Chapter 12 (Exam 3) Flashcards

1
Q

Concept that there is a defense to a contract unless the parties consent is both REAL and VOLUNTARY

A

Reality of consent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

5 situations where there is a lack of reality of consent

A
Mutual mistake of material fact
Material misrepresentation 
Duress
Undue influence
Unconscionability
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Court order cancellation of contract

A

Rescission

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Court ordered revision of a contract to correct a mistake

A

Reformation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Mistake of fact by both parties to the contract

A

Mutual mistake

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Mistake by only one party to the contract

A

Unilateral mistake

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

3 requirements for proving mutual mistake

A
  1. Must be more than mere uncertainty
  2. Must be material
  3. Fact that can be proved in past or present
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What does the word material mean?

A

Importsnt to the subject matter at hand

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

In order for a mistake to be an issue of fact, the mistake must pertain to (3) things

A

Existence
Identify
Character of the subject matter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Remedy for mutual mistake of material fact is

A

Rescission

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Is rescission normally a remedy for unilateral mistake ?

A

No. maybe be allowed though

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Elements to prove for unilateral mistake

A
  1. Mistake of fact by one party to contract
  2. non-mistaken was aware of other party’s mistake of fact
    3Mistake was regarding a verifiable fact (past or present)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

3 types of material misrepresentation

A

Innocent
Negligent
Fraudulent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Remedy for innocent misrepresentation

A

Only rescission

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Misrepresentation without fault

A

Innocent mis.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Misrepresentation that occurs when a party makes a statement without exercising due care to ensure that the statement is true

A

Negligent mis.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Remedies for negligent misrepresentation

A

Suing for damages or rescission

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Misrepresentation where there is a false statement of fact made with the intent to deceive, reasonably relied on , and causes damages

A

Fraudulent misrepresentation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Remedies for fraudulent misrepresentation

A

Rescission or actual damages + punitive damages

20
Q

2 types of fraudulent misrepresentation

A

Fraud in the execution

Fraud in the inducement

21
Q

Lying about the nature of a document in order to obtain a person’s signature

Told signing a loan but really it’s a promissory note

A

Fraud in the execution.

22
Q

Misrepresentation as to the understood subject matter of the contract

Seller lies to victim about the object being purchased

A

Fraud in the inducement

23
Q

4 elements that must be proved for fraud in the inducement

A
  1. Misrepresentation of material fact
  2. Intent to deceive : knew or disregard to truth
  3. Reasonable reliance
  4. Caused damage
24
Q

Are opinions, statements of law or value, prediction, and general statements usually statements of fact ?

25
When do opinions, statements of law/value, and predictions count ?
1. Confidential relationship between parties 2. Seller has superior knowledge 3. Concealment - buyer has no reasonable way of discovering defect
26
Forcing s party into a contract through fear of wrongful threats
Duress
27
4 elements to prove duress
1. Defendant must have threatened plaintiff 2. Threat must be wrong and unlawful 3. Involuntary acceptance 4 no alternative
28
Is duress a threat if economic handmade or only physical harm ?
Both
29
Abuse of position of trust to take advantage of a person who lacks freedom of will , without coercion
Undue influence
30
3 elements for undue influence
1. Confidential, fam, or trust relation between parties 2. Weaker party lacks free will because of influence of stronger part 3. Contract or gift is between 2 parties
31
Theory of ______ is often used to contest a death bed will or deed
Undue influence
32
Defense which allows a person to avoid a contract if he was pressured into accepting the terms of the contract and its grossly unfair
Unconscionability
33
3 elements to prove unconscionability
1. Unequal bargaining power 2. Contract of adhesion 3. Contract is obvisouly unfair or oppressive
34
Contract in which the terms are dictated by the stronger party with no real negotiation allowed
Contract of adhesion
35
The fact that the object is worth more or less than what we thought is a mistake of
Value
36
In extreme cases when something is worth more or less, it's a mistake of
Character
37
End result of fraud in execution is that the contrsct is ______
Void
38
2 ways to prove intent to deceive by defendant
1 defendant had knowledge of falsity of stats ent | 2. Defendant had reckless regard for truth
39
T or F. Threatening to sue someone under the promissory note if they owe you money is considered duress
False, threatening what one has legal right to do is not duress
40
Duress involves
Coercion
41
Old Rule: __________ : a contract is a co tract
Buyer Beudre
42
For remedies usually a party must choose between
Dollar damages and equitable remedy
43
Reformation is used if (2 reasons)
1. Oral agreement of parties | 2. Mistake in writing
44
Mistake in writing
Scrivener's error
45
Is uncertainty enough in mutual mistake of fact ?
No
46
Is unilateral mistake grounds for recission?
No