Chapter 10 Flashcards
Why is it important for the Dr. to monitor patient progress accurately?
Facilitates making the best possible clinical decisions
What are the benefits of using outcome measures for the patient, Dr., and 3rd party payers?
Patients = more likely to receive appropriate care
Dr = use the information to formulate diagnoses and plan care
3rd Party = be more likely to receive legitimate services in return for monetary expenditures
T/F An outcome measure should be insensitive to change
FALSE
-Needs to be sensitive to allow a change in direct association with actual changes that occur in the patient characteristic being measured.
Systematically developed statements to assist practioner and patient decisions about appropriate health care for specific circumstances
Clinical practice guidelines
- Developed by experts in a field using an organized process
- Evidence is assembled on the management ok the kinds of conditions handled by practitioners
Steps in clinical practice guidelines development
1) The subject area of the guideline is identified
2) Guideline development groups are assembled
3) Evidence is obtained and assessed
4) Evidence is shaped into a clinical guideline
5) The guideline is reviewed externally
Expert opinions that are sought when there is little or no scientific evidence available. Merely the opinions of a panel of experts.
Consensus opinions
Method used in guidelines development to establish a group position. Involves serial input from a group of panel members via questionnaires
Delphi method
What are disadvantages of guidelines?
1) Evidence for a treatment may be low quality or unavailable
2) Guidelines only address one condition at a time (most patient have multiple symptoms)
3) Recommended treatment options may not always be appropriate (unique patients)
4) Guidelines should never be treated as a “cook book”
5) Need to be updated periodically (depends how rapid change occurs in a topic/field)
Activities, disciplines, and methods that are available to identify, implement, and monitor the available evidence in health care.
Best practices
What does the choise of outcome methods depend on?
The objective for the patient or requirements of the party or stake holder who will receive the information
Questionnaires that are designed to assess the physical, psychological, emotional, and social well-being of patients. Reported from the patients perspective.
Healthy related quality of life (HRQL) measures
What is a major critcism of HRQLs?
Being subjective and unreliable
-However, measures are typically more reliable then “objective” outcome measures
What are some benefits of HRQLs?
- Findings are meaningful to the patient
- HRQL measures are helpful in the assessment of patients’ functional limitations
- They are appropriate and useful in monitoring the effects of treatment
T/F
The Neck Disability Index is an example of a generic HRQL instrument
FALSE
- SF-36 is a generic instrument HRQL
- Neck Disability Index is a specific instrument HRQL
What are some benefits of condition specific HRQLs over generic instrument HRQL?
- They evaluate elements of function that are relevant to the specific condition under consideration
- As a result, they are generally more responsive to changes in patients’ primary conditions
Most commonly used outcome measures in chiropractic
Pain and function
- Can’t measure pain directly however, so it must be estimated from replies to oral or written queries.
- Process is influenced by patient culture, conditioning, education, etc.
- Pain replies then need to be interpreted by the clinician.
A.k.a. 11 point pain scale. Very common. Patient estimates the severity of their pain on a 0-10 scale.
Numeruc Rating Scale
How does the Dr. interpret the NRS?
1-4 = mild pain
5-6 = moderate pain
7+ = severe pain
Occasionally encountered in the literature. Provides little more evidence then the 11-point scale
101-point NRS (NRS-101)
A 10 cm line with descriptive phrases at each end that depict the extremes of pain
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)