Chapter 22: Mergers and Corporate control Flashcards
Holding company
a form of corporate control in which one corporation controls other companies by owning some or all of their stocks
Primary motivation for most mergers
To increase the value of the combined enterprise
Synergy
Occurs when the whole is greater than the sum of its parts.
Synergistic merger
when the post merger earnings exceed the sum of the separate companies’ pre-merger earnings
Sources of synergistic effects
- operating economies (economies of sale)
- differential efficiency (more efficient firm’s management will increase overall efficiency after merger)
- financial economies
- tax effects
- increased market power (reduced competition)
Financial economies
- decreased borrowing costs
- decreased transaction/ issuing costs
- improved coverage from security analysts
Oligopoly
when several firms dominate an industry and choose not to compete on the basis of prices
firms as a group behaving like a monopoly
Why might a profitable company want to acquire a firm with low or even negative income
if firm to be acquired has large accumulated tax losses those losses may be used to offset the acquiring firm’s taxable income
(congress has limited the use of loss carryforwards in mergers specifically to limit this practice)
alternately may be able to use that firm’s carried-over interest expenses
Why use excess free cash flow to acquire another company rather than pay dividends or repurchase stock?
If pays dividends, stockholders must pay tax on those dividends
if repurchase stock the selling shareholders must pay capital gains taxes, acquisition avoids these tax consequences
Per the book this is not a good reason to acquire another entity
Breakup value
a firm’s value if it’s assets are sold off in pieces
if higher than combined value may be motivation for certain specialists to acquire the company in order to sell off the pieces for a profit
Diversification as a motive for mergers
debatable. May help stabilize earnings but there is researching showing that diversified conglomerates are worth less than the sum of their individual parts
may work for the owner-manager of a closely held firm, for whom acquisition may be less difficult than selling closely-held stock
Types of mergers based on the business of the acquirer and target
- horizontal
- vertical
- congeneric
- conglomerate
horizontal merger
one firm combines with another in the same line of business
Roll-up merger
Type of horizontal merger where a firm purchases many small companies in the same industry and “rolls them up” to create a consolidated brand
Vertical merger
Merger where one company’s products are used by the other company (merger of upward or downward sections of the supply chain)
Congeneric Merger
“allied in nature or action”
Merger of related enterprises that are not producers of the same product (horizontal) or in a producer-supplier relationship (vertical)
Conglomerate merger
merger of unrelated enterprises
Primary purchase methods for mergers and acquisitions
1) stock offerings to provide target shareholders with stock in the acquirer’s post-merger company in exchange for their snares
2) cash offers to purchase assets
3) cash offers to purchase shares
hidden liabilities
liabilities that are unknown by the acquirer at the time of acquisition
may become responsibility of acquirer without prior knowledge if acquire target shareholders’ stock
Due diligence
the detailed investigation of a target of a potential acquisition, including financial statements, legal liabilties, etc…
cash purchase of assets
acquirer not generally responsible for hidden liabilities since they and the target specify which assets go to the acquirer
Types of hidden liabilities
- unforeseen by both acquirer and target (product liabilities)
- known by target’s senior managers but hidden from the acquirer
- known but grossly underestimated at the time of the merger
Merger waves
the empirical observation that mergers tend to cluster in time, becoming frequent in some years and infrequent in others
Historical merger waves
- 1900s (horizontal mergers create monopolies)
- 1920s (mergers consolidate industries and integrate supply chains)
- 1960s (creation of conglomerates)
- 1980s (hostile takeovers and congeneric mergers)
- 1990s (deregulation leads to mergers of once-sheltered industries)
steps of a merger once a target has been identified
1) establish a suitable price or price range
2) decide on payment terms
3) decide how to approach company management
to tender shares (in case of a merger)
When stockholders of a merger target turn over their shares to a designated financial institution, along with a signed power of attorney that transfers ownership of the shares to the acquiring firm
Friendly merger
when the target company’s management agrees to the merger and recommends that the shareholders approve the deal
hostile merger
Occurs when the management of the target company resists the offer from the acquiring company. Acquiring company bypasses the management of the target company and makes an offer directly to the company’s shareholders
tender offer
the offer of one firm to buy the stock of another by going directly to the stockholders, frequently over the opposition of the target company’s management
Takeover defenses
- staggered terms for directors (not all directors elected at one time so boards cannot be changed over all at once)
- requiring a super majority (75%) to approve any mergers
- raise potential antitrust issues to the justice department
- appeal to another company to acquire the target firm first
- poison pill defense
- golden parachutes
- greenmail
white knight
a friendly competing bidder that a target management likes better than the company making a hostile offer. Target solicits a merger with the white night as a preferable alternative
Defensive merger
occurs when the management of an acquisition target under threat of hostile takeover seek out a friendly company to acquire their company
White squire
an investor who is friendly to current management and can buy enough of the target firm’s shares to block a merger/ hostile takeover
golden parachute
a large payment to executives who are forced out when a merger takes place
Poison pill defense
shareholder rights provision allowing existing shareholders in the target to purchase additional shares of stock at a lower-than-market value if a potential acquirer purchases a controlling stake
Greenmail
when the target buys back stock from the acquirer at a higher than market price in return for the acquirer agreeing to cease acquisition attempts for a specified number of years
Requirements of the 1968 Williams Act
- acquirers must disclose current holdings and future intentions within 10 days of amassing 5% or more of a company’s stock
- acquirers must disclose the source of the funds to be used in acquisition
- target firm’s shareholders must be allowed at least 20 days to tender their shares (offer must be open for 20 days)
- if acquiring firm increases the offer price during the 20-day open period then all shareholders who tendered prior to the new offer must receive the higher price
Control share acquisition statutes
state statutes intended to limit voting power (if raider purchases enough stoke to be able to impact the vote regarding the takeover)
Business combination statutes
state statutes that come into effect if a minority shareholder (such as a raider) owns more than a specified percentage of voting shares
may forbid raider from acquiring target for some given period
Expanded constituency statutes
state statutes that expressly permit the board to consider stakeholders other than just shareholders (ex: employees)
Assumption of Labor contract laws
state laws mandating that hostile acquirers continue to honor existing labor contracts