Chapter 1B - Sceptical cases Flashcards

1
Q

What was the Privy Council?

A
  • private council of the monarch

- made of advisors hand picked by the king

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is a justice of the peace?

A

Public official appointed to preserve peace and administer the law at a local level

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What was Thomas darlings story?

A
  • Feb 1596 he went hunting with uncle (boy of burton)
  • when he returned he fell ill and the next day began having fits
  • had hallucinations, said he saw green cat and green angles
  • he claimed that when he lost his uncle in the woods he saw a strange women with who he argued with
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Who was initially accused of bewitching Thomas Darling? Why was this suspicious?

A
  • either 60 year old Alice Gooderidge or her mother, 80 year old Elizabeth Wright
  • darling probably knew who these women were and blamed them due to their reputation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What happened when gooderidge went to visit Darling?

A
  • Darling began to fit and scratched her face in an effort to break the spell
  • Gooderidge confirmed she had met with Darling but she had not bewitched him. She argued with him as she thought she was someone who had once played a trick on her
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What happened when Alice Gooderidge was arrested?

A
  • arrested with her mother, they found witch-marks and detained them at Derby prison
  • after long period of sleep deprivation and starvation she confessed to bewitching Darling and explained she had a familiar in the form of a dog called Minny which was given to her by her mother
  • she sent the dog to harm Darling after the encounter
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What happened at Gooderidge’s trail?

A
  • placed in front of Darling who had 38 fits in succession
  • she explained to the JP that it was possible to break the spell but she had a choking fit before she could finish
  • she was sentenced to death but died in custody before the execution
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Who was John Darrell?

A
  • Despite Gooderidge’s death the fits still continued
  • Darrel (a well known exorcist) was called in
  • had already been warned 10 years previous by a judge for falsely accusing a women of witchcraft in Mansfield
  • He recommended a combination of prayer, fasting and reading bible extracts
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How successful was Darrell?

A

-Practiced the techniques in may 1596 on Darling with apparent success

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Who was William Somers?

A
  • An apprentice of Darrell’s who he exorcised in Nottingham, 1597.
  • Somers claimed that he had been bewitched by 13 women lead by Alice Freeman
  • All were arrested by only 2 were sent for trail
  • Darrell supported Somer’s but was already attracting suspicion
  • Somers was questioned and confessed that he worked with Darrell to fabricate the case
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What happened after Somer’s confessed?

A
  • Darrell was a minister so case went to the Archbishop of York who set up a commission
  • Somer’s was questioned again but took back his confession and fell into violent fits so real that the commission believed he was bewitched -Alice freemen was bought to trail in front of Judge Anderson. Somer’s once again confessed of lying and Freeman was released
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Who was Judge Edward Anderson?

A

Judge who was involved in case of Alice Gooderidge and Alice Freeman

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What happened to Darling after Somer’s confession?

A
  • Judge Anderson wrote to Archbishop of Canterbury about Darrell’s case
  • Darrell was summoned and questioned by the Archbishop, Bishop of London and Samuel Harsnett
  • Darling and Somer’s was among witnesses. They confessed to lying
  • Darrell and George More (another exorcist who helped Darrell both imprisoned for a year
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What impact did Darrell’s case have on the law?

A

-Bishop Bancroft draw up a canon that forbade any clergymen to practice exorcism without a license

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What were Edmund Robinson’s claims?

A
  • Looking for plums in the Pendle forrest one night in November 1633 when he was approached by 2 greyhounds
  • when a hare ran past the dogs did not move
  • black one changed into Frances Dickinson, grey one into an unknown boy
  • women offered shilling for him to keep quiet. He refused and boy turned into horse
  • they took Robinson to a witches gathering at a house called “Hoarsones” where he eventually escaped
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What happened after Robinson told his father his story?

A
  • Local magistrates were informed 3 months later
  • magistrates were led to a number of churches were Robinson ID’d around 25 witches to be bought to trail
  • taken to Lancaster for trail were 17 were found guilty.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What did the magistrates think of the pendle swindle case?

A
  • were sceptical and sent a Report to the Privy council in London
  • they had doubts on written evidence and spoken testimony
  • They instructed the Bishop of Chester, Henry Bridgemen to investigate some of the women
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What did Bridgemen find upon investigating?

A
  • The Robinson’s were not being truthful
  • sent them to London to be interrogated along with four of the accused women
  • women were examined and questioned by king Charles himself. No marks were found
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Who was Margaret Johnson?

A
  • one of the four sent to London with the Robinsons
  • confessed despite lack of evidence against her
  • said she sold her soul to the devil who called himself a Mamilion and promised to give her all she desired
  • claimed she met with other witches however her descriptions did not match with Robinsons claims
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What happened to Edmund Robinson after London?

A
  • Known as a witchfinder for a time
  • encouraged by father and uncle, he would visit church services in Lancashire where he would ID witches in the congregation
  • gained enough wealth to buy two cows
  • once again summoned to London, the boy was separated from his dad and confessed to making the whole story up and only did what his father told him to. Father wanted revenge against Francis Dickinson over dispute on payment for a cow
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Who was john Mompesson?

A
  • Land owner and JP who lived at Tedworth in March 1662
  • officer in county militia
  • intervened in the case of a drummer and ex-solider, william Drury,
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What were alms?

A

Money or food given to the poor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What did William Drury do? How were his felonies discovered?

A
  • fraudulently attempted to raise alms for the poor with a forged pass and banging his drum to get attention to his cause
  • fraud discovered when he demanded money from a constable who became suspicious. When Mompesson reviewed the pass, presented by Drury, apparently signed by two JP’s known to Mompesson, he could see that the signatures were forgeries
24
Q

Why were Drury’s acts illegal? What is a vagrant?

A
  • Entertainers who travelled from parish to parish were required to have passes in order to avoid punishment as a vagrant
  • vagrant = a person who would wander from parish to parish in order to beg or seek employment. Someone who was able to work but chose not to
25
Q

What happened to Drury after fraud was discovered?

A

-arrested on the orders of Mompesson and his drum was confiscated and sent to Mompesson house in April of 1662

26
Q

What strange occurrences did Mompesson experience?

A
  • Thumping’s heard in house as if someone was banging a drum
  • family heard scratching and what sounded like a dog panting
  • strange lights and sulphurous smells were detected
  • objects thrown around rooms, beds raised in he air and family horses injured
  • on xmas a bible was found in fireplace
27
Q

What impact did the strange occurrences at Mompesson’s house have?

A
  • continued for many months even when Drury was in prison on charge of pig stealing
  • house became attraction
  • King charles II sent to investigate
  • interest intensified when Drury was rumoured to have confessed to a fellow inmate about bewitching Mompesson
28
Q

What helped the Mompesson house to gain attraction?

A
  • appeared in two newspapers (Mercurius Publicus and The Kingdom’s Intelligencer)
  • both red widely in onion and accused by many of the gentry in the counties and some education tradesmen and farmers
29
Q

Who was Joseph Glanvill?

A
  • wrote “A Blow at Modern Sadducism, In Some Philosophical Considerations about Witchcraft”
  • visited the house in Jan 1663 and claimed to have heard to noises as well
  • spoke to eyewitness who claimed William Drury was responsible and using witchcraft to control events from afar
30
Q

What happened to Drury in 1663? What did Glanvill have to say about it?

A
  • found guilty of theft in April and was sentenced to deportation
  • Glanvill stated that the disturbances stopped immediately but that Drury was able to escape while being transported to Virginia because he was able to use his powers to raise storms at sea.
  • He escaped whilst ship was still one Severn Estury but was recaptured and tried for witchcraft at Salisbury
31
Q

What happend at Drury’s witchcraft trail?

A

Acquitted of witchcraft but was sentenced to deportation again for theft. Disturbances began again and continued for several years

32
Q

What did Glanvill do when writing about his case?

A
  • attempted to persuade the Royal Society that the study of witchcraft could be carried out and cases could be proved to be true by approaching them in a rational, scientific way
  • many within the Society favoured his approach
33
Q

What were some of the ways in which Glanvill’s account was branded as fraudulent?

A
  • John Webster’s “The Displaying of Supposed Witchcraft” in 1677 claimed he had been informed by reliable sources that the entire Tedworth case was made up and Mompesson was responsible for the noises heard in the house
  • Balthasar Bekker’s “The World Bewitched” (1692-94)
  • John Beaumont’s “Historical, physiological and theological treatise of spirits, apparitions, witchcraft and other magical practices” (1705) states that the servants may have been responsible. 2 young women did it to scare Mompesson’s mother
34
Q

Why may Mompesson have had a hatred for Drury before being interviewed?

A
  • Mompesson fought as a royalist but Drury was a drummer for the parliamentary army
  • It is likely Mompesson knew this
35
Q

What do Mompesson’s letters reveal about the Tedworth case?

A
  • his explanation of events ere shaped by neighbours and visitors and not by his own experiences
  • his letters show he was mystified and originally suspected a break in
  • only when a minister visited and suggested a devil may have been responsible did Mompesson’s tone change
  • neighbour told him story of fairies putting money in peoples shoes then Mompesson started writting about the sound of jingling money being heard in the house
36
Q

What was the importance of the Tedworth case?

A
  • it was revisited in a number of works over many decades
  • as the great thinkers of the age began to approach witchcraft with a more critical eye, they became suspicious of Mompesson
37
Q

What is special about the case of Jane Wenham?

A

-the last formal trail of a suspected witch in England

38
Q

Who was Jane Wenham?

A
  • from Walkern, near Stevenage
  • long reputation as a witch
  • known as wise women of Walkern
  • over 70 years old, many stories circulating about her before her 1712 trail
39
Q

What is one story that was told about Jane Wenham (excluding the trial)

A
  • bewitched a farm labourer, Matthew Gilson, who refused to give her small amount of straw
  • Wenham “cursed” him and he then ran down the road begging people for straw and stuffing his shirt with manure
  • Gilson’s employer publically voiced the allegation, Wenham reported this to local JP and the farmer was fined 1 shilling
  • Wenham not satisfied and farmers daughter + livestock fell ill
40
Q

What was the main case against Wenham?

A
  • Anne Thorne, 16 year old servant of local clergyman, Godfrey Gardiner, accused Wenham of bewitching her and causing her to suffer from fits and vomit pins
  • Gardiner noticed this when they left Anne alone for short time, came back and she had run almost a mile for sticks
  • Gardiner’s wife suspected witchcraft. Placed the sticks on the fire and saw the figure of Jane Wenham emerge in the doorway
41
Q

1) How did the evidence rack up against Wenham (pre trial)?

2) what happened when she was arrested?

A

1) James Burville, local man, stated he’d seen a cat with Wenham’s face on it at Anne Thorne’s door
2) arrested and searched for devils mark, nothing found but she made full confession, claiming she only did harmless magic

42
Q

What happened at the trial of Wenham?

A
  • only charge she was tried for was conversing with the devil in the shape of a cat
  • 16 witness called in to give evidence, including 3 local Clergymen
  • ointment, “made from human fat”, from under her pillow was presented as evidence
  • stumbled over some words in lords prayer
  • judge (John Powell) was very sceptical of the evidence from the start, witness said she was flying, he said there is no law against it
43
Q

What is a Whig politician?

A
  • member of the faction within parliament that favoured restrains on the power of the monarch
  • opposed from crown loving Tories
45
Q

Why was Wenham acquitted? (Reasons to do with her background and Walkern)

A
  • took place in time where convictions were extremely rare, surprising jury found her guilty
  • Wenham was probably a dissenter (made around 20% of Walkern population)
  • involvement of local Clergymen may show their desire to demonstrate the power of the COE
  • very poor and her accusers were very rich
46
Q

Why was Wenham acquitted? (Reasons to do with the judge and the law itself)

A
  • Sir John Powell was unimpressed with the witnesses and the evidence put before him
  • influenced by recent sceptical cases and publications
  • Powell was an outsider who was able to approach the case in a rational and objective way, realising many of the witnesses had personal judges against Wenham
47
Q

Who was Sir George Mackenzie?

A
  • Scottish lawyer and Lord Advocate (chief legal officer in Scotland) from 1677 to 1686
  • became concerned at legitimacy of witchcraft trails after the Scottish witch huntt of 1661-2
  • he even represented an accused shapeshifting witch in court in 1672
48
Q

What did Mackenzie’s book “Laws and Customs of Scotland in Matter Criminal” state about witchcraft?

A
  • witchcraft was possible but most of those accused were not genuine witches
  • true witches deserved punishment, but also laid blame on careless judges who found innocent people guilty and sent them to their deaths
  • witches were people who had been deceived but were not necessarily evil and deserving of harsh punishment
  • doubted devil would offer riches as most accused were destitute
49
Q

What did Mackenzie do when he became Lord Advocate in 1677?

A
  • free’d a number of witches
  • he paid attention to how certain cases were carried out
  • if he found evidence of foul play or torture he usually threw out the case
  • many accused him of atheism but his work contributed to a steep decline in witchcraft cases being heard in court
50
Q

Who was Sir John Holt?

A
  • born in 1642, attended oxford but did not get a degree
  • trained as a lawyer in 1660 and called to bar in 1663
  • Well liked by James II and became Recorder of London (chief judge in the city) in 1685, knighted around the same time
  • important in negotiates in transfer of power from Catholic James II to protestant William III - appointed Lord Chief Justice by William in 1689
51
Q

What are some of Holts cases?

A
  • 1691 Holt acquitted 2 women who had been accused in Frome, Somerset of bewitching a girl who had fallen ill. The ill girl did recover
  • 1694 Holt reviewed case of Mother Munnings, who was accused of causing death by witchcraft in Bury St Edmunds. Holt refused to accepted charges that related to events that took place 17 years earlier and refused to accept evidence of a man who had been returning from a pub who claimed he saw Munnings’ familiar in the form of a polecat
52
Q

Where were holts cases recorded?

A

-Francis Hutchinson’s “An Historical Essay Concerning Witchcraft (1718)

53
Q

What is Holt’s most famous case?

A
  • case of Sarah Murdock
  • Holt acquitted her but he was met with fierce opposition from her neighbours
  • An assize judge had already dismissed the case which then resulted in an angry mob forming around Murdock’s house
  • Neighbours claimed, in court, that the accuser (Richard Hathaway) had been unable to eat and went temp blind when she had bewitched him
  • Holt was prepared to put the accuser on trail for fraudulently claiming witchcraft
54
Q

Why was Holt so sceptical? Outcome of holt?

A
  • influenced by changing intellectual climate
  • works of webster, Beaumont and Bekker would have been known to him
  • there was still widespread belief in witchcraft and his predecessor, Matthew Hale was willing to accept dubious testimonies in order to secure convictions for witchcraft
55
Q

What was the last witchcraft execution in England and Scotland?

A
  • Alice Molland of Exeter accused of murdering 3 people in 1682 and hanged in 1684
  • 10 people (7 men, 3 women) hanged at paisley in 1697, final execution in Scotland involved the burning in Janet Horne in a tar barrel in 1727. Horne had been accused of turning her daughter into a flying horse
  • in total 1.5k had been executed for witchcraft in Britain
56
Q

What happened to witchcraft legislation in the early 18th century?

A
  • 1604 act repealed in 1736 in both England and Scotland
  • little opposition in England but in Scotland, where belief in witchcraft was still widespread, a number of clergy protested
  • new witchcraft act was passed, specifically aimed at punishing fraudulent cases with a max penalty of 1 year imprisonment. The act declared that magic and witchcraft were not real
57
Q

What impact did the lack of witchcraft legislation have on Britain?

A
  • many ordinary people continued to believe
  • accusations against neighbours continued and crowds would occasionally gather to confront the suspected witch
  • 1751 Long Marston, Hertfordshire, John and Ruth Osborne were attacked by an angry mob who accused them of harming cattle and people. A 4k strong group dragged them to a pong and put them to the swimming test. Ruth drowned and husband was beaten to death. Ring leader, Thomas Colley was arrested and executed for her murder
58
Q

What was the verdict on Wenham’s trial? Consequences?

A
  • found guilty
  • Powell secured a royal pardon
  • she could not return to Walkern and instead was offered a cottage by whig politician William Cowper. She lived there until she died in 1730
  • Anne Thorne was ordered to be watched over until she recovered from her hysteria