Chapter 2 Flashcards
According to Ruth Benedict, morality differs…
in every society, and is an convenient name for socially approved habits
According to Rachels cultural relativism is the view that
different cultures have different moral codes.
According to Rachels for cultural relativists the idea of universal truth in ethics
is a myth/incorrect
According to cultural relativists (customs)
the customs of different societies are all that exist.
Cultural relativism challenges…
challenges our beliefs in objectivity and universal truth.
According to Cultural relativism (universal truths)
there is no such thing as universal truth in ethics, there are only various cultural codes, and nothing more.
For many the key to understanding morality is this observation different cultures ___________
different cultures have different moral codes.
Which of the following claims have been made by cultural relativists?
1) different societies have different moral codes.
2) The moral code of a society determines what is right within that society.
Which claims have been made by cultural relativists? (4)
1) There is no objective standard that can be used to judge one society’s code as better than another’s.
2) The moral code of our own society has no special status.
3) It is arrogant for us to judge other cultures.
4) We should be tolerant of other cultures.
The cultural differences argument is the view that ____ it tries to
1) right and wrong are matters of opinion and opinions and vary from culture to culture.
2) tries to draw a substantive conclusion from the mere fact that people disagree.
Properly speaking cultural relativism holds that the norms of a culture
reign supreme within that culture.
Cultural relativists often employ a certain form of argument, beginning with
they begin with facts about cultures and end up drawing a conclusion about morality.
The cultural differences argument tries to (b/c ppl disagree)
derive a substantive conclusion about a subject from the mere fact that people disagree.
The cultural differences argument is invalid because
the truth of its conclusion does not follow from the premise.
From the mere fact that cultures disagree
it does not follow that there is no objective truth on the matter.