Chapter 3 Flashcards

Defences Against Negligence in Common Law

1
Q

How is denial used as a defence to an action?

A

The defendant must prove that one or more of the following occurred:

A. He or she did not commit the act that caused the complaint

B. His or her actions were not negligent

C. The plaintiff suffered no injury as a result of the defendant’s actions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is remoteness of damage and how can it be proven?

A

i. The defendant’s actions must be remote from the final consequence (not the proximate cause) in order to escape liability.
ii. A novus actus interveniens (intervening act) breaks the causal chain between the defendant’s breach of duty and the plaintiff’s injury - relieving the defendant of liability.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How does the defence of inevitable accident operate?

A

i. It places the onus on the defendant to show that the cause and result of the accident were inevitable.
ii. It must be shown that the damages arose from an outside cause over which the defendant had no control.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the leading case in which the defence of no duty owed was used successfully?

A

Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Describe a case that would suit a defence based on a plea of emergency.

A

a. A child runs into the road in front of a cyclist who swerves to avoid the child but instead injures another pedestrian.
b. The defendant must be in the position of danger through no fault of their own.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Act of God

A

An act of extraordinary natural force without human interference.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the restriction in effect on an act of God defence?

A

A defendant who has the duty to foresee a natural event must prove that the severity of the incident was unforeseeable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What does volenti non fit injuria mean?

A

To him that is willing, there is no injury.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What two steps were established in Waldick v. Malcolm to form a successful volenti defence?

A

i. Proving the plaintiff had knowledge of the risk.

ii. Proving the plaintiff waived his legal right to make a claim.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

List the circumstances cited in the Occupiers’ Liability Act of Ontario that would likely form a successful defence based on volenti.

A

Rural premises that are used for agricultural purposes

i. including land under cultivation, orchards, pastures, woodlots, and farm ponds
ii. vacant or underdeveloped premises
iii. forested or wilderness premises

Golf courses when not open for playing
Utility rights-of-way and corridors

iv. excluding structures located thereon

Unopened road allowances

Private roads reasonably marked by notice as such

Recreational trails reasonably marked by notice as such

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What type of agreement relinquishes the right to recovery?

A

A disclaimer is a notice of refusal to accept liability for damages that might occur in the future.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What defence seeks to have a plaintiff accept part of the fault for an injury?

A

Contributory negligence - it allows the damages to be reduced by the percentage of blame assigned to the plaintiff.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is a limitation period?

A

A period of time after which a cause of legal action may no longer be enforced.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Which court case introduced the doctrine of strict liability?

A

Rylands v. Fletcher (reservoir flooded)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the two most common situations in which strict liability arises?

A

Escape of substances from one land to another.

Escape of vicious animals.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

List five defences against strict liability.

A

a. Act of God
b. Escape caused by the plaintiff’s own actions
c. Escape by the deliberate wrongful act of a third party
d. When the dangerous object is on the defendant’s land with the implied or express consent of the plaintiff
e. When the authorization to bring and keep the dangerous object on the defendant’s land is granted by statute.

17
Q

Absolute Liability

A

Occurs in a prescribed set of circumstances, described by statute, for which there is no defence.

18
Q

Give an example of a statute imposing absolute liability upon persons.

A

The Environmental Protection Act of Ontario imposes absolute liability upon persons in control of a substance that is spilled and which causes damage to the environment.

19
Q

Where does the onus of proof rest with respect to bailees? Why?

A

When a charge is made for the service, and articles are damaged while in the hands of bailees, the onus is upon them to establish that they were not negligent.

20
Q

Upon whom does the burden of proof rest when the evidence leads to res ipsa loquitur as a conclusion?

A

“The thing speaks for itself”

When an accident could not have happened except through the negligence of the defendant, the burden of proof shifts to the defendant.

21
Q

Under what circumstances does res ipsa loquitur apply?

A

The thing that caused the loss must have been within the exclusive control of the defendant.

The thing that caused the loss could not have happened without negligence.

22
Q

What common law doctrine is concerned with domestic pets?

A

Scienter - It leaves the onus on the plaintiff to prove that the animal which caused the damage or injury had a propensity for the actions that caused harm.

(legislation often reverses this)

23
Q

Upon whom does the burden of proof usually rest?

A

Generally the party who alleges a fact has the burden of proving it.

Thus plaintiffs must prove allegations of negligence.

24
Q

Outline the Good Samaritan legislation.

A

Protects volunteer rescuers by restricting liability against them to the level of gross negligence or recklessness.

A person suing a rescuer for ordinary negligence would not be successful under Good Samaritan laws.

25
Q

Defences Against Negligence

A
  1. Denial
  2. Remoteness of Damage
  3. Inevitable Accident
  4. No Duty Owed
  5. Emergency
  6. Act of God
  7. Voluntary Assumption of Risk
  8. Disclaimer
  9. Contributory Negligence
  10. Limitation Period
26
Q

When Onus of Proof Shifts from Plaintiff to Defendant

A

a. Changed by statute
b. Bailees
c. Res Ipsa Loquitur (the thing speaks for itself)
d. Scienter