Chapter 11 Flashcards
How should transfusion be approached in emergent situations of Hemodynamically stable patients?
Hemodynamically stable patients:
* Use crystalloid for intravascular volume maintenance.
* Transfusion strategy based on clinical status and use a restrictive RBC transfusion strategy (70-80 g/L), except in some special cases.
* Transfuse one RBC unit at a time, reassess after each unit.
* Suitable for chronic bleeding or contained blood loss.
How should transfusion be approached in emergent situations of Hemodynamically UNstable patients?
Requires a different approach for rapid bleeding.
* Massive hemorrhage (e.g., trauma, obstetrics) needs immediate, coordinated intervention.
* Trauma patients often present with coagulopathy, and management has shifted to early recognition and treatment.
* Protocols for massive hemorrhage should be pre-planned and involve the entire care team.
* Emergency transfusion protocols should be institution-specific but apply general principles of trauma care to bleeding patients.
Who develope MHP protocolin a hospital?
An MHP is ideally a multidisciplinary process that accounts for local practice, local inventory, logistics, human resource availability, and system limitations. Bedside clinicians (e.g., anesthesiologists, trauma surgeons, emergency physicians, obstetricians, nurses), transfusion medicine specialists (e.g., hematologists, pathologists, hematopathologists), blood bank and laboratory representatives, and allied care staff (e.g., porters, communications specialists) should all be included in the MHP development process to ensure that the MHP is appropriate for, and executable at, that team’s institution.
Establishing a Massive Hemorrhage Protocol (MHP):
Purpose
Expedite provision of blood components (RBCs, platelets, plasma) and/or blood products.
Coordinate resources for rapid bleeding control and early identification of the massively bleeding patient.
All hospitals with emergency departments, operating rooms, or an obstetrical service should have an MHP
Establishing a Massive Hemorrhage Protocol (MHP):
Benefits?
Improves patient outcomes, reduces overall blood use, and results in cost savings.
For trauma patients, a 1-minute delay in blood delivery is linked to a 5% increase in mortality.
Establishing a Massive Hemorrhage Protocol (MHP):
Key Features:
Standardizes communication and best practices for transfusion and bleeding management.
Reduces cognitive load on clinicians, allowing focus on patient care.
Should be in place in all hospitals with emergency departments, operating rooms, or obstetrical services.
Establishing a Massive Hemorrhage Protocol (MHP):
Process:
Define processes for initiating and terminating the MHP.
Communicate early with the blood center in cases of limited blood supply.
Review and debrief after MHP activations to ensure continuous improvement.
Question: What is the importance of early identification in massive hemorrhage?
Early identification is critical for successful resuscitation.
Helps trigger massive transfusion protocols (MTP) early.
Improves patient outcomes by preventing delays in treatment.
What are some retrospective definitions of massive transfusion?
1- Replacement of one blood volume or more in 24 hours.
2- 10 or more units of red blood cells in 24 hours.
3- Replacement of more than 50% blood volume in four hours.
- Retrospective definitions are not helpful in immediate clinical scenarios.
What is the critical administration threshold?
Defined as the need for ≥3 red blood cell units in one hour.
A more clinically useful definition in identifying patients requiring massive transfusion.
Why is clinical judgment alone insufficient for identifying massive hemorrhage?
Clinical judgment has poor sensitivity and specificity (~65%).
Using a validated risk assessment tool improves prediction accuracy.
validated tools in MHP trigger
List 3 validated tools in MHP:
1- Critical administration threshold
2- shock index
3- ABC score
4- RABT score
What tools are available to identify massive hemorrhage patients?
Tools combine:
* Clinical assessment
* Laboratory values
* Bedside ultrasonography (e.g., FAST)
* Shock Index (SI): Calculated by dividing heart rate (HR) by systolic blood pressure (SBP) to assess hypovolemic shock.
Critical administration threshold?
> =3 RBC in 1 hour
What increases sensitivity in predicting the need for a massive hemorrhage protocol (MHP)?
- Mechanism of injury.
- Ultrasound assessment
Using these in combination with clinical and laboratory data improves prediction.
How is Shock Index (SI) calculated and when does it trigger an MHP?
- Shock Index = Heart Rate / Systolic BP.
- **SI >1 after ≥1 L of fluid is **48% sensitive and 91% specific for predicting MHP requirement.
What are the components of the ABC Score used to trigger an MHP?
ABC score ≥2 includes:
* Penetrating mechanism
* Systolic BP < 90 mmHg
* Heart Rate > 120 bpm
* + FAST ultrasound