Chapter 1 Torts Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Describe nominal damages.

A

There are small trifling sums awarded to a plaintiff when a tort or breach of contract has been shown, but no actual image or loss has been proven.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Strict liability extends to what three situations?

A
  1. situations involving wild animals
  2. commercial suppliers of products
  3. ultra-hazardous activities
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Describe punitive damages and their relation to compensatory damages.

A

Punitive damages are monetary sums awarded to a plaintiff in situations where the defendant has acted in an outrageous or extremely egregious manner. They are generally coupled with compensatory damages.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

A civil lawsuit generally involves all of the following except a:

a. possible jail sentence for the defendant.
b. private plaintiff.
c. request for monetary damages.
d. wrongful act or omission.

A

a. possible jail sentence for the defendant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Identify the three elements that must present for negligence to be established.

A
  1. the defendant breaches a duty of care owed to the plaintiff.
  2. the defendant’s breach of duty of care is the proximate cause of the plaintiff’s injury
  3. there are damages to the plaintiff’s person or property as a result
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Despite warning signs, danger signs, and verbal information from the worksite foreman that the scaffolding was unsteady, the contractor climbed up on it. The contractor slipped and fell with severe injuries. In a legal decision, he did not receive compensation for negligence. The full legal defense was:

a. contributory negligence
b. comparative negligence
c. strict liability
d. assumption of risk

A

d. assumption of risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Edward is making coffee in his office for a prospective tenant. He turns to answer his cell phone and knocks over the coffee pot, severely scalding the prospective tenant and ruining her clothes. This is an example of which legal concept?

a. nuisance
b. negligence
c. intentional tort
d. strict liability

A

b. negligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

In a legal action for an intentional tort, Harvey Jenkins was taken to court for using force to get back property that had been taken from him illegally. He had the right to the property and had previously demanded it be returned. His valid legal defense under common law was:

a. repossession of property
b. defense of property
c. implied consent
d. necessity

A

a. repossession of property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Under premises liability, who is help accountable for an injury to a person entering a property?

A

the person who possesses and asserts control over real property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Under the duty of care, persons owe a duty to avoid subjecting others to what?

A

unreasonable risk of injury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How are criminal prosecutions different from lawsuits?

A

Criminal prosecutions are brought by government officers on behalf of the public. Civil lawsuits are typically brought by a private plaintiff, although in heath, safety, and environmental areas governments are more likely to file civil or administrative actions than criminal complaints to enforce laws.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Define “contributory negligence”, “comparative negligence”, and “assumption of risk”.

A

contributory negligence-negligent behavior by the plaintiff, that together with the defendant’s negligent behavior, is a proximate cause of the plaintiff’s injury

comparative negligence-compares the relative fault of the plaintiff and the defendant in a negligence action and awards damages based on the defendant’s percentage of fault

assumption of risk-plaintiff is barred from recovering damages for the defendant’s negligent acts in cases where the plaintiff has expressly or impliedly assumed the risk of injury or damage from those acts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

A duty of care is breached if a person is subjected to an injury that is:

a. life threatening.
b. foreseeable
c. recoverable
d. unintentional

A

b. foreseeable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Mae Caldera is considering becoming a legal tenant at Playa Estates. In clarifying liability concerns with her legal advisor, she discovered that unless otherwise agreed, __________ is (are) obliged to ensure that the use or her premises does not cause injury to others.

a. the landlord
b. the tenant
c. both landlord and tenant
d. under common law, neither the landlord nor tenant

A

b. the tenant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Identify and describe five defenses to intentional torts

A
  1. consent-may be either expressed or implied
  2. defense of self or others
  3. defense of property (cannot be deadly force)
  4. repossession of property
  5. necessity-more harm would be suffered by the person asserting the privilege than would be suffered by the property owner.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Define intentional tort and define the three elements that a plaintiff must prove in order to recover damages.

A

An intentional tort is an intentionally committed wrongful act for which the law provides a remedy in the form of an action for damages.

  1. the defendant committed the act
  2. the defendant intended such an act
  3. the act caused the resulting harm to the plaintiff, giving rise to the legal liability.
17
Q

Which of the following is not always an element of an intentional tort?

a. an act was committed by the defendant
b. the defendant intended such an act
c. the act was morally corrupt
d. the act caused the resulting harm to the plaintiff

A

c. the act was morally corrupt

18
Q

Strict liability extends to all of the following except:

a. captive wild animals
b. ultra-hazardous activities
c. product liability
d. negligence

A

d. negligence

19
Q

Describe compensatory damages.

A

Compensatory damages are awarded to compensate the plaintiff for actual harm or loss suffered, and nothing more.

20
Q

Mrs. Sanchez’s office was flooded and severely damaged due to a blockage in the building’s daring system. She is claiming:

a. nominal damages
b. punitive damages
c. compensatory damages
d. all of the above

A

c. compensatory damages

21
Q

What are the traditional duties owed by a building owner to invitees?

A
  1. warn invitees of hidden dangers
  2. must act reasonably to inspect the property for dangerous conditions and to take reasonable precautions to protect invitees from foreseeable dangers in the use and operation of the property.