Chapter - 13 Hominin Evolution Flashcards
Hominins VS Apes
All hominids share a common ancestor, an ape-like creature.
- from there hominins evolved
However, Differ by appearance, structure, and behaviour.
Hominins
- relatively hairless
- upper and lower limb structure allows for a fully bipedal way of walking
- stand in erect posture and unique striding gait (not found elsewhere in the animal kingdom).
- Greater development of the Brain,
- Changes in size and shape of the teeth
- development of speech and sexual characteristics
These separate humans from other Homonids
TREND during HUMAN EVOLUTION: List Them
- CRANIAL CAPACITY and SKULL SIZE
- Reduced PROGNATHISM
- Homo sapiens also have a REDUCED BROW RIDGE
What was established in Early hominins?
BIPEDALSISM
Explain the TREND during HUMAN EVOLUTION: Cranial Capacity
GRADUAL INCREASE IN THE SIZE OF THE CRANIUM; houses a larger and MORE COMPLEX BRAIN
- SUBSEQUENT Fossil EVIDENCE confirmed a GRADUAL INCREASE IN CRANIAL CAPACITY as the HOMONIN SPECIES EVOLVED towards MODERN HUMANS.
DEFINE ENDOCAST
An Impression of the inside of the braincase, either artificial or natural, made of rock or some other solid material
ENDOCASTS HAVE BEEN USED TO CALCULATE THE CRANIAL CAPACITY OF FOSSILISED SKULLS
DEFINE CRANIAL CAPACITY
The volume of that part of the skull that is occupied by the brain.
Explain Australopithecines and Cranial Capacity
- Scientists infer via the use of endocasts
- Australopithecus afarensis had a CRANIUM MUCH CLOSER IN SIZE TO THAT OF A MODERN APE THAN A MODERN HUMAN - the average brain size of the 1st Australopithecus afarensis = range of MODERN GORILLA’s
- However, the bodyweight of this fossil Australopithecines = 1/3rd of Gorilla.
HENCE RELATIVE BRAIN SIZE = between CHIMPANZEES AND MODERN HUMANS - FORAMEN MAGNUM was MORE FORWARD than it is in apes, and the SKULL MORE ROUNDED IN THE BACK.
What happens when fragments of the fossilised skull are found?
Fragments of fossil skull = w/o endocast
- difficult in determining cranial capacity
- expert estimates VARY
- Such a range of figures from an examination of the SAME MATERIAL shows that the ESTIMATES of VCRANIAL CAPACITY must be TREATED WITH CAUTION.
EXAMPLE
- 1st specimen of HOMO HABILIS was discovered in Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania in 196.
- 3 different anthropologists gave 3 varying estimates for Cranial capacity
- 590, 647, 710 cm^3
Explain the TREND during HUMAN EVOLUTION: Cranial Capacity
***CONTINUED WITH CONVOLUTIONS + FRONTAL LOBE
Endocasts also REVEAL GRADUAL INCREASE IN CONVOLUTIONS IN THE BRAIN AND FRONTAL LOBE SIZE INCREASE
EXAMPLE
- trend seen in HOMO ERECTUS FOSSILS
- over a period of time that this species lived on earth
- CRANIAL CAPACITY OF H.erectus = 750 to 1250cm^3-
- BRAINCASE EXPANDED,
- the FACE tended to become = FLATTER and a NOTICEABLE FOREHEAD BEGAN IN THE LATER MEMBERS OF THE SPECIES…..PROBABLY DUE TO THE FRONTAL LOBE EXPANDING
The gradual enlargement of the cranial portion of the skull to accommodate the increasing size of the frontal region of the brain.
This led to a reduction in prognathism and in the size of the brow ridge.
Explain the TREND during HUMAN EVOLUTION: DENTITION AND PROGNATHISM
another discernible evolutionary trend
EXAMPLE
- early hominins eg. AUSTRALOPITHECUS AFARENIS
- LOWER JAW and a FACE that was like apes
TEETH were LARGE and there was a DISTINCT GAP BETWEEN the CANINES AND THE INCISORS
- ROWS OF TEETH PARALLEL RATHER THAN A CURVE
HOMO HABILIS
- MOLAR AND PREMOLAR teeth had become SMALLER AND NARROWER, but the CANINES were STILL PROMINENT
HOMO ERECTUS
- trend towards SMALLER MOLARS and a DECREASE in the ROBUSTNESS of the TEETH Continued
MODERN HUMANS
- older humans (before 100,000 years ago)
- HAD TEETH 10% larger than humans of today
- gradually losing wisdom teeth (3rd molar) with an increasing no. of people having NO WISDOM teeth at all
ANATOMICAL FEATURE
**SKULL***
CHARACTERISTICS MORE APE-LIKE = MORE PRIMITIVE
VS.
CHARACTERISTICS ORE HUMAN-LIKE = MORE MODERN
PRIMITIVE
- Thicker bones forming the cranium
- face large compared to cranial size
- smaller cranial capacity
- heavier brow ridge
- no forehead or slopping forehead
- lower cranium
- less prominent cheekbones
- possible sagittal crest on top of the skull
- foramen magnum towards the back of the skull (postcentral)
MODERN
- Thinner bones forming cranium
- Face small compared to Cranial size
- Larger Cranial Capacity
- Brow ridge reduced or absent
- increasingly larger and more vertical forehead
- dome-shaped cranium
- more prominent cheekbones
- NO crest on top of the skull
- foramen magnum under the centre of the skull
ANATOMICAL FEATURE
**MANDIBLE AND TEETH**
CHARACTERISTICS MORE APE-LIKE = MORE PRIMITIVE
VS.
CHARACTERISTICS ORE HUMAN-LIKE = MORE MODERN
PRIMITIVE
- more prognathic jaw
- larger jaw
- heavier, thicker mandible
- no chin
- larger teeth, especially molars
- diastema present
- canine teeth more prominent
- difference between size of incisors and molars
MODERN
- flatter face
- smaller jaw
- more slender, thinner mandible
- increasingly definite chin
- smaller teeth
- NO diastema present
- canine teeth less prominent
- More even teeth/ little difference between size of incisors and molars
ANATOMICAL FEATURE
**TORSO**
CHARACTERISTICS MORE APE-LIKE = MORE PRIMITIVE
VS.
CHARACTERISTICS ORE HUMAN-LIKE = MORE MODERN
PRIMITIVE
- Narrower pelvis
- back (lumbar) vertebrae less wedge-shaped
- wider, barrel-shaped ribcage
MODERN
- broader pelvis
- lumbar vertebrae are more wedge-shaped
- smaller ribcage
ANATOMICAL FEATURE
**LOWER LIMBS*
CHARACTERISTICS MORE APE-LIKE = MORE PRIMITIVE
VS.
CHARACTERISTICS ORE HUMAN-LIKE = MORE MODERN
PRIMITIVE
- shorter thumb that is less mobile
- finger longer and more curved
MODERN
- longer thumb with increased opposability
- fingers straighter and shorter
ANATOMICAL FEATURE
**UPPER LIMBS**
CHARACTERISTICS MORE APE-LIKE = MORE PRIMITIVE
VS.
CHARACTERISTICS ORE HUMAN-LIKE = MORE MODERN
PRIMITIVE
- femurs more parallel
- arms longer than legs
MODERN
- Femurs sloping inwards towards the knee
- arms shorter than legs