86
Q

The UK Government updated its Environmental Reporting Guidelines in March 2019… KPIs!!

A

Providing guidelines for businesses to measure and report their environmental impacts, including greenhouse gas emissions. The guide emphasises the use of environmental key performance indicators (KPIs) to capture the link between environmental and financial performance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
87
Q

EU Commission adopted an ambitious

Circular Economy Action Plan

A

In March 2019, the EU Commission adopted an ambitious Circular Economy Action Plan to address the challenges of climate change and pressures on natural resources as well as ecosystems.

88
Q

Global mining and metals sector

A

The global mining and metals sector has a considerable impact on the environment and the community in which it operates.

In January 2019, Brazil’s iron ore producer, Vale, experienced a deadly dam disaster, which resulted in the deaths of more than 250 people.

The share price fell, wiping out 71.34 billion reais (£11.9bn) in market value.

Sustainalytics, a company that rates the sustainability of companies based on their ESG performance, immediately downgraded Vale after the dam collapse, and the company was also removed from Brazil’s ISE corporate sustainability index.

In February 2020, the International Council on Mining and Metals (ICMM) launched the Mining Principles.

These define good practice ESG requirements for the mining and metals industry through a comprehensive set of performance expectations, including self-assessments and independent, third-party assessments, in addition to transparent disclosure of the outcomes.

89
Q

Supply chain transparency and traceability

A

Supply chain sustainability is the management of ESG impacts and practices (during its production and distribution), throughout the lifecycles of goods and services.

Supply chains are complex to understand
due to the fact that they are heavily interdependent.

As such, the relationship between products and services and environmental risk factors are intertwined across sectors and throughout every level of the supply chain.

Companies are increasingly expected to understand, manage and disclose their exposure to supply chain ESG risks or are left exposed to reputational, operational and financial risks.

As such, it is becoming increasingly important for investors to factor into their due diligence and active stewardship a stronger understanding of the supply chain management of their portfolio companies.

Addressing emissions in industry and the food system presents a particularly complex challenge.

In industry, a growing demand for materials coupled with a slow adoption rate of renewable electricity and incremental process improvements, make it especially difficult to bring emissions down to net-zero by 2050.

In the food system, significantly reducing emissions will also be challenging and will require changing the consumption habits of billions of people, changing the production habits of hundreds of millions of producers, and decarbonising long and complex food supply chains.

Traceability is a useful practice to identify and trace the history, distribution, location and application of products, parts and materials.

This ensures the reliability of sustainability claims, in the areas of human rights, labour (including health and safety), the environment and anti-corruption.

90
Q

In the context of environmental factors,

CDP’s Global Supply Chain Report (2018),

Showed that greenhouse gas emissions in supply chains are, on average, four times as high as those from direct operations.

Examples of sectors with particularly complex and/or high-risk supply chains include:

A
▶ oil and gas;
▶ mining;
▶ beef;
▶ cocoa;
▶ cotton;
▶ fisheries;
▶ leather;
▶ palm oil;
▶ agriculture; and
▶ forestry.
91
Q

It is therefore important for investors to understand key areas of environmental risks as a result of supply chain factors.

Some of the main environmental risks in the supply chain include:

A

Some of the main environmental risks in the supply chain include:

▶ material toxicity and chemicals;

▶ raw material use;

▶ recyclability and end-of-life products;

▶ greenhouse gas emissions;

▶ energy use;

▶ water use and wastewater treatment;
▶ air pollution;
▶ biodiversity; and
▶ deforestation.

92
Q

Companies and stakeholders in industries with complex supply chains, such as the agricultural and retail industry, have joined forces to build global multi-stakeholder initiatives in order to trace commodities collaboratively.

Examples of global traceability schemes include:

A

▶ the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC);

▶ the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC);

▶ Roundtable for Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO);

and

▶ the Fairtrade Labelling Organizations International (FLO).

93
Q

Not-for-profit organisations offer measurement frameworks and tools that can help trace critical sustainability issues in company supply chains.

These include:

A

▶ The Sustainability Consortium (TSC), which has built a set of performance indicators and a reporting system that highlights sustainability hotspots for more than 110 consumer-product categories, covering 80–90% of the impact of consumer products.

▶ The World Wildlife Fund (WWF) offers more than 50 performance indicators for measuring the supply-chain risks associated with the production of a range of commodities, as well as the probability and severity of those risks.

▶ CDP and the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) have created standards and metrics for comparing different types of sustainability impact.

▶ The Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) has developed standards that help public companies across ten sectors, including consumer goods, to give investors material information about corporate sustainability performance along the value chain.

▶ The EU Taxonomy for Sustainable Activities and the Climate Bonds Sector Criteria provide sector-specific metrics and indicators to assess if assets, projects and activities across energy, transport, buildings, industry, agriculture and forestry, water and waste management, etc., …

are compliant with the Paris Agreement, and more specifically limiting global warming to 2°C (3.6°F).

94
Q

Notably, these and other measurement frameworks keep evolving. For example, in terms of greenhouse
gas emissions, the initial focus has been on **direct emissions from core operations (Scope 1 emissions) and supporting activities, such as from the **logistics fleet of a retail chain **(Scope 2 emissions).

However, there is increasing focus on how to measure and incorporate indirect emissions from the **whole value chain, including those produced by suppliers and customers **(Scope 3 emissions).

In parallel, a number of organisations, such as GRI and ICMA, are working on disclosure templates to promote systematic capture of information, streamline measurement scope and methodologies, and facilitate comparisons.

A

OK

95
Q

***Investors should assess whether a company in their portfolio has policies and systems in place which:

A

(i) clearly explain the environmental (and social) requirements that suppliers are expected to meet via a procurement policy (such as a supplier code of conduct); and,
(ii) enable it to assess environmental (and social) risks throughout its supply chain and discuss whether it has a mechanism in place to improve poor practices.

96
Q

Fast food companies WWOOOOWWWW

In 2019, a coalition of investment firms with more than US$6.5tn (£5.2tn) in assets under management, convened by not-for-profit, Ceres and FAIRR initiative, called on six of the world’s largest fast food companies to take more ambitious actions to tackle the climate and water risks within their supply chains…

A

In an open letter, the investors state that “animal agriculture is the world’s highest-emitting sector without a low-carbon plan”,

urging recipients to bolster the sustainability requirements of their respective meat and dairy supply policies.

WOOOOWWW

97
Q

Systemic impact of climate risks on the financial system*

Environment-related risks (such as credit, market, operational and legal risks)

as a result of environmental degradation (including air pollution, water pollution and scarcity of fresh water, land contamination, reduced biodiversity and deforestation)

on a company- or country-level are easier to isolate and identify than systemic risks resulting from environmental issues.

Investors, central banks and policymakers have become increasingly aware of the systemic risk implications of climate change for the financial sector.

As described in the previous section, climate change affects the financial system through two main types of risks:

A
  1. Physical risk:
    Arises from damage to property, infrastructure and land. Financial impacts of this can go beyond physical infrastructure damage, depending on the region supply chains can be particularly vulnerable. From an investment perspective, when investing in a company with global and complex supply chains it can be difficult to fully understand all its risk exposures.
  2. Transition risk:

Results from changes in climate policy, technology, and consumer and market sentiment during the transition to a lower-carbon economy. Transitional impacts on businesses and the financial system can vary substantially depending on scenarios for policy and technology changes.

98
Q

Climate risks are:

“far-reaching in breadth and scope. They will affect all agents in the economy, in all sectors and across all geographies. Their impact will likely be correlated, and non-linear. They will therefore occur on a much greater scale than other risks”.

In a 2016 report from the Grantham Research Institute…

A

In a 2016 report from the Grantham Research Institute at the London School of Economics, the climate

value- at-risk (VaR) of global financial assets reached US$2.5 trillion (£1.9tn) in a business-as-usual scenario and US$24.2tn (£18.7tn) at the 99th percentile of the probability distribution.

99
Q

Economist Intelligence Unit

US$4.2tn to US$43tn

VaR

A

The Economist Intelligence Unit highlights the economic cost to the asset management industry caused by climate change, through weaker growth and lower asset returns. It estimates the value-at-risk, as a result of climate change, to the total global stock of manageable assets ranges from US$4.2tn to US$43tn (£3.2tn to £33.1tn) between now and the end of the century.

VaR

100
Q

KEY “MEGATRENDS” AND DRIVERS INFLUENCING ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE IN TERMS OF POTENTIAL IMPACT ON COMPANIES AND THEIR ENVIRONMENTAL PRACTICES.

A

OK

101
Q

Growth of environmental and climate policies

LSE Study 2017

A

There has been a considerable number and adoption of environmental and climate policies in the last decade, with the majority coming from Europe.

The London School of Economics undertook a mapping of the global climate change laws in 2017, and found that there were 1,200 climate change or relevant climate change relevant laws globally, a twenty-fold increase over twenty years.

Since then, the number of climate and environmental policies has only continued to increase.

102
Q

In September 2019, the European Parliament Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (ENVI) published a study of EU environmental and climate legislation.

A

The study provides a comprehensive review of the ongoing state of play and key challenges for the next five years, covering climate action policies to environmental policies.

The study identified three thematic priorities:

  1. protection and enhancement of natural capital;
  2. establishment of a resource-efficient and green low-carbon economy; and
  3. protecting the citizens’ health and wellbeing.
103
Q

International climate and environmental agreements and conventions.

A

ok

104
Q

Kyoto Protocol (2005)

A

The Kyoto Protocol was adopted in 1997 and became effective in 2005. It was the first international convention to set targets for emissions of the six main greenhouse gases, namely:

  1. carbon dioxide (CO2);
  2. methane (CH4);
  3. nitrous oxide (N2O);
  4. hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs);
  5. perfluorocarbons (PFCs); and
  6. sulphur hexafluoride (SF6).51

The first commitment period expired in 2012, but was extended to 2020.

Negotiations at United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) conferences on measures to be taken after the second commitment period ends in 2020 resulted in the 2015 adoption of the Paris Agreement.

105
Q

Paris Agreement (2015)

At the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) in Paris in 2015 (COP21),

a landmark agreement was reached to mobilise a global response to the threat of climate change in the form of the Paris Agreement.

A

The agreement’s long-term goal is to keep the increase in global average temperature to well below 2°C (3.6°F) above pre-industrial levels, and to limit the increase to 1.5°C (2.7°F), since this would substantially reduce the risks and effects of climate change.

Although the Paris Agreement is not legally binding under international law, it serves as a significant landmark in tackling climate change on a global scale.

106
Q

Nationally determined contributions (NDCs) are at the heart of the Paris Agreement.

A

NDCs embody efforts by each country to reduce national emissions and adapt to the impacts of climate change, and require every signatory

(whether a higher or lower income country)

to determine, plan and report on its NDCs*,

with updates to commitments every five years, starting in 2020.

While commitments vary, they tend to fall in the 25–30% range of greenhouse gas emissions relative to 2005 by 2030.

Unfortunately, many countries are not on track to achieving their targets, according to Climate Action Tracker, and progress so far is not sufficient to keep global warming to 2oC (3.6oF) and avoid the consequences.

107
Q

As of November 2018 at the COP24, three years after the Paris Agreement was established, 195 UNFCCC members have signed the agreement, and 184 have now ratified it.

A

▶ At the 2018 COP24 in Katowice, Poland, the parties reaffirmed their intention to implement the Paris Agreement and the process by which national governments must enhance their individual emissions reduction pledge.

▶ At the COP25 in Madrid in 2019, no consensus was reached on Article 6 of the Paris Agreement relating to carbon markets. At COP26 in Glasgow in 2020, all countries who have signed up to the Paris Agreement will need to reach a binding agreement with respect to Article 6.

108
Q

Policy action on climate change at a national and international level is a source of investment risk and opportunity. The transition to a low-carbon economy may affect company cash flows and profitability. This may result in ‘stranded assets’…

A

…where the value of certain assets is significantly reduced because they are rendered obsolete or non-performing from a financial perspective.

109
Q

the UN Sustainable Development Goals; also agreed by the UN General Assembly in 2015…

A

… either in their entirety or individually,

…are now regularly cited by corporate and investment actors as material to their business planning and operations.

110
Q

And the historic Kigali Agreement of 2016…

A

…a global agreement to phase out the manufacture of ozone-depleting hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) substances by 80–85% against their baselines by 2045.

111
Q

Other International initiatives…

A

…Apart from the 2015 Paris Agreement which has no doubt been the most instrumental driver.

112
Q

EU Sustainable Finance Action Plan!!

European Commission’s capital markets union (CMU)…

A

which aims at deepening and further integrating the capital markets of EU member states through “Investing for long term, infrastructure and sustainable investment”.

113
Q

In October 2016, a High-Level Expert Group (HLEG) on Sustainable Finance was established and in January 2018, the final report set out its recommendations for:

A

▶ a classification system, or ‘taxonomy’, to provide market clarity on what is ‘sustainable’;

▶ clarifying the duties of investors when it comes to achieving a more ***sustainable financial system;

▶ improving disclosure by financial institutions and companies on ***how sustainability is factored into their decision-making;

▶ an EU-wide label for green investment funds
***(the Ecolabel);

▶ making sustainability part of the mandates of the ***European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs); and

▶ a European standard for ***green bonds.

114
Q

EU Taxonomy

One of the most heavily debated topics by the investment community has been the EU taxonomy.

A

To reduce the risk of ‘green-washing’ of financial products.

The taxonomy provides a classification system to determine whether an economic activity is environmentally sustainable.

115
Q

Inclusion in the taxonomy is restricted to activities that contribute to at least one of the six environmental objectives:

A

▶ climate change mitigation;

▶ climate change adaptation;

▶ sustainable use of protection of water and marine resources;

▶ transition to a circular economy, waste prevention and recycling;

▶ pollution prevention and control;
and
▶ protection of healthy ecosystems.

116
Q

Under the proposed taxonomy regulation, institutional investors and asset managers offering investment products as environmentally sustainable would need to explain whether, and how they have used the taxonomy criteria.

A

Full details are published in the June 2019 report by the Technical Expert Group (TEG), which was open for public consultation. A supplementary report on using the taxonomy provides further guidance and examples.

Technical Expert Group (TEG)

117
Q

2019 - 2020 Technical Expert Group (TEG)

taxonomy for green economic activities

A

At the end of 2019, the EU co-legislators reached a common understanding on the taxonomy for green economic activities, which will be subject to approval by the European Parliament and the Council in 2020.

118
Q

Climate benchmarks – Technical Expert Group (TEG)

A

Another area led by the TEG is the creation of Climate Benchmarks as a pillar for climate resilient risk management.

119
Q

Two EU climate benchmarks for equities and corporate bonds are to be adopted in early 2020:

−30% and −50%

A

They start at −30% and −50% greenhouse gas intensity compared with the investable universe:

▶ EU Paris-aligned Benchmark (EU PAB) must achieve a 7% year-on-year reduction in CO2 emissions plus a 1.5°C (2.7°F) limit to global temperature rises by 2050, and excludes fossil fuel companies; and

▶ EU Climate Transition Benchmark (EU CTB) has similar targets but permits fossil fuel investments as part of a transition process.

120
Q

EU Commission’s Sustainable Action Plan

A

Further progress on developments from the
EU Commission’s Sustainable Action Plan

will continue to play a pivotal role in the development of the markets towards greater harmonisation in the financial markets, thereby influencing policy.

121
Q

European Banking Authority’s Action plan on sustainable finance, published in late 2019, outlines the EBA approach….

A

…starting with defining key metrics and strategies, risk management and moving towards scenario analysis and evidence for any adjustments to risk weights.

Among other initiatives, the regulator
will look into the evidence around the prudential treatment of ’green’ exposures, which would be expected to impact pricing of a wide variety of instruments.

122
Q

According to the action plan it published in early 2020, the EU securities markets regulator ESMA, set out to increase its focus on sustainability by integrating ESG factors in its work.

A

This includes looking at climate stress testing, risks from green bonds, and getting credit rating agencies to incorporate ESG factors.

123
Q

Country-Level Policy and Prudential Actions

The French Energy Transition Law

A

Countries and regions are leading the way in influencing the regulatory framework to promote the economic and financial mainstreaming of climate change and environmental factors.

An example of this is The French Energy Transition Law, which took effect in January 2016, and requires major institutional investors and asset management companies to explain how they take ESG criteria into account in their risk management and investment policies.

124
Q

UK

U.K. Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), published its first ever consultation on climate change in 2018.

At the same time, the UK Government’s Environmental Audit Committee (EAC) wrote to the largest 25 UK pension schemes on climate change risk.

The UK Department for Work and Pensions followed up in June 2018 with a proposal that corporate pension fund trustees should publish a fund statement of investment principles (SIP) by October 2019 that takes account of financially material ESG issues; climate change was singled out here.

A

The UK Pensions Regulator has issued guidance to pension funds relating to ESG and climate change along similar lines.

From 1 October 2020, *trustees of defined contribution (DC) pension schemes will be required to produce an implementation report setting out how they acted on the principles set out in the SIP.

125
Q

Another national leader is China…

A

…which has become a key player in the growing green bonds market.

China has begun combining its global leadership position on renewable energy with a greater desire for its financial system to address climate and the environment.

Chinese policymakers are also increasingly engaging with the EU on issues such as a green taxonomy and environmental disclosure.

126
Q

Carbon Markets

A

There is a growing consensus among both governments, the financial community and businesses on the fundamental role of

CARBON PRICING

in the transition to a

DECARBONISED ECONOMY.

Putting a price on

carbon emissions

is viewed as one of the most effective methods of tackling climate change: the

**‘polluter pays principle’*.

127
Q

Emission Trading System (ETS) and Carbon Tax

A

There are many types of carbon pricing; the most common are the

emission trading system (ETS) and carbon tax.

An ETS is a system where emitters can trade emission units to meet their emission targets.

On the other hand, a carbon tax directly sets a price on carbon by defining an explicit tax rate on greenhouse gas emissions, for example a price per tonne CO2e.

128
Q

UK AND EU 2000s.

European Union Emissions Trading System (ETS) in 2005.

A

Carbon pricing and the trading of emissions trading certificates were initially trialled in the UK in the early 2000s.

The European Union subsequently adopted emissions trading as one of its flagship climate policies with the establishment of the European Union Emissions Trading System (ETS) in 2005.

The ETS covers the main energy and carbon-intensive industries, regulating about half the European economy with a carbon price.

129
Q

A fully-fledged national Chinese scheme is expected to launch in 2020.

A

The growth of national carbon pricing schemes since then has been sporadic.

However, schemes are now also operating in California, the Eastern seaboard of the USA, New Zealand, South Korea and some Canadian provinces.

Following the running of pilot schemes in some Chinese provinces, a fully-fledged national Chinese scheme is expected to launch in 2020.

When it does, it will become the largest carbon market in the world, superseding the EU ETS.

The global aviation industry also plans to cap emissions from 2021 via the use of carbon offsets.

130
Q

SHADOW CARBON PRICING

Creates a theoretical or assumed cost per ton of carbon emissions.

*** Enables businesses to build this factor into future valuations

Investors use shadow carbon pricing in their financial analysis.

A

Over the last ten years, many companies – especially in energy-intensive sectors – have used the practice of shadow carbon pricing to guide their decision making process.

An internal or shadow price on carbon creates
a theoretical or assumed cost per ton of carbon emissions.

Shadow pricing is used to better understand
the potential impact of external carbon pricing on the profitability of a project, a new business model or an investment.

Its use reveals hidden risks and enables businesses to build this factor into future valuations and estimates of capital expenditure.

In addition, when emissions bear a cost in profit-and-loss statements, it helps to uncover inefficiencies and incentivise low carbon innovation within departments, cutting a company’s energy use and carbon pollution.

Likewise, investors use shadow carbon pricing in their financial analysis.

Some governments are using internal carbon pricing as a tool in their procurement process, policy design and project assessments in relation to climate change impacts.

More recently, financial institutions have also begun using internal carbon pricing to assess their project portfolio.

131
Q

CDP report

1,300 companies

US$7tn (£5.4tn)

Reported that they are currently using an internal price on carbon or plan to do so.

A

According to a CDP report, over 1,300 companies – including more than 100 Fortune Global 500 companies with a total annual revenue of about US$7tn (£5.4tn) – reported that they are currently using an internal price on carbon or plan to do so.

132
Q

Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures

MOST INFLUENTIAL

(TCFD)

Mark Carney 2015 Financial Stability Board (FSB)

Carney Was President

A

The most influential international framework for disclosure of climate change risks and opportunities affecting companies and financial institutions is the framework from the

Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD).

133
Q

Having identified climate change as a potential systemic threat to the stability of the financial system, with large-scale and long-term challenges, the G20 finance ministers and Central Bank governors asked the Financial Stability Board (FSB) to review how the financial sector can best take account of climate-related issues.

In December 2015, following his speech that climate change is a “tragedy of the horizon”, Mark Carney, the Chair of the FSB and Governor of the Bank of England, announced the formation of the TCFD. In his speech, Carney emphasised that:

A

“The risks of inadequate information can lead to a mispricing of assets and misallocation of capital and can potentially give rise to concerns about financial stability since markets can be vulnerable to abrupt corrections”.

Furthermore:

“Climate change is the tragedy of the horizon. We don’t need an army of actuaries to tell us that the catastrophic impacts of climate change will be felt beyond the traditional horizons of most actors – imposing a cost on future generations that the current generation has no direct incentive to fix”

134
Q

The TCFD set out to provide a set of recommendations and a framework for companies and financial institutions to provide better information to support investors, lenders, insurers and other financial stakeholders to identify, build and quantify climate-related risks (and opportunities) into their decisions…

A

…The TCFD also took the view that better information will help investors engage with companies on the resilience of their strategies and capital spending, including more efficient allocation of capital, which should help to promote a smooth transition to a more sustainable, low-carbon economy.

135
Q

In July 2017, the TCFD published its final recommendations::::::

A

That “one of the most significant, and perhaps most misunderstood, risks that organisations face today relates to climate change”.

136
Q

The recommendations are structured around four thematic areas that represent core elements of how organisations operate:

A

▶ Governance;
▶ Strategy;
▶ Risk management; and
▶ Metrics and targets.

137
Q

TCFD CORE ELEMENTS OF CLIMATE-RELATED FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES

A

▶ Governance
The organisation’s governance around climate-related risks and opportunities.

▶ Strategy
The actual and potential impacts of climate-related risks and opportunities on the organisation’s businesses, strategy and financial planning.

▶ Risk management
The processes used by the organisation to identify, assess and manage climate-related risks.

▶ Metrics and targets
The metrics and targets used to assess and manage relevant climate-related risks and opportunities.

138
Q

Types of risk
As defined by the TCFD, climate-related risks are categorised into

TRANSITION RISK

and

PHYSICAL RISK

A
  1. Transition Risk - The Risk Arising from Transition to a Low Carbon Economy.

Transitioning to a lower-carbon economy may entail extensive policy, legal, technology and market changes to address mitigation and adaptation requirements related to climate change. Depending on the nature, speed and focus of these changes, transition risks may pose varying levels of financial and reputational risk to organisations.

  1. Physical risk – risks related to the physical impacts of climate change.

Physical risks resulting from climate change can be event driven (acute) or longer-term shifts (chronic) in climate patterns.

Physical risks may have financial implications for organisations, such as direct damage to assets and indirect impacts from supply chain disruption.

Examples of physical climate risks include risk of floods, drought and hurricanes.

139
Q

GROWING SUPPORT

TCDF 2019

A

A growing number of public and private sector organisations are showing their support for the TCFD recommendations, including global companies, banks, insurers, asset managers, stock exchanges and governments.

The TCFD’s Status Report in 2019 provides an encouraging overview of the progress and adoption of climate-related disclosure by major financial and non-financial institutions.

140
Q

Other climate-related initiatives

Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS)

A

The NGFS is a coalition of central banks and was set up to strengthen the global response required to meet the goals of the Paris agreement and to enhance the role of the financial system to manage risks and to mobilise capital for green and low-carbon investments in the broader context of environmentally sustainable development.

In April 2019, the NGFS published its first comprehensive report, which proposes recommendations aimed at facilitating the role of the financial sector in achieving the objectives of the Paris Agreement.

This report is a significant step for the financial industry as it demonstrates that central and supervisory bodies recognise the importance of climate-related risks as a source of financial risk and are working collectively to ensure the financial system is resilient to these risks.

141
Q

4

ASSESSMENT OF MATERIALITY OF ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES

A

Assess material impacts of environmental issues on potential investment opportunities,

including the dangers of overlooking them:

corporate and project finance; public finance initiatives; asset management.

142
Q

**Material environmental issues **

are factors that could have a significant impact –

— both positive and negative –

on a company’s business model and value drivers, such as:

operating and capital expenditure,
revenue growth,
margins and risk.

A

it is clear that environmental factors, such as climate change, can influence the ability of a business (and industry) to produce goods and services.

These impacts can be immediate, for example, if flooding causes a business to close temporarily, or they can occur over time in a more dynamic sense, for instance by increasing the costs of operating in a specific location to the point where relocation or closure are the only viable options for the business.

143
Q

Furthermore, a business can experience direct impacts, such as business interruption and damage to physical assets in case of a windstorm, or indirect impacts through public policy or market changes such as rising demand for flood resilient materials or increased competition for certain resources

INSURANCE!!!

A

The macroeconomic impacts of such climate-related events have been most important to the insurance industry, and are becoming of increasing interest to institutions involved in…

Project finance,
Corporate finance and
Investment.

144
Q

Analytical scope and sophistication.

This includes, for example, considering a wider range of environmental factors, such as those from policy and technology responses (transition risks),

as well as the impacts of environmental events and physical risks.

A

Efforts by investors to assess the material financial impacts caused by environmental risks have begun to increase in terms of their analytical scope and sophistication. This includes, for example, considering a wider range of environmental factors, such as those from policy and technology responses (transition risks), as well as the impacts of environmental events and physical risks.

145
Q

Investors need to undertake relevant research and materiality analysis to determine the environmental impact – both positive and negative.

The type of analysis and approach will mostly be dependent on the type of assets being assessed – company, sector and geographic location, and on a portfolio level.

A

Based on both quantitative and qualitative data, environmental analysis will potentially determine adjustments to forecasted:

financials and ratios,

valuation-model variables,

valuation multiples,

credit assessments and

portfolio allocation weightings.

The challenge however is that definitions and classifications of measuring the level of risk in environmental factors vary and environmental risk is complex to analyse.

146
Q

Corporate and project finance

A

At a company or project level, investors looking to identify and measure a company’s environmental impact or materiality would need to analyse both quantitative and qualitative environmental factors in order to make an informed evaluation of the environmental risks embedded within.

A judgment is then made on how material the risks are and whether those risks are priced in or not.

A scoring system is also typically used to benchmark the company against its peers.

Materiality is also highly influenced by the industry/sector of the company, as well as its country and jurisdictions where projects are located.

This is also particularly relevant in the financing and investments of infrastructure projects.

Investors can assess the materiality of specific environmental risks by analysing the rate of a company’s utilisation or consumption in critical natural resources, such as energy, water and waste.

147
Q

▶ Energy consumption

A

…can be measured by the level of absolute emissions of greenhouse gases from fossil fuel combustion and industrial processes, and is measured by the amount of CO2e.

This could also include savings in energy and performance relative to a benchmark year, and can be provided on an annualised or lifetime basis, based on estimates (particularly relevant for projects) or actual measurement (relevant to operational assets).

148
Q

▶ Water utilisation

A

can be calculated as the costs generated by water usage efficiency in operations taken directly from the ground, surface waters or purchased.

Water and wastewater treatment can be assessed against *indicators tracking reductions in pollutants and harmful substances in supply areas, as well as incident reports and sanctions.

149
Q

▶ Waste utilisation

A

… is measured as the costs generated from the disposal of waste in operations such as through landfill, incinerated waste, recycled or hazardous waste.

Aspects that may need to be factored into the analysis include carbon capture and storage (e.g. for closed landfill, industrial operations), pollution control (soil, air, water), waste-to-energy facilities and waste-to-biofuel.

150
Q

The Transition Pathway Initiative (TPI)

A

At corporate level,

materiality could also be relative within the industry or peer group.

The Transition Pathway Initiative (TPI), a global, asset-owner led initiative, which assesses companies’ preparedness for the transition to a low carbon economy has developed a tool to benchmark companies
against their peers in terms of climate policy and maps their commitments to a decarbonisation transition trajectory by sector and overall.

151
Q

International Finance Corporation’s (IFC) Equator Principles

A

At a project finance level, when assessing project infrastructure initiatives, the

International Finance Corporation’s (IFC) Equator Principles

Have become a globally recognised risk management framework, and are adopted by financial institutions for determining, assessing and managing environmental and social risk in project finance.

They set out performance standards that address environmental factors such as resource efficiency, biodiversity and land resettlement, as well as other social-oriented standards.

152
Q

As part of the IFC’s Performance Standard, the primary objective of a risk assessment is to:

A

“identify the potential negative environmental (and social) risks in order to develop the appropriate strategies to address the risks and their potential impacts.”

153
Q

Biodiversity Assessment Tool (IBAT)

A

Another framework to assess materiality is the Integrated Biodiversity Assessment Tool (IBAT), which is a central database for globally recognised biodiversity information including key biodiversity areas and legally protected areas.

Through an interactive mapping tool, decision-makers can easily access and use this up-to- date information to identify biodiversity risks and opportunities within a project boundary.

154
Q

Public finance initiatives

Paris Agreement

A

As governments continue to raise the level of ambition in their national environmental and climate plans in line with the Paris Agreement, resources are allocated and investments from the public sector are mobilised to implement these plans.

Public finance is a key policy instrument to both incentivise and enable the transition to green growth.

Exposures to climate-related and other environmental risks can vary significantly from country to country, and lower- and middle-income economies are typically more vulnerable to physical climate risks.

155
Q

BLENDED FINANCE

green infrastructure funds (e.g. the ASEAN Catalytic Green Finance Facility under the ASEAN Infrastructure Fund), specialised banks (e.g. Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank)

A

Public sector financing is often blended with funding from multilateral development finance institutions in developing countries and disbursed through investment vehicles such as green infrastructure funds

(e.g. the ASEAN Catalytic Green Finance Facility under the ASEAN Infrastructure Fund), specialised banks (e.g. Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank)

and funding platforms (e.g. the Tropical Landscapes Finance Facility).

A variety of financing initiatives leveraging public sector and development finance for sustainable agriculture, biodiversity conservation and the blue economy are also emerging, particularly targeting more vulnerable and developing economies.

156
Q

latest report by the Climate Policy Initiative (CPI)

US$253bn (£195bn) in 2017/18, representing 44% of total commitments…

… TRANSPORTATION

A

The latest report by the Climate Policy Initiative (CPI) reported that the average annual public climate finance totalled US$253bn (£195bn) in 2017/18, representing 44% of total commitments, with the vast majority of spending on

▶TRANSPORTATION.

Other areas of spending were dedicated to:

▶ adaptation and resilience;
▶ energy efficiency;
▶ land use; and
▶ infrastructure projects with cross-sectoral impacts.

157
Q

Examples of the types of public finance include:

A
▶ export credit;
▶ development banks;
▶ concessionary lending to small and medium enterprises (SMEs);
▶ guarantees;
▶ research and development (R&D); and
▶ investment in infrastructure.
158
Q

Initiatives that typically require public (and private) sector funding with high environmental impacts are:

A

▶ energy;
▶ water and waste;
▶ transport; and
▶ flood defences.

159
Q

stranded assets
and
NDCs

climate-related litigation risks

A

Investments that lock in high-carbon emission pathways, such as fossil fuel power generation and supply infrastructure, would be considered potential stranded assets. In addition, public finance needs to align their investment to broader regional climate goals and country-level NDC (Nationally Determined Contribution) targets, government regulation and to the systemic and fiscal risks as a result of its environmental and climate- related policies in the longer term.

Governments also need to be aware of increasing climate-related litigation risks. A recent study found that climate change cases have been reported in at least 28 countries around the world, and of the recorded cases more than three-quarters have been filed in the USA.78

160
Q

ASSET MANAGEMENT

University of Cambridge Institute for Sustainability Leadership (CISL)

A

At a portfolio level, the University of Cambridge Institute for Sustainability Leadership (CISL) compares the vulnerability and resilience of different portfolio types to climate change-related risks in the shorter term.

The information provided in their study is intended to help investors understand how to hedge risk and invest in assets with the lower potential of being affected by climate change risk.

The study reveals that global investment portfolios could lose up to 45% in their equity investment portfolio value (and 23% loss for fixed income portfolio) as a consequence of short-term shifts in climate change sentiment such as climate change policy, technological change, asset stranding, weather events and longer-term physical impacts.

161
Q

SASB (Sustainability Accounting Standards Board)

2011

Materiality Map

A

An example used by companies for reporting and disclosure, and investors in assessing the environmental (including social and governance) risks of companies is the SASB (Sustainability Accounting Standards Board), which was established in 2011 to develop and disseminate sustainability accounting standards.

The standards identify financially material issues that are reasonably likely to impact the financial condition or operating performance of a company and therefore are most important to investors.

SASB provides an interactive proprietary tool that identifies and compares disclosure topics across different industries and sectors, described as a ‘materiality map’.

162
Q

‘Materiality map’. Environmental factors cover:

A
greenhouse gas emissions;
air quality;
energy management;
water and wastewater management;
waste and hazardous materials management; and ecological impacts.
163
Q

Insurance

A

Increased frequency and severity of major weather events mean that climate change has increased the risks and costs of insurance.

The impact of physical climate change events on the insurance sector is one of the most complex to measure and estimate.

164
Q

Schroders’

A

Another illustration of how environmental risk (in this case caused by physical climate change) affects different industries, is Schroders’ analysis (based on their internal proprietary metrics).

This shows the potential costs to some companies of insuring their assets against the impact of physical climate change.

The sector exposures analysed tend to vary according to the capital intensity of the business.

165
Q

APPROACHES TO ACCOUNT FOR MATERIAL ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS AND RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES

Identify approaches to environmental analysis at country, sector and company levels in both developed and emerging countries, including natural capital.

Environmental risks can be effectively integrated into company analysis and investment decision-making processes, using various ***financial tools and models.

▶ According to a G20 Green Finance Study, financial institutions need to combine
*two types of approaches to assess environmental risks:

A

▶ 1. Understanding environmental factors that may pose risks to financial assets and liabilities (for example the wrong pricing of a pollution liability or natural disaster insurance policy could be a risk to liability, if the event probability is underestimated), and how such risks may evolve over time.

and,

▶ 2. Translating environmental risk factors into quantitative measures of financial risk that can, in turn, inform firms’ risk management and investment decisions.

166
Q

The types of risk analysis tools and associated metrics primarily depend upon the asset classes and risk types financial institutions are exposed to (for instance, a fixed income analyst may be most interested in credit risk).

A

Similarly, the choice of approach depends on the type of direct or indirect exposure to an environmental risk factor. For example, the probability of physical risks from flooding will have to be incorporated differently than transition risks stemming from the transition to a low-carbon economy due to policy change. Depending on the investment strategy and objectives, different levels of analysis will likely be performed: at the individual asset level, portfolio level, and at the macroeconomic or systemic level.

167
Q

It is important to analyse the extent to which environmental and climate-related impacts could affect a company’s value chain –

supply chain, 
operation and assets, 
logistics and 
market – 
which would have an impact on financial performance.
A

OK!

168
Q

It is important to note that environmental risk assessments are conducted along with social and governance
assessments at:

company or project level;

sector level; or

country level.

A

Company or project level

At a company or project level, an assessment of material environmental risk factors will inform key financial metrics as monitored and disclosed in financial statements (such as **profit and loss and balance sheet).

For example, companies operating in water-scarce areas are exposed to higher risk than for those operating in areas where water availability is high.

Therefore, it is important to undertake an analysis of

  • **how well the company is managing these risks
  • **(e.g. improvement in water-efficiency over time.)

Often, analysts and portfolio managers will have their own internal environmental (social and governance) scoring system utilising a combination of external third-party data providers and internal analysis.

Qualitative and quantitative assessments are then made to determine the ***environmental materiality of a particular company; and how it will affect key efficiency or profitability ratios which might be used to value and compare across different companies.

This could include a decision being made to adjust the target price-to-earning (P/E) ratio, which reflects a company’s competitiveness in comparison to its peers with higher or lower environmental standards.

Cost assumptions can also be adjusted according to ***future capital expenditure in environmental (mitigation or adaptation) spending.

169
Q

Sector Level

A

▶Environmental risks (for example, carbon emissions), such as:

» greenhouse gas emissions;
» chemicals;
» energy;
» steel and cement;
» extractives;
» food or beverages; and
» transportation; 

or
▶ Physical risk from natural disasters, for example, to:

» buildings; or
» urban infrastructure.

Companies in these sectors tend to be influenced by an environmental risk premium, which may affect the discount rate used.

Hence, alongside the company level analysis above, these sector-wide considerations need to be considered and overlaid on the company analysis.

Adjustments are made to remove any regional/sector biases that align with the manager’s investment strategy and process.

170
Q

Country Level

A

A country’s environmental regulations, emission targets and their enforcement may vary in emphasis across different jurisdictions.

Often, investments may be multi-jurisdictional and hence, several country-specific considerations and regulations will need to be factored into the valuation of a company based on the country it is located or where its operations lie.

Disclosure and transparency of environmental data will also vary by region – for example, companies in emerging markets tend to have fewer comprehensive disclosures.

171
Q

Analysing Environmental Risks

A

It is not possible to outline all the available approaches for investors to assess environmental risks because there is no one common standard.

However, based on a combination of independent third-party research and data and useful frameworks, practitioners are able to map out and analyse the environmental risks and costs across different types of asset classes by company and sector, in order to make their own quantitative and qualitative risk assessments.

The following outlines some of the approaches that are used by investors to assess material environmental risks (and opportunities):

A. carbon foot-printing;
B. natural capital approach; and
C. climate scenario analysis.

We will look at each of these approaches in further detail in the following sub-sections.

172
Q

A. Carbon footprinting.

Carbon footprinting is one of the most common approaches used by companies and investors.

A portfolio carbon footprint effectively measures carbon emissions and intensity associated with operations of the companies in a portfolio.

Measuring the carbon footprint of a portfolio means that an investor can:

A

▶ compare it to global benchmarks;

▶ identify priority areas and actions for reducing emissions; and

▶ track progress in making those reductions.

173
Q

TCDF // weighted average carbon intensity

A

The TCFD recommends that asset owners and managers report the weighted average carbon intensity associated with their investments.

174
Q

Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol standards

A

The use of carbon footprinting applies the international accounting tool of the Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol standards. While Scopes 1 and 2 cover direct emissions sources (such as the fuel used in company vehicles and purchased electricity), Scope 3 emissions cover all indirect emissions arising from the activities of an organisation. These include emissions from both suppliers and consumers,

175
Q

SCOPE 1

A
  • Fuel combustion

* Company vehicles • Fugitive emissions

176
Q

SCOPE 2

A

• Purchased electricity, heat and steam

177
Q

SCOPE 3

A
• Purchased goods and services
• Business travel
• Employee commuting
• Waste disposal
• Use of sold products
• Transportation and distribution
(up- and downstream)
• Investments
• Leased assets and franchises
178
Q

Carbon footprinting however has its limitations and challenges as a risk measure and is seen as backward- looking or static.

Some of the main challenges of carbon footprinting include:

A

it is not yet available for unlisted assets;

Scope 3 emissions are rarely being included;

it uses different estimation methodologies;

and
it does not measure potential investment risks related to the physical impacts of climate change.

179
Q

B. Natural capital approach

A

A term often used to describe the relationship between nature and measuring and valuing nature’s role in decision-making is ***natural capital.

Natural capital helps businesses identify, measure, value and prioritise their impacts and dependencies on biodiversity and the ecosystem, which ultimately give businesses new insight into their risks and opportunities.

Understanding the value of both natural capital impacts and dependencies helps business and financial decision-makers assess the significance of these issues to their institution, and therefore make more informed decisions.

180
Q

Natural Capital Protocol (NCP)

A

Assessing environmental factors using the Natural Capital Protocol (NCP), a decision-making framework, enables organisations to identify, measure and value the direct and indirect impacts and dependencies of companies on natural capital.

It currently provides guidance for the apparel sector, food and beverage sector and forest products sector.

The protocol allows companies to measure, value and integrate natural capital impacts and dependencies into existing business processes such as risk mitigation, sourcing, supply chain management and product design.

181
Q

Climate Scenario Analysis

A

**Scenario analysis is an approach for the forward-looking assessment of risks and opportunities.

Scenario analysis describes a process of evaluating how an organisation, sector, country or portfolio might perform in different future states, in order to understand its key drivers and possible outcomes.

**Climate-related risk has been identified as one of the most complex macro-existential risks, which is least understood and hardest to quantify.

The TCFD recommends that companies and financial institutions:

“describe the resilience of the organisation’s strategy, taking into consideration different climate-related scenarios, including a 2°C or lower scenario and, where relevant to the organisation, scenarios consistent with increased physical climate-related risks.”

In the current landscape, there is no common set of scenario analysis methodology used by investors. Instead, the types of approaches and models will depend largely on the objectives and scope of the work.

182
Q

Institutional Investors Group on Climate Change (IIGCC)

A

The Institutional Investors Group on Climate Change (IIGCC) published a practical investor guide,

which provides a useful framework (see Figure 3.10) in which to approach climate-related scenario analysis.

183
Q

The Institutional Investors Group on Climate Change (IIGCC) guide sets out two objectives of undertaking scenario analysis:

A
  1. Financial impact: the use of scenario analysis enables the assessment and pricing of climate-related risks and opportunities.
  2. Alignment: aligning the portfolio(s) with a 2°C (3.6°F) or lower future. This is typically driven by a set of investment beliefs.
184
Q

EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive

A

At the over-arching level, however, there is no ‘one size fits all’ methodology that investors can use to determine materiality and they consequently use financial modelling and concepts, such as financial ratio analysis.

The EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive, which helps analysts and investors to evaluate the non- financial performance of large companies, sums up the most effective and recommended approach well.

This involves:

▶ taking a set of transparent and credible data sources and assumptions, which can be quantitative or qualitative;

▶ applying recognisable, accepted methodologies, which will probably have the backing of an industry body, government department or multilateral institution;

▶ focusing on materiality – looking in particular at business models, operations and financial performance; and

▶ generating a set of outputs which can be measured in terms of KPIs.

In order for the financial system to achieve a better appreciation of climate change risks (and opportunities), there is a need for more data, greater disclosure, better analytical toolkits, advanced scenario analysis and new risk management techniques.

185
Q
  1. APPLY MATERIAL ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS TO FINANCIAL MODELLING, RATIO ANALYSIS, RISK ASSESSMENT AND QUALITY OF MANAGEMENT
A

Apply material environmental factors to: financial modelling; ratio analysis; risk assessment; quality of management.

186
Q

The following case study is based on a WWF and Cadmus survey (2018) of

**more than 20 infrastructure investors and related stakeholders and

**looks at how investors evaluate the sustainability of ***infrastructure assets.

It can, however, be adapted for evaluating individual companies.

A

This case study demonstrates how and where to integrate the results of a comprehensive ESG assessment as input into the key financial ratios and variables of a financial model, focusing on the environmental assessment:

▶ Consideration of environmental (social and governance) factors may inform the forecasting of financials, such as revenues, operating costs and capital expenditure, which are utilised in the context of assessing an infrastructure asset.

▶ These financial ratios or variables form the basis of financial models including ***discounted cash flow (DCF) models and ultimately asset valuations.

▶ It provides an illustration as to how investors may benefit from the derived insights by illustrating ways to approximate and quantify, and thus linking them to expected revenues, costs, necessary capital expenditures, financing requirements or reserves, which, in turn, inform the financial model.

▶ Note that this example focuses only on the environmental impacts.

In reality, the social and governance factors need to be considered in parallel for a full ESG materiality assessment.

187
Q

ESG review – environmental factors and materiality

A

Over the lifetime of an infrastructure project – from development to construction, to operation, and all the way through to the decommissioning phase – infrastructure assets face all kinds of ESG issues.

These vary depending on asset type, sector, size, geographic location and stage in the life cycle.

Some of the environmental issues may originate outside the asset but could impact its technical ability to operate on its profitability (for instance, temperature rise and increased water scarcity).

Other issues may be caused by the asset itself and impact its surrounding environment and communities (such as water effluence and the quality of life of the communities around it).

In this latter case, this is called ‘externalities’, which can (and will) increasingly impact the asset’s financial performance via various feedback loops (including protests of the surrounding community).

It is thus important to realise that both directions of potential environmental impact (impact ON the asset, and impact FROM the asset) may have financial consequences for the investors.

For the purpose of arriving at a shortlist of environmental factors for which the potential impact of environmental risk on infrastructure financials can be demonstrated, a two-step process was followed:

  1. A longlist of widely recognised environmental factors was derived.

The longlist was reduced to a shortlist of environmental factors that are typically among those considered key to an environmental assessment in the context of infrastructure.

  1. If, and to what extent, any of the selected environmental factors has a material impact on any given infrastructure organisation or asset will be revealed by the asset-specific ESG due diligence process.
188
Q

TYPICAL ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS

Degradation or pollution:
• Air (climate) – greenhouse gas emissions.
• Air (health) – other pollution
• Water.
• Ground or contamination.
• Noise and light.
• Biodiversity.
Resource efficiency sourcing, use or treatment:
• (Raw) materials including supply
chain.
• Energy.
• Water.
• Waste.

Physical risk – impact on asset, such as flooding.

A

MATERIAL ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS FOR INFRASTRUCTURE:

A) QUANTIFIABLE:
***Degradation or pollution:
• Air (climate) – greenhouse gas emissions.
• Air (health) – other pollution
• Water.
• Ground or contamination.
• Noise and light.
• Biodiversity.
***Resource efficiency sourcing, use or treatment:
• (Raw) materials including supply
chain.
• Energy.
• Water.
• Waste.

B) Difficult-to-quantify
7. Biodiversity and habitat (E)

  1. Physical climate change
    impacts (E)
189
Q

TCFD framework CASE STUDY ::

A

(ii) it simplifies the framework:
1. Transition risks and opportunities, with the sub-categories of:
a) reputational;
b) regulatory/legal;
c) operational; and
d) market; and
2. Physical risks and opportunities.

The following table helps to show how the selected environmental factors may impact the financial performance of infrastructure organisations.

It elaborates on the potential impact pathways from the selected environmental factors to specific financial ratios/inputs into financial models.

Page 131

190
Q

7

OPPORTUNITIES RELATING TO CLIMATE CHANGE AND ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES

A

Previous sections have covered the risks of neglecting the implications of key environmental factors from companies as a result of direct and/or indirect business activities.

The increased awareness of climate change and environmental impact has resulted in an accelerating search for viable societal and economic solutions to enable a transition to a less carbon intensive economy.

Estimates for this transition reach trillions of dollars and the magnitude of change required will be pervasive.

191
Q

Global Commission on the Economy and Climate

90Tn

A

A study by the Global Commission on the Economy and Climate found that the world is expected to invest about US$90tn (£69tn) in infrastructure over the next 15 years*

**** requiring an urgent shift to ensure that this capital is spent on low-carbon, energy-efficient projects. The report further describes that “transformative change is needed now in how we build our cities, produce and use energy, transport people and goods,
and manage our landscapes”.

It is therefore no surprise that there is an increasing number of investment strategies that focus primarily on the opportunities of the low-carbon transition and green finance.

Investing in sectors such as

technology and resource efficiency,

waste management,

circular economy and

sustainable agriculture and

forestry are just some of the

investment opportunities available relating to climate change and environmental issues.

192
Q

FTSE Russell, in collaboration with Impax Asset Management, developed the FTSE Environmental Markets indexes, a classification system that provides a useful overview of the different investible areas of opportunities, ranging between :

A

clean technology,
renewable energy and
green infrastructure.

193
Q

OVERVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL OPPORTUNITIES

A
Renewable and alternative energy
Energy efficiency
Water infrastructure and technologies
Pollution control
Waste management and technologies
Environmental support services
Food, agriculture and forestry
194
Q

A. Circular economy

A

A key concept required to understand and recognise the potential opportunities in addressing environmental issues is the circular economy:

“A circular economy is based on the principles of designing out waste and pollution, keeping products and materials in use, and regenerating natural systems.”

This opposes the current approach of a linear economy where natural resources are extracted as input materials for the manufacture of products which are then used and eventually discarded.

The ‘take-make- waste’ (linear) approach is not a sustainable approach for the earth’s finite natural resources; therefore, the circular economy can be the focus of a thematic investment strategy that seeks to invest in businesses that provide specific solutions to create a circular economy (in addition to being a consideration in all investment decisions, especially for large companies that need to improve their operational efficiency to reduce their use of natural resources and waste generation.)

Companies that factor in circularity in their business model are able to play a major role in safeguarding natural resources and transform the way we currently use natural resources and support a transition to a low-carbon economy (Figure 3.12).

In a circular economy, products and materials are repaired, reused and recycled rather than thrown away, ensuring that waste from one industrial process becomes a valued input into another.

The circular economy concept is now a core component of both the EU’s 2050 Long-Term Strategy to achieve a climate-neutral Europe and of China’s five-year plans.

195
Q

The following are examples of companies who have placed the circular economy as an economic opportunity.

A

Nike
In its efforts to combat waste and focus on more efficient design and manufacturing technologies, in 2019, Nike created a set of ten circular design principles that have the potential to transform how the apparel industry operates and create a common language for circularity.95 This can be seen,
for example, with the ‘material choices’ principle, which asks: “How could your material choice increase the lifecycle or durability of the product?”

Heineken
As part of their Zero Waste Programme, 102 of their 165 production units sent zero waste to landfill in 2018. The waste from these sites was instead recycled into animal feed, material loops, compost or used for energy recovery.96

Schneider Electric
The company specialises in energy management and automation. It uses recycled content and recyclable materials in its products, prolongs product lifespan through leasing and pay-per-use and has introduced take-back schemes into its supply chain. Circular activities now account for 12% of its revenues and will save 100,000 metric tons of primary resources between 2018–2020.97

Stora Enso
The company provides renewable solutions in packaging, biomaterials, wooden constructions and paper. Reducing waste operates at the heart of the “bioeconomy and contributes to a circular economy”.98
In 2019, the European Investment Bank launched an investment fund to support the circular bioeconomy.99

196
Q

B. Clean and technological innovation

A

Technological innovation and the development of new business ventures associated with the environment have been around for some time.

However, the term cleantech as an umbrella term “encompassing the investment asset class, technology, and business sectors which include clean energy, environmental, and sustainable or green, products and services” became increasingly popular approximately 20 years ago.

197
Q

Increasing focus on cleantech innovations and the associated venture investments accelerated in the early 2000s following increasing regulatory policy and standard setting by governments.

Examples of policy and standards include:

A

▶ Long-term subsidy regimes have underpinned the rise of wind and solar power; possibly the most conspicuous example being the German Energiewende. This is a planned transition to a low-carbon economy in which a transparent and systematic subsidies regime has led to about 40% of Germany’s electricity now coming from renewable sources.

▶ A harmonisation of minimum technology standards has also assisted in driving forward cleantech innovations. The revolution in lighting systems in Europe over the last decade has been driven by EU policymakers’ decisions to phase out incandescent light bulbs, replacing them with low-energy emitting fluorescent bulbs and latterly light-emitting diode (LED) bulbs.

▶ The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) helps companies to manage their energy efficiently through a set of management system standards.

Many governments around the world also incentivise more efficient energy usage in buildings through the practice of energy performance certificates, which are needed whenever a building is built, sold or rented.

198
Q

real estate (EPCs)

A

The real estate sector has been undergoing significant change with property developers and owners deciding to take advantage of energy efficient materials and low-carbon technologies.

This has been aligned with a
push by regulatory authorities in most European countries playing a major role in driving market development, for example through introducing energy performance certificates (EPCs) and making them part of the documentation package for lettings and sales;

setting tighter performance requirements on energy efficiency in building codes (particularly in the Nordic countries) or by stipulating that all new residential build meets a minimum low-carbon threshold.

199
Q

UK EPC

LEED

A

In the UK, new legislation has introduced a minimum EPC ratings threshold for residential lettings, and this is being expanded to commercial lettings.

Property owners are also increasingly assessing their assets against building certification and/or energy performance standards (e.g.

Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED), which works internationally;

National Australian Built Environmental Rating System (NABERS), which covers Australia;

Comprehensive Assessment System for Build Environment Efficiency (CASBEE), which works in Japan;

EnergyStar that operates in USA;

Green Building – China; etc.),

while lenders and institutional investors are benchmarking holdings, e.g. using the

GRESB framework.

Property lenders have developed mortgages that reward borrowers for investing in energy efficiency,

adding to a range of government-backed initiatives that support energy efficiency retrofits in buildings and production facilities and promote energy efficient new construction.

200
Q

** One of the most startling and unpredicted developments of the last decade has been the fall in the costs of renewable energy.

A

According to cost analysis from the International Renewables Energy Agency (IRENA), new solar photovoltaic (PV) and onshore wind power are on the verge of costing less than the marginal operating cost of existing coal-fired plants.

The report predicted that by 2020, onshore wind and solar PV are set to consistently offer a less expensive source of new electricity than the least costly fossil fuel alternative, without financial assistance.

Equally impressive cost reductions for offshore wind are following suit in the rest of Europe, notably in Germany and the Netherlands.

201
Q

On a broad level, some of the industries in the cleantech sector that support environmental and climate solutions include:

A
▶ transportation;
▶ water management;
▶ waste management;
▶ smart energy and resource efficiency; and
▶ food and agriculture.
202
Q

According to Bloomberg New Energy Finance (BNEF), in 2019, total investment in renewable energy capacity worldwide was US$282.2bn (£217.4bn), with China as the largest investor followed by the USA.

A

There has also been increasing activity in corporate venturing and investments by incumbent fossil-fuel based corporations into clean and renewable technologies.

These private sector efforts have been complemented by greater supra-national and public sector support, for example the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) InnoEnergy, which was established to invest in and accelerate sustainable energy innovations.

Another initiative, still in concept phase is the World Economic Forum’s Sustainable Energy Innovation Fund (SEIF), which matches up private funding with public investment.

203
Q

C. Green and ESG-related products

A

Some specific financial products that have emerged include a range of green, sustainability and ESG indices, green bonds and loans and sustainability funds and ETFs, retail and institutional deposit/savings products, SRI retail bonds and crowdfunding investments.

204
Q

Green bonds, loans and other labelled ESG-related products.

A

The first green bond issuance was announced in 2007 by the European Investment Bank to raise funding for climate-related projects.

Green bonds were created to fund projects that have positive environmental and/or climate benefits. The majority are green ‘use of proceeds’ or asset-linked bonds .

The International Capital Markets Association (ICMA) sets out voluntary best practice guidelines called the Green Bond Principles (GBP), which were established in 2014 by a consortium of investment banks to promote the integrity of the green bond market by recommending transparency, disclosure and reporting.

As part
of ensuring the integrity of the use of proceeds, an external verification is obtained through a second party opinion provider who will track and report on whether proceeds are used as promised.

According to the Climate Bonds Initiative, green bond issuances by banks and corporates have accelerated in recent years, with total issuance rising from around US$44.5bnn (£31bn) in 2015,

to exceed US$170bn (£154bn) in 2018.

In 2019, issuance is almost US$258bn (£199bn), or 51% up over 2018, and

2020 has started off strongly for sovereigns and non-financial corporates.

205
Q

While clean energy and low-carbon building investment continues to dominate allocations, funding for low- carbon transport has increased dramatically and issuers from the ICT and manufacturing have entered the green bond market. For further information on the opportunities of the green finance market and the scale of growth of climate aligned issuances, refer to

Bonds and Climate Change: State of the Market 2018.

A

In addition to green bonds, which focus closely on climate-change solutions, there has been increased issuance in other labelled debt, primarily green and sustainability loans that are linked to climate impact key performance indicators.

There are also transition bonds, which is a newly coined term for bonds issued by high- emission companies to finance their reduction in greenhouse gas emissions.

Some of these products finance measures that may not be considered “green enough” but still aim to address climate change.

206
Q

In 2018, the Green Loan Principles (GLP) were established by the UK and Asia Pacific Loan Market Association.

The four pillars of the GLP are:

A

there is clear green use of loan proceeds;

the project’s sustainability objectives have been clearly evaluated and communicated to lenders;

loan proceeds are strictly managed through project accounts; and

detailed and strict reporting is mandated.

207
Q

Further to the GLP, in 2019, the UK and Asia Pacific Loan Market Association, including the US Loan Syndications and Trading Association, launched the Sustainability-linked Loan Principles (SLLP).

A

Some of these loans have no specific green purpose, but the borrower is incentivised to drive ESG or SDG improvement by a margin ratchet linked to key performance indicators.

As these are considered to be in the private markets, the size of the market is not fully transparent.

However, based on data by Refinitiv, it was reported that global green and ESG-linked loans totalled US$92bn (£73.6bn) in 2019.

This growth in ESG-related products will only continue to accelerate.

208
Q

Table 3.5 shows examples of green financing transactions, ranging from green bonds to sustainability or SDG- linked bonds and loans.

A

ISSUER AND TYPE
USE OF PROCEEDS

Green bond issued by Louisiana Local Government Environmental Facilities and Community Development Authority (2018)

Coastal flood defenses.

Dutch sovereign green bond (2019)
Chile’s sovereign green bond (2019 and 2020)
Flood protection under its Delta Programme.

First dedicated resilience bond under the Climate Resilience Principles by European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) (2019)112
Climate resilient infrastructure in Eastern Europe and North Africa.

The first issue in 2019 was focused on financing solar, low carbon transport, low carbon building upgrades and water infrastructure.

The 2020 issue was focused primarily on low carbon transport.

Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation (RCBC), one of Philippines largest banks, issued the first ASEAN sustainability bond (2019)

First SDG-linked bond, launched by the Italian energy producer Enel (2019)

Starbucks issued a sustainability bond (2019), following its previous issues in 2016 and 2017

Thames Water became the UK’s first corporate to issue a £1.4bn sustainability linked revolving credit facility (2018)

RCBC applied its Sustainability Finance Framework, which includes seven eligible green categories (energy, buildings, transport, urban and industrial energy efficiency, waste, water and land use) and five eligible social categories (affordable basic infrastructure,
access to essential services, employment generation, affordable housing and socioeconomic advancement and empowerment).

Proceeds aimed at general corporate purposes.

However, the new instrument requires Enel to measure its performance against several environmental and social KPIs, to which the coupon will be dependent.

Eligible categories fall under socioeconomic advancement and empowerment and access to essential services and under green (green buildings).

Interest payments are linked to its GRESB (Global Real Estate Sustainability Benchmark) infrastructure score.
Solvay, a Belgium chemical company issued a sustainability linked loan

The first to link to an ambitious greenhouse gas reduction target – in this case one million tonnes of CO2 by 2025.

209
Q

From an investment perspective, as the supply of green or ESG-related products continues to grow, it is important to note that what may be considered to be green or sustainable for one investor may not be so for another. Therefore, investors need to have a clear framework by which to assess these assets.

The following are some of the considerations:

A

▶ the eligibility of assets and criteria to meeting their green, ESG or SDG-related objectives;

▶ the use of proceeds effectively allocated to eligible projects;

▶ the transparency and reporting requirements and key measures of impacts; and

▶ the issuer or borrower has a clear sustainability and ESG strategy.

210
Q

Center for International Climate Research (CICERO)

Shows an example of the ‘shades of green’ methodology developed by the

Center for International Climate Research (CICERO)

to provide second party opinions that determine how a green or sustainability bond aligns with a low-carbon resilient future.

A

Dark – Wind and Solar
Medium – Hybrid buses
Light – More efficient fossil fuels
Brown - New Coal Infra

211
Q

D. Blue economy

A

The World Bank’s definition of blue economy refers to a “sustainable use of ocean resources for economic growth, improved livelihoods, and jobs while preserving the health of ocean ecosystem”.

All other definitions of the blue economy essentially relate to a broader perspective on sustainable economic and social activity associated with the world’s oceans and coastal areas.

212
Q

EXAMPLES OF OCEAN-BASED INDUSTRIES REPRESENTING THE BLUE ECONOMY

A
  • Aquaculture.
  • Fisheries.
  • Fish processing industry.
  • Shipbuilding and repair.
  • Marine extraction.
  • Maritime transport.
  • Desalination.
  • Blue bioeconomy and biotechnology.
  • Ports and warehousing.
  • Coastal and environmental protection.
  • Offshore wind energy.
  • Coastal tourism.
  • Ocean energy.
  • Deep water source cooling.
213
Q

The blue economy has more recently begun to gather more attention and has climbed the policy agenda. As covered in the previous section on oceans as a natural resource, it is clear that the ocean is already under stress from over-exploitation, pollution, declining biodiversity and climate change.

A

Investors and policymakers are now beginning to recognise:

the growth prospects for the ocean economy;
its capacity for future employment creation and innovation; and its role in addressing global challenges.

214
Q

There is growing importance for science and technology to manage the economic development of our seas and ocean responsibly.

Marine ecosystems lie at the heart of many of the world’s global challenges, such as food, medicines, new sources of clean energy and natural cooling systems, climate regulation, job creation and inclusive growth.

But safeguards are required to improve the health of these ecosystems to support an ever- growing use of marine resources.

Based on a study by OECD, three priority areas for action are presented:

A
  1. approaches that produce win–win outcomes for ocean business and the ocean environment across a range of marine and maritime applications;
  2. the creation of ocean-economy innovation networks; and
  3. initiatives to improve the measurement of the ocean economy via satellite accounts of national accounting systems.
215
Q

The World Bank and the European Commission have launched the Blue Economy Development Framework (BEDF),

which is a new step in the area of international ocean governance.

It helps (developing) coastal states transition to diverse and sustainable blue economies while building resilience to climate change.

The BEDF aims to create a roadmap that assists governments to:

A

▶ prepare policy, fiscal, and administrative reforms;

▶ identify value creation opportunities from blue economy sectors; and

▶ identify strategic financial investments.

In short, the BEDF will help coastal countries and regions to develop evidence-based investment and policy reform plans for its coastal and ocean resources.

The OECD suggests that many ocean-based industries have the potential to outperform the growth of the global economy as a whole, both in terms of value added and employment.

Projections suggest that the ocean economy could more than double its contribution to global value added to over US$3tn (£2.3tn),

in addition to huge potential in employment growth by 2030.