Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Civil Procedure > Chapter 29 - Affidavits > Flashcards

Chapter 29 - Affidavits Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
Civil Procedure 1L flashcards
1
Q

AFFIDAVITS

Overview

A

1) General principles on affidavit
2) Forms & formats of affidavit
3) Affidavit by two or more deponents
4) Affidavits by illiterate or blind person
5) Contents of affidavit
6) Issues on contents of affidavit
7) Jurats
8) Issues on jurats
9) Defective affidavit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

GENERAL PRINCIPLES ON AFFIDAVITS

Overview

A

1) What is an affidavit
2) Contents of affidavit
3) Applicability of EA
4) Affidavit as pleadings
5) Affidavit in civil proceedings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

GENERAL PRINCIPLES ON AFFIDAVITS

What is an affidavit

A
  • A sworn & written statement under oath.
  • Contains certain facts within the deponent’s knowledge.
  • Can be used as evidence of the matters deposed therein.
  • Statement made in an affidavit must be the truth and not fabricated.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

GENERAL PRINCIPLES ON AFFIDAVITS

Contents of affidavit

A
  • Intitulement;
  • Statement of facts;
  • Forms of jurat;
  • Exhibits.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

GENERAL PRINCIPLES ON AFFIDAVITS

Applicability of EA

A

S.2 EA:

  • EA does not apply to affidavit.
  • Any irregularities of an affidavit may not be raised based on EA.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

GENERAL PRINCIPLES ON AFFIDAVITS

Affidavit as pleadings

A

O.28, r.8:

  • affidavit may be ordered to stand as pleadings when O.S is converted to writ.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

GENERAL PRINCIPLES ON AFFIDAVITS

Affidavit in civil proceedings

A

1) Affidavit in support:

  • Legal action begun by O.S or NoA;
  • Intends to be used as a mean of adducing evidence.

2) Affidavit of service:

  • An affidavit supporting delivery of case-related papers to one or more parties in a legal matter;
  • Certifies service of a notice, Summons, Writ or process.
    Sending representative must sign, swear to the statement therein.
  • Act as evidence or proof that the documents have been served in the event no reply is received from the other party.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

FORMS & FORMAT OF AFFIDAVIT

Overview

A

1) Forms of affidavit
2) Exhibits
3) Signature

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

FORMS & FORMAT OF AFFIDAVIT

Forms of affidavit

A

O.41, r.1:

  • Must be sworn & affirmed.
  • Averment as to the particulars of the deponent.
  • Narration of facts in an affidavit must be neatly paragraphed.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

FORMS & FORMAT OF AFFIDAVIT

Exhibits

A

O.41, r.11:

  • Must be annexed at the back of the affidavit;
  • Marked with certain alphabetical caption.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

FORMS & FORMAT OF AFFIDAVIT

Signature

A

Mohd Nazir bin Badar Shair v Timbalan Dalam Negeri:

  • the signature of a Commissioner of Oaths in an affidavit showing that it has been sworn before him is an official act;
  • the affidavit must be presumed to have been regularly affirmed even though the jurat is on a completely new page unless the contrary is proved.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

AFFIDAVIT BY TWO OR MORE DEPONENTS

The law

A

O.41, r.2

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

AFFIDAVIT BY ILLITERATE PERSON

Overview

A

1) The law
2) Meaning of illiterate
3) Requirement of certification

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

AFFIDAVIT BY ILLITERATE PERSON

The law

A

O.41, r.3

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

AFFIDAVIT BY ILLITERATE PERSON

Meaning of illiterate

A

Fulcrum Capital Sdn Bhd v Low Kon Yang:

  • a person as disadvantaged as a (braille-untrained) blind person;
  • a person who is ignorant of letters, whose ignorance is aptly described by the Malay term “buta huruf”.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

AFFIDAVIT BY ILLITERATE PERSON

Requirement of certification

A

Ravi a/l Suppiah v Timbalan Menteri Hal Ehwal Dalam Negeri & Anor:

  • A person administering the oath must certify that the deponent is illiterate.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

CONTENTS OF AFFIDAVIT

Overview

A

1) The law
2) Facts able to prove
3) Source & ground of information
4) Hearsay, whether allowed
5) Matters which are scandalous, irrelevant or oppressive
6) Exhibits or annexed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

CONTENTS OF AFFIDAVIT

The law

A

O.41, r.5

19
Q

CONTENTS OF AFFIDAVIT

Facts able to prove

A

1) The law - O.41, r.5(1):
- Facts that deponents are able to prove
2) Non-party - Lori Malaysia Berhad v Arab-Malaysian Finance:
- a person who was not a party to the relevant transaction naturally had no personal knowledge of the matter.

20
Q

CONTENTS OF AFFIDAVIT

Source & ground of information

A

1) The law:
- O.41, r.5(2)
2) Scope:

Stating the source of information & grounds for believing the information.

3) Example of source - Dynacast (S) Pte Ltd v Lim Meng Siang & Ors:

  • “Saya telah dinasihati oleh peguam cara saya dan sesungguhnya percaya bahawa saya mempunyai pembelaan yang bermerit dan oleh itu perkara ini harus diperbicarakan.”
  • “Saya telah dinasihati oleh peguam cara saya” is the source of the information;
  • “dan sesungguhnya percaya” is the grounds for believing that information.
21
Q

CONTENTS OF AFFIDAVIT

Source of information - serious allegation

A

Lee Meow Lim v Leew Meow Nyin:

  • Since it is a serious allegation, the deponent of the affidavit, should disclose the source of information & belief.

Ref. JL Young Manufacturing Co Ltd:

  • The English Court of Appeal has commented strongly on the irregularity of an affidavit founded merely upon information and belief, without giving the source of such information and belief.
22
Q

CONTENTS OF AFFIDAVIT

Source of information - failure to state source

A

1) J.L Young Manufacturing Co Ltd:

  • Failure to state the source of information or belief renders the affidavit irregular;
  • The affidavit is inadmissible as evidence, whether on an interlocutory or a final application.

2) Dynacast (S) Pte Ltd v Lim Meng Siang & Ors:

  • If the sources are not so identified, they are purely hearsay evidence.
  • An affidavit of information and belief which does not state the source of the information or belief is irregular and therefore inadmissible in evidence;
  • As such statements of information or belief have no probative value unless the sources and grounds of the information and belief are revealed.

3) Seow Mui Kim v Perwira Habib Bank:

  • Unless the offending parts are small compared to the complying parts, and the Court may ignore the offending parts instead of disallowing the use of the entire affidavit.
  • Otherwise, it would be a material defect non-curable under O.2, r.1 or O.41, r.4.
23
Q

CONTENTS OF AFFIDAVIT

Hearsay, whether allowed

A

1) general - Datuk Bandar Kuala Lumpur v Zain Azahari bin Zainal Abidin (CA):

  • Hearsay evidence may not be admissible by way of affidavit if the deponent has no knowledge;
  • If the deponent is a public decision-maker, he must make full & frank disclosure of the source & ground.

2) interlocutory applications - Ahmed Ibrahim Bilal v Ketua Polis Negara (2011):

  • By virtue of O.41, r.5(2), hearsay evidence may be included in an affidavit in interlocutory proceedings, provided that their sources & grounds are disclosed.
  • Secondhand hearsay: not allowed as they are too “ easy”
24
Q

CONTENTS OF AFFIDAVIT

Matters which are scandalous, irrelevant or oppressive

A

1) The law:
- O.41, r.6
2) Scandalous & irrelevant - Repco (M) Sdn Bhd v Than Tho Fatt:
- Scandalous AND irrelevant: both must be present.

25
Q

CONTENTS OF AFFIDAVIT

Exhibits & annexed

A

1) the law:
- O.41, r.11
2) Right to peruse exhibits - Palaniappa Chettiar v Tan Jan & Anor:
- the certificate is part of the affidavit and that the signature is attached to the affidavit as a whole and therefore to every part of it.
3) Non-compliance - SOP Plantantions (SUA) Sdn Bhd v Ading Ak Layang:
- non-compliance with O.42 r.11(2) was not fatal but only an irregularity which could be cured.

26
Q

ISSUES ON CONTENTS OF AFFIDAVIT

Overview

A

1) Source of information
2) Affidavit sworn after filing of OS
3) Affidavit sworn after filing of petition
4) Affidavit filed after the hearing has commenced
5) Affidavits affirmed outside Malaysia
6) Whether solicitor may affirm on behalf of client

27
Q

ISSUES ON CONTENTS OF AFFIDAVIT

Source of information

A

1) Newspaper - Perwira Affin Bank Berhad v Lorraine Esme Osman:
- Without any supporting documents or sources, newspaper report by themselves are insufficient to conclusively establish a fact in dispute.
2) Example - Dynacast (S) Pte Ltd v Lim Meng Siang & Ors:

  • “Saya telah dinasihati oleh peguam cara saya dan sesungguhnya percaya bahawa saya mempunyai pembelaan yang bermerit dan oleh itu perkara ini harus diperbicarakan.”
  • “Saya telah dinasihati oleh peguam cara saya” is the source of the information;
  • “dan sesungguhnya percaya” is the grounds for believing that information
28
Q

ISSUES ON CONTENTS OF AFFIDAVIT

Affidavit sworn on or before filing of OS

A

1) Before OS - Yang Lak Man v Yang Paw Man:
- affidavit dated earlier than date of issuance of O.S is not fatal or irregular.
2) Earlier or on the date of OS - Standard Chartered Bank Malaysia Bhd v Arivalan Krishnan & Anor:

  • It would be inconvenient or impractical for the affidavit to be affirmed on or after the date on which originating summons has been filed and extracted;
  • it would mean filing the originating summons first, obtain the extract copy with the case number and then file the affidavit in support.
  • Therefore, an affidavit dated earlier or on the date of issuance of O.S is not a nullity & does NOT render the affidavit defective & inadmissible.
29
Q

ISSUES ON CONTENTS OF AFFIDAVIT

Affidavit sworn after filing creditor’s petition

A

Re Delta Drive (M) Sdn Bhd; Hong Leong Finance v Delta Drive (M) Sdn Bhd (No. 2) (2000):

  • r.26 would not be breached if the petition was filed in the morning and the affidavit verifying the petition was filed in the afternoon on the same day.
  • The premature swearing or affirming of an affidavit verifying petition is a mere irregularity curable under r.193.
  • It can be rectified by a re-swearing of the affidavit and the order sought by the petition can be made thereafter.
30
Q

ISSUES ON CONTENTS OF AFFIDAVIT

Affidavit filed after hearing has commenced

A

Tan Jiak Chye v Tan Toh Hua & Anor:

  • It was unusual for the an affidavit to be filed after the hearing had commenced;
  • The affidavit filed without the leave of court after hearing had commenced will be rejected by the court.
31
Q

ISSUES ON CONTENTS OF AFFIDAVIT

Affidavit affirmed outside Malaysia

A

1) O.41, r.12
2) O.41, r.13
3) Notaries Public Act

32
Q

ISSUES ON CONTENTS OF AFFIDAVIT

Whether solicitor may affirm affidavit on behalf of the client

A

Malayan Banking Berhad v Chatere Field Corporation Sdn Bhd:

  • A solicitor may depose an affidavit on behalf of litigant, provided that:

1) The facts deposed must not be contentious or disputed question of facts;
2) The facts to be deposed must be from his own knowledge; and
3) The solicitor must have been authorised by the litigant to depose the affidavit on his behalf.

33
Q

JURATS

Overview

A

1) Forms of jurats
2) Position of jurats
3) Title on jurats
4) Indorsement on jurats

34
Q

JURATS

Forms of jurats

A

O.41, r.1(8):

  • Form 74
35
Q

JURATS

Position of jurats

A

Fulcrum Capital Sdn Bhd v Low Kon Yang:

  • jurat shall be positioned after the substantive content of the affidavit;
  • this is to show that the jurat relates directly to the deposition; and
  • to obviate the possibility of abuse by a party who might otherwise pre-execute the jurat to an affidavit.
36
Q

JURATS

Position on jurats - effect of wrong position

A

Mohd Nazir bin Badar Shair v Timbalan Dalam Negeri:

  • There is no provision on the positioning of a jurat.
  • There is thus no legal basis for declaring a jurat defective if it does not end on the last page of an affidavit.

NOTE: Observe O.1A.

37
Q

JURATS

Title on jurats

A

1) Mohd Nazir bin Badar Shair v Timbalan Dalam Negeri:

  • There is no requirement for a jurat to be entitled.
  • It is the affidavit and not the jurat that must carry the title of the action.

2) Alliance Bank Sdn Bhd & Ors v Mukhriz Mahathir & Anor:

  • An affidavit may still be filed & used in evidence with the leave of the court.
  • In the present case, the court refers to O.1A & held that it may use and accept the affidavits as the failure to insert the title of the action in the jurat is of very little significance or consequence as the jurat is not a separate document from the affidavit sworn.
38
Q

JURATS

Indorsement on jurats

A

Mohd Nazir bin Badar Shair v Timbalan Dalam Negeri:

  • The indorsement must be made at the end of the jurat.
  • This will show that the jurat, even though beginning and ending on a new page or is on a completely new page, relates to the deposition in question and that the affidavit is regular.
39
Q

DEFECTIVE AFFIDAVITS

Overview

A

1) Scope
2) Supplemental affidavit
3) Examples of defective affidavit

40
Q

DEFECTIVE AFFIDAVITS

Scope

A

1) O.41, r.4:
- Court may grant leave for the use of a defective affidavit, notwithstanding its irregularity.
2) Whether affidavit may be ordered to be taken off - Rossage v Rossage:

  • The court has a complete jurisdiction over its own records;
  • It may order that an affidavit, filed in any matter, be forthwith taken off the filed & destroyed.
41
Q

DEFECTIVE AFFIDAVITS

Supplemental affidavit

A

Syarikat Islamiyah v Bank Bumiputra:

  • Supplemental or corrective affidavit may be used to correct the defect;
  • provided that the defendant is not prejudiced.

NOTE: Observe O.1A.

42
Q

DEFECTIVE AFFIDAVITS

Examples of defective affidavit - lack of endorsement

A

1) PPEC (M) Sdn Bhd v REPC Services Sdn Bhd:

  • The judge allowed the reliance on the affidavit as the lack of endorsement had been properly and adequately accounted for as a simple act of inadvertence.
  • The defendants were not in any way prejudiced nor did the defendants face any difficulty by this oversight.

2) Standard Chartered Bank Malaysia Berhad v Hua Hung Sawmill Company Sdn Bhd:

  • O.41, r.9(2): an affidavit that is not endorsed is not completely shut out from being used in any proceedings;
  • The party relying on the affidavit still has the avenue of seeking leave from the court for the use of the same.
  • OTF, the learned Deputy Registrar allowed the P’s application in spite of such omission.
  • Appellate court also would not hesitate to grant leave for the use of affidavits in question on the same ground advanced by the learned DR had the P made such an application to the court.
43
Q

DEFECTIVE AFFIDAVITS

Examples of defective affidavit - foreign deponent in local language

A

Ian James Roger v Menteri Sumber:

  • Englishman affirming in Malay will render the affidavit invalid as neither of them understood the Malay language;
  • there was no jurat.

Civil Procedure (43 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions