Chapter 1: Regulatory and Legal Environment Flashcards
Regulatory Environment - Introduction
This element explores the meaning of ‘professional’ and introduces the concept that as lawyers our conduct is regulated and that we have obligations to our clients and the public
Regulatory Environment - Introduction
‘Professionals are governed by codes of ethics and profess commitment to competence, integrity and morality, altruism and the promotion of the public good within their expert domain. Professionals are accountable to those served and to society’. As legal professionals, we are accountable to our clients and to the public.
As lawyers we are legal professionals. What does ‘profession’ mean?
- ‘Any type of work that needs special training or a particular skill, often one that is respected because it involves a high level of education’, Cambridge English Dictionary
- ‘An indicator of trust and expertise’, Professional Standards Council, Australia
- ‘Professionalism comprises the personally held beliefs about one’s own conduct as a professional. It is often linked to the upholding of the principles, laws, ethics and conventions of a profession as a way of practice’, Professional Standards Council, Australia
What does ‘ethics’ mean?
‘moral principles that govern a person’s behaviour or the conducting of an activity’, Oxford English Dictionary
Key aspects of being a legal professional:
- Professionalism requires knowledge, skill, expertise and a high level of education and training
- but also trust, ethics, morality and integrity.
- Trust and morality are important because legal professionals owe a duty to promote the public good, not just the interests of their clients.
- These principles apply to you as lawyers, in your personal life as well as your professional life.
As a lawyer you will need to comply with:
- Legal
- Regulatory
- Ethical
Summary
- Professionalism requires knowledge and expertise but also trust and morality.
-Legal professionals owe a duty to the public as well as to their clients.
-Lawyers need to comply with legal, regulatory and ethical requirements in their personal as well as their professional lives.
Regulators
This element explores the regulatory bodies that govern the conduct of legal professionals.
There are a number of bodies that regulate the legal profession
Legal Services Board regulates all lawyers in England and Wales.
Solicitors Regulation Authority (‘SRA’) regulates solicitors, law firms and individuals who work for businesses authorised by the SRA.
Bar Standards Board regulates barristers.
Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (‘CILEx’) regulates legal executives.
Council for Licensed Conveyancers regulates licensed conveyancers.
Costs Lawyers Standards Board regulates costs lawyers
To whom can a client complain?
- Law Firm
- Legal Ombudsman
- SRA
- Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal
Law Firm
The SRA requires that every law firm has a complaints procedure.
If a client is unhappy with the service, the client’s first step is to follow the law firm’s complaints procedure.
Legal Ombudsman (‘LO’)
If the firm’s internal complaints procedure is exhausted, individuals, small businesses, charities, clubs and trusts can refer complaints about poor service and fees/bills from solicitors to the LO.
The LO can require the solicitor to:
- apologise;
- pay compensation;
- correct or put right an error or omission;
- take specific action in the interests of the complainant;
- pay for the costs of the complaint;
- limit the firm’s fees.
Crucially the LO has no powers to discipline or fine a lawyer; the LO’s primary function is to resolve complaints.
SRA
The SRA sets the principles and code of conduct that solicitors and lawyers regulated by the SRA must comply with.
If the client has a complaint that is concerning misconduct, dishonesty or breaches of the SRA’s rules, they can complain to the SRA. The SRA has the power to:
- issue a warning to the firm;
- impose a disciplinary sanction, eg a fine;
- reprimand the solicitor for professional misconduct;
- order the solicitor to repay or refund the whole or part of the costs to the client;
- impose restrictions on a lawyer’s ability to practise;
- institute disciplinary proceedings before the Solicitor’s Disciplinary Tribunal;
- revoke recognition of a firm; and
- close down a firm.
Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (‘SDT’)
The SDT is an independent statutory body. It deals with serious breaches of the SRA’s rules and disciplines solicitors. Its powers include power to:
- strike a solicitor off the roll;
- suspend a solicitor from practice for a fixed or indefinite period;
- reprimand a solicitor;
- impose a fine;
- award costs against a party to proceedings; and
- make a restriction order, imposing a restriction on the area in which a solicitor can practice.
The SDT does not have power to award compensation.
Ultimately the only option left if the client is not happy would be court action.
The Law Society
- Represents solicitors in England and Wales to the public.
- Supports solicitors in their careers and practice.
- Is there to fight your corner.
Summary
· A number of bodies regulate the conduct of the legal profession in England and Wales.
· The SRA regulates law firms and individual lawyers who work in businesses authorised by the SRA.
· Clients who are unhappy with the service they receive should complain to the firm, the Legal Ombudsman and may also have the right to complain to the SRA.
· The SRA has power to refer a complaint about a solicitor to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (‘SDT’).
· The SDT has power to strike a solicitor off the roll of solicitors.
SRA Standards and Regulations 2019
This element explores three components of the SRA Standards and Regulations 2019: the SRA Principles, CCS and CCF.
Whether you work in a big or small firm, in-house or want to work outside a regulated law firm, all solicitors must follow certain rules and meet high ethical standards’ SRA.
This element will provide an overview of how three key parts of the Solicitors Regulation Authority’s (‘SRA’) regulations interact.
SRA Standards and Regulations 2019
The SRA sets out the ethical and professional standards it expects from solicitors, law firms, people that work in those law firms and other legal businesses in the SRA Standards and Regulations 2019 (‘SRA Standards and Regulations’). The SRA Standards and Regulations comprise a number of documents. Key documents include:
SRA Principles (‘Principles’)
Code of Conduct for Solicitors, Registered European Lawyers and Registered Foreign Lawyers (‘CCS’)
Code of Conduct for Firms (‘CCF’)
SRA Accounts Rules
The SRA Accounts Rules regulate how law firms hold and manage clients’ money.
Maintaining Trust and Acting Fairly
Maintaining trust and acting fairly
In this element we will consider how:
- many of the Solicitors Regulation Authority (‘SRA’) Principles (each a ‘Principle’) require legal professionals to maintain trust and act fairly
- maintaining trust and acting fairly can conflict with the Principle to act in the best interests of each client
- acting with integrity differs from acting with honesty; and
- Code of Conduct for Solicitors, Registered European Lawyers and Registered Foreign Lawyers (‘CCS’) 1 requires individuals to maintain trust and act fairly, including:
- CCS 1.1: you do not unfairly discriminate
- CCS 1.2: you do not abuse your position by taking unfair advantage of clients or others
- CCS 1.4: you do not mislead your clients, the courts or others.
Maintaining trust and acting fairly
Many of the Principles require legal professionals to maintain trust and act fairly:
Principle 1: acting in a way that upholds the constitutional principle of the rule of law, and the proper administration of justice.
Principle 2: acting in a way that upholds public trust and confidence in the solicitors’ profession and in legal services provided by authorised persons
Principle 3: acting with independence
Principle 4: acting with honesty
Principle 5: acting with integrity
Principle 7: acting in the best interests of each client
Principle 7: acting in the best interests of each client.
Although you must act in the best interests of each client, you must also act with independence, honesty and integrity. If the client wants to do something dishonest or illegal, you cannot help them do it.
For example, if your client wants you to lie to a court or other person or body, you must refuse to do so.
What’s the difference between acting with honesty and acting with integrity?
Integrity is broader than honesty.
For example, if you mislead a client or the court, you have not breached Principle 4 (honesty), but you have breached Principle 5 (integrity).
What’s the difference between acting with honesty and acting with integrity?
Integrity is about being scrupulous, careful and accurate.
The SRA might take action against an individual for lack of integrity where they have:
Taken unfair advantage of a client or a member of the public
Allowed another person to take unfair advantage of someone else
Misled another person or stood by and allowed another person to be misled
CCS: maintaining trust and acting fairly
The first section of CCS relates to maintaining trust and acting fairly. It is about upholding the trust that the public needs to have in the legal profession. The following paragraphs of CCS are relevant:
CCS 1.1 ‘You do not unfairly discriminate by allowing your personal views to affect your professional relationships and the way in which you provide your services.’
CCS 1.2 ‘You do not abuse your position by taking unfair advantage of clients or others.’
CCS 1.4 ‘You do not mislead or attempt to mislead your clients, the court or others, either by your own acts or omissions or allowing or being complicit in the acts or omissions of others (including your client).’
CCS 1.1
‘You do not unfairly discriminate by allowing your personal views to affect your professional relationships and the way in which you provide your services.’
To comply with this standard you must ensure that your personal views do not affect the way you provide legal services. For example, a solicitor with strong religious or political views should not allow those views to stop them from complying with Principle 7, acting in the best interests of their client.
CCS 1.2
‘You do not abuse your position by taking unfair advantage of clients or others.’
For example, you could be instructed on a matter and find yourself opposite a party with no legal representation. You should not take advantage of the other party’s lack of legal knowledge.
Dealing with an unrepresented client can be challenging.
If the unrepresented party produces a badly drafted document, you should suggest they find a lawyer. If they do not, you need to maintain a balance between acting in your client’s best interest and not taking advantage of the opponent’s lack of legal knowledge and drafting skills.
CCS 1.4
‘You do not mislead or attempt to mislead your clients, the court or others, either by your own acts or omissions or allowing or being complicit in the acts or omissions of others (including your client).’
Misleading a client:
- Telling a prospective client they have a strong case in order to get the work, when they don’t.
- Telling them the case is going well when it is going badly.
Misleading the court:
- Not disclosing a case or statutory provision to the court which goes against the argument you are presenting for your client.
Misleading others:
Making false representations on behalf of a client to a third party. For example, telling prospective purchasers of your client’s company that it is a good or bad deal. You should not give your personal opinion on the value of a deal to anyone involved.
Principles 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 7 are connected to the requirement to maintain trust and act fairly.
ü Although you must act in the best interests of each client, you must also act with independence, honesty and integrity. If the client wants to do something dishonest or illegal, you cannot help them do it.
ü Acting with integrity is broader than acting honestly.
ü Integrity is about being scrupulous, careful and accurate.
ü CCS 1 requires individuals to maintain trust and act fairly, for example:
ü CCS 1.1: you do not unfairly discriminate
ü CCS 1.2: you do not abuse your position by taking unfair advantage of clients or others
ü CCS 1.4: you do not mislead your clients, the court or others.
Equality, Diversity and Inclusion
This element explores the concepts of equality, diversity and inclusion.
‘Whether you are a manager or an employee, you have a role to play in implementing EDI policies… You must act with integrity and honesty and in a way which is fair, inclusive and transparent.’
**SRA, Guidance on the SRA’s approach to equality, ** diversity and inclusion, 23 July 2019.
Equality, diversity and inclusion (‘EDI’) applies to everyone
Meaning of Equality, Diversity and Inclusion
In this element we will explore:
- what equality, diversity and inclusion mean
- why EDI is important
- the protection required under the Equality Act 2010
- the SRA’s requirements on EDI under Principle 6 and CCS
- the SRA’s guidance note on its approach to EDI
- how most employers have a policy on EDI
Before working through this element, please read the SRA’s Guidance on its approach to equality, diversity and inclusion which can be found on the SRA website here:
https://www.sra.org.uk/solicitors/guidance/ethics-guidance/guidance-on-the-sra-s-approach-to-equality-diversity-and-inclusion/
Meaning of Equality, Diversity and Inclusion
What do equality, diversity and inclusion mean?
Equality is about making sure there is a level playing field and people are treated fairly.
Diversity is about encouraging and valuing people with a broad range of different backgrounds, knowledge, skills and experiences.
Inclusion is about accepting people for who they are and encouraging everyone to participate and contribute.
Importance of EDI
The SRA states that EDI is important for many reasons, including:
The effective administration of justice. A diversity of views and approaches, whether in law firms or the judiciary, support an independent justice system and maintains the rule of law.
Improving access to services. Some people may be more likely to seek legal help from solicitors with whom they share some social or cultural characteristics.
Allowing the most talented people to become solicitors and progress in their careers which helps to maintain high standards.
Equality Act 2010
The Equality Act 2010 protects people from discrimination in the workplace and in wider society against the following protected characteristics:
- age
- disability
- gender reassignment
- marriage and civil partnership
- pregnancy and maternity
- race
- religion or belief
- sex
- sexual orientation
Equality Act 2010
Legislation sets minimum legal obligations, eg that an employer takes steps to remove potential discrimination, harassment and victimisation.
The SRA’s obligations extend beyond strict compliance with the law.
SRA requirements relating to EDI
What are the SRA’s requirements on EDI?
Principle 6: You must act in a way that encourages equality, diversity and inclusion.
CCS 1.1 ‘You do not unfairly discriminate by allowing your personal views to affect your professional relationships and the way in which you provide your services.’
CCS 1.2 ‘You do not abuse your position by taking unfair advantage of clients or others.’
CCS 3.4 ‘You consider and take account of your client’s attributes, needs and circumstances.’
Guidance on the SRA’s approach to EDI
The SRA has issued a guidance note to help firms and individuals understand their obligations on EDI. You must:
Provide reasonable adjustments to disabled clients and employees to make sure they are not at a substantial disadvantage compared to those that are not disabled. You must not pass on the costs of providing these adjustments to others. Encourage diversity at all levels of the workforce.Collect, report and publish data about the diversity of your workforce.Uphold the reputation of the profession in your professional and personal life and treat people fairly and with dignity and respect. You should ensure your personal views do not have a negative impact on others. This includes expressing extreme personal, moral or political opinions on social media.Be fair and inclusive in your interactions with people you meet and deal with in the course of your work.
Guidance on the SRA’s approach to EDI
Firms must:
Have a complaints procedure and make sure complaints including those of discrimination, harassment and victimisation are dealt with promptly, fairly and effectively
Firms and other employers may wish to:
· produce a statement about EDI for their workforce, clients and the people they work with.
Monitor and analyse the diversity of their staff and clients.Draft and implement an EDI policy outlining the employer’s approach to recruitment, retention and progression and to encourage equality of opportunity and respect for diversity.Attract the best staff: have a recruitment policy and fair process for promotions to maximise the chances of getting and retaining the best people for each role.
Summary
EDI is important for many reasons including the effective administration of justice, improving access to legal services and allowing the most talented people to progress in their legal careers.The Equality Act 2010 imposes legal obligations to protect people from discrimination.The SRA’s obligations extent beyond strict compliance with the law.The key requirements are contained in Principle 6, CCS 1.1, 1.2 and 3.4.The SRA’s document Guidance on the SRA’s approach to EDI contains further guidance on solicitors’ obligations in relation to EDI.All employers should have an EDI policy.
The Equality Act 2010
In this element we will introduce key requirements under the Equality Act 2010:
- what the protected characteristics are
- key categories of unlawful discrimination under the Act, namely direct discrimination, indirect discrimination, harassment and victimisation, and
- the requirement to take positive steps to reduce the barriers disabled people face by making reasonable adjustments.
Equality Act 2010
The Equality Act 2010 (‘the Act’) came into force in October 2010.
The Act consolidates and replaces the previous discrimination legislation.
The Act provides a legal framework to protect the rights of individuals and advance equality of opportunity for all.
It provides Britain with a discrimination law which protects individuals from unfair treatment and promotes a fair and more equal society.
Equality Act 2010
As well as consolidating existing law, the Act makes discrimination unlawful in circumstances not covered previously. Under the Act, discrimination in most areas of activity is unlawful subject to certain exceptions.
These areas of activity include employment and other areas of work, education, housing, the provision of services, the exercise of public functions and membership of associations.
Protected Characteristics
The Act protects people from discrimination because of the following protected characteristics:
- age
- disability
- gender reassignment
- marriage and civil partnership
- pregnancy and maternity
- race
- religion or belief
- sex
- sexual orientation
Types of discrimination
The Act identifies different types of discrimination and unlawful conduct, including:
Direct discrimination
Indirect discrimination
Harassment
Victimisation
Direct discrimination
Direct discrimination occurs where “because of a protected characteristic, A treats B less favourably than A treats or would treat others” (section 13(1) Equality Act 2010)
An example of direct discrimination would be:
A club that organises salsa evenings deletes a woman from their list as soon as they learn that she is pregnant, on the assumption that during her pregnancy she will not want to come to salsa evenings. This decision resulting in unfavourable treatment based on a stereotype is likely to be pregnancy discrimination.
Note that, under section 13(6)(b) of the Act, in considering discrimination against a man, it is not relevant to take into account any special treatment given to a woman in connection with pregnancy or childbirth.
Indirect discrimination
Indirect discrimination is concerned with acts, decisions or policies (broadly speaking) which are not intended to treat anyone less favourably, but which have the effect of disadvantaging a group of people with a protected characteristic. Under the statutory definition of indirect discrimination in section 19 of the Act:
A discriminates against B where:
- A applies to B a provision, criterion or practice (‘PCP’)
- B has a protected characteristic
- A also applies or would apply that PCP to persons who do not share B’s protected characteristic
- The PCP puts or would put persons with whom B shares the characteristic at a particular disadvantage compared to others
- The PCP puts or would put B to that disadvantage
- A cannot show the PCP to be a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.
Indirect discrimination: example
A classic example of indirect discrimination is an employer requiring an employee to work full-time.
This requirement could disadvantage women as a group, since women in society as a whole bear a greater part of domestic and childcare responsibilities than men and are more likely to want (or need) to work part time.
Unless the employer can objectively justify the need for a full-time worker to do the job, the requirement could be indirectly discriminatory against a woman with child care responsibilities.
Harassment
There are three definitions of harassment in section 26 of the Act:
- the general definition of harassment related to a protected characteristic,
- conduct of a sexual nature, and
- less favourable treatment because of a person’s rejection of or submission to harassment of a sexual nature or harassment related to sex or gender reassignment.
We will focus on the general definition of harassment in this element.
General definition of harassment
A harasses B if A engages in unwanted conduct related to a relevant protected characteristic which has the purpose or effect of either:
- violating B’s dignity, or
- creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment for B (section 26(1)).
In deciding whether conduct shall be regarded as having the required effect, the following must be taken into account:
- B’s perception
- the other circumstances of the case
- whether it is reasonable for the conduct to have that effect (section 26(4))
General definition of harassment
An example of harassment would be:
- Two male shop assistants loudly commented on the size of a female shopper’s breasts. This could amount to harassment. Such comments could self evidently be unwanted and she would not have to object to it before it was deemed to be unlawful harassment.
Victimisation
The Act’s victimisation provisions protect individuals who do (or might do) protected acts such as bringing discrimination claims, complaining about harassment or becoming involved in another person’s discrimination complaint.
Victimisation occurs where A subjects B to a detriment because either:
- B has done a protected act, or
- A believes B has done, or may do, a protected act (section 27(1)).
The following protected acts are list in section 27(2):
- bringing proceedings under the Equality Act 2010;
- giving evidence or information in connection with proceedings under the Equality Act 2010, regardless of who brought those proceedings;
- doing any other thing for the purposes of or in connection with the Equality Act 2010;
- alleging (whether expressly or otherwise) that A or another person has contravened the Equality Act 2010.
Victimisation: Example
A gay man sues a publican for discrimination on the basis that she makes persistent derogatory remarks to other customers about his sexuality. Because of this, the publican bars him from the pub altogether. This would be victimisation.
Disability provisions of the Equality Act 2010
While the anti-discrimination regime of the Act prohibits certain types of behaviour, the disability provisions require the taking of active steps.
The disability provisions recognise that a level playing field for disabled people necessitates not only the absence of negative treatment, but also positive steps to reduce the barriers that disabled people may face.
The starting point is section 29: provision of services.
Provision of services
Section 29 of the Act states:
(1) A person (a “service-provider”) concerned with the provision of a service to the public or a section of the public (for payment or not) must not discriminate against a person requiring the service by not providing the person with the service.
(2) A service-provider (A) must not, in providing the service, discriminate against a person (B):
(a) as to the terms on which A provides the service to B;
(b) by terminating the provision of the service to B:
(c) by subjecting B to any other detriment.
(d) 7) A duty to make reasonable adjustments applies to:
(e) (a) a service-provider
EHRC Guidance
The Equality and Human Rights Commission (‘EHRC’) has published summary guidance on services, public functions and associations:
https://www.equalityhumanrights.com/en/publication-download/equality-act-2010-summary-guidance-services-public-functions-and-associations
The summary guidance includes guidance on the duty to make reasonable adjustments for disabled people. The rest of this element sets out key points from this guidance.
Duty to make reasonable adjustments
The duty to make reasonable adjustments aims to make sure that a disabled person can use a service as close as it is reasonably possible to get to the standard usually offered to non-disabled people. When the duty arises, a service-provider is under a positive duty to take steps to remove or prevent these obstacles.
Duty to make reasonable adjustments
Anyone providing goods, facilities or services to the public or a section of the public, or carrying out public functions, or running an association who finds that there are barriers to disabled people in the way they do things must consider making adjustments. If those adjustments are reasonable they must be made.
Duty is anticipatory
The duty is ‘anticipatory’. This means a service provider cannot wait until a disabled person wants to use the service. They must think in advance (and on an ongoing basis) about what disabled people with a range of impairments (such as people who have a visual or hearing impairment, a mobility impairment or a learning disability) might reasonably need.
Duty to make reasonable adjustments
Many adjustments will not be particularly expensive and a service-provider is not required to do more than is reasonable. What is reasonable depends, among other factors, on the size and nature of the organisation, the nature of the goods, facilities or services provided and the resources available.
Duty to make reasonable adjustments
If a disabled person can show that there were barriers that should have been identified and reasonable adjustments that could have been made, they can bring a claim if they have received a poor or inferior service because those adjustments were not made. The service-provider may be ordered to pay compensation and may also be ordered to make the reasonable adjustments.
Duty to make reasonable adjustments
The duty contains three requirements that apply in situations where a disabled person would otherwise be placed at a substantial disadvantage compared with people who are not disabled.
The first requirement involves changing the way things are done (equality law calls this a provision, criterion or practice). This relates to rules or ways of doing things, whether written or unwritten, that could present barriers to disabled people. It might be reasonable to stop the practice completely, or to change it so that it no longer has that effect.
Example:
A private club has a policy of refusing entry during the evening to male members who do not wear a shirt and tie. A disabled member who wishes to attend in the evening is unable to wear a tie because he has psoriasis (a severe skin complaint) of the face and neck. Unless the club is prepared to change its policy at least for this member, its effect is to exclude the disabled member from the club. This is likely to be an unlawful failure to make a reasonable adjustment.
Duty to make reasonable adjustments
The second requirement involves making changes to overcome barriers created by the physical features of premises, if these are open to the public or a section of the public.
Where a physical feature puts disabled people using a service at substantial disadvantage, the service provider must take reasonable steps to:
Duty to make reasonable adjustments
- remove the feature, or
- alter it so that it no longer has that effect, or
- provide a reasonable means of avoiding the feature, or
- provide a reasonable alternative method of making the service available to disabled people.
Duty to make reasonable adjustments
It is better to remove or alter the physical feature or find a way of avoiding it (such as replacing steps with a ramp or, if it is reasonable, a lift) before looking at providing an alternative service. An alternative service may not give disabled people a similar level of service.