Chapter 2 - Law Of Torts LO2 Flashcards

1
Q

Unliquidated / Unspecified damages

A

Amount of damages is not fixed in advanced and will be decided by courts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Actionable per se

A

Claimant does not have to prove they have suffered loss or damage - only that tor has been committed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Strict liabilities
Rylands vs Fletcher (1886)

A

person may be held liable if action is neither intentional or negligent
when defendant is liable for committing an action

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Trespass characteristics(3)

A

Act of defendant must be direct
Act must be intentional
Tort is actionable per se

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Types of trespass to person (3)

A

Assault - Threatening gestures
Battery - Hostile application or physical force
False imprisonment - Bodily restraint

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is Trespass to goods

A

Directly and intentionally interferes with goods

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is trespass to land (3)

A
  1. Unlawful entry onto another persons land
  2. Remaining on the land
  3. Placing or throwing things onto the land
    Must be intentional
    Actionable per se
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Negligence (3)

A
  1. Duty of care owed by the defendant to the claimant
  2. A breach of that duty by the defendant
  3. Damage suffered by the claimant as a result of the negligent act
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Neighbour principal / reasonable foreseeability

A

Duty of care owed to another person if it is reasonably foreseeable that they will be affected by one’ acts or omission

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Breach of duty

A

Fails to do what a reasonable man would do

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Original test for remoteness

A

Purely on causation
Defendant liable for injury directly caused by negligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Overseas Tankship vs Mort’s Dock and Engineering (The wagon Mound)

A

Thin skull / eggshell skull. Damages are not reasonably foreseeable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

The wagon Mound

A

New test based on foreseeability - Damage would be too remote if it was not reasonably foreseeable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Negligent Misstatement - Hedley Byrne v Heller

A

Before this case there was no liability in tort for negligent words, advice only for acts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Wheb dies liability arise under Hedley vs Burn

A

Liability arises when:
- special relationship between parties (but not contract)
- Giver of advice can reasonably foresee that advice will be acted on and cause damage if inaccurate
- advice is, in fact, acted upon, causing the loss

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Public Nuisance

A

Annoyance to the public

17
Q

Private Nuisance

A

Noxious things to escape and interfere with claimants land
Interfering with rights of claimants land

18
Q

Defence against strict liability

A

Consent of claimant
Act of god
Unexpected act of a stranger
Statutory authority

19
Q

Employers Liability

A

Duty at common law therefore not strict but duty to take reasonable care for safety of employees

20
Q

Health and Safety at Work (1974)

A

Takes common law of the duties of employer and makes the subject to criminal law

21
Q

Vicarious Liability

A

When one person is liable for another persons wrong

22
Q

OLA 1957

A

Common duty of care to all visitors present on the land of another

23
Q

OLA 1984 - UPDATED

A

Principal established in Herrington case extends duty of care to trespassers and other uninvited entrants

24
Q

Liability of defective producs

A

if victim was buyer of the good they can sue the seller
If victim not buyer then action in tort based on negligence or under the Consumer protection Act 1987

25
Q

Libel

A

Statement in permanent form: email, text, social media

26
Q

Slander

A

Non permanent deformatry speech

27
Q

Defence for defamation

A

Truth
Honest opinion
Publication on a matter of public interest
Innocent defamation
Privilege

28
Q

General defences in tort (4)

A
  1. Self defence
  2. Necessity - Carried out to avoid greater evil
  3. Statutory authority - alleged to be a tort is permitted by statute law
  4. Consent - Claimant agrees to the act done by defendant
29
Q

Volenti non fit injuria

A

no legal wrong is done

30
Q

Special damages

A

Claimant has to give notice when they make their claim and must prove strictly at trial

31
Q

Aggravated damages

A

Court may add addtional damages

32
Q

Exemplary / Punitive damages

A

Awards which exceed the loss

33
Q

Nominal damage

A

Actionable per se tort committed and no real loss - e.g token may be awarded

34
Q

Contemptuous

A

Tiny sum of money e.g small coin

35
Q

Consumer protection act 1987

A

Introduces strict liability on faulty goods sold for private use

36
Q

Limitation periods
Prsnl injury, libel, other torts

A

Libel = 1 yr

Prsnl Injury = 3yrs

Other torts = 6yrs