Chapter 12 Groups Flashcards

1
Q

How do you define a group?

A

A group is a collection of individuals who are interdependent to some significant degree.

Groups provide care for offspring, protection from predators, and access to food, which helps ensure the reproduction of our genes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the term that was initially used to describe enhanced performance in the presence of others and is now a broad term for both the positive and negative effects of the presence of others?

A

Social facilitation

It happens in animal species as well

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are three components of Zajonc’s theory of mere presence?

A
  1. the mere presence of others makes us more aroused.
  2. arousal tends to make us more rigid and narrowly focused, in that we become more inclined to do what we’re already automatically inclined to do

dominant response: the responses that one person is most likely to make in a person’s hierarchy of possible responses in any context

  1. the increase in dominant response tendencies facilitates performance on simple tasks and inhibits performance on complex tasks.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is a concern about looking bad in the eyes of others called?

A

Evaluation apprehension

Participants performing in front of an evaluative audience made more dominant responses than those performing alone did, but those performing in front of a blindfolded audience did not.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the tendency to exert less effort when working on a group task where individual contributions cannot be monitored?

A

Social loafing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How do we define groupthink?

A

Groupthink is a kind of faulty thinking by highly cohesive groups in which the critical scrutiny that should be devoted to the issues at hand is subverted by social pressures to reach consensus.

A high-stress situation with high stakes for making the correct decision is one of the antecedent conditions to groupthink.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What do strong leaders and the drive to find consensus breed?

A

Self-censorship: the decision to withhold information or opinions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are some ways to prevent groupthink?

A
  1. Group leaders can refrain from making their opinions known at the beginning
  2. New members can provide a fresh perspective
  3. A devil’s advocate - tasking one person with bringing to the group’s attention any weaknesses in the group’s deliberations and plans
  4. More empathic individuals, take turns in expressing ideas
  5. More women in the group
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What does group polarization do to contribute to social divisions?

A

group decisions tend to be more extreme than those made by individuals.
Whatever way the majority of individuals in a group are leaning, group discussion tends to make them lean even further in that direction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the two reasons behind group discussions leading to more extreme answers?

A
  1. the persuasiveness of the information brought up during group discussion
  2. people’s tendency to try to claim the “right” position among the various opinions within the group
    - social comparison interpretation: the desire to distinguish oneself from others by expressing a more extreme opinion in the “right” direction leads predictably to the group polarization effect.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What does power refer to in an individual context?

A

A person’s capacity to control one’s own outcomes and those of others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How do we define social hierarchy?

A

an arrangement of individuals in terms of their rank, or power, relative to the power of other group members

  • provides rules for dividing up resources
  • provide a shared notion of how decisions are made
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are two pathways for gaining power within groups?

A
  1. the path of virtue – doing things that are good for the group, e.g., sharing knowledge or giving time to others
    courage, humanity, justice, and temperance are four virtues that enable an individual to gain power within groups
  2. vice – machiavellianism (manipulativeness, deception, dominance), narcissism, psychopathy (lack of empathy, impulsivity, aggressiveness)

we gain and keep power thanks to actions that give us dominance over others, such as through force, fraud, manipulation, strategic violence, and the weakening of people around us

first one is better overall

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Which theory offers explanation to why having power can lead to its abuse?

A

The approach/inhibition theory:
when people experience elevated power, they should show approach behavior—that is, they tend to be less concerned about the evaluations of others and more inclined to act in goal-driven ways
less powerful people should show inhibition behavior—that is, they tend to be more vigilant and careful in making judgments and decisions and more restrained when taking action.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are some facts about high-power individuals? (empathy failures/disinhibition)

A
  • more likely to stereotype others than carefully attend to individuating information about them
  • less accurate judges of others’ emotions
  • more sexually inappropriate behavior
  • more likely to interrupt and swear at others
  • more likely to disobey the traffic law

The effects of power depend on who holds it. Power corrupts the corruptible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What happens when we are in a large group?

A

we often experience a loss of individual identity—a sense of deindividuation

we sometimes feel “lost in the crowd,” caught up in what’s happening in the moment, with a diminished sense of responsibility for our actions.

17
Q

What are the conditions to me met for mobs?

A
  1. anonymity
  2. diffusion of responsibility
  3. the arousal, heightened activity, and sensory overload

these conditions lead to deindividuation, and diminished self-observation and self-evaluation

18
Q

What is the correlation between deindividuation and war?

A

a strong correlation between deindividuation and aggressiveness in warfare. Among those cultures whose warriors changed their appearance before battle, 80 percent were deemed particularly aggressive; among those cultures whose warriors did not change their appearance, only 13 percent were deemed especially aggressive.

19
Q

What does the self-awareness theory suggest?

A

When people focus their attention on themselves, they become more concerned with self-evaluation and how their current behavior conforms to their own standards and values

Leading to individuation – make us particularly inclined to act carefully and in accordance with our sense of propriety

20
Q

What is the effect that shows people’s conviction that other people are paying attention to their appearance and behavior more than is actually the case?

A

Spotlight effect

21
Q

What is group entitativity?

A

Mutual interdependence and cohesion, e.g., people waiting at a bus stop (low)
An army unit fighting and dying together (high)

22
Q

What are the three reasons for us to live in groups from an evolutionary perspective?

A
  1. protection from predation/human violence
  2. collective hunting of big game
  3. cultural learning (the collective brain needs groups)
23
Q

What can we do to reduce social loafing?

A
  1. Task is challenging and involving
  2. Individuals are identifiable
  3. Members are friends
  4. Groups are cohesive
  5. In collectivistic cultures and among women
24
Q

What are the criteria to be met for wisdom of the crowd?

A
  1. The crowd has a diversity of opinions
  2. Individual opinions are independent of one another
  3. The crowd should be able to aggregate individual opinions to one collective decision
25
Q

What is detrimental to wise decisions and creativity and often lead to disastrous group decisions?

A

Herd mentality (homogenous groups who think alike)

26
Q

How do you define groupthink?

A

Social pressures to reach consensus in a highly cohesive group which leads to suboptimal decisions

27
Q

What are some conditions that foster groupthink?

A
  1. stressful situation
  2. like-minded members of group (homogeneity)
  3. isolation from outside information and influences
  4. lack of clear procedures
  5. strong, authoritarian group leader
28
Q

What are some symptoms of groupthink?

A
  1. Illusion of invulnerability
  2. Dissent is discouraged, esp by mindguards
  3. Self-sensorship, illusion of unanimity (a group of people all being of one mind)
  4. One-sided debate (collective rationalization)
  5. Unwillingness to consider alternatives
29
Q

Strategies to reduce groupthink?

A
  1. encourage criticism and diverse viewpoints
  2. input from outside sources
  3. generate different ideas, and approaches before decisions is made
  4. watch out for illusion of invulnerability
30
Q

What are the benefits of diverse groups?

A

More creativity, better decisions
Broader reservoir of information and expertise
E.g., the more diverse the research team, the more informational/impactful
Powerful antidote against confirmation bias
More opinions than a single individual who may fall into the trap of confirmation bias
Cultural role models take down stereotypes and facilitate positive social change
Rectify past imbalances and injustices
When marginal groups are underrepresented
Powerful antidote against prejudice (positive contact)

Individual practice: think about counter-arguments, perspective-taking

31
Q

What about the challenges of diverse groups?

A

In diverse groups:
Social interactions are less smooth
There are lower levels of trust and more concerns about disrespect
Greater perceived interpersonal conflict
Less social cohesion
More diverse countries are NOT prone to internal conflict unless social fractionization is territorial

32
Q

Solutions to the paradox of diversity?

A

Search for alternate information
Seek diversity
Practice empathy and respect
Greater awareness of differences
Greater curiosity awareness
Superordinate goals (common goals)
Superordinate identity
Positive emotional experiences & Climate “broaden and build”
Positive contact, e.g., going to musical events, having good food together
Conflict resolution education
Rituals, e.g., shared rituals in a group such as basic daily things: eating, walking, having fun together
Communication skills