CHAPTER 2: Justifying Circumstances and Circumstances which exempt from Criminal Liability Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What are the circumstances affecting Criminal Liability

A
JUSTIFYING CIRCUMSTANCES
EXEMPTING CIRCUMSTANCES
AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES
MITIGATING CIRCUMSTANCES
ALTERNATIVES CIRCUMSTANCES
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

OTHER CIRCUMSTANCES found elsewhere in the RPC

A

ABSOLUTORY CLAUSE
effect is to ABSOLVE the offender from criminal liablity, although not from civil liability

EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES
effect is to MITIGATE the criminal liability of the offender and has the SAME EFFECT as MITIGATING CIRCUMSTANCES

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

EXAMPLES of EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES

A

CONCEALMENT OF DISHONOR
in the crime of INFANTICIDE insofar as the mother and maternal grandparents are concerned
PENALTY: lowered by two degrees

ADULTERY
committed by a married woman ABANDONEDby her husband

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

IMPUTABILITY

A

It is the quality by which an act may be ASCRIBED to a person as its author or owner. It implies that the act committed has been FREELY and CONSCIOUSLY done and may therefore be put down to the doer as his own.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

RESPONSIBILITY

A

it is the OBLIGATION of TAKING the penal and civil consequences of the crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

GUILT

A

it is an ELEMENT of RESPONSIBILITY

for a man cannot be held responsible for the consequences of a crime unless he is gulity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q
JUSTIFYING CIRCUMSTANCES
(definition)
A

Those where the act of a person is said to be IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW, so that such person is deemed NOT TO HAVE TRANSGRESSED the law and is FREE from both CRIMINAL and CIVIL LIABILITY.

An AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, hence, the BURDEN OF PROOF is on the ACCUSED who must prove it by CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE

GR: no civil liability
XP: Art. 11, par.4 (avoidance of greater evil or injury)
where the civil liability is BORNE by the PERSONS BENEFITED by the act

Note: NO CRIME; NO CRIMINAL
Basis: Lack of Criminal Intent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

JUSTIFYING CIRCUMSTANCES

A
  1. Self-Defense
  2. Defense of Relatives
  3. Defense of Stranger
  4. Avoidance of greater evil or injury
  5. Fulfillment of duty or lawful exercise of right or duty
  6. Obedience to an order issued for some lawful purpose
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

RIGHTS INCLUDED IN SELF DEFENSE

A
  1. Right to HONOR:
    slap on the face is considered as an unlawful aggression since the face represents a person and his dignity
  2. Defense of PROPERTY RIGHTS:
    can be invoked if there is an attack upon the property ALTHOUGH IT IS NOT COUPLED WITH AN ATTACK UPON THE OWNER;
    all the elements of justification must be present
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

SUBJECTS OF SELF-DEFENSE

A

(PRPH)

Person
Rights
Property
Honor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

REASONS FOR RECOGNIZING SELF-DEFENSE AS A JUSTIFYING CIRCUMSTANCE

A
  1. Impulse of SELF-PRESERVATION

2. State CANNOT PROVIDE PROTECTION for each of its constituents

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

REQUISITES; SELF-DEFENSE

A

(URL)

  1. UNLAWFUL AGGRESSION (sine qua non)
  2. REASONABLE NECESSITY of the means employed to prevent or repel it
  3. LACK of SUFFICIENT PROVOCATION on the part of the person defending himself
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

REQUISITES; AVOIDANCE OF GREATER EVIL OR INJURY

A

(EIP)

  1. EVIL sought to be avoided ACTUALLY EXISTS
  2. INJURY FEARED be GREATER than that done to avoid it
  3. no other PRACTICAL and LESS HARMFUL MEANS of preventing it
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

REQUISITES; DEFENSE OF RELATIVES

A

(URP)

  1. UNLAWFUL AGGRESSION
  2. REASONABLE NECESSITY of the means employed to prevent or repel it
  3. PROVOCATION - although given by the person attacked, the one making the defense HAD NO PART therein
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

REQUISITES; DEFENSE OF STRANGERS

A

(URM)

  1. UNLAWFUL AGGRESSION
  2. REASONABLE NECESSITY of the means employed to prevent or repel it
  3. MOTIVE - person defending must NOT BE INDUCED BY

a. REVENGE;
b. RESENTMENT; or
c. OTHER EVIL MOTIVE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly