Chapter 2 Convergence And Sequences Flashcards

1
Q
Prop 2.3
  a in X (xn →a, d) if and only if 
A

Let (x_n) be a sequence in a metric space X and

let a ∈ X. Then x_n → a in (X, d) if and only if d(x_n, a) → 0 in R.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Prop 2.8
proof
unique limit
*****

A

Suppose that x_n → a and x_n → b.
By axiom M3,
0 ≤ d(a, b) ≤ d(a, x_n) + d(x_n, b)
for all n.

Now since x_n → a and x_n → b, d(a, x_n) → 0 and d(x_n, b) →0.

By the algebra of limits (2.5), d(a, xn) + d(xn, b) → 0 and, by the Sandwich Rule, the constant sequence d(a, b) → 0.

Hence d(a, b) = 0, and, by Axiom M1, a = b.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Prop 2.12

convergence of subsequence

A

.Let x_n_1, x_n_2, x_n_3, . . . be any subsequence of (x_n). For any
ε > 0, there is a natural number N such that if n > N, d(x_n, a) < ε.
Now choose the natural number K so that n_K > N. If k > K, then
n_k > n_K > N, and we conclude that d(x_n_k, a) < ε. Thus (x_n_k) → a as n → ∞.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Prop 2.3
Let (xn) be a sequence in a metric space X and
let a ∈ X. Then xn → a in (X, d) if and only if d(xn, a) → 0 in R.

*****PROOF

A
As d(x_n, a) ≥ 0,
d(x_n, a) ∈ B_R(0, ε ) ⇔ d(x_n, a) < ε ⇔ x_n ∈ B_X(a, ε).

By the definition of convergence, x_n → a in X if and only if d(x_n, a) →
0 in R.—

Given ε bigger than 0 there exists N in N st if n bigger than N |x_n -a| less than ε

d(x_n,a) = |x_n -a| → 0, |d(x_n,a)| less than ε

limit as n tends to infinity of x_n =a
limit as n tends to infinity of |d(x_n,a)|=0

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

DEF 2.1 limit

B(a, ε).

d(xn

A

Let (x_n) be a sequence in the metric space X =
(X, d). Let a ∈ X. We say that x_n → a, or that (x_n) has limit
a ∈ X, or that (x_n) converges to a, if, given ε > 0, there exists
N ∈ N so that, for all n > N, x_n ∈ B(a, ε), that is, d(xn, a) < ε.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

EXAMPLE

Show that 1/√n → 0 in R.

A

Let ε > 0. By the Archimedean property of R, there exists
N ∈ N so that N > 1/ε^2

For n > N,
d(1/√n, 0) = 1/√n < 1/ √N < ε,
so 1/√n → 0.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

in R we have limit properties:

Algebra of limits

A

(a) if y_n → y and c ∈ R then cy_n → cy. In particular, if
yn → 0 and c ∈ R then y_n → 0

(b) if y_n → y and z_n → z then y_n + z_n → y + z. In particular,
if y_n → 0 and z_n → 0 then y_n + z_n → 0.

(c) if y_n → y and z_n → z then y_nz_n → yz. In particular, if
y_n → 0 and z_n → z then y_nz_n → 0.

(d) if y_n → y, z_n → z, each z_n ≠0 and z ≠ 0 then y_n/z_n →y/z.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

in R we have limit properties:

sandwich rule

A

If w_n ≤ y_n ≤ z_n for all n and w_n →l and
z_n → l then y_n → l.

In particular, taking w_n = 0 = l, if 0 ≤ y_n ≤ z_n and z_n → 0 then y_n → 0.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

in R we have limit properties:

following sequences tend to 0

A

(a) 1/n^p (= n^−p) for any p > 0. This includes 1/n, 1/n^2 and
1/√n.

(b) a^n for any a such that −1 < a < 1
(only 0 ≤ a < 1 will be
relevant here).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Example 2.6. Show that
(1/√n,(n−1)/n)
→ (0, 1) in R^2 with the Euclidean metric.

A

d( (1/√n,(n−1)/n) , (0,1))

  \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
√((1/√n− 0)^2 + (((n-1)/n) -1)^2)
      \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
=  √((1/n)  + (1/n^2))
≤
(√(2/n))  = √2 (1/√n)
By Summary 2.5(iii)(a) and (i)(a), √2 (1/√n) → 0. By the Sandwich
Rule,
d( (1/√n,(n−1)/n) ,  (0,1))
→ 0
so, by Proposition 2.3, 
(1/√n,(n−1)/n)
→ (0, 1).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Example 2.7. Show that the sequence (f_n) in C[0, 1] defined by
f_n : [0, 1] → R, x → x^n/n,
converges to the constant function f(x) = 0 in C[0, 1] under both
d∞ and d1.

A

d_∞(f_n, f) = sup {|f_n(x) − f(x)| : x ∈ [0, 1]} = sup {x^n/n : x ∈ [0, 1]} = 1/n

as f_n increasing on [0,1], 1/n → 0 so, by Proposition
2.3, f_n → 0.

d_1(fn, f) = ∫ over [0,1] of |x^n/n -0|.dx
= ∫ over [0,1] of x^n/n .dx
= 1/(n(n+1)) less than 1/n^2

We know that 1/n^2 → 0 so, by the Sandwich Rule, d_1(f_n, f)→ 0 in R
and hence f_n → f in (C[0, 1], d_1).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Proposition 2.8

unique limit

A
A sequence (xn) in a metric space (X, d) has at
most one limit.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Proposition 2.9

under d1 sequence in R^m converges

A

Let (x_n) = (x^1_n, . . . , x^m_n) be a sequence in R^m and
let x = (x^1, . . . , x^m) ∈ R^m.

Under the metric d_1, x_n → x, as n → ∞ if and only if x^j_n → x^j ∈ R , as n → ∞ for all 1 ≤ j ≤ m


holds for d_2 and d∞ because a sequence in R^m converges under d_1 if and only if it converges under
d_2 if and only if it converges under d_∞

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

DEF 2.11 SUBSEQUENCE

A

Let n_1 < n_2 < n_3 < . . . be an increasing
sequence of natural numbers and let (x_n) = x_1, x_2, x_3, . .

be a sequence in a metric space (X, d). Taking x_n_1, x_n_2, x_n_3, . . ., we
get a new sequence (x_n_k), which is a subsequence of (x_n).

For example we might have x_1, x_3, x_5, . . . or x_1, x_3, x_6, x_7, x_12, . . .. Note that
n_k > k.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

PROP 2.12 for subsequences

A

Let (x_n) be a sequence in a metric space (X, d)
converging to a limit a ∈ X. Then any subsequence (x_n_k) also converges
to a.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

fn to converge to a function f∈ C[a, b]:

A

fn to converge to a function f∈ C[a, b]:

• fn → f in the metric space (C[a, b], d1).
or
• fn → f in the metric space (C[a, b], d∞).

sequences (f_n(x)) for each x

17
Q

POINTWISE CONVERGENCE

A

We say that (f_n) converges pointwise to f if, for

each x ∈ [a, b], the sequence (f_n(x)) converges to f(x) in R.

18
Q

Example 2.14. Let (f_n) be the sequence of functions defined by
f_n(x) = 1 + x +x^2/2! + · · · + x^n/n!

A

for any x, e^x =Σ from i =0 to ∞ of (x^i/i!)

ie for each x,nΣ from i =0 to ∞ of (x^i/i!)→ e^x as n → ∞, and this exactly means that
(f_n) converges pointwise to e^x

19
Q

Let (f_n) be the sequence of functions defined by
f_n(x) = 1 + x +x^2/2! + · · · + x^n/n!

Show that, for b > 0, (fn) converges to e^x
in C([0, b]) under d∞.
A

Here |f_n(x) − e^x| = e^x − f_n(x). This has derivative e^x −f_{n−1}(x) = x^n/n! + x^{n+1}/(n+1)! +· · · ≥ 0 for all x ∈ [0, b] so it is increasing and
must take its maximum value at b. So d_∞(f_n(x), e^x) = |f_n(b)−e^b| →0 as f_n → f pointwise. Therefore (f_n) converges to e^x in C([0, b]).

20
Q

Proposition 2.15 pointwise.

A

If f_n converges to f in (C[a, b], d_∞), then f_n

converges to f in (C[a, b], d_1) and also f_n converges to f pointwise.

21
Q

Example 2.16.
In the space C([0, 1]), let f_n(x) =x^n

Does
the sequence (f_n) converge in any of the senses we’ve described?
A

Sketch the first few functions in the sequence. looks as if the graphs are getting closer and
closer together, and approaching some limit graph. limit graph seems to be
f(x)=
{0 if 0 ≤ x < 1
{1 if x = 1.
and this isn’t continuous. It turns out that whether this sequence
converges or not depends on our definition of convergence

22
Q
Example 2.16.
In the space C([0, 1]), let f_n(x) =x^n
show that:
(i)(fn) does not converge pointwise to any continuous function
f ∈ C[0, 1].
A

For x ∈ [0, 1], fn(x) = x^n
, which converges to 0 if x < 1, and converges to 1 if x = 1. Therefore if f_n converges pointwise to a function f ∈ C[0, 1], then

f(x)=
{0 if 0 ≤ x < 1
{1 if x = 1.
But this isn’t continuous, f ∉ C[0, 1].

23
Q

Example 2.16.
In the space C([0, 1]), let f_n(x) =x^n
show that:

(ii) (fn) does not converge in (C[0, 1], d∞).

A

from Proposition 2.15 that if (fn) converged in (C[0, 1], d∞),
then it would converge pointwise. But we know it doesn’t converge
pointwise.

24
Q

Example 2.16.
In the space C([0, 1]), let f_n(x) =x^n
show that:

(iii) (fn) converges to the zero function g(x) = 0 in (C[0, 1], d1)

A
For all n,
d1(fn, g) = 
∫ over[0,1] of  |fn(x) − g(x)|dx 
=
∫ over[0,1] of [x^n] dx 
=
1/{n + 1}  <  1/n

We know that 1/n → 0 so, by the Sandwich Rule, d_1(fn, g) → 0
and, by Proposition 2.3, f_n → g.

25
Q

function spaces and relationship between metrics

A

two natural
metrics on function spaces like C[0, 1] have very different properties.
When we deal with function spaces, we will try to be very careful
always to specify the metric.