Chapter 3 Flashcards
Information on each workpaper
Name, date, purpose, page number
Procedures performed and conclusions reached by the auditor
(Evidence that the auditor followed GAAS, Audit Tick Mark Legend)
Preparer’s and Reviewer’s initials
5 Activities of an Audit
- Obtain (or retain) Engagement
- Engagement Planning
- Risk Assessment
- Audit Evidence
- Reporting
Pre-Engagement Activities
(Obtain (or retain) Engagement)
Client acceptance or continuance
- Communication between predecessor and prospective auditors
- Compliance with Independence and Ethical Requirements
- Engagement Letters
Communication between predecessor and prospective auditors
ATTEMPT to communicate is required
Issues should be discussed
IF the client permits… what issues should be discussed between the predecessor and prospective auditors?
- Basic information regarding issues that reflect directly on the integrity of management
- Disagreements about accounting principles or audit procedures
- Communications the predecessor auditors gave the former client about fraud, illegal acts, and internal control recommendations
- The predecessor auditors’ understanding about the reason for change of auditors (particularly about the predecessor auditors’ termination)
What does the responsibilities principle require auditors to do?
Comply with the appropriate ethical requirements for each audit engagement
Independence in Appearance
Relates to the perceptions of auditors’ independence (auditor needs to be objective)
A lack of independence can result in…
Disciplinary action by regulators and/or professional organizations and litigation by those who relied on the financial statements
Engagement Letter
“Establishes an understanding with the Entity”
Outlines the responsibilities of the client and the auditor
Formal contract that protects both parties
(Management is supposed to provide things in a timely manner)
Audit Plan
- How are you going to gather sufficient appropriate evidence on which to base the opinion on the financial statements?
- Auditor needs to develop and document a plan that describes the procedures to be performed to assess the risk of material misstatement at the financial statement and assertion level
How does an auditor mitigate risks?
The auditor must carefully plan the nature, timing, and extent of control tests and substantive tests
Staffing the Audit Engagement
- Audit engagement partner
- Audit manager
- Audit staff
- IT audit specialist (more likely for public companies)
- Tax partner/manager/senior
- Quality assurance partner
Why are more experience staff members typically assigned to new clients, clients with complex transactions, and public clients?
SEC regulations for public, difficulty, shareholder’s interest, legal liability (litigation risk)
Considering the work of internal auditors
Must obtain an understanding of a client’s internal audit department and its work
Who has to have internal auditors?
Companies traded on the NYSE (not required for NASDAQ)
Audit efficiency of working with internal auditors
How can I use the internal audit as an external auditor to make my job as efficient as possible?
Prior to using work of internal auditors…
assess the internal auditors’ objectivity and competence
Rely less (or not at all) in risky areas (materiality, risk, judgement)
Should you delegate tasks that require extensive professional judgement to internal auditors?
No
What are the two ways to use internal audits?
Reliance: external auditors use internal auditors’ wok
Direct assistance: external auditors use the internal auditors to work (employee is kind of on “loan”)
Internal audits are used in what kind of situations?
low risk and straight-forward
Use of Auditor-Employed Specialists
- Specialists are persons skilled in fields other than accounting and auditing (actuaries, geologists, etc.) and who are not members of the audit team
- Auditors must know about the specialist’s professional qualifications, experience, and reputation
- Specialists should be unrelated to the client (objectivity)
- Auditors should evaluate the work of specialists
- Specialists are typically not referred to in the audit report (the auditor is taking responsibility for the specialists)
Use of Company-Employed Specialists
- Must consider objectivity and competence of the company specialist
- Must evaluate the work of the company specialist, including evaluating data, methods, or assumptions made
- The extent of the evaluation of the work is contingent on the risk of material misstatement in the area, the significance of the work to the auditor’s conclusion, and the objectivity and competence of the company specialist
Time Budget
Used to maintain control of the audit by identifying problem areas early on in the engagement, thereby ensuring that the engagement is completed on a timely basis
Interim Audit Work
Refers to procedures performed several weeks or months before the balance sheet date
(work used before year-end)
Year-End Audit Work
Refers to procedures performed shortly before or after the balance sheet date
(for fiscal year end 12/31 - December until filed (March))
Materiality
Refers to an amount (or transaction) that would influence the decisions of users - an amount (or event) that would make a difference. the emphasis is on the user, rather than management or the audit team.
The United States Supreme Court interpretation of materiality is that a fact is material if…
there is a substantial likelihood that the…fact would have been viewed by the reasonable investor as having significantly altered the “total mix” of information made available
The determination of materiality requires…
professional judgement
What establishes materiality for the financial statements as a whole?
Overall/Planning Materiality
What is used as a basis for designing audit tests?
Tolerable misstatement or performance materiality
When is materiality used during the audit?
Up front to design tests and at the end to evaluate