Chapter 2 Flashcards
Cause WW1
“The causes of World War I have been endlessly debated, but it perhaps suffice to say that if states are divided into hostile alliance systems are engaged in an arms race, as the European powers were, then war is likely” (Grant, 2009, p. 268).
Germany constitution WW1
-Otto von Bismarck and William I had orchestrated the unification of Germany under the leadership of Prussia by winning 3 successive wars between 1864 and 1871 (against Denmark, Austria and France).
They created a powerful, modern and prosperous German Reich/Empire. This unified Germany seemed menacing for the rest of Europe.
Bismarck relationship to other countries
- However, Bismarck also felt insecure. He was afraid that other European powers resented his new empire and they would form an anti-German military alliance.
- In fact, many historians see the two world wars like interconnected efforts by the French, Russians and British to resist Germany’s attempts to dominate Europe (Morrow, 2011).
- Bismarck no longer wished to provoke wars. Germany was in a hegemonic position so peace would allow his country to remain the most powerful country in Europe.
- His main concern was France. He wanted to make sure that France would be isolated because it was still a serious threat for Germany if it could find military allies.
Bismarck reaction to this feeling of insecurity - strategy and name
- Bismarck created what is known as the Bismarckian system. He knew that the only way the French could get their revenge was by finding allies to defeat Germany.
- To isolate France, Bismarck improved his relations with Austria-Hungary in 1879 and established an alliance with Italy.
- This led to the formation of the Triple Alliance in 1882 (Germany, Austria-Hungary and Italy).
- The only missing piece was Russia. Bismarck was afraid that Germany could eventually face attacks on two fronts, if the Russians made a pact with the French
What stoped Bismarck from created his super solid alliance
- But in 1890, William I died. Hence, Germany had a new Kaiser/Emperor, William II. He was “an intelligent egomaniac with a bad temper” (Hallcock, 2013, p.25).
- Germany’s new ruler did not think that it was a good idea to seek the friendship of Russia so he fired Bismarck.
- Russia was an enemy of Austria-Hungary and William II did not want to jeopardize the existing alliance with the Austrians
Consequnce of the new german alliance
-This allowed a Franco-Russian rapprochement in 1894. Their goal common was to limit Germany’s expansion.
Were alliances german only political move
- In the meantime, William II also worked tirelessly to create a German colonial empire despite Bismarck’s belief that this was a waste of time and money.
- William II started to mount a challenge against Great Britain’s naval and imperial dominance.
Consequence of the expanse of Germany’s colonial empire
- The Germans were quickly improving their navy and they started to acquire colonies in Africa such Cameroon, Togo, Namibia and Tanzania.
- The rise of Germany as an imperial and naval power annoyed the British: “Anglo-German rivalry over naval supremacy, or at least Britain’s perception that Germany threatened its long-standing dominance of the oceans, was a key factor in creating hostility between the two states before the war.” (Grayzel, 2013, p. 19).
- In 1907, the British joined the French and the Russians to make the Triple Entente.
Conclusion alliances b4 war
- The new German emperor, William II, had failed to continue the isolation of France that had been an obsession for Bismarck.
- William II had surrounded the powerful German empire that he inherited with enemies. He did exactly what Bismarck had tried to avoid.
- Europe was becoming dangerously polarized in two rival alliances: “The tragedy of Bismarck is that he constructed a delicate balance of European powers that could not be maintained without himself as the master juggler” (Roskin, 2013, p.29).
- Therefore, all the main European powers were polarized in two camps and militarism was on the rise. The number of soldiers increased by 1,000 percent during the 25 years before the Great War (Druiker & Momani, 2007).
Definition of Militarism
Definition of Militarism: “a policy of aggressive military preparedness; in particular, the large armies based on mass conscription and complex, inflexible plans for mobilization that European nations had before World War I” (Spielvogel, 2005, p.588).
consequence context of militarim
- In this context, any minor incident could trigger a major conflict: “it often takes only a spark to set off a firestorm” (Duiker & Momani, 2007, p.46).
- European rulers believed that their alliances were indispensable and they were ready to take foolish risks to respect their commitments to their military allies.
elemt déclencheur WW1
-The flame that ignited the conflagration was the assassination Franz Ferdinand, the Austrian archduke and the heir to the Austrian crown (it took place June 28, 1914. He avoided a bomb, a few hours before he was shot).
Assasination FF who what where when
-Franz Ferdinand and his wife, Sophia, were murdered by Gavrilo Princip, a member Black Hand; at the end of a visit to Sarajevo, a Bosnian city that had be taken by the Austrian back in 1908 (the Black Hand was terrorists/nationalists organization that wanted free Bosnia from the Austrians so it could join Serbia instead. It was part their plan to create a Slavic nation, in the Balkans).
Assasination FF consequences
- The assassination gave an excuse for the Austrians to attack Serbia. The Austrians began by making a harsh ultimatum that included 10 unreasonable requests that would have basically allowed them to control Serbia’s government and media.
- The Germans reassured their Austrian allies that they would support them if the Russians would assist Serbia.
WW1 beggining
- In July 1914, Russia mobilized troops to attack the Austrians. This was seen as an act of war. The system of competing alliances swung into action.
- Within one month (August, 1914) all the major powers of Europe declared war to each other except for Italy (Triple Entente vs. Triple Alliance).
- The Italians promised to aid their allies in case on an attack. They accused the Germans and the Austrians of being the aggressors so they had no obligations towards them (Italy eventually fought against Austria-Hungary. The countries of the Triple Entente promise that Italy’s contribution would be rewarded with a part of Austria-Hungary at the end of the war).
How did peeps excpect WW1 2 go
- When the war started during the summer of 1914, both sides were confident that they would be victorious before the end of 1914 (they were wrong. Exactly Five years elapsed between the assassination of Franz Ferdinand and the signing of the Treaty of Versailles the marked the end of the war).
- The naïve officers, nationalist political leaders and the gullible hoi polloi honestly taught that the soldiers would be back for Christmas: “the anticipation of carnage was delightful to something like ninety percent of the population” Bertand Russell, British philosopher, 1914.
western front name strat
- On the western front (Germany vs. France and Great Britain), the German strategy was to quickly invade France by going through neutral Belgium.
- This was the Schlieffen Plan (Alfred von Schlieffen had actually retired back in 1905 after developing this invasion plan).
how did invasion through Belgium work
- The war started well for the Germans. They quickly invaded Belgium at the end of the summer of 1914 after the Belgians refused to let Germans troops pass through their country.
- By September 1914, an army of 2 million German soldiers was already at the doorstep of Paris, the capital of France.
- The harsh treatment of the Belgians by the German troops urged the French population to do anything possible to avoid having to endure the humiliating fate of their Belgian neighbors.
- The initial momentum of the Germans was stopped by Joseph Joffre’s French troops at the Battle of the Marne (i.e., the Miracle of the Marne). The French used 2,000 Parisian taxi cabs to transport as many soldiers as possible to the battlefield (the contribution of the taxi driver was greatly exaggerated since they only transported a few thousand soldiers).
Battle of the Marne (i.e., the Miracle of the Marne) and consequences
- This battle caused about 500,000 deaths in 4 days of fighting. It was very important since it ended the Schlieffen Plan and Paris remained under French control.
- Many German officers were fired because of this failure because the Germans did not have the resources to win a very long war on two fronts.
- The Schlieffen Plan had to work to perfection because the emperor William II wanted to “Have Paris for lunch and St. Petersburg (Russia) for dinner”. The defeat of the Marne forced the Germans to readjust their game plan.
what type of war far entered after Battel of Marne
- The conflict was at a stalemate in October, 1914. Both sides dug 475 miles of parallel trenches stretched across northeastern France and protect their positions and prevented flaking maneuvers (the trenches went from the English Channel to the French border with Switzerland).
- What had been a fast passed war of movement was now war of attrition in the fall of 1914.
- Frontal assaults were extremely deadly so both sides had to settle for a defensive war when they saw that all attempts to make breakthroughs would lead their troops to be slaughtered.
was this type of warfare effective (trenches)
- Nobody was able to make significant progress for 4 years. The German war veteran and novelist describes the maddening conditions of life in the trenches in the classic novel All Quiet on the Western Front.
- Fritz Franke, a German soldier, described trench warfare more concisely when he wrote to his family in November, 1914: “Every foot of ground contested; and everywhere bodies - rows of them!”
no man’s land
- All attempts to advance in the “no man’s land” were deadly; the officers did not know how to dislodge opponents from their entrenchments (the distance between trenches could be as short as 100 yards. It was actually possible to dig tunnels to reach the other trench. Officers did not want the trenches to be comfortable to make sure that soldiers would want to get out).
- The European military officers had all been trained to fight wars of movement that characterized conflicts of the 18th and19th Centuries.
- They were surprised by modern weapons such as machine-guns, grenades, flame-throwers, and land-mines that made it almost impossible to break the enemy lines with traditional strategies.
battles WW1 proving trench is tough
Even the massive effort of the Germans to take the town of Verdun ended in failure. Verdun became a symbol of French courage and of the Germans inability to get a major victory (the Germans fired over 1 million artillery shells on the French during the battle longest battle of the war. The British and the French had a similar failure at the Battle of the Somme that was also fought in 1916).
German “tech”
-The Germans tried to use planes and poison gas to get the French and British out of their trenches but the gases frequently turned against them (chlorine gases contributed to the German victory at the Battle of Ypres, but Canadian soldiers managed to avenge the defeat of their French allies. They used handkerchiefs that were soaked in mud and urine to cover their face).
eastrern front begin of war
- Things were moving at a quicker pace on the eastern front. It was due to the problems of the Russian army.
- The Russians had been able to get early victories over Austria-Hungary. But they made a mistake by entering eastern Germany.
- This forced the Germans led by Paul von Hindenburg to get involved on the eastern front before they could achieve victory on the western front.
How did Russia match up to Germany
- The weaknesses of the Russian army were quickly exposed by the Germans (something that the Austrians were too inept to do).
- The Russians had plenty of manpower, but their soldiers were poorly-equipped and they were the victims of the poor leadership of their officers and their Czar, Nicholas II.
- The Russian army had every conceivable problem except a shortage of soldiers.
-In 1915, the Russian army had already lost 2, 5 million soldiers who were dead, captive or severely injured.
Battle russian went pertictaculartly poorly
-The Battle of Tennenberg, in eastern Germany, was particularly catastrophic for the Russian army (it led Samsonov, the Russian general responsible for this defeat, to commit suicide).
Russian army dope or nope ?
russian army biggest WW1,
- bad equipment, leadership, motivation and training
Italians later implication in the war
- However, Germany and Austria-Hungary had lost the support of Italy, their original partner in the Triple Alliance (Italy actually tried to help the Triple Entente but Italian troops performed very poorly against the Austrians and the Germans).
- Mussilini fought here as well led to leave communist party
Triple Alliance reaction to itlay jumping into the war against Austria-Hungary
-The Germans and Austrians compensated by adding the Ottoman Empire to their side.
Triple Entente reaction to Ottaman empire
- In April 1915, the British tried to quickly crush the Ottoman Empire.
- They failed because of their spectacular debacle at the Battle of Gallipolli (in the Dardanelles).
- The British’s poorly planned naval attack failed to open the way for the British infantry but the soldiers were sent anyway. They were massacred by entrenched Ottoman troops that were waiting for them on the coast.
- Winston Churchill was severely blamed for the poor planning of the British offensive. This led him to a depression and it temporarily halted his ascent as a rising star in British politics (the British tried to get Gallipoli for 8 months. They failed and lost 250,000 soldiers in the process).
who was credited win battle of gallipoli
-On the other hand, Mustafa Kemal received most of the credit for the victory and he became a hero for the Turks of the Ottoman Empire (Kemal became the most influential politician in the history of modern Turkey).
who eventually took down ottoman empire
-It was Thomas Lawrence (Lawrence of Arabia), a young British officer, who would eventually cause the demise of the Ottoman Empire by convincing the Arabs to revolt against their Turkish overlords with the assistance of the British.