Chapter 1 - Theories of punishment Flashcards
What is the difference between punishment, taxes, treatment and other form of governmental coercion?
By governmental coercion suffering is not intended. They are primarily orientated towards reparation and prevention.
Treatment: meant to help not to punish
How can criminal law be distinguished from administrative law?
- form of public law
- forms of law enforcement concern a legal relationship between government and citizen
- administrative measures are primarily orientated towards reparation and prevention
- suffering is not intended
- establishment of administrative fines led to a retributive component => administrative criminal law = punishment by means of administrative fines in order to relive the classic criminal law system
- administrative fines are seen by the ECtHR as form of punishment
What is the difference between crime and a tort?
Tort: horizontal = not a punitive intention (puts the claimant back in the position he was before the incident)
Criminal law: Vertical = there is a relationship between government and citizens (puts the state in charge)
Difference crime and tort Blackstone
A crime is a public wrong while a tort is a private wrong. A private wrong affects only the victim. A public wrong effects the public at large
Difference crime and tort Duff
A public wrong should not be interpreted as wrong that injures the public but as one that properly concerns the public
What is punishment
The intentional infliction of suffering
Enlightment
- originated 17th century in England
- peak in 18th century in France
- declining years at the start of the 19th century in Germany
- has changed politics, science, morality, religion and law in Western world
- view of the Enlightenment on man and his relationship with the State forms the basis of many theoretical foundations of our current criminal law
- Philosophers: Beccaria, Montesquieu
- criminal law should not only be surrounded with more procedural safeguards for the (suspected) citizen than it was the case during the Acien Régime, but it should also be more efficient in realizing certain goals of criminal politics, including the repression and prevention of crime
- criminal law as the ultimum remedium
- punishment with moderation
- clearly written criminal law
- criminal law focusing on the act instead of intention
- retrospective reaction to crimes
- led to two different theories of punishment: retributive and utilitarian
Theories of punishment by Kant (enlightment)
Retributivist: assumed the existence of an undermined moral reality “above” the sensory perceptible reality
–> man to the extent he is part of the undetermined, moral reality, has free will. And as a being with free will he should be held responsible for the crimes of which he’s guilty (therefore he should be punished)
Theories of punishment by Bentham (enlightment)
Only accepted the existence of empirical reality that is utterly causally determined, including mankind.
Man strives to happiness/pleasure –> to ensure the greatest happiness for the greatest number punishment is sometimes required
Two sides of enlightment by Focault
I. one side which is characterized by freedom, practical reason and man as subject (spirit - retributive)
II. The other side is characterized by discipline, instrumental reason and man as object (body - utlitlarian)
Conditions for sanctions to be forms of punishment by Lord Walgrave
a) coercion = imposed by the government
b) suffering = sanction hurt
c) intention = suffering is intentionally inflicted - no side effect
d) relation = connection between crime committed and sanction imposed
Why are general and special detterrence called utilitarian goals?
Prevention is the main goal with a look at the future.
General: you punish so in future there is no crime
Special: you punish so the person doesn’t commit a crime in the future again
Is punishment a moral evil according to Hobbes?
Punishment is an evil inflicted by public authority on someone that had done or omitted something unlawful which was judged by the same authority. Therefore punishment is a necessary evil which will lead to something better
What is the deterrence theory?
Deterrence theory states that people commit crimes because they are motivated by some deep moral sense.
Deterrence requires that a person understands the consequences of his actions and is able to take those consequences into consideration
Criticism deterrence theory
I. The deterrence theory only applies to rational people but some crimes are committed by people who can not control their behavior in a rational way e.g crime of passion
II. Do crime rates show deterrence or only failure to deter?
What are the main arguments of the German Constitutional Court for refusing to consider physiological violence as coercion?
An interpretation of the term “force” as also encompassing psychological force would constitute a violation of the legality principle, since it has in the general use of language various meanings which could lead to the danger that other behavioral patterns which are in social life would come under threat of punishment