Chapter 2 Flashcards
Role of Judiciary (Courts)
To interpret the laws and apply them to specific situations
Judicial Review
Determining whether laws or actions of the other two branches are constitutional; explicitly established by supreme court in Marbury v. Madison (1803); exercised by both state and federal courts
Jurisdiction
“Power to speak the law” (juris=law diction=to speak); court must have jurisdiction over defendant and over subject matter of dispute
In Personam Jurisdiction
Personal jurisdiction; by geography of residents or businesses
In Rem Jurisdiction
Jurisdiction over the thing, by geography of property location
Long Arm Statute
Court can excercise personal jurisdiction over certain out of state defendants bases on activities that took place within the state; must prove that defendant had sufficient “Minimum Contacts” with the state to justify jurisdiction
General Jurisdiction
“unlimited”; can decide cases involving a broad array of issues (i.e. State Trial Court, Federal District Court)
Limited Jurisdiction Courts
I.e State Probate courts - state courts handling transfer of a persons assets and obligations after death
i.e. Federal Bankruptcy Courts
Courts of Original Jurisdiction
Lawsuits begin, trials take place, evidence is presented; trial courts
Courts of Appellate Jurisdiction
Reviewing courts, must first file in trial court before appealing; not being heard for first time
Federal Questions
If plaintiff’s case is based on federal law, the court falls under judicial authority of federal courts and courts can apply federal law
Diversity of Citizenship
Federal court has jurisdiction over a case that does not involve a question of federal law; plaintiff/defendant residents of different states and the monetary value exceeds 75,000; will apply relevant state laws
Exclusive vs. Concurrent Jurisdiction
State/Federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction in some areas, but often a concurrent jurisdiction situation exists and the case can be brought in federal or state courts
Standing to Sue
Party must have a legally protected and tangible interest at stake in the litigation
Justiciable Controversy
A controversy that is real and substantial as opposed to hypothetical or academic