Chapter 14 - Behavioral Finance Flashcards
What is behavioral finance?
Studies the psychology of market
participants to help explain why markets
are inefficient and exploitable.
What is behavioral finance macro (BFMA) and behavioral finance micro (BFMI)?
Behavioural Finance Micro (BFMI) examines the behavioural biases (that is, irrational behaviours) of individual investors. It compares irrational investors to rational investors envisioned in classical economic theory, known as Homo economicus or “rational economic human being.”
Behavioural Finance Macro (BFMA), on the other hand, describes “anomalies” or irregularities in the overall market that contradict the efficient market hypothesis.
The two are very closely related. BFMI suggests that these biases impact an individual’s economic decisions, and BFMA asserts that markets are subject to the effects of these collective decisions.
How does the term bias apply to the study of behavioral finance?
Bias is an irrational assumption or belief that affects the ability to make a decision based on facts and evidence. Investors are as vulnerable as anyone to making decisions clouded by prejudices or biases. Smart investors avoid two big types of bias—emotional bias and cognitive bias.
What is a calendar anomaly?
A calendar anomaly is an irregular securities pattern that emerges during certain times of the
year, such as the January Effect mentioned earlier. The January Effect shows that stocks in
general, and small stocks in particular, move abnormally higher during the month of January.
Haugen and Jorion, two researchers in this area, have observed that the January Effect is, perhaps,
the best-known worldwide example of anomalous behaviour in security markets.
Explain what a cognitive bias is.
A cognitive bias can be technically defined as basic statistical, information processing or memory
errors that are common to all human beings. They can be thought of also as “blind spots” or
distortions in the human mind. One of the most common cognitive biases is anchoring bias.
Here, clients get anchored to the price of a stock or the level of the market and hold on to that
price before being willing or able to make an investment decision. Cognitive biases were first
identified by Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman as a foundation of behavioural economics.
Tversky and Kahneman argue that cognitive biases are used in problem-solving through heuristics
that include the availability heuristic and the representativeness heuristic.
Explain the concept of the efficient market hypothesis.
The efficient market hypothesis was developed from the doctoral dissertation of Professor
Eugene Fama of the University of Chicago. Fama believed and demonstrated that, in a securities
market populated by many well-informed investors, investments will be accurately priced and
reflect all available information.1 There are three forms of the efficient market hypothesis:
* Weak form: all past market prices and data are fully reflected in current securities prices; that
is, technical analysis is of little or no value.
* Semi-strong form: all publicly available information is fully reflected in current securities
prices; that is, fundamental analysis is of no value.
* Strong form: all information (including insider information) is fully reflected in current
securities prices.
Many market efficiency studies point to evidence that supports the efficient market hypothesis.
Researchers have documented numerous, persistent anomalies, however, that contradict the
efficient market hypothesis. There are three main types of market anomalies that advisors should
know about:
* Fundamental anomalies
* Technical anomalies
* Calendar anomalies
Explain the concept of emotional bias.
On the opposite side of the spectrum from illogical or distorted reasoning are the emotional
biases. An emotion is a mental state that arises spontaneously, rather than through conscious
effort. Emotions are physical expressions, often involuntary, related to feelings, perceptions or
beliefs about elements, objects or relations between them, in reality or in the imagination.
Emotions can be undesired to the individual feeling them; she may wish to control them but
often cannot. Investors can be presented with investment choices, and may make sub-optimal
decisions by having emotions affect these decisions. Often, because emotional biases originate
from impulse or intuition rather than from conscious calculations, they are difficult to correct.
Emotional biases include endowment, loss aversion and self-control.
What is a fundamental anomaly?
A fundamental anomaly is an irregularity in a security’s current price when compared to a
fundamental assessment of its intrinsic value. There is a large body of evidence documenting,
for example, that investors consistently overestimate the prospects of growth companies and
underestimate the value of out-of-favour companies. In a totally efficient market, this would
not happen. Professors Ken French and Eugene Fama performed a study of low price-to-book-
value ratios that covered a period of 38 years.2 The study considered all equities listed on NYSE,
AMEX, and/or NASDAQ in the United States. The stocks were divided into 10 groups by book/
market and were re-ranked annually.
The highest book/market stocks outperformed the lowest book/market stocks 21.4% to 8%, with
each decile (representing one-tenth of the sample or population) performing more poorly than
the previously ranked, higher-ratio decile. They also ranked the deciles by beta (the measure of
an investment’s volatility relative to the market as a whole) and found that the value stocks posed
lower risk and the growth stocks had the highest risk. This result encouraged many investors to
buy value stocks. The methodology contained in the analysis is widely used today and is based on
inefficient market conditions.
What are heuristics?
Some refer to biases
as heuristics (simple, efficient rules of thumb); others call them beliefs, judgments or preferences;
still others classify biases along cognitive or emotional lines.
What is the concept of homo economicus?
First established in neo-classical economics, Homo economicus (or rational economic human
being) is a model of human economic behaviour that hypothesizes that three principles rule
economic decisions made by individuals:
* Perfect rationality
* Perfect self-interest
* Perfect information
Homo economicus is a model that academics and practitioners believe in with varying degrees of
stringency. A few believe in a “strong” form, which holds that irrational behaviour does not exist.
Others have adopted a “semi-strong” form; this version sees an abnormally high occurrence of
rational economic traits. Other economists support a “weak form” of Homo economicus, in which
the irrational traits exist but are not strong.
All of these versions share the core assumption that humans are “rational economic maximizers,”
who are self-interested and make rational economic decisions. Economists like to use this as a
principle for two primary reasons. First, Homo economicus makes economic analysis relatively
simple. Second, it allows economists to quantify their research findings, which makes their work
easier to teach and disseminate. If humans are perfectly rational, possess perfect information and
display perfect self-interest, then perhaps their behaviour can be quantified.
Most criticisms of Homo economicus proceed by challenging the bases for these three underlying
assumptions (criticisms of the three bullet points above).
What is the January effect?
Th e tendency of all markets to end the year
higher if prices rally in January, or end the
year lower if they decline in January.
What does fungible mean?
Being something (such as money or a commodity) of such a nature that one part or quantity may be replaced by another equal part or quantity in paying a debt or settling an account.
What does non-fungible mean?
Non-fungible means that something is unique and can’t be replaced.
What are the two types of traders?
Those who want to be right, and those who want to make money. You can’t be both.
What is standard deviation?
A quantity calculated to indicate the extent of deviation for a group as a whole. Remember 68-95-99.7 empirical rule.