Chapter 3 Flashcards
Process of clinical assessment is like?
Has been likened to a funnel… The clinician begins by collecting a lot of information across a broad range of the individual’s functioning to determine where the source of the problem may lie. After getting a preliminary sense of the overall functioning of the person, the clinician narrows the focus by ruling out problems in some areas and concentrating on areas that seem most relevant.
Reliability
Degree to which a measurement is consistent—for example, over time or among different raters.
Validity
Degree to which a technique actually measures what it purports to measure.
What are the types of validity?
Comparing the results of one assessment measure with the results of others that are better known allows you to begin to determine the validity of the first measure. This comparison is called concurrent validity.
Predictive validity is how well your assessment tells you what will happen in the future.
Standardization
Process of establishing specific norms and requirements for a measurement technique to ensure it is used consistently across measurement occasions. This includes instructions for administering the measure, evaluating its findings, and comparing these to data for large numbers of people.
The clinical interview
The interview gathers information on current and past behaviour, attitudes, and emotions, as well as a detailed history of the individual’s life in general and of the presenting problem. Clinicians determine when the specific problem first started and identify other events (e.g., life stress, trauma, physical illness) that might have occurred about the same time. In addition, most clinicians gather at least some information on the patient’s current and past interpersonal and social history, including family makeup (e.g., marital status, number of children, student currently living with parents), and on the individual’s upbringing. Information on sexual development, religious attitudes (current and past), relevant cultural concerns (such as stress induced by discrimination), and educational history are also routinely collected.
Mental status exam
Relatively coarse preliminary test of a client’s judgment, orientation to time and place, and emotional and mental state; typically conducted during an initial interview
Appearance and behaviour of a mental status exam
The clinician notes any overt physical behaviours, such as Frank’s leg twitch, as well as the individual’s dress, general appearance, posture, and facial expression.
Thought processes of a mental status exam
When clinicians listen to a patient talk, they’re getting a good idea of that person’s thought processes. They might look for several things here. For example, does the person talk really fast or really slowly? Does the patient make sense when he or she talks or are ideas presented with no apparent connection? In addition to rate or flow and continuity of speech, what about the content? Is there any evidence of delusions (distorted views of reality)? The individual might also have ideas of reference, where everything everyone else does somehow relates back to him
Mood and affect
Mood is the predominant feeling state of the individual, as we noted in Chapter 2. Does the person appear to be down in the dumps or continually elated? Does she or he talk in a depressed or hopeless fashion? Are there times when the depression seems to go away? Affect, by contrast, refers to the feeling state that accompanies what we say at a given time.
Intellectual functioning
Intellectual functioning. Clinicians make a rough estimate of others’ intellectual functioning just by talking to them. Do they seem to have a reasonable vocabulary? Can they talk in abstractions and metaphors (as most of us do much of the time)? How is the person’s memory? We usually make some gross or rough estimate of intelligence that is noticeable only if it deviates from normal, such as concluding the person is above or below average intelligence.
Sensorium mental status exam
Intellectual functioning. Clinicians make a rough estimate of others’ intellectual functioning just by talking to them. Do they seem to have a reasonable vocabulary? Can they talk in abstractions and metaphors (as most of us do much of the time)? How is the person’s memory? We usually make some gross or rough estimate of intelligence that is noticeable only if it deviates from normal, such as concluding the person is above or below average intelligence.
Semi-structured interviews
Semistructured interviews are made up of questions that have been carefully phrased and tested to elicit useful information in a consistent manner, so clinicians can be sure they have inquired about the most important aspects of particular disorders. Clinicians may also depart from set questions to follow up on specific issues—thus the label “semistructured.” Because the wording and sequencing of questions has been carefully worked out over many years, the clinician can feel confident that a semistructured interview will accomplish its purpose. The disadvantage, of course, is that it robs the interview of some of the spontaneous quality of two people talking about a problem. Also, if applied too rigidly, this type of interview may inhibit the patient from volunteering useful information that is not directly relevant to the questions being asked.
Are physical exams required before making a diagnoses?
If the patient presenting with psychological problems has not had a physical exam in the past year, a clinician might recommend one, with particular attention to the medical conditions sometimes associated with the specific psychological problem. Many problems presenting as disorders of behaviour, cognition, or mood may, on careful physical examination, have a clear relationship to a temporary toxic state. This toxic state could be caused by bad food, the wrong amount or type of medicine, or the onset of a medical condition (hypothyroidism is a good example).
How to determine if problems associated with the disorder are co-exsisting or casual?
If a current medical condition or substance abuse situation exists, the clinician must ascertain whether it is merely co-existing or causal, usually by looking at the onset of the problem. If a patient has experienced severe bouts of depression for the past five years but within the past year also developed hypothyroid problems or began taking a sedative drug, then we would not conclude the depression was caused by the medical or drug condition.
Behavioural Assessment
Measuring, observing, and systematically evaluating (rather than inferring) the client’s thoughts, feelings, and behaviour in the actual problem situation or context. goes past the mental status exam by Measuring, observing, and systematically evaluating (rather than inferring) the client’s thoughts, feelings, and behaviour in the actual problem situation or context.)
What is targeted in behavioural assessment?
In behavioural assessment, target behaviours are identified and observed with the goal of determining the factors that seem to influence those behaviours. It may seem easy to identify what is bothering a particular person (i.e., the target behaviour), but even this aspect of assessment can be challenging.
What are the ABC’s of intervention?
his mother asking him to put his glass in the sink (antecedent),
the boy throwing the glass (behaviour), and
his mother’s lack of response (consequence).
Informal and formal observation
- informal observation. During the home visit, the clinician took rough notes about what occurred. Later, in his office, he elaborated on the notes. A problem with this type of observation is that it relies on the observer’s recollection and on his or her interpretation of the events.
-Formal observation involves identifying specific behaviours that are observable and measurable. For example, it would be difficult for two people to agree on what “having an attitude” looks like. A formal observation, however, clarifies this behaviour by specifying that this is “any time the boy does not comply with his mother’s reasonable requests.”