Chapter 3 Flashcards

1
Q

Investigating the impact of a prevention technique or intervention on the level of subsequent crime, fear, or other intended outcome is referred to as:

    generalizability
    evaluation
    external validity
    reliability
    none of the above
A

Evaluation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Ekblom and Pease argue that the goals of evaluation include all but which of the following?

understanding the implementation of the intervention
understanding the impact of the initiative
understanding who had the most impact on a project
all of the above are goals
none of the above are goals
A

Understanding who had the most impact on a project

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Another name for an impact evaluation is:

    force evaluation
    benefit evaluation
    outcome evaluation
    scientific evaluation
    none of the above
A

outcome evaluation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

The fact that neighborhoods or other geographic areas are often targeted in prevention raises all but which of the following problems?

    neighborhoods cannot be isolated
    interventions are not uniformly applied
    crime displacement may occur
    there are competing influences
    all of the above are problems
A

all of the above

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

The largest problem with a cost-benefit analysis is:

    setting monetary values on all factors
    accessing the needed data
    getting the proper people involved
    securing funding
    none of the above
A

setting monetary values on all factors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Which of the following is NOT a reason for an atheoretical evaluation?

an evaluation has already been conducted
there is no interest in why the program works
the administrators already know the program works
there is a lack of interest in undertaking an evaluation
all of the above are reasons
A

an evaluation has already been conducted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Which of the following is NOT an advantage of a true experimental design?

increases the likelihood of group equivalency
certainty that the experimental group receives the treatment
other possible factors are controlled
costs can be assessed
all of the above are advantages
A

costs can be assed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

The taking of measurements in the study that cause change to occur in place of or beyond the impact of the stimulus refers to the problem of:

    history
    instrumentation
    testing
    selection
    none of the above
A

testing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Something that takes place independent of the experiment and causes the change to take place refers to:

    history
    instrumentation
    testing
    selection
    none of the above
A

history

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Which of the following is NOT a threat to external validity listed by Tilley?

    place attributes
    non-crime options
    selection
    intervenor attributes
    all of the above are threats
A

all of the above are threats

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

The underlying problem for external validity is that, too often, experimental designs fail to consider the __________.

    context of the program
    costs of the program
    implementation of the program
    dosage of the program
    none of the above
A

context of the program

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

The negative findings in an evaluation may be the result of all but which of the following?

poor program implementation
misspecification of the appropriate target
misspecification of the causal mechanism
resistance by the target
none of the above
A

none of the above

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Impact evaluations consider the implementation of a program or initiative and involve determining the procedures used to implement a specific program

A

false

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

The fact that crime prevention initiatives rarely rely on a single intervention or approach is an advantage in conducting evaluations

A

fasle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Process evaluations offer a detailed descriptive account of the program and its implementation

A

true

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Self-report data is a response to evaluations of crime prevention programs on neighborhoods or other small geographic areas that do not coincide with specific police reporting areas

A

true

17
Q

The ideal follow-up time for evaluation is 6 months

A

true

18
Q

A true experimental design is also known as a randomized control trial

A

true

19
Q

Threats to internal validity are factors that could cause the results other than the measures that were implemented

A

true

20
Q

The issue of generalizability involves what are called threats to internal validity

A

false

21
Q

Intensity of intervention in relation to target people, places of crime problems varies from site to site, and the level refers to the external validity problem of intervenor attributes

A

false

21
Q

Intensity of intervention in relation to target people, places of crime problems varies from site to site, and the level refers to the external validity problem of intervenor attributes

A

false

22
Q

In realistic evaluation, rather than relying exclusively on experimental approaches, evaluation needs to observe the phenomenon in its entirety

A

true