Chapter 11 State healthcare provision Flashcards
Explain likely role of the State in the provision of alternative or complementary health and care protection.
Briefly outline the impact of the State on the provision of healthcare to its citizens (5)
(Consider what role the State may play in the healthcare system used by its citizens)
- The role of the State in the provision of healthcare to its citizens has a large impact on the market for health insurance products.
- This is especially so, given the State can be the…
- …administrator/regulator…
- …financier, and…
- …purchaser…
of healthcare all at the same time
What are the overall objectives of government regarding provision of healthcare? (4)
- Protecting the nation’s health
- Subsidising the poor
- Balancing the budget
- Following social culture and/or political promises
In regards to the State’s provision of healthcare to its citizens, what do the State’s objectives depend on? (4)
- Political stance, history of State care, and social and cultural stance
- Other State benefits, and quantity/quality of med services & expertise available
- Economy, state of infrastructure and state of development
- Population characteristics
State healthcare objectives: protecting the nation’s health
Give a brief overview of this objective (2)
In what ways may the State execute this objective? (4)
What is the key outcome/benefit of State protecting the health of its citizens? (3)
Protecting the nation’s health
- is usually the primary objective of State healthcare
- the extent to which the objective can/is executed depends on the nation’s
- wealth and priorities
- style and culture of politics also plays a role
The key ways through which State protects nation’s health
- firstly, is to address availability of food, water, hygiene, etx.
- provide medical services
- engage/sponsor latest tech development, research and scientific advances
- education about the benefits general healthy lifestyle
The biggest benefit from the State protecting its nation’s health is that
- keeping a productive workforce that’s healthy grows GDP
- this gives government money to sustain the healthcare provision
- ..ie..in an ideal environment, the objective is somewhat self-funding
State healthcare objectives: subsidise the poor
Give a brief overview of this objective (2)
What is the key outcome/benefit of State subsidising the poor? (1)
Even where healthcare is heavily commercialised
- the State will have a role in providing healthcare (primary medical assistance and hospitals) to the poorest
- especially children and the elderly (either of whom aren’t always able to care for themselves)
Provision of healthcare in this manner is seen as state’s wellfare package
- it serves as useful tool to redistribute wealth among citizens
State healthcare objectives: balancing the budget
Give a brief overview of this objective (2)
How does the state fund its healthcare provision? (4)
What key healthcare factors affects the level of funding the State requires in its budgeting for healthcare costs? (4)
Provision of healthcare
- is part of the state’s budget (sometimes significantly so)
- whether services are provided to everyone or just those that cannot afford private care
Funding the cost of State healthcare provision
- usually through health charges (eg national insurance), general taxation, VAT or a mixture of them all
- usually involves some redistribuition/cross subsidy from health to unhealtly or from rich to poor
The State should be aware that due to
- technological advances, expectations from the public, and the use of more advanced medical treatment, healthcare costs will increase by more than CPI.
- this may in turn be exacerbated by increasing longevity and morbidity.
State healthcare objectives: following social culture and/or political promises
In what way may political parties influence the State’s provision of healthcare to its citizens (1)
In what way may social culture influence the State’s provision of healthcare to its citizens (1)
- State’s healthcare approach may be determined by a political party’s ethics. This may change with changing parties.
- State healthcare may be part of national culture and so radical changes may be hard to introduce especially in the short-term.
State healthcare objectives: following social culture and/or political promises
Social practices in terms of purchasing in insurance can influence the level of State healthcare provision.
What do we mean by the following groups of commercial insurance products, in terms of how private insurance may coexist with State provision?
- optional alternative (3)
- optional complement (4)
- compulsory alternative (3)
- compulsory complement (3)
Optional alternative
- comprehensive State provision, with private insurance offering more quality/choice
- opting to use commercial insurance products as an alternative to what the public sector already provides
- hence, paying for commercial insurance products to cover expenses in private sector
Optional Complement
- limited state provision, with private insurance providing balance
- opting to use commercial insurance products to complement what the public sector already provides
- eg for elective procedeurs soner than the state would provide
- waiting policy or gap cover
Compulsory Alternative
- comprehensive State provision for the poor, with private insurance purchase by those who State sees as not poor
- using commercial insurance products where the health system has made it compulsory to fund alternative benefits to that given by the state
- eg comprehensive cover for the wealthy whom the state considers can afford comprehensive cover
Compulsory Complement:
- State providing some benefits for free (to all), with private insurance being used to cover the rest
- using commercial insurance products for funding where the health system has made it compulsory (compelled) to obtain benefits not provided by the State to anyone at all
- eg purchasing top-up plans, dental plans
What challenges does the State face in its objectives of providing healthcare to its citizens? (12)
-
Demographic
- increasing/aging population=> increased costs of healthcare
-
Technological
- tech medical advances => increased demand for healthcare
-
Challenge of Sysyphus
- ironically, successful healthcare provision=> life expectancy gains in older age groups and tech innovation=> to constant budget pressure
-
Burden of disease
- general health of the population (e.g. HIV prevalence) may increase the cost of healthcare
-
Access to skilled medical professionals and insfrastructure
- cost and duration of medical training is extensive
- professionals may leave to other countrires after training
-
Competition and regulation in healthcare
- possibility for market failure in healthcare market => need for regulation.
- strike balance between regs vs allowing competition
State healthcare: resource allocation
What kind of decisions must the State make regarding resource allocation in regards to provision of State healthcare to its citizens? (3)
What methods may the State use for this decision making process? (5)
State resources are limited, and hence the State needs to make decisions regarding:
- how to allocate resources, and
- costs of healthcare provision relative to the effectiveness/benefits of treatment
The State may use the following approaches to assist its decision making process:
- cost analysis
- cost-effective analysis (CEA)
- cost-utility analysis (CUA)
- cost-benefit analysis (CBA)
- willingness to pay (WTP)
Resource allocation approaches: cost analysis
Describe this tool for resource allocation (3)
What is the biggest disadvantage of this tool for assessing resources allocation within a State’s healthcare budget? (1)
Overview:
- Simplest method of economic evaluation of a healthcare system, and whether it’s sustainable over time
- Estimate the budget required by calculating the costs of all resources (initial/recurring, fixed/variable, direct/indirect, current and future) and cost recoveries from insured
- Can provide breakdown of future and current costs
Biggest disadvantage of this measure:
- Doesn’t consider the quality and effectiveness of the healthcare system/services provided e.g improved health
Resource allocation approaches: cost-effective analysis (CEA)
Describe this tool for resource allocation toward State healthcare systems (3)
What is the calculation for cost-effective analysis (CEA) (2)
Overview
- Assess the costs of a healthcare system relative to the non-monetary benefits of the healthcare system (eg. infant mortality)
- It is a relative concept, which is useful for comparing systems or allocating a fixed budge
Calculation:
- CEA = cost of healthcare system in monetary units / measure of effectiveness (measure in a scale)
Resource allocation approaches: cost-effective analysis (CEA)
Strengths (3)
Weaknesses (4)
Strengths
- Benefits relative to the costs can be easy to understand
- Benefits don’t have to be converted to monetary terms
- It is a relative concept, which is useful for comparing systems or allocating a fixed budge
Weaknesses
- Need for all healthcare systems assessed to have same metric/ measure of effectiveness for comparability
- Inability to account for multi-dimensional effects
- Possibility that CEA will under-estimate the value of various healthcare interventions.
- Doesn’t reflect utility of healthcare servivces to population covered.
Resource allocation approaches: cost-utility analysis (CUA)
What do we mean by cost-utility analysis? (2)
What is the calculation for cost-utility analysis (CUA)?
Cost Utility Analysis
- asesses the costs of healthcare relative to the changes in quality of life as well as in mortality.
- emphasis on healthy years of life saved rather than number of lives saved.
Calculation
- CUA = Costs in monetary terms/ (Benefits in QALYs) QALYs - quality adjusted life years.
- Benefits can either be measured in
- QALYs: quality adjusted life years
- DALYs: disability adjusted life years
- HYEs: health years equivalent
Resource allocation approaches: cost-utility analysis (CUA)
Strengths (3)
Weaknesses (4)
Strenghts
- It is a relative concept, which is useful for comparing systems or allocating a fixed budge
- Benefits don’t have to be converted to monetary terms
Weaknesses
- Need for all healthcare systems assessed to have same metric/ measure of effectiveness for comparability
- Relies on appropriate scale
- Sensitive to function chosen and may not reflect the value of a system to the population