Chapter 20 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is Slander?

A

Slander is a defamatory statement that is simply spoken without any way of being permanent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is Libel?

A

Libel is a type of defamatory statement which is released in permanent form through any written media, this could be a news article or even a twitter post.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Definitions of defamatory statements:

A
  • A defamatory statement is a statement that can cause or result in serious harm to a person or organisation.
    • This serious harm can include:
      • Exposing the victim to hatred, ridicule or contempt, or causing them to be shunned or avoided;
      • Lowering the victim in the views of the right thinking public;
      • Or disparaging the victim in their place of work.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What does “meaning of words” refer to?

A

“Meaning of words” refers to what a statement means in the public eye. This is because for a statement to be classed as defamatory, it first has to be proven that it has harmed, or could be harming to, a client.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is an inference?

A

An inference is a statement which has a secondary meaning which can be understood by someone, without special knowledge, who “reads between the lines in the light of his general knowledge and experience of worldly affairs”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are innuendos?

A

Innuendos in defamation law are statements that seem to be innocuous to some people but are defamatory to people with special knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is meant by bane and antidote?

A

Bane and antidote is a term that basically describes a situation where a defamatory meaning may be conveyed by a particular sentence, but might be removed by the context which follows in the article.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Why media organisations may be reluctant to fight defamation actions?

A
  • It is an uncertainty on how a judge will decide the meaning of what was published.
    • When it comes to defamation actions, it is difficult to properly prove it in court.
    • If they lost a defamation trial, they could lose a substantial amount of money in damages.
    • The legal costs of the case are enormous for both sides involved, which are normally payed by the loosing side on top of their own legal fees.
    • Due to the legal costs, it is often easier to settle the claims outside of court.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What two key points in the defamation act of 2013 have helped make it easier to defend libel action?

A
  • Firstly, it abolished the use of a jury for defamation cases.
    • Secondly, it states that a statement is not defamatory unless it has caused, or is likely to cause, serious harm to the victim’s reputation.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Why should journalists try to print a prompt apology if an innocent error has occurred?

A

Printing a prompt apology can result in lowering the chances of an offended individual suing, resulting in saving thousands of pounds that could have gone towards legal fees. It can also play a significant part in the court’s consideration of whether a statement caused “serious harm” to a clients reputation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly