Chapter 2 Convergence And Sequences Flashcards
Prop 2.3 a in X (xn →a, d) if and only if
Let (x_n) be a sequence in a metric space X and
let a ∈ X. Then x_n → a in (X, d) if and only if d(x_n, a) → 0 in R.
Prop 2.8
proof
unique limit
*****
Suppose that x_n → a and x_n → b.
By axiom M3,
0 ≤ d(a, b) ≤ d(a, x_n) + d(x_n, b)
for all n.
Now since x_n → a and x_n → b, d(a, x_n) → 0 and d(x_n, b) →0.
By the algebra of limits (2.5), d(a, xn) + d(xn, b) → 0 and, by the Sandwich Rule, the constant sequence d(a, b) → 0.
Hence d(a, b) = 0, and, by Axiom M1, a = b.
Prop 2.12
convergence of subsequence
.Let x_n_1, x_n_2, x_n_3, . . . be any subsequence of (x_n). For any
ε > 0, there is a natural number N such that if n > N, d(x_n, a) < ε.
Now choose the natural number K so that n_K > N. If k > K, then
n_k > n_K > N, and we conclude that d(x_n_k, a) < ε. Thus (x_n_k) → a as n → ∞.
Prop 2.3
Let (xn) be a sequence in a metric space X and
let a ∈ X. Then xn → a in (X, d) if and only if d(xn, a) → 0 in R.
*****PROOF
As d(x_n, a) ≥ 0, d(x_n, a) ∈ B_R(0, ε ) ⇔ d(x_n, a) < ε ⇔ x_n ∈ B_X(a, ε).
By the definition of convergence, x_n → a in X if and only if d(x_n, a) →
0 in R.—
Given ε bigger than 0 there exists N in N st if n bigger than N |x_n -a| less than ε
⇔
d(x_n,a) = |x_n -a| → 0, |d(x_n,a)| less than ε
⇔
limit as n tends to infinity of x_n =a
limit as n tends to infinity of |d(x_n,a)|=0
DEF 2.1 limit
B(a, ε).
d(xn
Let (x_n) be a sequence in the metric space X =
(X, d). Let a ∈ X. We say that x_n → a, or that (x_n) has limit
a ∈ X, or that (x_n) converges to a, if, given ε > 0, there exists
N ∈ N so that, for all n > N, x_n ∈ B(a, ε), that is, d(xn, a) < ε.
EXAMPLE
Show that 1/√n → 0 in R.
Let ε > 0. By the Archimedean property of R, there exists
N ∈ N so that N > 1/ε^2
For n > N,
d(1/√n, 0) = 1/√n < 1/ √N < ε,
so 1/√n → 0.
in R we have limit properties:
Algebra of limits
(a) if y_n → y and c ∈ R then cy_n → cy. In particular, if
yn → 0 and c ∈ R then y_n → 0
(b) if y_n → y and z_n → z then y_n + z_n → y + z. In particular,
if y_n → 0 and z_n → 0 then y_n + z_n → 0.
(c) if y_n → y and z_n → z then y_nz_n → yz. In particular, if
y_n → 0 and z_n → z then y_nz_n → 0.
(d) if y_n → y, z_n → z, each z_n ≠0 and z ≠ 0 then y_n/z_n →y/z.
in R we have limit properties:
sandwich rule
If w_n ≤ y_n ≤ z_n for all n and w_n →l and
z_n → l then y_n → l.
In particular, taking w_n = 0 = l, if 0 ≤ y_n ≤ z_n and z_n → 0 then y_n → 0.
in R we have limit properties:
following sequences tend to 0
(a) 1/n^p (= n^−p) for any p > 0. This includes 1/n, 1/n^2 and
1/√n.
(b) a^n for any a such that −1 < a < 1
(only 0 ≤ a < 1 will be
relevant here).
Example 2.6. Show that
(1/√n,(n−1)/n)
→ (0, 1) in R^2 with the Euclidean metric.
d( (1/√n,(n−1)/n) , (0,1))
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ √((1/√n− 0)^2 + (((n-1)/n) -1)^2) \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ = √((1/n) + (1/n^2)) ≤ (√(2/n)) = √2 (1/√n)
By Summary 2.5(iii)(a) and (i)(a), √2 (1/√n) → 0. By the Sandwich Rule, d( (1/√n,(n−1)/n) , (0,1)) → 0 so, by Proposition 2.3, (1/√n,(n−1)/n) → (0, 1).
Example 2.7. Show that the sequence (f_n) in C[0, 1] defined by
f_n : [0, 1] → R, x → x^n/n,
converges to the constant function f(x) = 0 in C[0, 1] under both
d∞ and d1.
d_∞(f_n, f) = sup {|f_n(x) − f(x)| : x ∈ [0, 1]} = sup {x^n/n : x ∈ [0, 1]} = 1/n
as f_n increasing on [0,1], 1/n → 0 so, by Proposition
2.3, f_n → 0.
d_1(fn, f) = ∫ over [0,1] of |x^n/n -0|.dx
= ∫ over [0,1] of x^n/n .dx
= 1/(n(n+1)) less than 1/n^2
We know that 1/n^2 → 0 so, by the Sandwich Rule, d_1(f_n, f)→ 0 in R
and hence f_n → f in (C[0, 1], d_1).
Proposition 2.8
unique limit
A sequence (xn) in a metric space (X, d) has at most one limit.
Proposition 2.9
under d1 sequence in R^m converges
Let (x_n) = (x^1_n, . . . , x^m_n) be a sequence in R^m and
let x = (x^1, . . . , x^m) ∈ R^m.
Under the metric d_1, x_n → x, as n → ∞ if and only if x^j_n → x^j ∈ R , as n → ∞ for all 1 ≤ j ≤ m
–
holds for d_2 and d∞ because a sequence in R^m converges under d_1 if and only if it converges under
d_2 if and only if it converges under d_∞
DEF 2.11 SUBSEQUENCE
Let n_1 < n_2 < n_3 < . . . be an increasing
sequence of natural numbers and let (x_n) = x_1, x_2, x_3, . .
be a sequence in a metric space (X, d). Taking x_n_1, x_n_2, x_n_3, . . ., we
get a new sequence (x_n_k), which is a subsequence of (x_n).
For example we might have x_1, x_3, x_5, . . . or x_1, x_3, x_6, x_7, x_12, . . .. Note that
n_k > k.
PROP 2.12 for subsequences
Let (x_n) be a sequence in a metric space (X, d)
converging to a limit a ∈ X. Then any subsequence (x_n_k) also converges
to a.