Chapter 2 Global theory of curves Flashcards
smooth
A vector funct is smooth on I if it extends to an infinitely differentiable vector function defined on open interval J containing I
e.g I=(a,b) inff diff on x
I=[a,b]-smooth funct on I extends to smooth funct on (a-e,b+e) e>0
PARAMETRISED CURVE
A PARAMETRISED CURVE is a SMOOTH vector function
REGULAR
if γ’(t) =/ 0 for all t in I
VELOCITY
γ’
SPEED
|γ’|
e.g of parametrised curves
simple circular curve
when is it regular
parametrised plane curve
γ:R to R^n
γ(t) = (rcos 2πt, rsin 2πt) r>0
regular
γ’(t) =(-2πr sin2πt, 2πr cos 2πt)
|γ’(t)| =2πr>0 never 0
e.g of parametrised curve
is it regular
γ:R to R^3
γ(t) = (t^3,t^2)
γ’(t) =(3t^2,2t)
=(0,0) for t=0
not regular
ACCELERATION
γ’’
LENGTH
L(γ) = Integral_[a,b] |γ’(t)|.dt
e.g of parametrised curves
straight line
when is it regular
give another repara
γ:R to R^n
γ(t) =a+tv a,v in R^n
regular when γ’(t) =v iff v=\0
γ~(𝜏)= a+ (tan𝜏)v
𝜏 in J=(-pi/2,pi/2) is a reparameterization of γ
φ(𝜏) = tan𝜏 regular
but
𝜏^3 wouldnt be regular
-𝜏 would be traversed in opposite direction
circular helix
is it regular?
γ(t) = (rcost,rsint,ht) r>0
regular
RPC:
for any h in R
γ’(t)=(-rsint,rcost,t)
if h=0 but periodic so never equal to 0
DEF
RE-PARAMETRISATION
of a parametrised curve
γ:I to R^n
is another parametrised curve
γ~ : J to R^n s.t
γ~= γ∘φ
where
φ:J to I is a SMOOTH SURJECTIVE funct s.t φ’(t)>0 for any t in J (strictly increasing)
RETAINS IMAGE, DIRECTION TRAVERSED, #TIMES IF CLOSED
γ~= γ∘φ
where
φ:J to I is a SMOOTH SURJECTIVE funct s.t φ’(t)>0 for any t in J (strictly increasing)J to I is a SMOOTH SURJECTIVE funct s.t φ’(t)>0 for any t in J (strictly increasing)
φ
is called the parameter transform
allows us to evaluate original PC using different input φ(t) for t in J
and is a BIJECTION
as injective
γ~= γ∘φ
used to reparametrise
consider
γ(t) = (a + t(b-a)) t in [0,1]
thus we can always define a PC on [0,1] from [a,b]
using the reparametrisation
φ’(t)>0
φ(t) = a +t(b-a)
φ(0)=a
φ(1)=b
can be used for smooth surjective funct
PROPN 2.1
which re-parametrisations of regular closed curves are RPC
EVERY re-para of an RPC is an RPC
proof:
by chain rule
γ~’(𝜏)= (γ∘φ)’(𝜏)
= φ’(𝜏) γ’(φ(𝜏) =/0
we know
φ’(𝜏)>0 for all 𝜏 in J
γ’(t) =/0 for all t in I
thus PC γ~ is
REGULAR
length of arc
Let γ : I → R
n be a PC. For a closed interval [t_0, t_1] ⊂ I the quantity
L(γ| [t_0, t_1]) =
integral_[t_0,t_1]
|γ’(t)| dt
is called the length of the arc
γ| [t_0, t_1].
arc length for repara
prop 2.2
The length of an arc does not change under a re-parametrisation
proof: prop 2.2
The length of an arc does not change under a re-parametrisation
Let ˜γ : J → R^n be a re-parametrisation of a PC γ : I → R^n, that is ˜γ = γ ◦ϕ, where ϕ : J → I is a function that satisfies the hypotheses of Definition II.3. Suppose that ϕ maps [τ_0, τ_1] → [t_0, t_1] bijectively. Then by the change of variables formula, we obtain
L( ˜γ| [τ0, τ1]) =
∫{τ_0,τ_1] |γ˜’(τ )| dτ =
∫{τ_0,τ_1] |γ’(ϕ(τ ))| ϕ’(τ )dτ =
∫_{t_0,_1] |γ’(t)| dt
= L(γ| [t_0, t_1]),
ϕ’(τ ) > 0 t_0 = ϕ(τ_0), t_1 = ϕ(τ_1).
change of vars integral fromula
∫{a,b] f(x).dx = ∫{c,d} f(g(t__g’(t).dt
g([c,d]) to [a,b]
example: considering PCS
γ_ℓ:R to R^2
γ_ℓ (t)=(cos2πℓ, sin2πℓ)
γ_1(t)=(cos2π, sin2π)
are they reparametrisations?
γ_1 =γ_ℓ ◦ϕ
ϕ(t)= ℓt
t to ℓt
but
NO: check ARC LENGTH
|γ_ℓ ‘(t)| = 2πℓ
L(γ_ℓ|[0,1]) = ∫_{0,1} 2πℓ .dt
=2πℓ
|γ_1 ‘(t)| = 2π
L(γ_1|[0,1]) = ∫_{0,1} 2π .dt
=2π
not the same
note their image looks the same!
UNIT SPEED CURVE
A PC γ : I → R^n is called a unit speed curve (USC) if |γ’(t)| = 1 for any t ∈ I.
MAKES IT EASIER TO FIND LENGTH
PROPN 2.3 USC exist?
Let γ : I → R^n be an RPC. Then there exists a re-parametrisation γ˜ of γ that has unit speed.
PROOF:
Let γ : I → R^n be an RPC. Then there exists a re-parametrisation γ˜ of γ that has unit speed.
Proof. Pick a point t0 ∈ I and consider the arc-length function
s(t) = integral_[t_0,t] |γ’(τ )| dτ.
Clearly, s : I → R is a smooth function, and s’(t) = |γ’(t)| > 0. Denote by J the image of s; it
is an interval in R . Then s : I → J is bijective, and there is an
inverse function
ϕ = s−1: J → I.
By the inverse function theorem, ϕ is smooth,
ϕ’(τ ) =
(1/s’(ϕ(τ ))) > 0.
ϕ can be used as a parameter transformation
γ˜’(τ ) = γ’(ϕ(τ ))ϕ’(τ ) chain rule
= γ’(ϕ(τ ))/s’(ϕ(τ ))
= γ(ϕ(τ ))/ |γ’(ϕ(τ ))| ,
thus USC
|γ˜’(τ )| = 1.
DEFN
normal component of acceleration
γₙ’‘(t)
found by
[γ’‘(t)- [γ’‘(t) *γ’(t)][|γ’(t)|²] γ’(t) ]
CURVATURE VECTOR OF
γ
k(t)
(1/|γ’(t)|²)
[γ’‘(t)- [γ’‘(t) *γ’(t)][|γ’(t)|²] γ’(t) ]
=γₙ’‘(t) /|γ’(t)|²
RECALL IN EXAM
diagrams for acceleration, velocity vectors
For a curve compute acceleration and velocity
taking projection of acceleration on velocity
v =γ’(t)/|γ’(t)|
taking orthogonal component and γ’’ prokected onto notmal
ie γ’’ projected onto γ’
true or false
the curvature vector orthogonal to velocity?
true always
k(t) γ’(t)
=
(1/|γ’(t)|²)
[γ’‘(t)γ’(t)
- [γ’‘(t) γ’(t)][|γ’(t)|²] γ’(t)γ’(t) ]
=0??
true or false reparametrisation keeps arc length
true, it will have same properties, if we find a phi s,t it doesnt clearly this isnt a repara
PROP 2.4
curvature vector
how does is change under re-parametrisation?
The curvature vector is unchanged under a re-parametrisation, that is if
γ˜ : J → R^n is a re-parametrisation of an RPC γ : I → R^n, then
˜k(t) = k(ϕ(t)) for any t ∈ J,
where γ˜ = γ ◦ ϕ,
˜k is the curvature vector of γ˜, and k is the curvature vector of γ
if USC
dot prod
γ’ * γ’=
γ’’ * γ’
=1
=0
as if USC velocity orthogonal to acceleration
if our curve isnt USC?
we can always reparameterise
into a USC
preserving image
traversed in same direction
same #times
regularity
length
and curvature preserved
EXAM EXAMPLE
given a curve check its regular:
Given 2 parametrised curves determine whether related by parametrisation or not
γ_1(t)= a+tv line in R^n
γ_2(t) = r(cos 2pit, sin2pit)
γ_3(t) = a +t^3v
circle
take line and wrap around circle
1 &3:
1 regular 3 not regular as γ’_3(0)=0 so not
1 and 2: straight line has curvature k(t)=0 so cant be repara of a circel as regions where curvature never equals 0
Given 2 parametrised curves determine whether related by parametrisation or not
γ_2(t) = r(cos 2pit, sin2pit)
defined for [0,1]
γ_4(t) = r(cos 4pit, sin4pit)
both regular
velocity >0
γ’_4(t) = 2γ’_2(t)
length preserved?
|γ’_2| = 2pir
|γ’_4| = 4pir
length arc different so not repara
integrating over [0,1] gives double
CLOSED CURVES
DEFORMATIONS OF A CIRCLE
e.g
point end at same place
SPHERE IN R^3
2 parameters
2D object in R^3,R^4,..
def T-Periodic
A vector-function f : R → R^n is called T-periodic (or periodic with period T > 0) if f(t + T) = f(t) for any t ∈ R.
e.g
periodicity of
f(t) = sin(2πt)
g(x) = sin (x )
h(t) = t^2
f(t) = sin(2πt) 1-periodic smooth function,
g(x) = sin x 2π-periodic smooth function.
On the other hand, any unbounded continuous function h : R → R
(e.g. h(t) = t) can not be T-periodic with T > 0
continuous funct on closed interval period?
are bounded, may be periodic
PROPN 2.5 when do we have a periodic extension
A smooth function γ : [a, b] → R^n has a smooth (b − a)-periodic extension
IFF
all derivatives at the ends coincide
γ⁽ᵐ⁾(a) = γ⁽ᵐ⁾(b)
for any non-negative integer m.
L5 PROOF
A smooth function γ : [a, b] → R^n has a smooth (b − a)-periodic extension
IFF
all derivatives at the ends coincide
γ⁽ᵐ⁾(a) = γ⁽ᵐ⁾(b)
for any non-negative integer m.
LONG SUMMARISE??
uses that ends coincide then periodic can be shown as adding f(a+T) =f(b)?
(T₁, T₂)-equivariant
A real-valued function ϕ : R → R is called (T₁, T₂)-equivariant for given positive real numbers T₁& T₂ , if
ϕ(t + T₂) = ϕ(t) + T₁ for any t ∈ R.
ie
evaluated at t + T₂
same as evaluating at t and adding T₁
diagram 2T_2 for 2T_1 increments
example
ϕ(t) = 2πt
(T₁, T₂)-equivariant
( 2π, 1)-equivariant
for any t in R
ϕ(t + 1) = 2π(t + 1)
= 2πt + 2π = ϕ(t) + 2π.
how are T periodic functs and (t_1,t_2) equivariant functs linked
*any T-periodic function
is (0, T)-equivariant function.
- derivative of a (T_1, T_2)-equivariant function is a T_2-periodic function.
*equivariant functions often occur as integrals of periodic functions
L5:
Let f : R → R be a T2-periodic function. Can you show that the function ϕ, defined below, is
(T1, T2)-periodic:
ϕ(t) = ∫{0,t} f(s)ds,
where
T1 =∫{0,T_2} f(s)ds
ϕ(t +T_2) =
∫_{0,t+T_2} f(s)ds
using change of vars
𝜏=s-T_2
d𝜏/ds =1
𝜏_1= s_1-T_2=0
𝜏_2 =s-T_2 -t = ?
= ∫{0,T_2} f(s)ds + ∫{T_2,t+T_2} f(s)ds
= T_1 + ∫_{0,t+T_2} f(s)ds
= T_1 +ϕ(t)
PROPN 2.6 equivariant function composed with periodic function gives
Let ϕ : R → R be a (T1, T2)-equivariant function. Then for any T1-periodic vector-function f : R → R^n the composition
f ◦ ϕ is a T_2-periodic vector function.
proof:
For any t ∈ R
f ◦ ϕ(t + T2) = f(ϕ(t + T2)) = f(ϕ(t) + T1) = f(ϕ(t)) = f ◦ ϕ(t),
where in the second relation we used equivariance of ϕ, and in the third – the periodicity of f.
PROP 2.7
when to we have a (T_1,T_2) equivariant extension
Let ϕ : [c, d] → [a, b] be a surjective smooth function. Then it has a smooth (T1, T2)-equivariant extension ϕ¯ : R → R with
T_1 = (b − a) and
T_2 = (d − c)
IFF
ϕ(c) = a,
ϕ(d) = b, and
ϕ⁽ᵐ⁾(c) = ϕ⁽ᵐ⁾(d)
for any integer m > 0.
Proof. (For MATH5113M only.) The proof follows an argument similar to the one in the proof of
Proposition II.5.
CLOSED PARAMETRISED CURVE
A vector-function γ : [a, b] → R
n is called a closed parameterised curve (CPC) if it has a (b − a)-periodic extension ¯γ : R → R^n that is a smooth map.
“no distinguished start /end”