Chapter 3 Flashcards

1
Q

Ad populum

A

(Bandwagon appeal) this fallacy occurs when evidence boils down to “ everyone’s doing it so it must be a good thing to do.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Appeals to false authority

A

This fallacy occurs when someone who has no expertise to speak on an issue is cited as an authority. A tv star, for instance, is not a medical expert, even though pharmaceutical advertisements often use celebrity endorsements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Argument

A

A process of reasoned inquiry; a persuasive discourse resulting in a coherent and considered movement from a claim to a conclusion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Assumption/ warrant

A

In the toulmin model, the warrant expresses the assumption necessarily shared by the speaker and the audience.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Backing

A

In the toulmin model, backing consists of further assurance or data without which the assumption lacks authority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Begging the question

A

A fallacy in which a claim is based on evidence or support that is in no doubt. It “begs” a question whether the support itself is sound.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Circular reasoning

A

A fallacy in which the winter repeats the claim as a way to provide evidence “you can’t give me a C I’m am A student!”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Claim

A

Also called an assertion or proposition, a claim states the argument’s main idea or position. A claim differs from a topic or subject in that a claim has to be arguable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Claim of fact

A

A claim of fact asserts that something is true or not true.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Claim of policy

A

Proposes a change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Claim of value

A

A claim of value argues that something is good or bad, right or wrong

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Classical oration

A

Five part argument structure used by classical rhetoricians: introduction, narration, confirmation, refutation, and conclusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Introduction

A

Introduces the reader to the subject under discussion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Narration

A

Provides factual information and background material on the subject at hand or establishes why the subject is a problem that needs addressing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Confirmation

A

Usually the major part of the text, the confirmation includes the proof needed to make the writers case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Refutation

A

Adresses the counterargument. It is a bridge between the writer’s proof and conclusion

17
Q

Conclusion

A

Brings the essay to a satisfying close

18
Q

Closed thesis

A

A closed thesis is a statement of the main idea of the argument that also previews the major points the writer intends to make

19
Q

Deduction

A

Logical process whereby one reaches a conclusion by starting with a general principle or universal truth (a major premise) and applying it to a specific case ( a minor premise). The process of deduction is usually demonstrated in the form of a syllogism, major premise, minor premise, conclusion

20
Q

Either/ or

A

A fallacy in which the speaker presents two extreme options as the only possible choices

21
Q

Fallacy/ logical fallacy

A

Logical fallacies are potential vulnerabilities or weaknesses in an argument. They often arise from a failure to make a logical connection between the claim and the evidence used to support it

22
Q

Faulty analogy

A

A fallacy that occurs when an analogy compares two things that are not comparable

23
Q

First hand evidence

A

Evidence based on something the writer knows, whether it’s from personal experience, observations, or general knowledge of events

24
Q

Hasty generalization

A

A fallacy in which a faulty conclusion is reached because of inadequate evidence

25
Q

Induction

A

From the Latin inducere, “to lead into” a logical process whereby the writer reasons from particulars to universals, using specific cases in order to draw a conclusion, which is also called a generalization

26
Q

Open thesis

A

One that does not lit all the points a writer intends to cover in an essay

27
Q

Qualifier

A

In the toulmin model, the qualifier uses words like usually, probably, maybe, in most cases, and most likely to temper the claim making it less absolute

28
Q

Quantitative evidence

A

Things that can be measured, cited, counted, or otherwise represented in numbers

29
Q

Rebuttal

A

In the toulmin model a rebuttal gives voice to possible objections

30
Q

Reservation

A

A reservation explains the terms and conditions necessitated by the qualifier

31
Q

Rogerian argument

A

Developed by psychiatrist Carl Rodgers, rogerian arguments are based on the assumption that having full understanding of an opposing position is essential to responding to it persuasively and refuting it in a way that is accommodating rather than alienating

32
Q

Syllogism

A

A logical structure that uses the major premise and minor premise to reach a necessary conclusion

33
Q

Toulmin model

A

An approach to analyzing and constructing arguments

34
Q

Ad hominem

A

Latin for against the man.” This fallacy refers to the specific diversionary tactic of switching the argument from the issue at hand to the character of the other speaker