Chapter 1 Risks of ML and TF-Overview Flashcards
When was the FATF formed?
Formed in 1989, the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) is an intergovernmental body created by the Group of Seven industrialized nations to set standards and foster international action against money laundering
Insurance Companies Overview
The insurance industry provides risk transfer, savings, and investment
products to a variety of consumers worldwide, ranging from individuals to
large corporations to governments
An important aspect of the way the
insurance industry operates is that most of the business conducted by
insurance companies is transacted through intermediaries, such as agents
and independent brokers. Insurers, with some exceptions, are subject to AML
requirements
Insurance Companies Risks
The susceptibility of the insurance industry to money laundering is not as high
as that for other types of financial organizations
certain sectors of the insurance industry, such as life insurance and annuities, are a
primary target of criminals who engage in money laundering and terrorist
financing
Insurance Companies Risks Part 2
the sector’s vulnerability to money laundering is
similar to that of the securities sector; in some jurisdictions, life insurance
policies are even viewed as investment vehicles similar to securities.
What is the highest risk product for Insurance?
life insurance is by far the most attractive area of the insurance sector to money launderers. Substantial sums can be invested in widely available life insurance products, and many feature a high degree of flexibility, while at the same time ensuring nonnegligible rates of return
Other life insurance products such as whole and permanent life insurance have an investment value which in turn can create an cash value above the original investment when the policy is cancelled
Lowest risk product for insurance
Life insurance products with no cash
surrender value
Products that feature payments of
cash surrender value and the opportunity to nominate beneficiaries from the
first day of the policy are the most attractive and therefore higher risk.
Insurance-Annuities
An annuity is an investment that provides a defined series of payments in the future in
exchange for an up-front sum of money. Annuity contracts can allow criminals
to exchange illicit funds for an immediate or deferred income stream, which
typically takes the form of monthly payments starting on a specified date
A policyholder can place a large sum of money into a policy with
the expectation that it will grow based on the underlying investment, which
can be fixed or variable. Unit-linked policies and insurance wrappers are also
high-risk insurance products because of their high value accumulation and
flexibility in adding and managing assets
Features of High Risk Insurance Products
- Offers the ability to fold funds and assets into the policy
- Full or partial underlying investments under the control of the customer
- Can offer the option of asset transfers
- Can have a high upper limit for the amount of funds held
What is a strong indicator of ML in the Insurance field?
A potential policyholder is more interested in a policy’s cancellation
terms than its benefits
Vulnerabilities in the insurance sector
- Lack of oversight/controls over intermediaries
- Decentralized oversight over aspects of the sales force
- Sales-driven objectives
Examples of ML in the Insurance industry part 1-Overfunding policy
- The customer can overfund the policy and move funds into and out of the policy while paying early withdrawal penalties. When such funds are reimbursed by the insurance company (e.g., by check), the
launderer has successfully obscured the link between the crime and the
generated funds.
Examples of ML in the Insurance industry part 2-Single premium insurance bonds
- The purchase and redemption of single premium insurance bonds are key
laundering vehicles. The bonds can be purchased from insurance
companies and then redeemed prior to their full term at a discount. In such
cases, the balance of the bond is paid to a launderer in the form of a
sanitized check from the insurance compan
Examples of ML in the Insurance industry part 3-Free look period
- A free-look period is a feature that allows investors—for a short period of
time after the policy is signed and the premium paid—to back out of a policy
without penalty. This process allows the money launderer to receive an
insurance check, which represents cleaned funds. However, as more
insurance companies are subject to AML program requirements, this type of
money laundering is more readily detected and reported.
Examples of ML in the Insurance industry part 4-Cancellation
One indicator of possible money laundering is when a potential policyholder
is more interested in the cancellation terms of a policy than the benefits of
the policy. The launderer buys a policy with illicit money and then tells the
insurance company that he has changed his mind and does not need the
policy. After paying a penalty, the launderer redeems the policy and
receives a clean check from a respected insurer
Examples of ML in the Insurance industry part 5-Third parties
Third parties that fund insurance policies (i.e., not the policyholder) have not
been subject to regular identification procedures when the insurance
contract was concluded. The source of funds and the relationship between
policyholder and the third party might be unclear to the insurance company
Examples of ML in the Insurance industry part 6- Investment opportunities using large deposits
Money laundering is enabled by using large sums of money to make substantial payments into single-premium life insurance policies, which serve as wrapped investment policies.
A variation on this method is the use of large premium deposits to fund annual premiums. Such policies, which are comparable to single-premium policies, also enable the customer to invest substantial amounts of money with an insurance
company. Because the annual premiums are paid from an account that
must be funded with the total amount, a life insurance product with apparently lower money laundering risk will bear the features of the higher risk single-premium polic
Factors to consider for Insurance companies ML risks
- Use cash or cash equivalents to purchase insurance products
- Purchase an insurance product with a single premium or lump-sum
payment - Borrow money against an insurance product’s value
Securities Broker-Dealers Overview
The world’s capital markets are vast in size,
dwarfing deposit banking
FATF has strongly recommended money laundering controls for the securities field since 1992, in conjunction with the Madrid-based International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO), a global association of governmental bodies that includes the Commodity Futures Trading
Commission (CFTC), which regulates the securities and futures markets. The
difficulty in dealing with money laundering in the securities field is that typically
little currency is involved.
Concentration Accounts
Concentration accounts are internal accounts established to facilitate the processing and settlement of multiple or individual customer transactions
Concentration accounts are also known as special-use, omnibus,
settlement, suspense, intraday, sweep, and collection accounts
Audit trail can be lost when ID info is seperate from transaction info
- Requiring dual signatures on general ledger tickets
- Prohibiting direct customer access to concentration accounts
- Capturing customer transactions in the customers’ account statements
- Prohibiting customers’ knowledge of concentration accounts and their ability to direct employees to conduct transactions through these accounts
- Retaining appropriate transaction and customer identification information
- Frequently reconciling accounts by an individual who is independent of the transactions
- Establishing a timely discrepancy-resolution process
- Identifying and monitoring recurring customer names
Securities Industry ML risks
- International nature
- Speed of transactions
- Ability to conduct free-of-payment asset transfers, in which securities are transferred without a corresponding transfer of funds
- Ease of conversion of holdings to cash without significant loss of principal
- Routine use of wire transfers to, from, and through multiple jurisdictions
- Competitive, commission-driven environment
- Practice of brokerage firms of maintaining securities accounts as nominees or trustees, thus permitting concealment of the identities of the true beneficiaries
- Weak AML programs that do not have effective CDD, suspicious activity
monitoring, and other controls.
Securities Industry risks-Layering
For illegal funds originating outside the sector, securities transactions for the creation of legal entities can be used to conceal or obscure the source of these fund
In the case of illegal activities within the securities market itself (e.g., embezzlement, insider trading, securities fraud, and market manipulation), the transactions and manipulations generate illegal funds that must then be laundered
In either case the dual advantage is ML plus profit
Securites Industry-ML indicators
1.Use of customer accounts to hold funds and that can bypass more stringent ML controls
2.Wash Trading and offsetting transactions- the process of matching buys and sells to create the illusion of trading
Securities Industry-Greatest ML vulnerabilities
The FATF Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing in the Securities Sector typologies report identifies the following
- Wholesale markets
- Unregulated funds
- Wealth management
- Investment funds
- Bearer securities
- Bills of exchange
Securities Industry-Unique challenges
1.Variety and complexity of securities: Security offerings are broad, with some products tailored to the needs of a single customer and others designed for sale to the general public
2.High-risk securities: Although most securities are issued by legitimate
companies, securities that are underregulated or established for illegitimate purposes pose risks. In the United States, securities that are not traded on regulated exchanges are typically sold over-the-counter, with tiers such as “pink sheets” that require only minimal reporting
3.Multiple layers and third-party risk: The securities industry involves many
participants, including financial organizations and broker-dealers, financial
advisors, transfer agents, securities lenders, custodians, introducing brokers, and sales agents.
Securities Industry-ML Indicators
1.A customer with a significant history with the securities firm who abruptly
liquidates all of her assets in order to remove wealth from the jurisdiction
- A customer who opens an account or purchases a product without regard
to loss, commissions, or other costs
Securities Industry-ML Indicators part 2
- A securities account that is used for payments or outgoing wires with little
or no securities activity (e.g., account appears to be used as a depository
account or a conduit for transfers)
4.A customer’s transactions that include a pattern of sustained losses, which
might indicate the transfer of value from one party to another
Securities Industry-ML Indicators-part 3
5.Transactions in which one party purchases securities at a high price and
then sells them at a considerable loss to another party, which might indicate the transfer of value from one party to another
- A customer who is unfamiliar with a financial product’s performance and
specifications but wants to invest in it nonetheless
Securities Industry-ML Indicators-part 4
7.A customer who is known to have friends or family who work for the securities issuer, or a trading pattern that suggests he might have nonpublic information
- Two or more unrelated accounts at a securities firm that trade an illiquid or
low-priced security, or “penny stock,” suddenly and simultaneously - A customer who deposits physical securities that (1) are in large quantities;
(2) are titled differently from the name of the account; (3) do not bear a
restrictive legend, even though the history suggests that they should; or (4)
lack sense in terms of the method by which they were acquired
Securities Industry-Retail Brokers
Retail broker-dealers are the industry’s frontline defense—and its most
vulnerable access point.
pressure to expand their client base and manage more assets. The more assets in a
client’s account, the more commission will be generated.
Money launderers can promise a large or steady commission stream. Therefore, it is important for broker-dealers to understand their customers and monitor transactions.
Securities Industry-Retail Brokers requirements
Requirements established by the SEC, FINRA (Financial Industry Regulatory Authority) which compel brokers to have AML programs.
These include appointed BSA officer,CDD,SARs monitoring ,training, transaction monitoring, and independent audits.
Oversight also done by SEC and/or FINRA
Securities Industy-Case Study
Financial Conduct Authority fined Duestche Bank 163m GBP for inadequate ML controls between 2012-2015
The infractions and resulting loopholes allowed the front office of Deutsche Bank’s Russia-based subsidiary, DB Moscow, to
execute more than 2,400 pairs of mirror trades between April 2012 and October 2015, these trades were used to transfer USD 6 Billion from Russia , funds went through various locations including Cyprus,Estonia and Latvia. DB Moscow executed the mirror trades. Investigations found connections between DB Moscow and DB London customers.Rubles were changed into USD and withdrawn.
Securities Industy-Case Study part 2
The deficiencies included:
* Inadequate KYC and customer due diligence (CDD)
* Failure to ensure that the CB&S front office took responsibility for its KYC obligations
* Flawed customer and country risk-rating methodologies
* Deficient AML policies and procedures
* Inadequate AML information technology infrastructure
* Lack of automated AML systems for detecting suspicious trades
* Failure to provide adequate oversight of trades booked in the UK by
traders in non-UK jurisdictions
Securities Industy-Key Takeaways
- Inadequate AML/CFT frameworks allow abuse of the financial system by
criminals. - Real-time mirror trades involve the rapid transfer of significant sums of
money around the world. - It is critical to have adequate KYC and CDD procedures in place to identify
suspicious activity. - Organizations need to undertake continuous risk assessment and ensure
controls are in place to mitigate against existing, new, and emerging risks.
Securities Industry Case Study 2:
In June 2020 SFC (Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission) fined Guotai Junan Securities HK 25M
From 2014-15 GJS failed to account for 15,600 3rd party deposits and withdrawals totalling HK 37.5 Billion
Failure to respond to several red flags , more than 5000 deposits made into accounts with knowing the depositor identities
HK 28.8M used by 5 clients to purchase shares of a HK listed company were deposited by the same 3rd party that exceeded their self declared net worth.
Securities Industry Case Study 2: Takeaways
- Ongoing transaction monitoring is a key component of an effective
AML/CFT compliance program. - Share offerings have associated risks for money laundering, insider trading, and wash trades.
- Both potential and confirmed breaches should be promptly disclosed to
the relevant regulator.
Casinos-Overview
Casinos and other businesses associated with gambling, such as bookmaking,
lotteries, and horse racing, are associated with money laundering because they
provide an excuse for recently acquired wealth with no apparent legitimate
source.
Casinos- ML
ML in casinos generally occures in the layering and placement stages
Buying chips with illegal cash, request repayment by check drawn on casino’s account or can request a casino to provide credit.
One laundering technique involves the person actually gambling the money to be laundered, but in such a way that he is reasonably sure of ultimately recovering his stake in theform of checks issued or funds transferred by the gambling or betting agency and reflecting verifiable winnings
Casinos-Junkets
Junkets, a form of casino-based tourism, also present significant money
laundering risk, because junket participants largely rely on third parties, or junket
operators, to move the funds across borders and through multiple casinos creating a layer of obscurity.
In some countries Junkets can rent private gaming rooms, monitor player activity,collect credit, operate pool funds.
In certain regions, licensed junket operators act as fronts for junket operators in another country. The front operators supply
players to a casino through the casino’s licensed junket companies, which
might not qualify for a license in the country where the players will be gambling
several jurisdictions do not require licensing of junket operators and their agents, further increasing the risks of money laundering.
FATF emphasizes the need to ensure that junket operators are not under criminal influence and that financial transactions are transparent and subject to
relevant AML/CFT measures.
Casinos- Suspicious behaviours part 1
FinCEN and FATF have identified specific behaviors to watch for, including:
- Attempts to evade AML reporting and recordkeeping requirements, such
as
1.Paying of large debt without triggering threshold
2. Two or more customers combining funds after minimal gambling to request for a casino check
3.Customer receives payout in excess of USD 10k but requests less and takes the remaining in cash
4.Structuring transactions to avoid tax filings or CTR
5. Reducing the presented chips when asked for ID
Casinos- Suspicious behaviours part 2
Using the cashier’s cage solely for its banking-like financial services, such as:
1.Wiring of funds originated from nongaming proceeds to another country
2.Using the casino as a temporary repository of funds by depositing money and requesting transfers.
Casinos- Suspicious behaviours part 3
Minimal gaming activity without a reasonable explanation, such as:
- Purchasing many chips, doing a bit of gambling then redeeming chips
2.Using credit to purchase chips, doing minimal gambling, pay off credit in currency and redeems chips for a casino check - Large deposit using small denomination bills, withdraws at the chips table–> minimal gambling–>exchanges chips for large denominations
4.Inserting a high # of small bills into slot machine engaging in minimal play and exchanges the voucher for large denom bills or casino check - Purchasing chips under a reporting threshold, engages in minimal play, leaves casino without cashing out
6.Customer transfers funds to a casino into a front account, withdraws it as chips in a table then asks chips to be exchange for casino check
Casinos- Suspicious behaviours part 4
- Unusual gaming and transaction patterns, such as:
- 2 customers both sides of a bet to cover each other
2.Customer requests casino check issued to 3rd parties
3.Using multiple fin instruments to pay off large markers - Requesting casino checks under reporting threshold
5.Establish high value deposit then remain dormant.
Casinos-High Rollers
It is a serious mistake for casinos to allow play and accept the revenue without
reasonably determining the source of a customer’s gaming funds. FinCEN
expects US casinos to know the source of high rollers’ funds.
Casinos-Examples of failures of AML/CTF programs
Tinian Dynasty Hotel & Casino fined US$75 million (2015)-Failed to file CTRs,assisted in structuring transactions
Caesars Palace fined US$9.5 million (2015):
Promoted private salons without proper monitoring transactions
Sparks Nugget fined US$1 million (2016): Failed to file STRs and instructed it’s compliance manager to avoid interacting with regulatory auditors
Artichoke Joe’s Casino (AJC) fined US$8million (2017). Failed to file STRs despite knowing that loan sharks were using chips for money laundering
Casinos-use of tools and online gambling
Casinos can use AML tools specifically designed for casinos for their AML needs.
Online gambling provides an effective method of money laundering for cybercriminals, because transactions are conducted principally
through credit and debit cards. Site operators are typically unregulated
offshore organizations Site operators also may have accounts in reputable banks
Casinos-Onling Gambling
Due to the regulatory environment and framework some credit card issuers do not allow online gambling, banks screen the types of org the accepting the card and thus can block it from conducting a transaction
However other methods such as prepaid cards, wire transfers, peer to peer , virtual currencies can fund online gambling
Casinos-ML Indicators
- A ML colludes with a site operator to deposit illicit funds into an account and then withdraws them as winnings, the launderer declares the winnings with the tax authorities and uses funds for a legit purpose
2.ML deposits funds into an account using stolen identity
- ML logs into the account from multiple countries
4.Player is a PEP
Casinos- Case Study
ILGA (Australian Independent Liquor and Gaming Authority) investigated Crown Melbourne
Crown accepted large deposits by Chinese nationals at a VIP room operated by a Junkey agency, they also used shell companies to facilitate transactions with China that were not reported to the regulator, the Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Center
Vids showed bricks of cash being exchanged for chips which happened regulary in the VIP rooms.
Crown used two shell companies to enable VIP gamblers and Junket agents and circumvent
Casino Case Study-Key Takeaways
Casino cashiers can be exploited for placement.
* Intermediaries, such as junket agents and shell companies, can be used to
place, layer, and integrate funds through casino operations.
* A VIP customer’s commercial value must not protect them from suspicion,
scrutiny, or AML controls.
Dealers in High-Value Items-Overview
The USA PATRIOT Act requires certain dealers including precious metals, stones, and jewels, to establish AML programs.
However, in many other jurisdictions, these are not required.
Gold has high value and can be bought and sold easily.
Dealers in High Value Items-FATF Report Takeways
- Gold is an extremely attractive vehicle for laundering money.
- The gold market is a target for criminal activity because it is lucrative.
Understanding and knowing the various stages of the gold market and types
of predicate offenses is critical in identifying money laundering
Dealers in High Value Items-ML Indicators
1.Payments or returns to persons other than the owner-owner of the metal directs payments to a third party
2.Precious Metal Pool Accounts-Group of companies that hold precious metal credits for a company which can be used by a customer.(Monetary/delivery etc)
Dealers in High Value Items-Diamonds
Diamonds are commonly used for TF/ML
Direct purchase of gems with illegal money
Common type of activities:
FX Transactions
Fraudulent Invoicing
Commingling proceeds
International fund transfers
Dealers in High Value Items-Fine Art
Anonymous agents at art auction houses bid millions of dollars for priceless works. Payment is later wired to the auction house by the agents’ principals from accounts in offshore havens.
Dealers in High Value Items-Fine Art-How to decrease ML Risks
- Require all art vendors to provide names and addresses and sign on a form stating the art is not stolen
2.Verify addresses of new vendors and customers
3.Contact the Art loss register if the art is believed to be stolen
4. Be wary of customers wanting to deal in cash
5.Appoint a staff to which people can report STRs
Precious metals- Case Study-Operation Apex
12 people arrested in relation to the Wu Gang , engaged in criminal activities
Established a shark finning business, legal in Florida not in California using fake ID, fake invoices and paperwork used
Proceeds from shark finning and drug trafficking put into 3rd party accounts around the world
Precious metals- Case Study-Operation Apex-Key Takeaways
Converting illicit proceeds into precious metals and gems is attractive to
financial criminals because:
* They have high value in a compact form, and their value tends to hold for long periods of time.
* They are easy to transport, so value can be transferred across borders without customs declarations.
* Their origins are difficult to trace.
* They can be easily exchanged for cash or used as currency in most areas of the world.
Precious metals- Case Study-Elemetal
Firm did not undertake basic KYC procedures
Refined billions of dollars worth of gold
Forfeited USD $ 15 Million
US Federal law requires precious metal dealers to have an AML program
Firm did not have confirmation on supplier identities and accepted gold which was most likely smuggled
3 employees pled guilty to importing illicit gold, Elemetal removed from London Bullion and COMEX-gold futures market
Precious metals- Case Study-Elemetal-Takeaways
1.AML risks inherent in the gold trade include heavy reliance on cash,
anonymity, and difficulty tracing the source and origin of gold
2.The BSA requires precious metals dealers to perform KYC on suppliers and
identify the source and origin of metals
3.In addition to KYC, AML programs must also implement Know Your
Employee controls
Fine Art Case Study-Philip Rivkin
In 2016, US biodiesel businessman Philip Rivkin pled guilty in Houston, Texas, to
laundering US$78 million through many avenues, including purchasing over
2,000 pieces of art
10 years imprisonment and $138m fine
Investigators determined that
Rivkin’s company Green Diesel was not in fact producing biodiesel, but merely
selling certificates and defrauding its customers
He bought a collection of Photos worth $15M to legitimize his income
within months of the US
imposing sanctions on the Russian brothers Arkady and Boris Rotenberg, they
illegally spent more than US$18 million on art in the US using shell companies
linked to Russian oligarchs to evade sanctions
Fine Art Case Study-Philip Rivkin-Key Takeaways
1.Art markets are high risk
2. Shell companies are used to enhance secrecy
3. Following legislation in place for art markets
The responsible art market initiative/the AML act of 2020/the EU fifth directive
4.Art participants should understand AML law and are liabile
Travel Agencies and Websites-Overview
ML can occur in the following ways
1.Purchasing an expensive ticket for another person who then asks for a refund
2.Paying for services in installments that are actually structured wire
transfers in amounts small enough to avoid recordkeeping requirements, a
method used especially by criminals from foreign countries
3.Establishing tour operator networks with false bookings and
documentation to justify significant payments from foreign travel groups
Travel Agencies-Case Study-ISIS-Malaysia
In 2015, Indonesian militant suspect Gigih Rahmat Dewe opened a travel
agency on Bintan Island, Indonesia, as a cover for the terrorist organization the
Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS).
Cash intensive business can allow for comingling of funds, such transfer of funds raise minimal suspicion.
Travel Agencies-Case Study-ISIS-Malaysia-Key Takeaways
- Travel agencies are cash-intensive businesses.
- Travel agencies solve logistics problems for terrorists.
- Travel agencies can allow the use of false identities.
- Travel agencies can be used to commingle legitimate and illegitimate fund.
- Travel agencies can be used in all three stages of money laundering.
Vehicle Sales-Overview-ML indicators
1.Structuring cash deposits below the threshold
2.Purchasing vehicles with sequentially # cheques or pay orders
3.Trading in vehicles and conducting successive transactions in buying/selling
4.Accepting 3rd party payments from jurisdictions with low controls
Cases have also occurred in which car dealers laundered money by allowing
drug dealers to trade in cars for less expensive models and to be paid in
checks, not cash, for the difference
Vehicle Sales-Case Study-Luxury Vehicles
Leontaritis was the owner and operator of Vanderhall Exotics of Houston LLC,
which specialized in exotic luxury automobiles. He used his car dealership to
launder drug money for a large Houston-based drug trafficking organization
that smuggled drugs from Mexico into the US
Accepted cash from drug dealers for high luxury vehicles, used fraudulent dealer invoices to hide IDs and did not report cash payments.
Vehicle Sales-Case Study-Luxury Vehicles-Key Takeaways
- Cash-intensive businesses, such as car dealerships, are particularly
vulnerable to money laundering. - Fraudulent invoices can be used to hide buyers’ identities.
- The purchase of luxury vehicles and other assets can be used to place
large amounts of illicit money into the financial system seemingly
legitimately
Gatekeepers: Notaries, Accountants,
Auditors, and Lawyers-Overview
FATF identified the following functions provided by lawyers, notaries,
accountants, and other professionals as the most useful to potential money
launderers
- Creating and managing corporate vehicles and other complex legal
arrangements, such as trusts - Buying or selling property: Property transfers can serve as the cover for
illegal fund transfers - Performing financial transactions: These professionals might carry out
various financial operations on behalf of a client - Providing introductions to financial organizations
- Undertaking certain litigation
- Setting up and managing charities
Gatekeepers: Notaries, Accountants,
Auditors, and Lawyers-Overview-red flag indicators - part 1
The FATF report also describes five categories of red flag indicators of money
laundering or terrorism financing:
1.Characteristics of a client:
Overly secretive
* Uses an agent or an intermediary or avoids personal contact without a
logical reason
* Reluctant to provide or refuses to provide information or documents
usually required to enable the execution of a transaction
* Holds or has previously held a senior public position or has professional
or family ties to such individuals
* Known to have been the subject of investigation for an acquisitive crime
(i.e., one in which the offender derives material gain from the crime,
such as theft or embezzlement)
* Known to have ties to criminals
* Shows unusual interest and asks repeated questions on the procedures for applying ordinary standards
Gatekeepers: Notaries, Accountants,
Auditors, and Lawyers-Overview-red flag indicators - part 2
- Characteristics of the involved parties:
* Native to, residents in, or incorporated in a high-risk country
* Connected without an apparent business reason; that is, tied in a way
that generates doubts as to the real nature of the transaction
* Appear in multiple transactions over a short period of time
* Incapacitated or under legal age, with no logical explanation for their
involvement
* Attempt to disguise the real owner or parties to the transaction
* Not directing the transaction, (i.e., the person directing the operation is
not one of the formal parties to the transaction)
* Do not appear to be suitable representatives
Gatekeepers: Notaries, Accountants,
Auditors, and Lawyers-Overview-red flag indicators - part 3
- Characteristics of the source of funds:
* Provided using unusual payment arrangements
* Collateral located in a high-risk jurisdiction
* Represents a significant increase in capital for a recently incorporated
company, including foreign capital, without a logical explanation
* Represents unusually high capital in comparison with similar businesses
* Stems from a security transferred with an excessively high or low price
attached
* Stems from large financial transactions that cannot be justified by the
corporate purpose
Gatekeepers: Notaries, Accountants,
Auditors, and Lawyers-Overview-red flag indicators - part 4
- Characteristics of the lawyer:
* Located at a significant distance from the client or transaction without a
legitimate or economic reason
* Little or no experience in providing the specific services needed
* Being paid substantially higher than usual fees without a legitimate reason
* Frequently changed by the client, or the client has multiple legal
advisors without legitimate reason
* Provides services previous refused by another professional
Gatekeepers: Notaries, Accountants,
Auditors, and Lawyers-Overview-red flag indicators - part 5
- Characteristics of the retainer:
* Transactions that are unusual with regard to the type of operation and
the transaction’s typical size, frequency, or execution
* Transactions that do not correspond to the client’s normal business
activities and show that he does not have a suitable knowledge of the
nature, object, or purpose of the professional performance requested
* Creation of complicated ownership structures or structures with
involvement of multiple jurisdictions without a legitimate or economic
reason
* Client transaction history with no documentation to support company
activities
* Inconsistencies and unexplained last-minute changes to instructions
* No sensible commercial, financial, or tax reason for the transactions or
increased complexity that unnecessarily results in higher taxes or fees
* Exclusively keeping documents or other goods, or holding large
deposits or otherwise using the client account without provision of legal
services
* Abandoned transactions without concern for fee level or after the
receipt of funds
* Power of attorney sought for the administration or disposal of assets
under unusual circumstances without logical reason
* Litigation that is settled too easily or quickly with little or no involvement
of legal professional retained
* Requests for payments to third parties without substantiating reason or
corresponding transaction