Chapter 2: Methodology Flashcards
Bystander effect
When witnessers in the crime scene in the big city do nothing to help the victim. This is the result of “diffusion of responsibility.”
Hindsight bias
Tendency to exaggerate how much we could’ve predicted outcome after knowing it occurred.
Theory and hypothesis
Theory is developed. The hypothesis is formulated and derived from theory and is tested. After obtaining results, the theory is revised, and new hypotheses are formed.
3 types of research methods
- Observational method: describing the social behavior by observing people and recoding their behavior.
- Correlational method: predicting social behavior by making relationships between independent and dependent variables.
- Experimental method: making causal inference, involving direct intervention, and changing independent variable to see effect.
Examples of observational method
- Ethnography: when researchers attempt to understand a group or culture by observing the behavior for the inside without interfering or imposing preconceived notions.
- Interjudge reliability: level of agreement b/w 2 or more people who independently observer and code a set of data.
- Archival analysis: when researcher examines accumulated documents of a culture likes diaries p, magazines, novels, etc.
Limits of observational method
There is inadequate information from archives and inaccurate data. Because of this, researchers are not able to predict social behavior.
Correlation coefficient
A statistic that assesses how well you can predict one variable from another. It’s designated “r”.
- if r>0: positive correlation; x and y are directly proportional.
- if r
Example of correlational method
Survey: research in which representative sample of people are asked questions about their attitudes or behavior.
Random selection of people in a population is very important; people have equal chance of being selected for a sample.
Problems of correlational method
- Accuracy of responses in surveys: straightforward questions are easy to answer, but asking participant how and why they behaved in some hypothetical situation, inaccuracy is invited.
- Correlation does not equal causation
- Hidden third variable
Internal validity
Keeping everything in the experiment the same except the independent variable.
High internal validity is accomplished by controlling all extraneous variables and by randomly assigning people to different experimental conditions.
Problem: situation can become somewhat artificial and distant from real life.
Random assignment to condition
Process whereby all participants have equal chance of taking part in any condition of an experiment; researchers can be relatively certain that differences in participants’ background or personalities are evenly distributed across conditions.
Probability level (p-value)
Number that tells researchers how likely it is that the results of their experiment occurred by chance and not because of independent variable.
If p-value
External validity
Extent to which results of a study can be generalized to other situations and other people.
High external validity is accomplished with high generalizability, ability to conduct field experiments, and using cover story.
Problem: researchers cannot control independent variable.
Psychological realism
Extent to which the psychological processes triggered in an experiment are similar to those that occur in everyday life.
Cover story is used.
Cover story
A disguised version of the study’s true purpose.