Chapter 3: Advocate Flashcards
Rule 3.1 Meritorious Claims and Contentions
a) A lawyer shall not:
(1) bring or continue an action, conduct a defense, assert a position in litigation, or take an appeal, without probable cause and for the purpose of harassing or maliciously injuring any person;* or
(2) present a claim or defense in litigation that is not warranted under existing law, unless it can be supported by a good faith argument for an extension, modification, or reversal of the existing law.
(b) A lawyer for the defendant in a criminal proceeding, or the respondent in a proceeding that could result in incarceration, or involuntary commitment or confinement, may nevertheless defend the proceeding by requiring that every element of the case be established
Rule 3.2 Delay of Litigation
In representing a client, a lawyer shall not use means that have no substantial* purpose other than to delay or prolong the proceeding or to cause needless expense.
Rule 3.3 Candor Toward the Tribunal*(A)(1)-(3)
a) A lawyer shall not:
(1) knowingly* make a false statement of fact or law to a tribunal* or fail to correct a false statement of material fact or law previously made to the tribunal* by the lawyer;
(2) fail to disclose to the tribunal* legal authority in the controlling jurisdiction known* to the lawyer to be directly adverse to the position of the client and not disclosed by opposing counsel, or knowingly* misquote to a tribunal* the language of a book, statute, decision or other authority; or
(3) offer evidence that the lawyer knows* to be false. If a lawyer, the lawyer’s client, or a witness called by the lawyer, has offered material evidence, and the lawyer comes to know* of its falsity, the lawyer shall take reasonable* remedial measures, including, if necessary, disclosure to the tribunal,* unless disclosure is prohibited by Business and Professions Code section 6068, subdivision (e) and rule 1.6. A lawyer may refuse to offer evidence, other than the testimony of a defendant in a criminal matter, that the lawyer reasonably believes* is false.
This includes failing to correct a material misstatement of law includes citing as authority a decision that has been overruled or a statute that has been repealed or declared unconstitutional, or failing to correct such a citation previously made to the tribunal* by the lawyer.
Rule 3.3 Candor Toward the Tribunal(B)
b) A lawyer who represents a client in a proceeding before a tribunal* and who knows* that a person* intends to engage, is engaging or has engaged in criminal or fraudulent* conduct related to the proceeding shall take reasonable* remedial measures to the extent permitted by Business and Professions Code section 6068, subdivision (e) and rule 1.6.
Rule 3.3 Candor Toward the Tribunal(D)
(d) In an ex parte proceeding where notice to the opposing party in the proceeding is not required or given and the opposing party is not present, a lawyer shall inform the tribunal* of all material facts known* to the lawyer that will enable the tribunal* to make an informed decision, whether or not the facts are adverse to the position of the client.
Rule 3.4 Fairness to Opposing Party and Counsel(A)(B)(C)
A lawyer shall not:
(a) unlawfully obstruct another party’s access to evidence, including a witness, or unlawfully alter, destroy or conceal a document or other material having potential evidentiary value. A lawyer shall not counsel or assist another person* to do any such act;
(b) suppress any evidence that the lawyer or the lawyer’s client has a legal obligation to reveal or to produce;
c) falsify evidence, counsel or assist a witness to testify falsely, or offer an inducement to a witness that is prohibited by law;
Rule 3.4 Fairness to Opposing Counsel(D)
d) directly or indirectly pay, offer to pay, or acquiesce in the payment of compensation to a witness contingent upon the content of the witness’s testimony or the outcome of the case. Except where prohibited by law, a lawyer may advance, guarantee, or acquiesce in the payment of:
(1) expenses reasonably* incurred by a witness in attending or testifying;
(2) reasonable* compensation to a witness for loss of time in attending or testifying; or
(3) a reasonable* fee for the professional services of an expert witness;
Rule 3.4 Fairness to Opposing Counsel(E)(F)(G)
e) advise or directly or indirectly cause a person* to secrete himself or herself or to leave the jurisdiction of a tribunal* for the purpose of making that person* unavailable as a witness therein;
(f) knowingly* disobey an obligation under the rules of a tribunal* except for an open refusal based on an assertion that no valid obligation exists; or
(g) in trial, assert personal knowledge of facts in issue except when testifying as a witness, or state a personal opinion as to the guilt or innocence of an accused
A violation of a civil or criminal discovery rule or statute does not by itself establish a violation of this rule.
Rule 3.5 Contact with Judges, Officials, Employees, & Jurors (a)
judge, official, or employee of a tribunal.* This rule does not prohibit a lawyer from contributing to the campaign fund of a judge or judicial officer running for election or confirmation pursuant to applicable law pertaining to such contributions.
Rule 3.5 Contact with Judges, Officials, Employees, and Jurors(B)
A lawyer shall not directly or indirectly communicate with or argue to a judge or judicial officer upon the merits of a contested matter pending before the judge or judicial officer, except:
(1) in open court;
(2) with the consent of all other counsel and any unrepresented parties in the matter;
(3) in the presence of all other counsel and any unrepresented parties in the matter;
(4) in writing* with a copy thereof furnished to all other counsel and any unrepresented parties in the matter; or
(5) in ex parte matters.
Rule 3.5 Contact with Judges, Officials, Employees, and Jurors(D)(E)(F)
(d) A lawyer connected with a case shall not communicate directly or indirectly with anyone the lawyer knows* to be a member of the venire from which the jury will be selected for trial of that case.
(e) During trial, a lawyer connected with the case shall not communicate directly or indirectly with any juror.
(f) During trial, a lawyer who is not connected with the case shall not communicate directly or indirectly concerning the case with anyone the lawyer knows* is a juror in the case.
Rule 3.5 Contact with Judges, Officials, Employees, and Jurors(G)
g) After discharge of the jury from further consideration of a case a lawyer shall not communicate directly or indirectly with a juror if:
(1) the communication is prohibited by law or court order;
(2) the juror has made known* to the lawyer a desire not to communicate; or
(3) the communication involves misrepresentation, coercion, or duress, or is intended to harass or embarrass the juror or to influence the juror’s actions in future jury service
Rule 3.5 Contact with Judges, Officials, Employees, and Jurors(H)(I)
h) A lawyer shall not directly or indirectly conduct an out of court investigation of a person* who is either a member of a venire or a juror in a manner likely to influence the state of mind of such person* in connection with present or future jury service.
(i) All restrictions imposed by this rule also apply to communications with, or investigations of, members of the family of a person* who is either a member of a venire or a juror.
Rule 3.5 Contact with Judges, Officials, Employees, and Jurors(J)(K)(L)
(j) A lawyer shall reveal promptly to the court improper conduct by a person* who is either a member of a venire or a juror, or by another toward a person* who is either a member of a venire or a juror or a member of his or her family, of which the lawyer has knowledge.
(k) This rule does not prohibit a lawyer from communicating with persons* who are members of a venire or jurors as a part of the official proceedings.
(l) For purposes of this rule, “juror” means any empaneled, discharged, or excused juror.
Rule 3.6 Trial Publicity (a)
(a) A lawyer who is participating or has participated in the investigation or litigation of
a matter shall not make an extrajudicial statement that the lawyer knows* or
reasonably should know* will (i) be disseminated by means of public
communication and (ii) have a substantial* likelihood of materially prejudicing an
adjudicative proceeding in the matter.