Chapter 1- Principles Of Criminal Liability Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Who enforced criminal law

A

Criminal law is enforced by the state and most prosecutions are undertaken in the name of the crown

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Basic aims of sentencing

A
Punishment 
Deterrence
Protecting the public 
Reparation 
Rehabilitation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Three elements of criminal liability

A

Actus Reus- guilty act
Mens Rea- guilty mind
Absence of any defence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

To prove guilty of an offence ..

A

To be guilty of an offence D must have committed all elements of Actus reus as well as having the relevant men’s rea

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Three elements to actus reus

A

Conduct
Circumstances
Consequences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Define acts & omissions

A

Act- D doing something

Omission-D failing to do something (fail to stop/withholding information)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Two ways liability for omission can arise

A

1- the definition of the crime is written in such a way it makes sense to say an omission will suffice (destroy or damage property for failing to put out a fire)

2- D has a duty to do a positive act and failed to do it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Types of duty

A

1- special relationship (parent/family)
2- D has contractual duty (employee under contract)
3- voluntary assumption of D responsibility(voluntarily placed themselves in a dutiful position)
4- deliberate or accidental creation of a dangerous situation by D
6- pUblic office (police failing to act)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Vountariness

A

No criminal liability where the D conduct was involuntary - no proof required unless D conduct was voluntary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

4 things prosecution must prove against D

A

Their actions were voluntary
The circumstances of the offence
That the D caused consequences of the offence (attacking victim etc)
Causation between D conduct and the consequence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Prosecution to prove break in chain of causation?

A

P to prove that Ds conduct caused a consequence

  • cause in fact of the consequence (but for)
  • cause in law of the consequence (significant contribution to V injury or damage)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Test for factual causation

A

White 1910- but for test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Points causation in law

A

1- D conduct must be more than a trivial cause of the consequence in questions
2- D conduct need not be the sole cause
3- Case of death or less If injuries inflicted by D make a significant contribution towards the consequence then D causes that consequence no matter what had happened after D inflicted injury
4- Alleged intervening events were they reasonably foreseeable consequence of D conduct - Padgett

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Examples of break in causation

A

Refusal of medical treatment or aggravated injury - Blaue

Especially susceptible victim- Thin skull rule Blaue confirmed ‘whole v as a person’ including religious belief to take victim as you find them.

Injuries resulting from V attempted escape- Majoram ‘reasonably foreseeability what would a reasonable person in D position have foreseen?’

Negligent / poor medical treatment- Cheshire states poor medical treatment would be break in causation if it in itself was the sole cause of death.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Drug difficulties causation

A

If D self injects V then V dies D will be liable. Cato

If D gives drug to V and V self administered it
Dalby case failed to convict D of offence

Kennedy confirmed Free and voluntary act by the V will always break causation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Common types of Mens Rea

A

Intention

Recklessness

17
Q

Two definitions of intention

A

Direct intention- V death aim or purpose (Moloney)

Indirect / Oblique intention - V death is not D aim or purpose but certain to occur if D achieves their primary aim or purpose (Nedrick)

18
Q

Two types of unjustified risks for recklessness

A

Objective recklessness- obvious risk (criminal damage only)
Subjective recklessness - D believed unjustified (G and another)

NB 2003 recklessness now only subjective

19
Q

House of Lords recklessness definition

A

Recklessness involves the conciliatory taking of an unjustified risk. D will have given thought to and will have recognised the risk but will have still proceeded.

20
Q

Can transferred malice apply

A

Yes providing mens rea can be transferred to the victim - D meant to hurt X but accidentally hurt V. D intent tk hurt X is enough to find D guilty

LATIMER

21
Q

Can transferred malice apply to recklessness

A

Yes, providing actus Reus is the same crime. case or MITCHELL two old people in queue at post office

22
Q

Does actus and mens need to coincide

A

Yes, mens does not need to be at the same time. It can come later if the crime continues (FAGAN accidentally drove over police foot but remained on the foot when realised what he did)

23
Q

What is a strict liability offence

A

An offence which is general public concern and doesn’t require mens rea

It’s statutory and will not have the words intentionally or knowingly in the stat as mens rea needs to be proven in those instances

24
Q

Strict liability offence 2 examples

A

Damage to environment/ pollution
Adulterating food or drink
Selling food unfit for human consumption
Road traffic offences such as speeding
Breach health and safety regs
Breach planning and building construction requirements
Misdescribing quality and price of goods

25
Q

Privy counsel guidelines to establish if an offence is strict liability

A
  • severity of punishment (lower is likely to be strict)
  • if an offence applies only to specific members of the public or activity (will be strict lib)
  • of an offence deals with issues of social concern or public safety (will be strict lib)
  • court will consider if offence is strict lib whether it will promoter greater vigilance to prevent offence being committed
26
Q

Justification for strict lib offences

A
  • people comply with rules so makes it easier to abide by
  • minor nature of strict libs means little stigma is attached to the offence
  • proving fault would be difficult and take up a lot of the court time
  • disproportionate time and effort would be necessary to establish D possessed mens rea
27
Q

Imposing arguments for strict Lib

A

Parliament doesn’t make it clear

Corporations often at fault and the strict lib doesn’t act as a deterrent

Mens rea makes D blameworthy. Uncomfort comes from D being ‘non fault’ of the crime