Chapter 1 Privacy Basics Flashcards
What are the classes of privacy
Privacy of the person and Territorial privacy, information privacy
Information privacy has been defined as
the claim of individuals, groups, or institutions to determine for themselves when, how, and to what extent information about them is communicated to others
By law, information privacy is concerned with
establishing rules that govern the collection and handling of “personal information.” This can include financial information, medical data, or other records (e.g., phone records, internet search histories).
Privacy in Canada is approached from one of three perspectives
Privacy of the individual vis-à-vis the state
Privacy of the individual vis-à-vis other individuals
Privacy of the individual vis-à-vis organizations
Explain privacy perspective:Privacy of the individual vis-à-vis the state.
the extent to which an individual is free to live their life without the state interfering or knowing what the individual is doing.
Explain privacy perspective:Privacy of the individual vis-à-vis other individuals.
One examines to what extent an individual can live life free from intrusion from another individual, such as a neighbour, coworker, spouse, parent or child
Explain privacy perspective:Privacy of the individual vis-à-vis organizations.
One looks at the extent to which organizations can collect, use and disclose personal information about an individual, and once they have collected such information, what obligations they have.
the federal Privacy Act lists nine examples of the types of information that are deemed to be information about an identifiable individual. They are:
a) Information relating to the race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, age or marital status of the individual;
b) Information relating to the education or the medical, criminal or employment history of the individual or information relating to financial transactions in which the individual has been involved;
c) Any identifying number, symbol or other particular assigned to the individual;
d) The address, fingerprints or blood type of the individual;
e) The personal opinions or views of the individual except where they are about another individual or about a proposal for a grant, an award or a prize to be made to another individual by a government institution or a part of a government institution specified in the regulations;
f) Correspondence sent to a government institution by the individual that is implicitly or explicitly of a private or confidential nature, and replies to such correspondence that would reveal the contents of the original correspondence;
g) The views or opinions of another individual about the individual;
h) The views or opinions of another individual about a proposal for a grant, an award or a prize to be made to the individual by an institution or a part of an institution referred to in paragraph (e), but excluding the name of the other individual where it appears with the views or opinions of the other individual; and,
i) The name of the individual where it appears with other personal information relating to the individual
under The federal Privacy Act do government institutions consider opinions about an individual to be the personal information of that individual?
yes
under the federal Privacy Act, can someone see the and can he know the identity of the opinion holder. and why
yes, yes
because the identity of the opinion holder is considered the personal information of both the opinion holder and the opinion subject.
what does the Supreme Court say the Privacy Act’s definition of personal information
is undeniably expansive. deliberately broad” and “entirely consistent with the great pains that have been taken to safeguard individual identity
In the 2001–2002 Annual Report to Parliament, what did the privacy commissioner note
the expansive nature of the term about an identifiable individual:”
“That definition is meant to cover a lot of ground . . however some judges and commissioners are moving away from this expansive definition
Most laws also provide for exceptions to the definition to recognize that while some data might otherwise be considered to be about an identifiable individual, there is a public policy reason for not treating it as such. One common example
job-related information
job related info is not protected if : 5 points
information is not protected if it is:
Information about an individual who is or was an officer or employee of a government institution that relates to the position or functions of the individual including:
i.The fact that the individual is or was an officer or employee of the government institution;
ii.The title, business address and telephone number of the individual;
iii.The classification, salary range and responsibilities of the position held by the individual;
iv.The name of the individual on a document prepared by the individual in the course of employment; and,
v.The personal opinions or views of the individual given in the course of employment.
what does PIPEDA apply to
PIPEDA applies to every organization that “collects, uses or discloses in the course of commercial activities” or “is about an employee of the organization and that the organization collects, uses or discloses in connection with the operation of a federal work, undertaking or business.