Chapter 2: Express Private Trusts Flashcards
Does a trust need to be in writing?
No, a trust can arise from written or spoken words or by conduct
What are the three certainties?
The requirements for a valid express private trust
- Certainty of intention
- Certainty of subject matter - (property to be included in trust)
- Certainty of objects - (the beneficiaries)
Who is the settlor?
The person who creates a trust
How does a settlor demonstrate certainty of intention?
The settlor must show by written or spoken words or conduct that they intend to subject the trustee to a binding obligation
No particulars words necessary
Can there be certainty of intention if the settlor did not own the property which they intended to include in the trust?
No, the settlor must’ve manifested the intention to create the trust whilst they owned the property
Can there be intention for the trust to take place in the future?
No, the intention must be for the trust to take effect immediately
What is precatory language?
- Words such as “hope”, “desire” and “wish”.
- Do not create a trust as they do not demonstrate intention to impose binding obligation on trustee.
Can informal words or actions show intention?
Yes, phrases such as “this money is as much your money as it is mine” and joint withdrawals from a back account for joint use may give rise to a trust
What happens if there is uncertainty as to intention?
- The trust is void for uncertainty of intention
- The property passes as an outright gift to the person who would’ve been the trustee
Can subjective phrases create a trust?
- No
- Phrases such as “most of my estate” are not sufficiently certain to create a trust.
Can a trust for a fractional share be sufficiently certain?
- A trust for fractional shares can be sufficient.
- If the item is for tangible property e.g. 20 bottles of wine from warehouse, the trust will fail unless trust assets have been segregated. This is because there is no specification as to which wine bottles.
An interest placed in trust must presently exist. True or false?
- True.
- A future interest may be held in trust e.g. House deeded to Abigail for life and then to Benjamin. Whilst Abagail is alive, Benjamin only has a future interest. This is a vested future interest and can be trust property.
- However, an interest not yet in existence cannot be held in trust. Therefore, property to be inherited cannot be included. This is because there is an expectancy and the person may not give the gift.
Beneficial entitlement must be certain, what does this mean?
It must be clear how much of the property left on trust that the beneficiary will receive
If an objective phrase such as “reasonable income” is used, will this be sufficiently certain?
Yes
What happens if the subject matter is uncertain?
- The trust is void
- The property reverts to the settlor
How can beneficiaries under a trust be identified?
By their names or reference to a concept which defines the class of beneficiaries e.g. “my nephews and nieces”
When a concept is used, it must be capable of objective determination. True or false?
True
How is certainty of objects established in fixed trusts?
- The complete list test
- The beneficiaries must be named or described sufficiently to enable the trustee to draw up a complete list of beneficiaries
Under the complete list test (certainty of objects), do beneficiaries need to be in existence at the date of the trust?
- No
- Beneficiaries merely need to be ascertainable at the time their interests come into enjoyment
- E.g. “for my son for life with the remainder to his children living at his death” - the settlor’s son may have more children after the trust is created.
If in a fixed trust, the fund is to be divided equally between a group of people described and not named, will this be valid?
- Yes, but the description must be capable of objective determination
- A gift to “my kindest friends in equal shares” would be insufficient
If a beneficiary is known to exists but cannot be traced, will this cause the fixed trust to fail?
No, but the trustees should seek direction from the Court regarding the funds they are holding for a beneficiary who cannot be located
How is certainty of objects established in discretionary trusts?
The given postulant test is applied to determine whether any given person falls into the description of a class described in the trust
Under the given postulant test, is it necessary for the whole range of potential beneficiaries to be ascertainable?
No, so long as the description of the class is clear enough to enable the Court to decide whether a person is indeed a “given postulant”
What is the given postulant test?
Whether it can be said with certainty that any given individual is or is not part of the class
Would a trust for “my former colleagues” in equal shares be conceptually certain?
Yes, if it is possible to obtain records confirming how many former employees that there were.
What is administrative unworkability?
- If the objects are too wide to form a class, the trust will fail. Also known as capriciousness
- E.g. a trust for “all of West Yorkshire”- This is because West Yorkshire is inhabited by over 2.5m
What is capriciousness?
When a discretionary trust fails because it is administratively unworkable.
I.e. class is too wide. E.g. trust for all of West Yorkshire.