Chapter 12: The residue theorem Flashcards

1
Q

singularities and integral ∫_γ f(z)dz

A

Let D be a simply connected region containing a simple positively oriented contour γ.
Suppose f is analytic on D except for finitely many singularities β1, . . . , βn, none of which lie on γ.

Then
∫_γ f(z)dz
= 2πi × (sum of residues of f at the singularities of f inside γ).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

EXAMPLE:

Evaluate
∫_γ dz/(z^2(z − 3))

where c : z = 71e^it (0 ≤ t ≤ 2π).

A

let f(z) = 1/(z^2(z-3))

Then f is analytic in C \ {0, 3}. Now z^2(z − 3) has a zero of order 2 at the origin
and a simple zero at the point z = 3.

Hence f has a double pole at the origin and a simple pole at z = 3. Both these
singularities lie inside the contour c, which is a simple contour described in the
positive direction. Now

Res{f;0} = (1/1!) lim as z tends to 0 of ((d/dz)(z^2 x [1/(z^2(z-3)]) 
=((-1)/(z-3)^2)_{z=0} = -1/9

Res{f;3}=([(1/z^2)]/[(d/dz)(z-3)])_{z=3} = 1/9

By Cauchy’s Residue Theorem
∫_c dz/(z^2(z − 3)) = 2πi(Res{f; 0} + Res{f; 3}) = 0.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

EXAMPLE:

Evaluate
∫_γ dz/(z^4 +1)

where c denotes the semi-circular contour consisting of the
straight line from −2 to 2 along the real axis, followed by the semicircle z = 2e^it
(0 ≤ t ≤ π) of radius 2 in the upper half plane from 2 back to −2.

A

let g(z)= 1/(z^4 +1)

Then g is analytic in C except for the four points at which z^4 + 1 = 0. Now z^4 + 1
has simple zeros at the points exp (±πi/4), exp (±3πi/4) and, hence, g has simple poles,
at exp (±πi/4), exp (±3πi/4) .

diagram contour semicircle with 2 points inside 2 outside

The simple poles at exp ( πi/4), exp ( 3πi/4) lie inside the contour whereas the other two lie in the lower half plane, so are outside the contour. Moreover c is a simple contour described in the positive direction. Now

Res{g; exp(πi/4)} = (1/[(d/dz)(z^4+1)]){z=exp(πi/4)}=(1/4z^3){z=exp(πi/4)}=1/(4e^{3πi/4})= -(e^{πi/4})/4

Res{g; exp(3πi/4)} = (1/[(d/dz)(z^4+1)]){z=exp(3πi/4)}=(1/4z^3){z=exp(3πi/4)}=1/(4e^{9πi/4})= (e^{-πi/4})/4

Thus the sum of the residues is
Res{g ; exp ( πi/4)} + Res{g ; exp ( 3πi/4)} =1/4(e^− πi/4 − e^πi/4 ) = (−1/4).2isin π/4 =−i/2√2

By Cauchy’s Residue Theorem
∫_c dz/(z^4 + 1) = 2πi ×−i/(2√2) = π/(√2)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

EXAMPLE: Let γ be the square contour with vertices −3, −3i, 3, 3i described in the anticlockwise
direction. Evaluate

∫_γ z^3 cos(1/z) dz

A

By Cauchy’s Residue Theorem
∫_γ h(z) dz = ∫_γ z^3 cos(1/z) dz =2πi/24 = πi/12

Let h(z) = z^3cos (1/z), 
k(z) = cos (1/z).

Then h and k are both analytic in C \ {0} and have isolated essential singularities at the origin.

diagram inside contour

origin lies inside the contour γ, which is a simple contour described in the positive direction. Now. for z ≠ 0,
z^3cos(1/z) = z^3(1 −1/(z^2 2!) + 1/(z^4 4!) − · · · ) = z^3 − z/2! + 1/z 4! − · · · ,

cos(1/z) = (1 − 1/(z^2 2!) + 1/(z^4 4) − · · · )

Thus Res{h; 0} =1/4! = 1/24 and Res{k; 0} = 0

By Cauchy’s Residue Theorem ∫_γ h(z) dz = ∫_γ z^3cos(1/z) dz = 2πi/24 = πi/12

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

EXAMPLE: Let γ be the square contour with vertices −3, −3i, 3, 3i described in the anticlockwise
direction. Evaluate

∫_γ cos(1/z) dz

A

By Cauchy’s Residue Theorem
∫_γ k(z) dz = ∫_γ cos(1/z) dz = 0.

Let h(z) = z^3cos (1/z), 
k(z) = cos (1/z).

Then h and k are both analytic in C \ {0} and have isolated essential singularities at the origin.

diagram inside contour

origin lies inside the contour γ, which is a simple contour described in the positive direction. Now. for z ≠ 0,
z^3cos(1/z) = z^3(1 −1/(z^2 2!) + 1/(z^4 4!) − · · · ) = z^3 − z/2! + 1/z 4! − · · · ,

cos(1/z) = (1 − 1/(z^2 2!) + 1/(z^4 4) − · · · )

Thus Res{h; 0} =1/4! = 1/24 and Res{k; 0} = 0

By Cauchy’s Residue Theorem ∫_γ k(z) dz = ∫_γ cos(1/z) dz = 0.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

lemma 12.5

straight line segment on imaginary axis and ∫_L1 φ(z) e^{iλz} dz

A

Suppose that the function φ is analytic on the region D = {z ∈ C : |z| > r} for some r > 0. Let L_1 be the straight line segment from iR to iS on the imaginary axis, where R, S > r. Let λ be a positive real number and let t ∈ R. If |φ(it)| → 0 as t → ∞,
then
I_R =
∫_L1 φ(z) e^{iλz} dz → 0 as R, S → ∞.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

∫_[-∞,∞] (xsinπx)/(x^2+2x+5) dx

A
let p(z)=z, q(z) = z^2 + 2z + 5, φ(z) = p(z)/q(z)
f(z) = φ(z)e^{iπz} = ze^{iπz}/(z^2 + 1)

Then
(i) q(z) = z^2 + 2z + 5 = (z + 1)^2 + 4 and so the polynomial q is non-zero on the real axis,
(ii) the degree of the polynomial q is bigger thn the degree of the polynomial p,
(iii) the function f is analytic in C except for simple poles at −1 ± 2i. The only
singularity of f in the upper half -plane H = {z ∈ C : Im z > 0} is the simple pole
at −1 + 2i.
Now Res{f; −1 + 2i} =
(ze^{iπz}/((d/dz) (z^2 + 2z + 5))){z=−1+2i} =
((ze^iπz)/(2z + 2))
{z=−1+2i}
=(−1 + 2i)e^{iπ(−1+2i)}/4i
= (−1 + 2i)(e^−iπ e^−2π)/4i
= −((−1 + 2i)e^−2π)/4i

By theorem 12.1
∫_[-∞,∞] (x)/(x^2+2x+5)e^iπx dx =
∫_[-∞,∞] 
φ(x)e^iπx dx = 2πi Res{f; −1 + 2i}
= 2πi [−((−1 + 2i)e^−2π)/4i]
=π/2e^−2π(1 − 2i)

Equating imaginary parts gives

∫_[-∞,∞] (xsinπx)/(x^2+2x+5) dx
=−π e^{−2π}

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

∫_[-∞,∞] (cosπx)/(x^2+2x+5) dx

A

Let
p(z) = 1, q(z) = (z^2 + 1)2
φ(z) = p(z)/q(z)
f(z) = φ(z)e^iπz =e^{iπz}/[(z^2 + 1)^2]

Then
(i) the polynomial q is non-zero on the real axis,
(ii) the degree of the polynomial q > the degree of the polynomial p,
(iii) the function f is analytic in C except for double poles at ± i. The only
singularity of f in the upper half -plane H = {z ∈ C : Im z > 0} is the double pole at i.

Now
Res{f;i} =(1/1!) limz→i d/dz[(z−i)^2f(z)]= limz→i d/dz[(z − i)^2 e^{iπz}/[(z − i)^2(z + i)^2]
= limz→i d/dz [e^iπz/(z + i)^2]
= limz→i[ [iπe^{iπz}/(z + i)^2]−[2 e^{iπz}/(z + i)^3]]
=
(iπe^−π)/4i^2− 2e^−π/8i^3
= − i e^{−π} (π + 1)/4

By Theorem 12.1,
[-∞,∞] [1/(1 + x^2)^2]e^iπx dx =
[-∞,∞] φ(x)e^{iπx} dx = 2πi Res{f;i} = 2πi × [−i e^{−π}(π + 1)/4]=(π/2)e^{−π}(π + 1)

and equating real parts gives
∫_[-∞,∞] cos πx /(1 + x^2)^2 dx =(π/2) e^−π (π + 1).

Using the substitution t = −x we see that
[0,∞] [cos πx/(1 + x^2)^2]dx =
[0,∞] [cos(−πt)/(1 + t^2)^2]dt =
∫_[0,∞] [cos(πt)/(1 + t^2)^2]dt

Thus
[0,∞] [cos πx/(1 + x^2)^2]dx =
(1/2)∫
[-∞,∞] [cos πx/(1 + x^2)^2] dx = (π/4)e^{−π}(π + 1)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Let α > 0. ∫_[-∞,∞] evaluate (cosαx)/(1+x^2) dx

By using a suitable value for α and a standard
result, deduce that
∫_[0,∞] (cos^2 x)/(1 + x^2) dx =
(π/4e^2)(1 + e^2).

A
3. Let
p(z) = 1, q(z) = z
2 + 1, φ(z) = p(z)
q(z)
, f(z) = φ(z)e
iαz =
e
iαz
z
2 + 1
.
Then
(i) the polynomial q is non-zero on the real axis,
(ii) the degree of the polynomial q > the degree of the polynomial p,
(iii) the function f is analytic in C except for simple poles at ± i. The only
singularity of f in the upper half -plane H = {z ∈ C : Im z > 0} is the simple pole
at i.
(iv) α > 0.
Now
Res{f;i} =
e
iαz
d
dz (z
2 + 1)!
z=i
=
e
−α
2i
.
By Theorem 12.1
Z ∞
−∞
1
1 + x
2
e
iαx dx =
Z ∞
−∞
φ(x)e
iαx dx = 2πi Res{f;i} ) = 2πi ×
e
−α
2i
= πe−
and equating real parts gives
Z ∞
−∞
cos αx
1 + x
2
dx = πe−α
.
Using the substitution t = −x we see that
Z 0
−∞
cos αx
1 + x
2
dx =
Z ∞
0
cos(−αt)
1 + t
2
dt =
Z ∞
0
cos αt
1 + t
2
dt.
Thus
Z ∞
0
cos αx
1 + x
2
dx =
1
2
Z ∞
−∞
cos αx
1 + x
2
dx =
πe−α
2
. (1)
We notice that
Z ∞
0
cos2 x
1 + x
2
dx =
1
2
Z ∞
0
1 + cos 2x
1 + x
2
dx. (2)
Putting α = 2 in equation (1) gives,
Z ∞
0
cos 2x
1 + x
2
dx =
πe−2
2
=
π
2e
2
(3)
and
Z ∞
0
1
1 + x
2
dx =
tan−1 x
∞
0
=
π
2
. (4)
From equations (1), (2), (3), (4) it follows that
Z ∞
0
cos2 x
1 + x
2
dx =
π
4
1
e
2
\+ 1
=
π(1 + e
2
)
4e
2
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

lemma 12.4

∫_ΓR φ(z) e^iλz dz

A

Suppose that the function φ is analytic on the region D = {z ∈ C : |z| > r}
for some r > 0. Let ΓR be given by
z = Reit (θ1 ≤ t ≤ θ2),
where 0 ≤ θ1 < θ2 ≤ π and R > r. Let M(R) be the maximum value of |φ(z)| on ΓR and
let λ be a positive real number. If M(R) → 0 as R → ∞, then
IR =
∫_ΓR φ(z) e^iλz dz → 0 as R → ∞.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

corollary 12.3

positive real number

A

For any positive real number R,
−R sin θ ≤ −2Rθ/π
(0 < θ ≤π/2)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

lemma 12.2

θ and sinθ relation

A

For 0 < θ ≤π/2

2/π≤ (sin θ)/θ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Example. Show that
∫_[- ∞,∞] (cos x)/(x^2 + 1) dx = π/e

Deduce that
∫_[0,∞] (cos x)/(x^2 + 1) dx =π/2e
`

A

Let
p(z) = 1, q(z) = z^2 + 1,
φ(z) = p(z)/q(z)
f(z) = φ(z)e^iz =[1/(z^2 + 1)]e^iz

Then the function f is analytic in C except for simple poles at ± i.

using contour semicircle from -R to -to R to -R

consisting of the straight line segment L from −R to R followed by the semi-circle ΓR
given by z = Reit(0 ≤ t ≤ π), where R > 1. Now f is analytic in C except for simple
poles at ± i, neither of which lie on γ. By the Cauchy’s Residue Theorem

∫_γ f(z) dz = 2πiRes{f;i}

since the pole at i is inside γ and the pole at −i is outside. Now

Res{f;i} =[(e^iz)/(d/dz (z^2 + 1))]_z=i = e^−1/2i = 1/2ie

∫_L f(z) dz + ∫_ΓR f(z) dz =
∫_γ f(z) dz =2πi/2ie = π/e

i.e. ∫_[-R,R] f(x) dx + ∫_ΓR f(z) dz =π/e

We now show that ∫_ΓR f(z) dz → 0 as R → ∞.

…. by mod less than or equal to
equating real and imaginary parts substitution
….

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q
complex integration helps us evaluate certain real integrals.
Integrals of the form 
∫_[- ∞,∞] φ(x) cos λx dx , 
∫_[- ∞,∞] φ(x) sin λx dx , 
∫_[- ∞,∞] φ(x) cos λx dx ,
∫_[0,∞]φ(x) sin λx dx , 

where φ is a rational function and λ is a positive real number

A

Integrals of this form are evaluated by integrating
f(z) = φ(z) e^{iλz}
around a suitable contour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

thm 12.1

useful*

no singularities on real axis

A

Suppose that
φ(z) = p(z)/q(z)
and f(z) = φ(z) e^{iλz}
where λ ∈ R, and p and q are polynomials with no common factor other than 1. Suppose
also that the polynomial q is non-zero on the real axis (i.e. none of the singularities
of the rational function φ lie on the real axis.)
If the degree of the polynomial q is greater that the degree of the polynomial p and λ > 0,
then

∫_[- ∞,∞] φ(x)e^{iλx}.dx
=2πiΣ from r=1 to k of [Res{f;z_r}]

where z1, z2, · · · zk are the zeros of the polynomial q in the upper half-plane
H = {z ∈ C : Im z > 0} (i.e. z1, z2, · · · zk are the singularities of f in the upper half plane
H.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

thm 12.1

useful* cos and sin

A

theorem gives:

∫_[- ∞,∞] φ(x) cos λx dx

=Re( 2πiΣ from r=1 to k of [Res{f;z_r}])

∫_[- ∞,∞] φ(x) sin λx dx = Im(2πiΣ from r=1 to k of [Res{f;z_r}])